The only man who said anything sensible on #Article50 on #BBCQT was an African

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0844z3m/question-time-24112016

The reality is that none of the three of you [on the panel] and our own civil servants really understand how the European Union works: it is not a democracy, it is a dictatorship by European Civil Servants. The MEPs are just cosmetic fronts. My solution to our problem now if I were Prime Minister - which I am not, but if I were - is to give 90 days' notice to European Union that we are going to declare a UDI - a Unilateral Declaration of Independence - and then revoke the European Communities Act of 1972.

This man must be a Zimbabwean and my experience of Zimbabewans both white and black is that they are very clever and well-educated people unlike criminally stupid and spineless British politicians.

This is because President Mugabe believes in education. I was once told by a proud Zimbabwean that he actually has seven degrees and they are not honorary degrees. Mugabe actually studied and passed examinations in them. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesia's_Unilateral_Declaration_of_Independence

My comment on gay marriage The Conservative Woman deleted because the admin does not like me

"I have known for years that the British public despise the religious. While they fear Muslims who may retaliate if they are insulted too much, they think Catholics - known to have paedo priests - are beyond contempt and are fair game, especially if their beliefs are represented by a prissy middle class blond woman talking about God.

I could perhaps better represent The Conservative Woman, since I am capable of expounding on the nature and purpose of marriage in evolutionary and eugenic terms without feeling I have to invoke God.

Were I to invoke God I would only say that He is the Santa for grown-ups and the Pope no more than the High Priest of the Cult of Santa for Adults.

I would also say that God was created by Man to protect him from the slut, against whom he is otherwise defenceless.

The reason why man needs to be protected from The Slut is simply to prevent his civilisation - and the labour, enterprise and creativity of his ancestors as well as his blood, sweat and tears - from being trashed by a barbaric, feckless and pornocratic matriarchy."

http://conservativewoman.co.uk/2014/04/tues-caroline-farrow-spat-at-after-bbc-question-time-for-defending-the-age-old-meaning-of-marriage-welcome-to-the-new-barbarism/

Should I marry this man to demonstrate my commitment to anti-feminism?

Daryll Christopher - a great rarity in modern Britain for he is a man not afraid of saying what he thinks:

"They [the BNP] should have capitalized on that publicity [generated by Nick Griffin on BBC Question Time] and embraced immigrants who loved Britain, instead they started to fight against each other. They need a Max Clifford type person, it was a opportunity missed."

I rather thank I am that Max Clifford person capable of promoting both a radical and a racially neutral agenda that promotes the institutions of marriage and the family, as well as lower taxes and fewer laws in the long-term national interest.   Too bad then that anyone who expresses views that are socially conservative will be immediately denounced as a bigot or a fascist or a Nazi if they even so much as get anywhere near questioning feminism.

If I were leader of the BNP, Daryll would be snapped up at once as the BNP Women's Affairs Spokesman, he who says such things as the things said at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/irreversible-decline-happens-when-your.html

It is worth doing just to watch feminists have a collective fit of the vapours.

To rescue the institution of marriage, you have to make marriage attractive again to men like Daryll.

And that is the reality of reconsecrating the institution of marriage.  That is the sacrifice we women are required to make for the good of the nation.

Would I be prepared to marry Daryll as evidence of the sincerity of my anti-feminist fervour?

Only if we can successfully agree a marriage contract.

I acknowledge that this proposed sacrifice is not quite as great as the sacrifice that Joan of Arc made for the people of France, but it will have to do for the moment.

But perhaps I should hold out for Peter Mandelson (who appears to be equally keen to marry me), but who will probably not make quite as many sexual demands on me.


https://www.facebook.com/groups/466234513398453/permalink/475490985806139/
Public Debate group on Facebook discussing this.   

A HUGELY PROFITABLE idea for the BBC

The BBC could have a hugely profitable debate on debating society lines instead of the SHIT programme that is QUESTION TIME. 

The whole nation could vote for or against a notion via SMS, but they do not. I wonder why.  They could call  it THE NATION DEBATES.

What the liberal establishment really fear. It is not the BNP but the wrath of the voter.

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2009/10/tory-and-labour-cowardice-on-immigration-is-helping-bnp-warns-nicholas-soames.html

Griffin will say nothing more than common sense and has made nothing more than commonsensical points from what I have heard. The hysterical and exaggerated reaction to comments that in other sensible countries would raise no eyebrows has served to promote the BNP.

When Nick Griffin comes across as perfectly nice, sensible, normal and well-mannered, that will be the shock horror revelation - that the liberal establishment have been lying to them for decades, and demonising anyone - both white and non-white - who dares to express concern about uncontrolled immigration.

That is what the liberal establishment is so desperate to suppress - their cowardice, their hypocrisy and their lies, their inability to deal with the parlous state of British state education after decades of toxic liberal child-centred progressive teaching methods that impose no discipline, low grade skills because British numeracy and literacy in state schools is an international scandal. Growing numbers of NEETs who are even now going forth and multiplying are being prepared only for a life of illegitimacy, welfare, single mummery and crime.

The truth is that no sensible employer wants to hire a "local" when they can have an employee from abroad with a work ethic, brought up by two parents, taught in a school that teaches them the 3Rs, in an environment where discipline is imposed and respect for authority expected and received.

Yet no political party will touch the problem of single mummery and education with a bargepole.

That would be opening a can of worms, would it not, and there are already quite enough maggots crawling around at the feet of politicians.

http://restoreorder.tripod.com/

http://www.cre.org.uk/

http://www.famyouth.org.uk/

Government's incompetent attempts to censor BNP

If I were the Left I would have

1. ignored the BNP and not set the Equalities & Human Rights Commission on them
2. allowed to keep their colour bar and political objectives but made them change their name to the British White People's Party (on the grounds that a nation is a concept collection of tribes and races, a bigger idea than race and is supra-racial)

However, in an escalating series of hysterical own goals, the BNP have been propelled into prominence and the national consciousness.

If Question Time were to be cancelled, you can be sure there would be a huge outcry, riots even.

The nation's citizens - white and non-white - is agog and there ain't nothing the liberal establishment can do about it. It is the television event of the 21st century, and will mark the beginning of the end of liberal establishment.

Irony of ironies: BNP and their Muslim-pleasing message

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2009/10/21/fury-as-bnp-chief-nick-griffin-demands-that-gordon-brown-tony-blair-should-be-hanged-as-war-criminals-86908-21762694/

Were Question Time to be cancelled tomorrow, I think there will be riots and possibly a revolution, so don't even think of it, Peter Hain.

Or perhaps we should dare you to stop it.

And if you do, then the British will have their revolution sooner rather than later.

The BNP have been the only party who have made politics emotional, absorbing and thought-provoking again. To be told things that we find interesting, to be given arguments that we find persuasive, to be intrigued and interested in politics at an emotional level, is something so rare these days that we must be grateful wherever we can find this.

The LibLabCon-trick have nothing to say for themselves except repeat the same old mantra that the BNP are evil racist fascists.

We will see, won't we, very soon, who is actually evil.

My definition of evil is the infliction of unnecessary suffering on another.

Whatever you think of their evil fascist racism, the BNP have started no unwinnable wars in Muslim lands, however much they dislike Muslims, they at least share the Muslim view that invading Iraq and Afghanistan was a bad idea and no good would come of it.

Perhaps the only way to appease our enemies now is to execute our warmongers, as a warning to others, if they will not do the decent thing. Hitler at least had the decency to shoot himself when he knew Germany had lost the war and it was all his fault.

Peter Hain, the BNP and Question Time

http://www.newstatesman.com/2009/10/bnp-bbc-unlawful-secretary

Why is Peter Hain shrieking about the illegality of the BNP as a party or its legal right to appear on Question Time when he already knows Jack Straw is going to be on the panel?

Perhaps he is trying to suggest that all who appear on Question Time with the BNP that they are breaking the law, including the "Justice" Secretary to intimidate them into calling it off.

Labour is in serious disarray when it sends out mixed messages with such petulance and hysteria. Perhaps it is trying to have it both ways, ie having its debate with the BNP and saying they shouldn't be allowed a platform.

How typical of them.