British Nationalists to attend LSE event on 13 March?

 John Breuilly is professor of nationalism and ethnicity at LSE.

Dr Faisal Devji is reader in Indian History, St. Antony's College, University of Oxford.

Dr Mark Hewitson is senior lecturer in German History and Politics in the Department of German at University College London.

This event will be followed by a reception in the Senior Common Room, 5th Floor, Old Building.

http://www2.lse.ac.uk/publicEvents/events/2013/03/20130313t1830vHKT.aspx

It really does sound fearfully dull, but it is an evening event from 6.30 to 8.00 and there will be an opportunity for nationalists to rub shoulders and discuss their ideas with academics over a glass of wine while being served with canapes.

London nationalists attending will no doubt find it bemusing to hear of themselves and their ideas discussed with the formality and detachment so customary of academia.  Surely Nick Griffin himself should be attending?

If he is too busy to attend because he will be in Brussels working for the European Parliament and the EU then perhaps he should send a representative.

I will let Peter Rushton and Lady Renouf of  http://jailingopinions.com/ know about this too.  I am not sure if David Irving the historian and the great raconteur will be in the country then but will let him know too.

It is beginning to sound very interesting after all!

I do hope that the LSE are not going to be snooty about nationalists and find some excuse to exclude us from the talk or not give us wine and canapes.  Let us hope not.   

Nationalism won't ever get off the ground because it is a headless chicken that does not think it needs a head

http://efp.org.uk/new-video-from-john-tyndall-memorial-meeting/

JIM LEWTHWAITE

Jim Lewithwaite discusses how divided nationalists are - many of them cannot stand being in the same room with each other and won't attend each other's demos.

Talk about putting the cart before the horse: Lewthwaite tells nationalists they haven't got time to find a leader, they need to get a movement together first, apparently.   Talk about getting things back to front.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/draft-proposal-rival-nationalist-leader.html explains how I would go about finding nationalists a leader, but I know they are too divided and disorganised even to agree to think about doing this, let alone do it.

No leader, no movement. No horse, no means of moving the cart.  But nationalists either can't get it or won't get it.  I think they fear and hate each other so much they actually don't want a charismatic leader.  They prefer pointless activity to effective planning.  So there you go.

Predictably, NOTHING ABOUT FEMINISM or SSMs in Lewthwaite's speech either.

What are the chances of the baby you can hear in the background being legitimate?

PETER RUSHTON

Peter Rushton talks about Radical Nationalism. What a joke. Just think of these Radical Nationalist Nazi Fascist Extremist Racist "men" too afraid to question the morals of their women who give them mostly bastard children. Radical indeed!

Instead, he jeers at Asians high up in the Tory Party who denigrate the lack of work ethic of the white working classes. How dare these brown people with their family and their traditions and their work ethic who are not mostly sluts and bastards look down upon white people with no work ethic, no family, no traditions who are mostly sluts and bastards!  How very dare they!

Rushton does not mention FEMINISM at all. White people can do no wrong, it seems. They could never be the author of their own misfortunes, not even the ones who let all the immigrants in.

Priti Patel and Kwasi Kwateng were sneered at for their parents' decision to come to Britain rather than go somewhere else where they would not be quite so racially alien.

Dominic Raab is Jewish.

More jeers and sneers from the audience. (And why not, it is after all their all-white all-gentile meeting.)

The reason why there are so many white idlers is because there are so many immigrants in this country, Rushton says.

I would say it is the existence of the welfare state rather than the presence of so many fucking foreigners.

The Welfare State is the Sacred Cow that not even nationalists will blaspheme against, for most nationalists are white working class and we all know how the white "working" classes need and want their welfare state ie in the way a junkie thinks he needs his next fix.

Rushton then goes on to discuss the pointless wars fought - he hints - for the benefit of the Israelis.

The so-called Tory Right was not even properly Conservative, he says. It is a kind of perversion of Gladstonian Liberalism.

That was the most interesting part of his speech.

The Three Pillars of Gladstonian Liberalism:

1. Individual liberty is the highest aim of any civilised society
2. Economic Freedom was a self-evident good
3. High Church ideals of morality should regulate relations between nations. Foreign policy must follow these teachings when dealing with foreign nations instead of being determined by the National Interest.

These have now become the nostrums of Modern Conservatism and New Labour - the Fetish of Freedom.

Was there ever a bigger fraud on the British people than to say to them that the British political system would give to them FREEDOM, he asks.

[Sardonic laughter from the audience.]

We have the freedom to buy stuff and the freedom to get ourselves into debt. We now have a SPIVOCRACY of spivocrats.

Grant Shapps, Jewish millionaire and now Chairman of the Conservative Partym said to have fraudulent get-rich quick internet schemes, is the Greatest Spivocrat of all.

Shapps was not even a subtle spivocrat and for he was caught doctoring his Wikipedia entries, apparently.

[My settled view is that Jews and Muslims (or any group of people who respect the institution of marriage) will find themselves effortlessly superior when competing with another group of people who are mostly sluts and bastards, as the gentile white European mostly is these days after so many decades of degenerate feminism.  I continue to find it astounding and bemusing to encounter the hostility I continue to get from these degenerate people merely for pointing this out.   I had imagined ethno-nationalists who are nominally interested in breeding at some level would be interested in discussing eugenics and policies of preventing degeneracy, but not a bit of it.   With the noble exception of Simon Sheppard, they all seem neurotically fearful of discussing feminism.  It is like a taboo for both the liberal elite and the despised racialist in Britain.   They absolutely will not discuss it at all.   It was only when I realised this that I knew that the entire nation was rotten with feminism - its most sacred of all its sacred cows.]

Just for pointing this out again and again in my blogs, I have been banned from every single nationalist party in the land on trumped up charges and spurious accusations.

Anyway, Rushton continues his talk.

1948 was the time when the multi-racial society was being created.

Commander Fountain a Conservative was PPC for Chorley in 1947.

He was very rude about the Labour Party and was was denounced as an antisemitic racist with a violent disposition. A case of projection, Rushton suggests.

Rushton goes on to denounce Martin McGuinness and dares him to sue.

White people do have something to be guilty about though, for allowing themselves to be drawn into WW2 - not just for the war but how the war was conducted ie Dresden.

[He then flogs a DVD on the subject with free bonus DVD on Richard Stokes the Labour MP who stood up to be counted over Dresden.]

Rushton warns against believing what the tabloids say, especially when they blame mosques or Muslims. The cause of British malaise is the treason of our elites!

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/the-treason-of-elites-by-peter-rushton.html

I think the enemy is even more within that that.  The enemy is between our heads and our legs.

DAVE JONES

Dave Jones starts by mentioning Rochdale whom he calls the threat from without.

He wants to destroy the threat from within - which he identifies as the liberal intelligentsia, the organised gay lobby (who are all white), the charities with their PC aims promoting multiculturalism who have now descended upon Tod.

Todmorden must not become like Rochdale in 10 years' time.

Dave managed to get 25% of the vote in a two-horse race against the LibDem candidate in the councillor election on 25 October 2012.

The Treason of the Elites by Peter Rushton

Part 1

Part 2

"Peter Rushton (of Heritage and Destiny, including Lady Michele Renouf and Richard Edmonds; no relation to J P Rushton) speaks at the 7th Memorial Meeting to John Tyndall (1934-2005). Based on Julien Benda's Trahison des Clercs, updated to the modern world, and including of course Jewish influence."

What is the point of complaining about the government when you yourself also fear to point your finger at the thing that most condemns your own people to depravity and degradation - feminism?

The Jews and Muslims seem effortlessly superior because most Jews and Muslims are not slut and bastard like the feminist-indoctrinated liberal atheist gentile.

There is no Jewish or Muslim conspiracy.   You gentiles did this to yourselves all this by yourselves and even now refuse to look under the rock from which the ugly evil slimy matriarchal monster of feminism will emerge ...

Deuteronomy 28 - Curses for Disobedience
15 However, if you do not obey the LORD your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you:
16 You will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country.
17 Your basket and your kneading trough will be cursed.
18 The fruit of your womb will be cursed, and the crops of your land, and the calves of your herds and the lambs of your flocks.
19 You will be cursed when you come in and cursed when you go out.
20 The LORD will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him.[a] 21 The LORD will plague you with diseases until he has destroyed you from the land you are entering to possess. 22 The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with scorching heat and drought, with blight and mildew, which will plague you until you perish. 23 The sky over your head will be bronze, the ground beneath you iron. 24 The LORD will turn the rain of your country into dust and powder; it will come down from the skies until you are destroyed.
25 The LORD will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth. 26 Your carcasses will be food for all the birds and the wild animals, and there will be no one to frighten them away. 27 The LORD will afflict you with the boils of Egypt and with tumors, festering sores and the itch, from which you cannot be cured. 28 The LORD will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. 29 At midday you will grope about like a blind person in the dark. You will be unsuccessful in everything you do; day after day you will be oppressed and robbed, with no one to rescue you.
30 You will be pledged to be married to a woman, but another will take her and rape her. You will build a house, but you will not live in it. You will plant a vineyard, but you will not even begin to enjoy its fruit. 31 Your ox will be slaughtered before your eyes, but you will eat none of it. Your donkey will be forcibly taken from you and will not be returned. Your sheep will be given to your enemies, and no one will rescue them. 32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand. 33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days. 34 The sights you see will drive you mad. 35 The LORD will afflict your knees and legs with painful boils that cannot be cured, spreading from the soles of your feet to the top of your head.
36 The LORD will drive you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you or your ancestors. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone. 37 You will become a thing of horror, a byword and an object of ridicule among all the peoples where the LORD will drive you.
38 You will sow much seed in the field but you will harvest little, because locusts will devour it. 39 You will plant vineyards and cultivate them but you will not drink the wine or gather the grapes, because worms will eat them. 40 You will have olive trees throughout your country but you will not use the oil, because the olives will drop off. 41 You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity. 42 Swarms of locusts will take over all your trees and the crops of your land.
43 The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail.
45 All these curses will come on you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the LORD your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you. 46 They will be a sign and a wonder to you and your descendants forever. 47 Because you did not serve the LORD your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity, 48 therefore in hunger and thirst, in nakedness and dire poverty, you will serve the enemies the LORD sends against you. He will put an iron yoke on your neck until he has destroyed you.
49 The LORD will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand, 50 a fierce-looking nation without respect for the old or pity for the young. 51 They will devour the young of your livestock and the crops of your land until you are destroyed. They will leave you no grain, new wine or olive oil, nor any calves of your herds or lambs of your flocks until you are ruined. 52 They will lay siege to all the cities throughout your land until the high fortified walls in which you trust fall down. They will besiege all the cities throughout the land the LORD your God is giving you.
53 Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the LORD your God has given you. 54 Even the most gentle and sensitive man among you will have no compassion on his own brother or the wife he loves or his surviving children, 55 and he will not give to one of them any of the flesh of his children that he is eating. It will be all he has left because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of all your cities. 56 The most gentle and sensitive woman among you—so sensitive and gentle that she would not venture to touch the ground with the sole of her foot—will begrudge the husband she loves and her own son or daughter 57 the afterbirth from her womb and the children she bears. For in her dire need she intends to eat them secretly because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of your cities.
58 If you do not carefully follow all the words of this law, which are written in this book, and do not revere this glorious and awesome name—the LORD your God— 59 the LORD will send fearful plagues on you and your descendants, harsh and prolonged disasters, and severe and lingering illnesses. 60 He will bring on you all the diseases of Egypt that you dreaded, and they will cling to you. 61 The LORD will also bring on you every kind of sickness and disaster not recorded in this Book of the Law, until you are destroyed. 62 You who were as numerous as the stars in the sky will be left but few in number, because you did not obey the LORD your God. 63 Just as it pleased the LORD to make you prosper and increase in number, so it will please him to ruin and destroy you. You will be uprooted from the land you are entering to possess.
64 Then the LORD will scatter you among all nations, from one end of the earth to the other. There you will worship other gods—gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your ancestors have known. 65 Among those nations you will find no repose, no resting place for the sole of your foot. There the LORD will give you an anxious mind, eyes weary with longing, and a despairing heart. 66 You will live in constant suspense, filled with dread both night and day, never sure of your life. 67 In the morning you will say, “If only it were evening!” and in the evening, “If only it were morning!”—because of the terror that will fill your hearts and the sights that your eyes will see. 68 The LORD will send you back in ships to Egypt on a journey I said you should never make again. There you will offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you.

Who are the accursed?

Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators, and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners.

http://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/worship/book-of-common-prayer/a-commination.aspx

As the Bible implies, the foreigner who lives amongst you whom you hate and fear is merely a symptom of your malaise.

The cause of your malaise is the enemy within, between your ears (with the thoughts you think and views you hold) and between your legs with its uncontrolled carnal appetites that you like to call Sexual Liberation.

It is not liberation at all.   Embracing Sexual Liberation means only that you will be enslaved by the worst of your women while you incur the hatred, ridicule and contempt of the men of other races and nations.

North East Patriots Meeting in Newcastle - 27 May 2012

Me and Andrew Brons

Edward and his wife Karen Allen,  and John McCaffrey

Karen Allen's husband, Karen Allen herself who was PPC for Houghton & Sunderland South in 2010.  It was she who provided the raffle prizes, Ken Booth tells me.  On the right is John McCaffrey, formerly BNP, now an  English Democrat

Jeffrey Marshall listening

Richard Edmonds

Kevin Scott, Andrew Brons, Jim Lewthwaite

Ken Booth, who allowed his BNP membership to lapse, enjoying the show

Peter Rushton about the election results

Andrew Brons giving a very good speech

Andrew Brons describing the Griffin Monster

Andrew Brons eloquent in his description of the Griffin Monster

Andrew Brons telling us of the Griffin Monster

Jeffrey Marshall saying he will reluctantly step into the breach if no one else will do it

I was charmed by Newcastle, its elegance and architecture.

Ken Booth made a few references to my Facebook controversies and looked meaningfully in my direction when he spoke about the unhelpful photos I had of myself taken with a certain Northern Nationalist to whom he did not refer by name.  Attendance was about 50.

Peter Rushton, the first to speak, referred to UKIP as "fake nationalists" during his talk which analysed the election results.

UKIP MAN
As it happened, there was a UKIP man there who told us that he too was "passionate" about his country. "Keep these meetings going, he said, "let's keep patriotism going."  All nationalists should vote for UKIP because it is the biggest Eurosceptic party around, he said.  While they have a long list of nationalist parties whose ex-members are banned from joining their party, people should continue voting UKIP anyway.  UKIP are however adamant that the ban should stay despite his and others' protestations.


ANDREW BRONS

This was the most interesting speech of all.  "There are challenges for us as a nation," he began.  "In the long-term it is a global challenge.  The West is becoming more and more impoverished.  We are in a shambles.  We may not even be able to survive as a nation to deal with the problems."

He referred to Hope Not Hate as "the Hate People".

They did not destroy the BNP, he said.  "We did it on our own."  He likened nationalists to people playing on in ouija board.  Consciously or unconsciously, the message nationalists are being given is that they are heading for DESTRUCTION.

Nick Griffin "craves personal power, uses lies and trickery and is indecisive"  He surrounds himself with Yes Men and people outside the party eg Jim Dowson, Patrick Harrington and allows them to take decisions.

According to Fred Coolidge, deranged dictators from all over the world suffer from the same three things:

1. Narcissism
2. Paranoia
3. Sadism

In fact, Griffin behaves like "a gangster".   David Soane(?) the printer for the BNP in Ireland was told by Nick Griffin and his daughter Jennifer to fabricate receipts against Richard Barnbrook to stitch him up in order to win back the GLA seat.   Nick Griffin even claimed Andrew Brons owed him money which claims Andrew Brons denounced and repudiated.   Now Nick Griffin in trouble as result of that with OLAF [sounded like] which is some EU organisation that investigates fraudulent expenses claims.  [I do hope I have got this right.]  

Nick Griffin is further compared to Gaddafi, Assad and the character played by Sacha Baron Cohen in THE DICTATOR.   Wolfie Smith [whoever he is] was mentioned. 

Apparently, the only reason why Nick Griffin has not sacked Andrew Brons is because Nick Griffin thinks Andrew Brons wants to be sacked.  

Nick Griffin has driven out every person of talent.  The English Democrats and Andrew Moffat were mentioned.   Only deviants, simpletons, and non-party members are retained these days.   

The "disproportion response" taken by Nick Griffin against Eddy Butler, now in the English Democrats, was mentioned.   Andrew Brons admitted that he himself did not think the General Election results were that unsatisfactory [though Eddy clearly did, probably bearing in mind that UKIP failed to get an MP either.

The 840 signatures Eddy Butler was required to obtain before he was eligible to challenge the leadership was an impossibility.  It was even more of an impossibility because he was not even allowed to use the membership list.

"Look at the way Nick Griffin runs the party.  This is the way he will run the country." .  

"Nationalists are like Eeyore - they seem to want to go to a lonely place where we know we won't be followed.  English Democrats went to where the rest of us wouldn't follow."

If he thought it would make a difference, he would join the NF so he could die there, but he didn't think it would make a difference, so he will remain in the BNP.

He did not really think Nick Griffin is a state plant as many do.

He then made a rather puzzling reference to Obama, a bridge in Maine and unemployed construction workers and ended by telling nationalists to think and act rationally.

JIM LETHWAITE asked if BNP is toxic and whether nationalism can start in one region and spread nation-wide.   He remarked on the "collective passivity over Nick Griffin's behaviour" and proposed "a confederation of relatively autonomous branches" in Yorkshire, Lancashire, the North East and the Midlands.

London, obviously, is a lost cause.  In fact, he is not the first Northern Nationalist to say this.

Bloody hell, I thought, these so-called nationalists have more or less implicitly surrendered their capital city without giving any thought of trying to win it back.  I was reminded of China's frequent changing of its capital cities, according to how successful their invaders were.  http://www.chinatraveldiscovery.com/china-facts/historical-capitals-of-china.html

QUENTIN HAWKINS (I think) said nationalism can win through the ballot box.  [I heartily agreed, but only if they implement the changes I recommend.]  It is always the party that says they are the only party who can do this who fail, he said.

There was a break and then I was allowed to speak on the subject of unity.

MY SPEECH
I tried to say that civic nationalism is the only way forward, because even the non-whites (non-white British citizens have been born here for generations now so they too are indigenous, technically) are complaining about immigration.  It is pointless to talk about repatriation either compulsory or voluntary because they are light years from getting into power.  It is unrealistic and pointless to insist on talking about this  as a badge of ethno-nationalism.   [Did I really say this, or did I only mean to?  I later asked Jeffrey and he said I just went on about the usual things I have been going on about for years, and he was a bit vague too.]  I tried to say, but do not know if I in fact said it, that if you cannot get rid of them the least you can do is to make them behave and even vote for you.  I mentioned too how popular BNP policies were  though of course their image needs a make-over to make the most of that instinctive peasant good sense that most people the world over really have, if they have not been brainwashed and indoctrinated.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-384167/Most-Britons-actually-support-BNP-policies.html

After me,  JEFFREY MARSHALL spoke.  He did not think concentrating on the regions while ignoring the development of the national  party as a whole was particularly constructive.  The BNP brand was at  least recognisable and the little parties just did not register in the consciousness of the voter.

A blond rather handsome middle aged woman, Jan Purvis, who was a hard-line supporter of the 14  Words disagreed vehemently while he was making his speech.   She entirely rejected civic nationalism.   I think she even said that nationalist unity was now in fact impossible.  The best they can do now is stay together, stick to their ethno-nationalist principles, and reject the BNP.  It seemed to me a toxic mixture of complacency and despair.

[At least the BNP calls itself the British NATIONAL Party and embodies those expectations.  What will this woman call her non-party?  The British Regionalist Party?  The British Separatist Party?  Why, if civic nationalism is really so useless,  is UKIP always getting more votes than the BNP?  Why is 17%  of the vote that Marine Le Pen of La Front Nationale obtained something to be dismissed, sneered at and scorned when the British version of it is precisely nowhere because of these dinosaur attitudes that makes them refuse to grasp the ethno-nationalist bull by its horns and wrestle it to the ground?

Taking the bull by the horns - what British Nationalism ought to be 

What British Nationalism is at the moment

http://efp.org.uk/moves-to-nationalist-unity-at-north-east-patriots-meeting/
Hmmm.  It seems plans are afoot ...

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1501

Thinking aloud about setting up a Nationalist Unity Party

1. Would Peter Rushton consider joining David Jones and Claire Khaw in a Nationalist Unity Party intended to unite Civic and Ethno-Nationalists?
2. If so, he should bear in mind that David are both are libertarian and anti-statist and our over-riding aims would be to lower taxes and repeal laws, and certainly the totalitarian Equality Act 2010.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_Act,_2010  
3. David and I are also anti-feminist and pro-family values and therefore in favour of the restoration of parental and male authority the lack of which has resulted in the sorry state the West now finds itself.
4. This Party is meant to be a Counter-Revolutionary Party to the Sex Revolution, which was what let in Feminism.  Feminism unapologetically promotes female promiscuity, and consequently degeneracy, widespread illegitimacy, which corrupts the characters of men by making them think and behave like women in a Culture of Excuses and Entitlement, and has provably accelerated the decline and fall of the West.   
5. Such a party would be run on the basis of a triumvirate.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumvirate   Nationalism after all needs to be give the impression that it is a broad church.
6. The idea is to have a workable combination of male and female, the young and the mature, town and country, white and non-white, that is pro-enterprise but that also cares about the condition of the poor and the establishment of a strong and flourishing meritocracy that is racially neutral.  

It is my considered view that Western malaise can be attributed to feminism and its toxic effects of destroying  the family through no-fault divorce and consequently male and parental authority.  All any foreign settlers in the West have to do in the West is to continue practising family values themselves while the West destroys itself and fritters away its inheritance on wine, women, gambling and song.   In short, it is her considered view that it is feminism rather than the presence of Jews and Muslims that is responsible for the West's moral, economic and intellectual decline.  

As G K Chesterton said, "When we cease to believe in God we will start believing in anything."   Liberalism, Feminism and the Glorification of Female Promiscuity are now the deities the White Man worships.   It is no surprise therefore that he is now sunk so low that they need a female and a foreigner to be the one to point out these brutal home truths that they are now too much in denial to acknowledge.

Denial is a particularly feminine trait, is it not?      

I really think that with me in the mix, such a nationalist unity party would get the publicity it needs to thrive and flourish.   I do not mean to be egotistical, but a female and a foreigner in a white nationalist party would have a certain novelty value that would make the liberal media ask questions, in spite of the NUJ commandment to NEVER report favourably on nationalists.   http://www.reportingthebnp.org/

There is no one in the country better placed than I to promote the nationalist cause,  Now, all I need is your support and your co-operation without which nothing much can happen.  Even if you HATE the idea, I urge you to discuss it with as many nationalists as you can.   

Peter Rushton now appears on RT.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JdZ45b6YL0 

'Mossad agrees Iran has no nuke bomb plot'

How to move Right and get the votes of social conservatives of *all* races

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2125892/Tory-Cabinet-ministers-ordered-attend-Eid-Diwali-festivals-appeal-Asian-voters.html

Sceptical Facebook friend:

"A fools errand if ever there was one. Blacks and muslims know where their bread is buttered and will continue to vote for Labour/ Lib Dem or any of the other overtly anti-white parties. If it wanted to make inroads into the ethnic vote the tory party would have to become even more pro-multicultural than it already is and lose even more of its traditional supporters."

Being the eternal optimist I am, I believe it is possible to both capture the non-white vote and shift the politics of the nation to the Right.

Unlike this Facebook friend of mine, I already know that many non-white British voters have been complaining about immigration for quite a while.  They are tired of being shouted at by liberals who remind them that they too are immigrants.  They are also tired of being dared to join the BNP by the liberals who mock them for daring to be immigrants complaining about immigraiton.  

But all this would only work if I am leader of the BNP or an equivalent party, or at any rate co-leader.  

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.tumblr.com/post/20592896467/going-right-instead-of-going-wronger

UKIP is just as Islamophobic as the BNP.  UKIP peer Lord Pearson of Rannoch inviting Geert Wilders was arguably more aggressive than anything the BNP have proposed so far, for he wants to ban Islam and the Koran, after all.

For starters, I just need one heavyweight nationalist to join me on this one, ie someone with seniority and gravitas in the movement.

Either Peter Rushton of Press TV and James Lewthwaite
http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/news_elections/general_election_2010/constituencies/145.bradford_south/candidates/2540._james_lewthwaite/ would be nice.  Both, preferably, if they can bear the idea of Civic Nationalism, which is only about tactics, not about loyalties or principles.  I believe these two men are better able to understand what I am trying to say more than the other ethno-nationalists who seem to equate ethno-nationalism with the practice of

1. being rude to other races
2. threatening to conduct a pogrom the moment one is in power
3. threatening to make other-races second class citizens
4. regarding all of the above as "sticking to one's principles" and a badge of ethno-nationalism

I would like to run past them my little idea of Secular Koranism which I will be happy to have described as the Great White Project, the whole point of which is to allow the white race to be seen to have conquered Islam rather than be conquered by it.  Through this Project can white racial pride be salvaged!

David Irving talk on 25 February 2012

http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/blogs/searchlight-blog/another-day-another-dollar

The once fighting fit far-right writer David Irving was a shadow of his former self when he hobbled into view last month at a meeting to promote his new book on Himmler, the mass murdering head of Hitler’s SS.

https://irvingbooks.com/xcart/home.php?cat=3  is where you can go to get David's books.  I am afraid the only reason why I have not bought any of his books is that they are so terribly long and I fear they will end up being one of those books that gather dust unread on my shelves.

Instead I got this at https://irvingbooks.com/xcart/product.php?productid=17520&cat=249&page=1 but cannot play it on my DVD.  I informed him of this by on 26 February.  He said he would see to it that it was replaced or the money refunded, but I have not heard from him since.

It was yet another engaging talk by David Irving, this time on how Churchill tricked the Americans into participating in WW2.

The previous  one I attended several years ago concerned the Holocaust of Dresden when in the space of  two days 100,000 Germans non-combatant civilians died and corpses were piled high one on top of the other.  This is of course the Holocaust denied by the British.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II

He looked very well, and was energetic, witty, lucid and entertaining.

David Irving and me at the Swan after his talk

He looked very much the same as the last time I saw him (2 or 3 years ago if I remember right) and has not noticeably aged.  As far as I am concerned, he looked fine for a man of 73.

To suggest that he was limping or had a gammy leg that day is simply untrue.   Why are the Left so consistently dishonest and malicious?  If the Right are so wrong, why do the Left not use the force of rational argument to dismiss our ideas?

It was also his 74th birthday on the 24th, so happy belated birthday, David.  Thank you for choosing to be a historian who wishes to tell the truth, as he sees it, even though the heavens fall in and the liberals rend their garments, tear their hair and gnash their teeth .....

It was not hard to miss Peter Rushton from the England First Party and his bosom friend Lady Michèle Renouf. Also prominent were the IONA London Forum chief honcho Jez Bedford-Turner and the Dragon Lady, as Claire Khaw is referred to by a fair number of fascist and racist followers, sometimes as a mark of respect, but otherwise as a derogatory term, coupled with racist abuse, by those who walk out of the room when she enters. Their objection is her non-white ethnicity not her views, such as this on her blog yesterday: “I am quite happy to announce that I would abolish infanticide as a crime. This means I would make it legal for parents to dispose of their own babies up to the age of 12 months.”

I didn't notice anyone walking out of the room when I arrived at the Swan 20 minutes late for the talk though.  Even if they had wanted to they would have been constrained by the fact that

1. it was a very crowded room
2. they were all seated
3. David Irving had begun the talk they had come and paid good money to hear

So yet another factual inaccuracy by the despicable and dishonest Left who care nothing for the truth, remain incapable of rational argument but only wish to demonise their enemies with smears and lies.

Actually, Peter Rushton very kindly bought me a drink during the interval and told me he had been interviewed by Russia Today on Syria that day.  You can see that at  http://www.rt.com/news/syria-referendum-vote-constitution-211/

He has done another at http://djia.tv/russia-today/mossad-agrees-iran-has-no-nuke-bomb-plot/ since then.

I also bumped into Lady Renouf who was a little cross with me for misunderstanding her talk on Birobidjan as a Jewish homeland I blogged about at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/36th-new-right-meeting.html.  I asked in what regard and she asked me to look at http://www.birobidjan.co.uk/  I am none the wiser, sadly, and invite her to comment on the blog and correct me in any regard on what I have misunderstood.

During question and answers, I again asked the same question I asked last time of David Irving:

Is the existence of the Madagascar Plan evidence that the Nazis intended to expel rather than exterminate the Jews?  

He again agreed with me, but never seems to get my point that the way to make this point is to ask the question and to somehow incorporate this question into the title of one of his books.

A title that might make this point quite well:

"The Madagascar Plan: Intention, Expulsion and Extermination"

If the Allies had not declared war on Germany, the Jews would only have been expelled in another one of the pogroms periodically conducted on Jews in Christian Europe.  

Anyone who has seen Fiddler on the Roof will know what I mean.   The English were not the last to do this sort of thing  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion as the Nazis have shown.  

Because the Allies declared war on Germany,  Jews were exterminated.  

At any rate more Jews were harmed and killed  by the Nazis because of WW2.

Why does no historian at all dare ask this question?

It is so much easier to justify and excuse all sorts of terrible injustices when you are at war, after all.

Indeed, I even tried to make this point to Jeffrey Marshall after the talk, but he suggested that it was not my place to tell my elders and betters who clearly knew much more history than me how to suck eggs.   "It is all about presentation", I cried, in frustration.  "Why doesn't anyone get it?"  To which the infuriating and pompous response I received was, "Oh, but he is a historian, while you are a propagandist."   

If you read this and agree with it, you should have the courage to vote for Tess Culnane, but you probably won't because you are a piece of gutless scum and DESERVE to have your country taken over

http://www.national-front.org.uk/?p=236

If you live in Greenwich and Eltham and agree with the sentiments in this leaflet, then you have no choice but to vote for Tess Culnane.

But will you?

When Tess was still in the BNP and on the selection panel, I knew she objected on principle to having either me and Carlos Cortiglia (the Uruguayan who was rumoured to have supported the Argies in the Falklands War) as the BNP London Mayoral Candidate, because there were perfectly good white candidates such as Jeffrey Marshall to represent the party.  Tess told me that the last straw was when she saw Nick Griffin refusing to even glance at Jeffrey's excellent CV.   My dealings with her have always been civil and cordial, and I bear her no animosity whatsoever.  In fact, my dealings with many NF members have been perfectly friendly.  Richard Edmonds once bought me a coffee.   Recently, that nice Peter Rushton of the England First Party  who are having a meeting in Burnley this Saturday http://efp.org.uk/nationalist-unity-meeting-%E2%80%93-burnley-%E2%80%93-10th-march-2012/ bought me a pint at a David Irving talk http://fpp.co.uk/ and told me he had appeared on Russia Today.  http://rt.com/news/syria-referendum-vote-constitution-211/

I have met members of the British People's Party
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/09/my-afternoon-in-york-with-simon.html and probably have more problems with UKIP (who like to pretend I am a some sort of baby-eating racist monster who must never join their party when I am in fact a Libertarian Civic Nationalist just like them) than with many ethno-nationalists.

Tess Culnane, NF London Mayoral Candidate 2012