Dmitry Babich says the ultra-[sexually] liberal Americans are now making a porn star their heroine because they hate the idea of an alpha male leader as their President

From the 11th minute

Dmitry Babich made a great point about Stormy Daniels being made a heroine by corrupt liberal-feminist media.

Liberal media serves no purpose other than to spin a narrative for our stupid and corrupt politicians to pretend to believe, so they vote for more war.

The media no longer even cares what the ordinary voter thinks, but is just there as a way of writing history before it has happened. Future historians will think what they saw on media was the justification for war and the preponderance of the media material will be pro-war.

There were all those anti-war protests in 2003.

Apparently, either 6 to 11 million or 8 to 30 million people participated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_February_2003_anti-war_protests

Apparently, at least 6 million Westerners who demonstrated could deduce from the facts alone that war was not a good idea but Western politicians who were supposed to be more informed than us, could not.

Democracy is nothing but a cover for war.

We are Athens, Russia is Sparta, and NATO is the Delian League. Ukraine is the latest Delos.

Probably, Muslims will be the New Romans.

https://www.facebook.com/Americans-Against-Aggressive-Neocon-Foreign-Policy-416842915167525/

Realpolitik and territorial disputes

Who really owns which piece of land? On what is his claim based? Why are some permitted to declare independence from large countries, and others not? And if there is no consistent legal or moral answer to any of these questions, what lessons should we learn from that?

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2015/02/a-not-so-brief-history-of-crimea.html

Peter Hitchens' questions

Q.  Who really owns which piece of land?

A.  The person with most claim.

Q.  On what is this claim based?

A.   Possession is nine points of the law.

Q.   Why are some permitted to declare independence from large countries, and others not?

A.   It depends on the mood and the military readiness of the large countries concerned as well as the determination and military readiness of those who wish to become independent.

Q.   And if there is no consistent legal or moral answer to any of these questions, what lessons should we learn from that?"

A.  That there is everything to play for when claim to a piece of land is being disputed, by the parties disputing each other's claim to this land and those seeking to gain something from the disputing parties.

EU used by the US to provoke Russia by suggesting Ukraine could join the EU

.@Arky67 Typical propaganda sucker. 1. EU's own report says *Georgia* started war with Russia https://t.co/yQ27GeQ54B

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@Arky67 2. EU also provoked Russia by seeking to make non-aligned Ukraine part of Western bloc....

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@Arky67 ...& openly backing armed mob putsch against legit government.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@Arky67 UKraine in 1992 used threats of violence to block Crimea's democratic attempt to break away from Kiev https://t.co/v76nGMzSW7

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@Arky67 ...and Russia's intervention in Syria came long after Saudi, US , British and French active destabilisation of that country.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Then why do so via an armed mob putsch? US (rightyly) would not tolerate such manoeuvres in Mexico or Canada.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 And US historically did not tolerate such manoeuvres in Cuba.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@Irish_Ryan17 @Arky67 Indeed, and interesting contrast between EU/NATO silence over Turkey's Cyprus intervention, and rage over Crimea.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Your memory selective. Many films show protestors carrying firearms. 18 police officers killed. https://t.co/DXDZKneS8Q

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 That was USSR. Russia (unlike US) has retreated from areas USSR previously regarded as its sphere:https://t.co/psMNBlSgfq

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 But point is simple. Western nations regard intervention in neighbouring territory as reasonable, when it is their own.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Russia warned repeatedly for 15 years against relentless eastward NATO/EU expansion. Was ignored.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Now not ignored. Agree diplomacy would have been better, but only works if people listen.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 USA or Britain would have done the same, at least, in parallel circs.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Imagine, if Canada broke up and a mob putsch in Montreal installed a pro-Russian government in Quebec.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 I'm OK with anyone having spheres of influence. Monroe Doctrine, anyone? Bay of Pigs? Grenada?

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Moscow gave up defence in depth in 1991, letting Ukraine go without a struggle.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Russia has been repeatedly invaded by Tartars, Lithuanians, Poles, Swedes, French(X2), British,Turks, Germans(X2), ...

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 ...This sort of thing makes you sensitive about your borders. USA wouldn't tolerate Russian troops 500 miles from DC.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Who is 'they'? Russia is not the same country as USSR, is Christian, not Communist, and has no global power ambitions.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 No. They gave up power over the Baltics. But in the expectation that they would stay non-aligned.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Once again, USA would not be be happy with geographical equivalent(Connecticut joining an anti-US nuclear alliance)

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 if Ukraine, it was part of internationally-recognised Russian Empire before 1917,after which violently seized by Germans

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 ...who were also an empire.Germans sponsored a brief pseudo-state, but lost war in Wes and pulled out.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Treaty of Riga restored Ukraine to Moscow rule in 1921, where it remained until Hitler seized it again in 1941.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 It is now. Thanks to Moscow's peaceful withdrawal from territory it formerly controlled. It never was before.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Expansion of NATO and EU into Baltics was never anticipated by *anyone*, east or west, at time of their independence.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 By the way, Baltics were also recognised part of Russian Empire until seized by German aggression 1914-18....

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 The same German aggression that financed the Bolsheviks in their overthrow of Russia's first democracy in 1917.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 I know. Independence from USSR. Vote much lower in Crimea, and https://t.co/v76nGMzSW7

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 And Ukraine's new govt wasn't prepared to let Crimea vote on *its* independence from Kiev https://t.co/v76nGMzSW7

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Absolutely. Crimea is overwhelmingly Russian, almost as much as the Falklands are British.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC @Arky67 One..more...time https://t.co/v76nGMzSW7 . In 1992 Kiev blocked a lawful, democratic vote on Crimean independence.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Pretty hypocritical for a country that'd just become independent because Moscow allowed *it* to have a referendum...

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 And then Moscow recognised the result even though it was a grave economic and strategic blow.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 Compare and contrast Spain's attitude to Catalonia or Basque country. And ask yourself ...

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC @Arky67 And ask yourself if USA would ever even contemplate allowing a vote in territories it seized from Mexico in 1848

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC @Arky67 On the contrary. Putin had been warning for years, most notably in Munich in 2007 : https://t.co/f30lQM5vI7

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC Once again, Imagine how Washington would react if Mexico took over San Diego.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC Democracy? That's a funny name for overthrowing the elected govt by foreign-backed armed force, and violating the constitution.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC 1.Well, dear, say Southern California (seized from Mexico in 1848) seceded from the USA in a referendum...

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC You should have read the constitution you were defending, then. It's against mob putsches and forcible removals of Presidents...

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC Or is that kind of thing OK for foreigners?

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC I didn't say they did. I said the mob was foreign-backed and armed. The guns were there already.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC 2. Say that the truncated USA then made a treaty agreeing to share San Diego between US Navy and Mexican Navy.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC 3. Then say that Mexico demanded higher and higher fees for this deal...

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC 4 While leading Mexican politicians openly talked of kicking the US Navy out for good. Bad enough eh?

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC 5.Then imagine that remaining US citizens still living in San Diego were ordered to adopt Spanish names...

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC 6. And then imagine what would happen if Mexico signed a Political, Military and Economic treaty with Russia.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC 7.These are *exact* parallels with recent events in Ukraine.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC So what? Nothing to do with the subject. San Diego=Sevastopol. Territories seized from mexico in 1848 =Ukraine.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

@NavyvetPC I haven't been asked to. Of course Russia was present in Crimea(in many cases legally under treaty) . But no treaty explains....

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

.@NavyvetPC No treaty explains the covert, accidentally revealed presence of CIA director John Brennan in Kiev in 2014.

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) May 20, 2016

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-18/british-general-says-nuclear-war-russia-2017-entirely-plausible

Why a rational foreign policy and democracy don't mix: too many moron voters who believe everything they are told

European defence ministers oppose sending weapons to Ukraine

Sending weapons to Ukraine would escalate violence – UK Defence Secretary

Ukraine crisis: Russia is a threat to other Baltic states, warns Defence Secretary Michael Fallon

What does the exchange below prove?

That morons (both in and outside Parliament) who believe any shit they are told have the vote and our democracy is based on these morons voting. That is why our foreign policy is shit and that the Third World War is yet again the fault of the White Anglo Saxon Protestant, who is already responsible for the previous two. Quite a hat-trick, eh? Once that happens, the game will be over for Western civilisation as we know it.

@naughtiej @Sarah_Montague On 6 February Michael Fallon was concerned about escalating the violence. On 19 February he shows the opposite.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem Not really. Simple strategic concerns.
— Igor Merheim-Eyre (@MerheimEyre) February 19, 2015

@MerheimEyre Please explain.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem Perceiving a potential threat does not mean escalating a conflict
— Igor Merheim-Eyre (@MerheimEyre) February 19, 2015

@MerheimEyre Michael Fallon talking about it so publicly is surely intended to create alarm and further aggression.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem Given the current state of UK Armed Forces & NATO preparedness, I hardly doubt it.
— Igor Merheim-Eyre (@MerheimEyre) February 19, 2015

@MerheimEyre None of the Western leaders know what they are doing, and are suffering from collective dementia.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@warmatters @Furedibyte Why has no one commented on Michael Fallon's U-turn? It is not just him who has gone mad. @BBCr4today @DAaronovitch
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@warmatters @Furedibyte The Ukraine is Russia's backyard.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

The only people doing the sabre-rattling is NATO. #Ukraine
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley On 6 February Michael Fallon was concerned about escalating the violence. On 19 February he shows the opposite. #Ukraine
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem Thanks,i think and hope we 're all concerned about 'creep' The Bears flying close again Sum up ,to me ,#Putin's Global expansion plan
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley It is the US that is bent on global domination. Have you heard of the Wolfowitz Doctrine?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

I have Ms @ntfem but you have to look beyond one's own bias .
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley What bias are you accusing me of?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley Would you call yourself a Neocon?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem Neocon !!! No no no never I'm a leftie I believe in the sovereignty of the Free speech UK and the Defence of ALL of our citizens
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley You talk a lot of shit.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley Do you believe in the Special Relationship?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem Believe is a bit strong but I do think we have affinity with the #US
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley We now have anr European war, but US has a buffer continent n a buffer ocean while NATO countries shit on their own doorsteps.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley The only country that has an equal relationship with the US is Israel, the rest of NATO r groupies with UK being Chief Groupie
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem Claire ,may I,#NATO kept and should keep us safe (if we all paid our GDP 2%'s) #Putin has increased his military spending by 30% Why
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley Russia is feeling threatened because NATO are collectively ratting their sabres at it at the behest of the Americans. #Ukraine
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley If you don't arm yourself properly the Americans will just kick you around and even impose regime change on you.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley Are you sure you have read the Wolfowitz Doctrine? You sound entirely ignorant of it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley Putin should re-establish the one-party state to avoid being kicked around by the Americans: that would be my advice to him.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley I don't need to live in Moscow to give @PutinRF_Eng advice and my advice to him would be to re-establish the one-party state.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley UK/EU/NATO are the cat's paw of the US foreign policy, but you either don't see it, or don't seem to mind.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem That's unfair & inaccurate Of course I mind .Our actions should come from the #HoC and no where else .We live on a shrinking globe
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley You mean the lobby fodder in the House that should be turned into a museum or a hotel? Don't make me laugh.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem What would you replace the #HoC with ? A #Gulag selection committee
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley I rather like the Chinese system. It wd be unicameral and so we should move that lot somewhere else into a new round building.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley Haven't u noticed that these conscience-less morons would vote to drop any bomb on any country rather than defy a 3-line whip?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@AllanMadeley These convictionless cunts in the House would drop any bomb on any country for any reason rather than defy a 3 line whip.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@ntfem No need for that language.Please remember children read Twitter .I accept your apology Bye Have a good day
— Allan Madeley (@AllanMadeley) February 19, 2015

End of the debate by this ignoramus who shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Why is NATO *collecting* enemies? It already has ISIS, now it wants Russia and a European war.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@cuzzinharry It can only be collective dementia blindly obeying the commands of the US who are using us as the cat's paw to needle Russia.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@cuzzinharry When there is a full-blown European war, America will have a buffer continent and a buffer ocean while we get FUCKED OVER.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@cuzzinharry Russia has nothing to lose now. If I were Putin, the next step would be to gang up with China to tell NATO to fuck off.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@cuzzinharry Russia, China and America will be fine while Europe gets all the grief and the fucking refugees.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

@cuzzinharry Not one single fucking leader of any EU nation understands fucking geopolitics and how they are being FUCKED OVER BY AMERICA.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 19, 2015

Which rules are more likely to discourage war - the Wolfowitz Doctrine or the Koranic rules of warfare?

Pity the Ukrainians led by a woman in a wheelchair known for her braided hair wanting to be part of NATO.

Woman in wheelchair who will now rule the Ukraine.

Woman in wheelchair looking tired, ill and confused.  More of that to come?

Woman in wheelchair when she was young and sexy.  Did she get the job cos of her looks?

I know people in the Philippines who, after having had a number of disastrous female Presidents, said that female Presidents should be forbidden in their constitution.

You can easily guess at my gloomy predictions for the people of the Ukraine. Better under Papa Putin, I would have thought.

Now is the time you would want a ruthless and firm-minded leader if you were a Ukrainian as your country descends into violence and chaos.  A woman in a wheelchair just doesn't fucking cut it, does it?

Die Loreley
http://www.kellscraft.com/LegendsRhine/legendsrhine068.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhinemaidens

Looking at this woman's hair, I was reminded of the Rhinemaidens.  Yep, Yulia is could be likened to a Rhinemaiden with braided hair.  Wagner meant his Rhinemaidens to be a metaphor for the female sex if I have understood Wagner correctly.  He probably meant:

"Love your woman, for a good woman is a prize worthy of acquiring, but understand that she cannot really be trusted.  Her beauty will fill your mind with desire and dreams, so keep your feet firmly planted on the ground, old chap, and don't let yourself get too carried away."

Sorry, peeps, that's all the political analysis you are going to get from me on this subject.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2565489/Yulia-Tymoshenko-released-prison-daughter-pictured-weeping-joy.html

If the Ukrainians choose the EU, they choose gay marriage.