Further thoughts on nationalist unity

Why do I bother, eh?

They are not my people and very much dislike me for saying the things I do.  I am now banned for every kind of nationalist meeting for trumped-up reasons.  

Troy Southgate, the Organiser of the New Right Meetings pretends I am a security risk merely for blogging on what they discussed.

Jez Turner banned me from attending a London Forum Meeting in April for reasons he refuses to disclose.

Richard Edmonds now claims that I support the actions of Anders Breivik whom I have described as a terrorist on  numerous occasions, and nothing I say, long or short, will disabuse him of the idea.  Indeed, the very idea is defamatory, for every response he gives suggests that he has not read anything of what I have said, because his purpose was to pretend that I support Breivik and use this reason to exclude me.  

But if I don't remain active in nationalism and wag my finger at the men like an officious nanny, who will?  There is no one in nationalism who dares denounce feminism, except Simon Sheppard,  the Political Prisoner, and he is under a very strict control order that prevents him from discussing politics at all, I understand.  

Give me the name of a man better able to lead the nationalist movement to dizzying heights of triumph and national influence than I, and I will shut up and return to the kitchen!  

My speech to the Nationalist Unity Meeting explaining how I came to British Nationalism (if I had been allowed to attend and speak)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pv_dFNmAH74
Carlos Cortiglia's HOW I CAME TO BRITISH NATIONALISM speech in Coventry

How did you come to British nationalism is a question that I am often asked by curious nationalists.

It is not your fight, they seem to be saying.

Below are my main reasons.

I.   MOST NON-WHITES NOT INDOCTRINATED BY LIBERALISM ARE INSTINCTIVELY "RIGHT-WING"

The BNP are "rightwing" which means they want to punish criminals properly,  educate their children properly and want to be rude about foreigners because they feel it is their God-given right to be rude about foreigners just for being foreigners.  Most foreigners who arrived from countries uncorrupted by Left Liberalism are "rightwing" too, in this sense, and support the institutions of marriage and family, which is these days is a very "rightwing" thing to do.   It is foreigners who instinctively understand how the white working classes might feel about them - unlike the white middle class liberal - because they know how they would themselves feel if they had stayed in their own country and had the racial composition of their villages, towns, cities and nation radically changed in a short space of time.

It is not exactly unknown for non-white British citizens to complain about immigration, but they too will be shouted down by the liberals and made to feel even more foolish than a white person complaining about immigration.   "Aren't you an immigrant too?  Would you like to join the BNP?  Oh, but they wouldn't be nice to you if you tried to join, you turkey voting for Christmas" etc etc.   Pity them, for they have nowhere to go and no party to vote for.  There is no party for immigrants who don't want any more immigrants to join them in the country they immigrated into.  But if the BNP would just become this party and changed its name to the "We Were Here Before You" Civic Nationalist Party, then it would become unstoppable.

It is better for ethno-nationalists to get SOMETHING of what they want than NOTHING AT ALL of what they want.  SOMETHING is BETTER than NOTHING.

II.   A DESIRE TO DESTROY FEMINISM AND EXTREMIST PC LIBERALISM AS RESPECTABLE AND DECENT POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES

If I destroy it in the West, I destroy it globally.

If I prove by sweet reason and valid arguments how it is Feminism that is against the National Interest - and I can - then Feminism (which rides on the coat-tails of Liberalism) will be as good as destroyed.

III.   A SENSE OF FRUSTRATION AND  IMPATIENCE WITH THE BNP

Yes, I am afraid not a day passes by without me thinking "If I were the leader of the BNP I would be doing A, B and C right down to X, Y and Z" and every day it is not being done.

IV.    A SENSE THAT I COULD DO MUCH BETTER THAN THE CURRENT LEADERSHIP

V.    A SENSE THAT IT IS IN MY INTERESTS TO HELP WHITE PEOPLE WHO CAN'T SEEM TO SORT THEMSELVES OUT (WHETHER THEY WANT ME TO HELP THEM OR NOT) BECAUSE I LIVE IN THE LAND OF WHITE PEOPLE - Call it Altruism, Civic Consciousness, A Bee In My Bonnet, OCD, whatever.  What is good for white British people - the majority in the UK - (eg family values supported by marriage and the end of feminist state-sponsored sluttery and bastardy) is also good for non-white British peoples.

VI.    PERSONAL AMBITION in the sense that I want my ideas understood, absorbed and implemented in my lifetime.  They are not even particularly original, just practical and sensible, and good for the nation as a whole with SOMETHING for EVERYONE, even for liberals, Asian shopkeepers and Slut Single Mums.  

http://efp.org.uk/unity-meeting-in-yorkshire-february-2012/ suggests that there is not much more in the way of Nationalist Unity but more of the same unruly old factions carrying on as before, plodding away from success and electoral viability ...

Anti-Griffin Nationalist Unity Meetings in the South and the North

When I asked it would be OK for me to attend a Nationalist Meeting to take place soon up North, I was told:

"X who's is helping organise [the Nationalist Unity] meeting in [a northern city] got back to me after having made extensive enquiries  and it seems some people weren't too happy with you attending due to your perceived, (note PERCEIVED), closeness to Griffin.  Most other attendees were happy to have you attend (and report things in your blog) but there were a few who still see you as a Griffinite.  However, X did say that this in no way means that you won't be able to attend future events, but that at this delicate stage its important that people FEEL free to express themselves freely and talk to each other without fear of things getting back to NG."

Well, that's actually quite nice to know.   I think most nationalists know I was expelled in July 2011 and have been banned from attending BNP meetings since October 2011.  These things do not happen without the knowledge and direction of the Chairman.   


I have also been told that the Chairman called me "an Nazi" when someone asked him his opinion of me.  I would say that this does not  indicate a relationship of closeness between the Chairman and me.


It is actually a relief not to have to go up north, even if I am ever so slightly disappointed not to meet a few nationalists I have got to know online recently.


I have just yesterday attended another meeting in London whose theme was also nationalist unity so it seems that they are taking place all over the country, which is a Good Thing, as it shows that nationalist "freelancers" - code name for those of us who have expelled from the BNP - may be down but are not out and are certainly getting up, out and about.


If I could have attended I would say the following:


1.  If they cannot find an alternative leader - and it appears that they are nowhere near finding another leader - any attempt to start up a rival organisation would be dead in the water.


2.  Apart from the taint of racism, what the voter finds most objectionable about the BNP is their anti-business economic policies.


3.  The Nazi Party was in fact the German Labour Party that managed to get its funding from German industrialists.  Any national movement cannot appeal to only one class alone and must appeal to both the working and middle classes.  If what nationalists want is the unfashionable Old Labour Party with an anti-immigrant ethos, it is unlikely that this will find favour with the British public.   


https://twitter.com/#!/ProgressOnline

ProgressOnline ProgressOnline
'The electorate are crying out for labour to listen to how anti-social behaviour and immigration affects their lives' says Joan Ryan #ncg12
31 Jan 2012

As you can see, traditional Nationalist concerns are being voiced by the more sensible elements of the Labour Party.  It is therefore a matter of calibrating and fine-tuning the nationalist message to widen its appeal.
  
4.   Talking in racial terms will never appeal to the majority of white voters who are already too hooked on cheap foreign labour, Thai/Chinese/Indian food, have mixed-race children and friends and family to get it together to forcibly repatriate non-white British citizens.  


5.   The Ethno-Nationalism v Civic Nationalism debate is a dead end.  Nationalism should be defined as an ideology of pursuing the National Interest, and the National Interest cannot be about any particular race or class but a judicious balancing of the conflicting interests of those who are part of the Nation.


6.   The only thing the Nationalist movement can usefully do now is bounce the LibLabCon into stealing its policies.


7.   Nationalists need to define their ideology rationally, coherently and in a way that would appeal to the British public.   (I can help with that.)


8.  The Nationalist movement needs to find a leader both capable of having the respect and trust of nationalists and appealing to the British voter.  (I can help with that.)


9.  There is no reason why a nationalist leader cannot be elected from outside the BNP.  Such an elected leader would have legitimacy and authority, and, such a leader could then have a party that goes on to rival and surpass the BNP, if such a leader has the trust and respect of nationalists and is able to connect with the voter.   If nationalists cannot even get it together to find a leader they trust and respect, then the whole nationalist movement is a dead duck anyway.   


10.  Without a leader they are NOTHING just as a leader without followers is NOTHING.  


11.  There should be Nationalist Club if only to allow the opportunity of having a Code of Conduct to be drawn up.