Confessions of a Grammar Nazi

If, as Montaigne says, grammar is the logic of language, then some people have no logic at all. Their thoughts must be so incoherent as to be actually deranged if they consistently express themselves in a way that is barely intelligible, and you have to guess at what they might possibly mean, particularly when you are trying to have a political discussion with them. Should I add GRAMMAR to my requirements of Truth, Logic and Morality? Logically, logic should include grammar.

There is something so inexpressibly dismaying and depressing about reading bad grammar, unpunctuated sentences expressing incoherent badly-spelled thoughts.

EXAMPLES OF WHAT I HAVE TO DEAL WITH

Example 1

Bs ask any Torah scholar they rejected it based upon his message and where he came from. You forget that mohammad also faced tones of persecution as well but still fought off the pagans and spread it more effectively. Wouldnt Jews back then that were part of the byzantine empire adopt it right away if it was so capatable to them?

Example 2

You dont even read anyway why should I take you seriously? You repeat the same talking points the once someone questions your vague intrepertation of the koran to suit your obvious Jewish supremist agenda your labeled a cripple. Chapter 18:104 mentions childern of Israel to dwell in the land the Jews dont have a monoply on that term. Historically that's were christianity began as well. Dont put words in my mouth I'm addressing arguements other people have accused you of the same thing.

Example 3

You do want Jewish law on gentiles a theocractic state for the greater israel where Jews rule over muslims. Yet muslims can still give dawah to Jews? Which is it?

Example 4

Anglos are known bootlickers and busy themselves with abstract concepts. Such as feminism and equal rights under the law no matter what lifestyle. Alot of mental gynastics goes into these ideas in order to sound right and have a broad appeal. When really your enemy will only resent you for being weak to those that break traditional moral value.(gods laws known the abrahamic text) Sacrificing this in order to get popular, will only sacrifice the integrity of these values in order to be popular.(selling your soul to the devil) which is why Muslim countries in general, such as Chechnya dont need even to reference homophobic verses as there is none. To enforce and be eternally vigilant against destructive behaviours of the nation.

Claire Khaw
"Bootlickers" of whom?

Who is the enemy you refer to?

 You can only deal with things as you find them, not pretend your country is Chechnya.

Ungrammatical Person
Hows that working out for yeah? Hows that channel coming along?

Claire Khaw
What do you actually expect from me?

Nationalists, antisemites and Jews refusing to discuss Secular Koranism is a sign of success. A Jewish YouTuber feels he has to hide me from his channel. Are you on good terms with him?

The number of subscribers I have does not bother me, as long as people who matter know about my ideas. No point having as many subscribers as Mark Collett if he says nothing of interest, is it?

Ungrammatical Person
Free speech is relatively been promoted but that was only due to the understanding that no one would break traditional moral code. Now they have subverted what is moral and taken away free speech so they can maintain credibility.

Too stubborn to learn from other countries for the appeal of being popular. Typical bigoted anglos.

Claire Khaw 
Who is too stubborn to learn what?

Example 6

[IN RESPONSE TO SOMEONE ELSE'S POST ON FEMINISM]
Ungrammatical Person
This is a tit for tat debate the economic pressures must be eradicated first were it's actually feasible for a one income household to support a family.

Claire Khaw
Which is why you have to propose the radical solutions that I do.

You have to tell people the radical solutions without required without fear or favour to apprise people of how far their government is astray.

Ungrammatical Person
 what radical solutions your lack of knowledge of the Torah. Yet you want to implement a legal system of juadism and islamic law without understanding the process each system implements its punishments?

Islam is tougher on crime than juadism. Even if there are harsher punishments in the Torah it's still heavily beaurcractic anyway.

Claire Khaw
It is you who do not understand Secular Koranism yet refuse to ask. You have made some assumption about how wrong and horrible it is going to be, yet cannot even think to ask yourself a sensible question.

Ungrammatical Person
your a puritanical ideologue anyway a faulty one at that. Who doesnt understand diplomacy.

Claire Khaw
What you just said revealed a fundamental misunderstanding of my ideas and you did not even once ask me a question about it.

Ungrammatical Person
You havent even read the Torah why should we take your version seriously

Claire Khaw
"A legal system of Judaism"? What do you mean by that? Do you even know?

Ungrammatical Person
When it comes to corporal punishments there is more checks and balances before the punishment is dealt with. Unlike in the koran were it's more clear and concise but still asks for repentance.

Claire Khaw
I tried to make sure you understood my ideas but you seem intent on misunderstanding them though I kept trying to tell you what I was trying to do and then you refused to engage with me at all because you thought I was a Jewess! Your crazy antisemitism is intellectually cripping you. Worse of all, you won't even admit that you hate them.

I gave https://ask.fm/oneparty4all to ask me questions anonymously if that option was wanted if you had any questions, but you wouldn't even do that. Now, you think I want to impose Jewish law on gentiles? I never ever said that. If you thought I did it was because you fundamentally misunderstood me. Presumably you preferred to think evil of me because you had more or less decided to retire from political activism and you were too invested in not antagonising your leader whose goose will be cooked if he is convicted of assaulting those women. Are you going to suspend your political activism until after his trial? Or after he comes out of prison?

Ungrammatical Person
You dont even read anyway why should I take you seriously? You repeat the same talking points the once someone questions your vague intrepertation of the koran to suit your obvious Jewish supremist agenda your labeled a cripple. Chapter 18:104 mentions childern of Israel to dwell in the land the Jews dont have a monoply on that term. Historically that's were christianity began as well. Dont put words in my mouth I'm addressing arguements other people have accused you of the same thing.

Claire Khaw
There is no point self-censoring just to remain in a micro-party that will be fucked by the establishment anyway. I am so glad I never made that mistake.

Ungrammatical Person
Your so dense

You do this on purpose so you can claim the moral high ground when people block you for outright lies.

Hows that channel working out for you?

I wonder when youtube is going to listen to claire khaw a lonely old lady who badly promotes her Jewish supermist movement.

Claire Khaw
I am well aware that Canadian parents are mostly the unmarried parents of bastards and that the UK is worse. Is that what you mean?
quran.com/24/2

Ungrammatical Person
When are you going to quote Torah verses?

anyone that disagrees with me and questions my logic or character judgement must come from an single parent household.

Your such a waste of time

Claire Khaw
What Torah verses do you want me to quote and why?

I have never said anything about your parentage. I certainly don't assume anyone who is illegitimate to be bad person, just saying it is to be avoided and that government should discourage illegitimacy.

Ungrammatical Person
another lie

Claire Khaw
What is this lie you claim I have told?

Please state the "outright lies" you claim I have told.

On the one hand you accuse me of promoting Jewish supremacism, on the other you seem to understand that I am proposing to use the prospect of Greater Israel to extend dawah to Israeli Jews.

At least you have got one part right.
X - who is an unashamed antisemite - recently complimented me on my idea of a Register of Jews and how I invite them to support this idea, for their own protection and ours. A Jew liked the idea too.

Ungrammatical Person
it's interesting that you still haven't addressed my points about how accurate your interperations are of the koran that suggest the greater israel project and its specific borders.


Claire Khaw
I don't understand your question.

Ungrammatical Person
Who are we going to beg for gas on the side of the road?


Claire Khaw 
I don't understand your question.


Ungrammatical Person
You seem to want to keep the elite in power just for the sake of peace. Even when they've showed themselves to unshamfully corrupt and now hide in the shadows when the domestic population says anything. My point is who is going to administer this why would their colleagues voluntarily accept this form of sharia when they can buy their own protection from the consequences of their own policies?

Claire Khaw
You seem to be saying you want to overthrow the political establishment.

I am not a pacifist and do not believe in peace at any price.

If you are going to take up arms, you should at least make sure all peaceful avenues have been explored. Since neither you nor your party leader are prepared to discuss the failure of Christianity, it would appear that you are not in the process of exploring all peaceful avenues and seem determined to skip this step because you do not want to alienate your so-called Christian supporters.

Who are "hiding in the shadows"?

What is the "domestic population" saying?

"why would their colleagues voluntarily accept this form of sharia when they can buy their own protection from the consequences of their own policies?"

I don't know who you are talking about and I don't know who their colleagues are.

"why would their colleagues voluntarily accept this form of sharia when they can buy their own protection from the consequences of their own policies?"

I don't know
a) who will be buying their own protection
b) what this protection consists of
c) what policies of whose
d) what the consequences of those policies are

[NO ANSWER SO FAR.]

My complaint to The Today Programme about an Ebola female doctor's bad grammar

Dr Geraldine O'Hara who went to Oxford, said the following at

2:41:

"The woman was sat on the floor"

https://audioboom.com/boos/2603499-dr-geraldine-o-hara-s-ebola-audio-diary

I write to complain about the BBC condoning bad grammar in a member of the learned profession. I had a nasty turn when I heard John Humphrys saying "was sat" too, but that was some time ago and I let that pass.

Now that bad grammar is now mixed up with a nasty life-threatening tropical disease that will soon be out of control, I feel it is now time to make a stand.

It is impossible to convey the sense of despair and foreboding I feel about the way the media gives the impression that women are being in charge of Ebola and therefore by extension that it is going to be allowed into Britain to kill us all too, while female doctors take time off to collect their kids from school.  The fact that this female doctor has bad grammar as well as a regional accent does not give confidence to me or the public. The fact that the BBC does not see fit to correct this grammatical error and perpetuates it is even more disturbing and alarming.

The increasing number of people who say "the amount of people" instead of "the number of people" who go uncorrected simply confirms my diagnosis that not only is this country degenerate, but the libtards of the BBC are actually going around encouraging and promoting this by refusing to correct anyone's grammar.

It was Montaigne who said that grammar is the logic of language. When educated people no longer care about grammar or logic, we may safely conclude that we and our government are indeed degenerate and decline and doom is imminent and inevitable.

Doubtless we will soon be reduced to grunting or saying "fuck off" to each other in varying tones of voice to convey emotion and information after we have forgotten all the other words. Is this what the BBC wants? If so, why should the BBC licence fee payer be forced to fund this?

I look forward to hearing from you as to whether my complaint about Dr O'Hara's bad grammar will be conveyed to her so that she will desist from using "was sat" next time she is sitting anywhere or sees anyone sitting anywhere that she sees fit to inform us about.

Claire Khaw

Sent 9.30AM

29/10/2014

The Bishop of Bradford's grammar and the Syrian Question

http://nickbaines.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/something-must-be-done/

It is a cry that has gone up many times in the last couple of weeks. Something must be done about Syria. But, what exactly… and to what end?

• Something to save the lives of innocent children?
• Something to save the lives of innocent children from chemical attack?
• Something to save the lives of innocent children from any form of violent attack?
• Something to save the lives of innocent children from a future shaped by sectarian hatred, rage and revenge?

You have to laugh at the grammar of the Bishop of Bradford who wrote this egregious piece of idiocy.

If you ever you wanted an example of inane prattling, you can find no finer example than this.  

All properly formed sentences and questions would have a subject and a verb, but the bishop himself does not know this.   

What is he trying to say?

Fuck knows.  

What is he actually doing?

Wringing his hands and show to all and sundry that his wringing his hands like the good liberal he is.   

Being a nationalist, my guiding principles are:

1. to only embark on a course of action that serves the long term national interest
2. to refrain from embarking on any course of action that is detrimental to the long term national interest

The Bishop of Bradford only cares to display his liberal credentials, but the average voter cares nothing about his liberal credentials or about UK foreign policy because these matters are too abstract and far-removed from the concerns of the ordinary voter who only cares about the price of beer, milk, bread and other such mundane matters.

They might be prevailed upon to give a stuff or two about women and children if the women and children concerned are British, or European, or Western, but these women and children are Muslim, and we all know that the average non-Muslim Briton does not much care for Muslims.      

Ordinary voters suspect that the British political establishment is in thrall to Israel and her allies and/or Western arms manufacturers whose business will be improved when the government buys and uses armaments on its new and latest victims.  They assumed that there would be enough lobby fodder MPs to approve Cameron's warmongering, but were very pleasantly surprised.   

This was thanks to Diane Abbott, who threatened to resign if Ed Miliband rubber-stamped Cameron's proposal to romp into yet another war of liberal interventionism.   

All it takes is a few good men and women in Parliament capable of logical thought and moral reasoning to dig their heels in.   

Sadly, for the Church, it is now stuffed with second rate female vicars and infested by liberalism, feminism and third rate minds.  

Montaigne:

"Grammar is the logic of language."

"The greater part of world's problems is due to questions of grammar."  [When you let women have too much power, the study of grammar will be neglected, and the ability to reason logically will be arrested. Feminine hypocrisy and cowardice will be rewarded while masculine courage and truth punished.  These are all signs of a matriarchy, and the most conclusive sign of a matriarchy is when the institution of marriage has been desecrated with the connivance of those who are supposed to maintain the morals of the people ie the Church.]

Feminism causes paedophilia and means DYING ALONE

Lonely UK: Number of middle-aged people living alone rises dramatically as marriage continues to decline

• Almost 2.5m aged 45-64 have no spouse, partner or children living with them
• 
  
• Amount has grown 50% since the mid 1990s
• Number of loners has pushed up demand for housing

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2226138/Lonely-Britain-A-MILLION-people-live-1996.html#ixzz2B4tDYRQ2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Feminism also mean reporters in the Daily Mail use "amount" when they should use "number" cos the female-dominated teaching profession does not see fit to teach British school children grammar, cos most teachers are grammatically ignorant.

As Montaigne said, "Grammar is the logic of language," but what do these feminists - these selfish evil women who are determined to cling to their privileges at the expense of men, the young and the old - care about that, or the long-term national interest?

Isn't it time to tell feminism to fuck off, or challenge the matriarchy to a debate?

Go on then, ask Dame Jenni Murray if you can appear on Woman's Hour to question feminism and see what  happens.

You might even find yourself being accused of paedophilia, who knows.  This is what these women do.

Say or do anything they don't like or hurt their feelings and you will be accused of racism, extremism, sexism, paedophilia or whatever shit they can find to chuck at you.  

These days you are called a Far Right extremist Nazi Fascist racist sexist if you express any view that puts you into the category of a social conservative.

Ask yourself this question:

Was there such a fear of paedophiles before feminism became our ruling orthodoxy?

FEMINISM CAUSES DEGENERACY, PAEDOPHILIA AND FUCKS UP YOUR CIVILISATION.   

FEMINISM IS THE MATRIARCHY FUCKING UP THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN AND THE NEXT GENERATION, BECAUSE THEY CAN.

WHEN WILL YOU GET IT TOGETHER TO TELL FEMINISM TO FUCK OFF?

Grammar is the logic of language and the British are largely illogical and immoral

A sign of degeneracy is the NUMBER OF people who say "the amount of people" with no one noticing or daring to correct them.

That is why the immigrants (who are not mostly sluts and bastards) keep coming. Most people who learn English as a foreign language know not to say "amount of people" and say instead "number of people".

Or they have their fathers who are around to correct them.

Or their elders do, without being stabbed in the face or accused of being paedos.

A question of grammar

Montaigne:

"The greater part of the world's troubles are due to questions of grammar."

Grammar is the logic of language and language is the expression of thought.  That is why the British mostly now have shit for brains.  They haven't learnt any grammar for fuck knows how long now.  The liberal female-dominated teaching profession has decreed that the British shall have shit for brains and those in power are too afraid of them to do anything about it.  This is because David Cameron is a cunt of convictionless Conservatism and should be told to go away and fuck himself, and let Dan Hannan have his seat in Witney. 


If he is a man of honour he would do so, but of course he is but a knave and a fool and will do nothing of the sort.