Translate

Showing posts with label New Statesman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Statesman. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 September 2015

Feminism and Gender Neutrality go hand in hand like lunatics and straitjackets


at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Thursday, 9 October 2014

Why those who cheer what the tranny potter said about default man have shit for brains



Grammarly Man was so impressed by my answer that he asked me for a snog and wanted me to call him.


Do feminists and their mangina running dogs who cheer on the fall of the patriarchy have shit for brains?



Answers in a comment below, please, on what you think IS/ISIS/ISIL would do to a nation of tranny potters and his default woman, apart from behead them and then sell their default women and default children as slaves.

You could also tell the Tranny Potter in person what  you think about the default man by by going to the Tranny Potter Show, if he is taking questions, and if you don't mind paying £15+ for the privilege of doing so. The best and worst of Britain's Commie Pinko Feminazi Homos, as well as Martin Amis, will be in attendance, as you can see at http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/grayson-perry-in-conversation-with-miranda-sawyer-tickets-13049384059

If anyone wants to pay for my ticket, I will gladly go and point out a few home truths to the assembled libtards.


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 7 July 2014

Did Cambridge Professor of Politics Andrew Gamble mention feminism in his book as the major cause of Western decline?

Andrew Gamble, Cambridge Professor of Politics.
Does he state in his latest book the origins and the continuing causes of Western economic decline?

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/derbyshire/crisis-without-end-a-conversation-with-andrew-gamble/#.U7o-qPldVqV
http://www.polis.cam.ac.uk/crisis-without-end-a-conversation-with-prof-andrew-gamble
http://www.polis.cam.ac.uk/Staff_and_Students/professor-andrew-gamble

My theory is not in a book but is expressed rather more succinctly in the series of tweets below:

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html
Oh, and did I say that general elections are merely politicians pandering to the vices of their voters every 5 years?

Did he not mention feminism because he did not identify as it as a major cause of Western profligacy and fear of offending female voters the operating cause of preventing Western politicians from making economically sound decisions? Or did he not mention feminism because it would not have been politic to do so and he feared the feminazis of Cambridge would crucify him?

Very predictably, Jonathan Derbyshire and Prospect Magazine have blocked me on Twitter. This is how these "liberals" "debate". I am very very happy to change my views if proven wrong, but no liberal has been able to do so.  Every time they block me without further ado, I conclude that they cannot win the argument using fair and rational means.

The New Statesman loved this book as you can see at
http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2009/06/crisis-gamble-capitalism

David Marquand, who reviewed the book, warns:

The left has no hope of winning the battle of ideas if it has nothing better to offer than a spruced-up Keynesianism. To win, it will have to jump out of the Keynesian box in which it has been trapped for too long, admit that there was substance to the neoliberal critique of the postwar Keynesian order, and think new thoughts in new ways.

Actually, all it has to do is propose the abolition of usury - which the Koran prescribes. This would please everyone because it would allow us to default on our debts https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-we-abolish-usury/351776538265174?fref=ts and implement other Islamic measures such as the Slut-shaming  recommended at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts and other measures for moral regeneration recommended at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Secular-Koranism/657868884251333?fref=ts including the reintroduction of slavery to kick-start the economy mentioned at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Controversial-Humour-Is-it-in-the-long-term-British-national-interest-to-reintroduce-slavery/230825987052657?fref=ts, legalising brothels at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-we-legalise-brothels-in-Britain/292618650867502?fref=ts, requiring those who want to marry to agree a marriage contract to allow the courts to better apportion fault in the event of a divorce, and finally enjoining charity after dismantling the welfare state at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-the-welfare-state-be-dismantled/437625616314380?fref=ts under a one-party state

All we need is conduct a referendum under the principles of Shura to vote for a Caliph and a Caliphate, and a Caliph is simply a leader who agrees to govern under the rules prescribed by the Koran.

As we all know, boys and girls, Islam is the middle way between the patriarchy and the matriarchy, and between Capitalism and Communism.

I would be very happy to advise the Labour Party on how all of the above is to be done with the minimum of fuss and inconvenience. Everything will be fine as long as they do exactly what I say.
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 11 February 2014

The Far Right never "collapsed". Its house never got built.

Who are the "Far Right"?

They are the people who cannot make sense of the sentence "Ethno-nationalists must adopt a civic nationalist strategy to acquire electoral respectability."

It genuinely does not compute with them, and their leader is too afraid or apathetic to explain it to them for fear of being accused of being a "race traitor".

These ideas are too abstract for them, you see.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/02/what-lies-behind-spectacular-collapse-british-far-right

The Right did not collapse. It was just never had the wherewithal to succeed: a weak and cowardly leader whose only concern is to remain leader at all costs in order to continue exploiting its stupid members who cannot see the point of adopting a civic nationalist strategy because they are mostly mostly uneducated members of the lower classes who are universally despised.  They are also labouring under the misapprehension that political activism is being rude about Muslims, Jews and other races.

These uneducated lower class people can only see political activism in terms of street activism during which they show the world how ugly, lower class, badly-dressed, badly-behaved and stupid they are.

When these demos fail utterly to bring public opinion on their side, they blame the "Jew-controlled media".

That is the sum total of what passes for "strategy" in the Far Right.  Most of them don't even know why they are so despised.

at 6 comments:
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...