What sort of person isn't grateful for the existence of RT?

1.  A person who doesn't like acknowledging the possibility that he, his government and its leaders have been wrong for a very very long time.

2.  A person who finds the challenge of understanding Western foreign policy too difficult, time-consuming, boring and overwhelming.

3.  A person who prefers to hang on to his views whatever the facts, logic and morality of the situation.

4.  A person who enjoys the idea that white people can just bomb the shit out of any country they like without suffering any consequences and that bombing the shit out of brown people is part of their white racial identity of which they are very very proud.

5.  A person who doesn't want to admit that he has been duped by mainstream media for a very very long time.

6.  A person who prefers mainstream media because it is all so predictable and familiar.

7.  A person who does not like admitting mistakes out of pride, stubbornness and chauvinism.
That would be most people.

Most people do not care to be guided by the truth, logic or morality and believe that their confused thoughts and inconsistent positions are better than anyone else's logic and truth just because their confused thoughts and inconsistent positions are theirs.

Do such people - who only care about the price of beer and cigarettes, more or less - even deserve the vote?

What is the very best thing about RT? For me it is Peter Lavelle's Crosstalk.

And probably the best documentaries I have come across.

RT should be make T-shirts, hoodies and badges for us to wear.

Even if I don't get a job from RT this year, this post will still be staying up.  

Tweets by PLCROSSTALK

If you read this and agree with it, you should have the courage to vote for Tess Culnane, but you probably won't because you are a piece of gutless scum and DESERVE to have your country taken over

http://www.national-front.org.uk/?p=236

If you live in Greenwich and Eltham and agree with the sentiments in this leaflet, then you have no choice but to vote for Tess Culnane.

But will you?

When Tess was still in the BNP and on the selection panel, I knew she objected on principle to having either me and Carlos Cortiglia (the Uruguayan who was rumoured to have supported the Argies in the Falklands War) as the BNP London Mayoral Candidate, because there were perfectly good white candidates such as Jeffrey Marshall to represent the party.  Tess told me that the last straw was when she saw Nick Griffin refusing to even glance at Jeffrey's excellent CV.   My dealings with her have always been civil and cordial, and I bear her no animosity whatsoever.  In fact, my dealings with many NF members have been perfectly friendly.  Richard Edmonds once bought me a coffee.   Recently, that nice Peter Rushton of the England First Party  who are having a meeting in Burnley this Saturday http://efp.org.uk/nationalist-unity-meeting-%E2%80%93-burnley-%E2%80%93-10th-march-2012/ bought me a pint at a David Irving talk http://fpp.co.uk/ and told me he had appeared on Russia Today.  http://rt.com/news/syria-referendum-vote-constitution-211/

I have met members of the British People's Party
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/09/my-afternoon-in-york-with-simon.html and probably have more problems with UKIP (who like to pretend I am a some sort of baby-eating racist monster who must never join their party when I am in fact a Libertarian Civic Nationalist just like them) than with many ethno-nationalists.

Tess Culnane, NF London Mayoral Candidate 2012