Translate

Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts

Saturday, 30 May 2020

The practical joke God played on Christians and is still waiting for them to notice after 2000 years

If I serve Truth, Logic and Morality and the Abrahamic God represents Truth, Logic and Morality, then I will have His protection as long as I do my work for the best possible reasons in the best possible way.

If the Abrahamic God created the Universe, He would have created a logical universe, if He is indeed omnipotent. This is because it is easier to be illogical than logical. Being omnipotent, God would be able to do the harder thing effortlessly.

He has created laws for us intended for our protection and understanding of His purpose.

Our lives are no more than an opportunity of character development to test our fitness for our next life or afterlife. Even if we don't believe in God, we know that only people of good and strong character will be remembered by history. If you have a bad and weak character, you wouldn't be able to achieve anything history would remember.

The people most remembered by history are the prophets and prophetesses of God.

I like to think I present an opportunity for individuals, nations and empires to correct themselves if they are not so disconnected from Truth, Logic and Morality as to be beyond my reach, if they are at least prepared to challenge my position that democracy is dementia and Christianity is kaput should should be replaced by a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

The truth is that the West has been been a victim of a practical joke called Christianity. I understand how humiliating and traumatising it must be to be asked to believe in an absurdity and then forced into affirming it by state intimidation for generation after generation, century after century. It is actually worse to have that happen to you than suffering repeated attempts to exterminate you as Jews have done throughout the centuries.

The only way the Post-Christian Westerner can cure himself now is to discuss the one party theocracy Secular Koranism proposes as a possible alternative to the illegitimate, idolatrous, blasphemous and absurd religion that is Christianity and the dementia that is democracy.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Friday, 10 August 2018

Secular Koranism is the paradoxical solution for Islamophobes because it would deal with the feminazis


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 13 June 2018

National identity and National Consciousness

National identity is forged in the furnace of war and revolution. How else does one form of national identity replace another? Religion and political ideology (and change thereof as well as the culture produced by religion and politics) is the only source of national self-consciousness.

What is self-consciousness in the philosophical sense? When we realise we are different to other people and know for a fact that our interests are different to theirs. We know we are different to other people when we do things differently to other people for special reasons of our own. Jews are a good example of a people with a very developed by sense of group identity.

Democracy, liberalism and feminism are the sacred cows of the West. The consequence of this unholy trinity is that it leads to matriarchy, and a matriarchy is a primitive, declining and extinct society, or one that is about to become extinct. All the five world religions anyone has ever heard of is about protecting the patriarchy and promoting marriage and family values. Once your government stops doing that, you will become a matriarchy.

White men no longer wishing to live in a matriarchy saying they are tired of suffering the consequences of uncontrolled immigration seems a perfectly respectable political aspiration to me.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 29 March 2018

Dmitry Babich says the ultra-[sexually] liberal Americans are now making a porn star their heroine because they hate the idea of an alpha male leader as their President


From the 11th minute

Dmitry Babich made a great point about Stormy Daniels being made a heroine by corrupt liberal-feminist media.

Liberal media serves no purpose other than to spin a narrative for our stupid and corrupt politicians to pretend to believe, so they vote for more war.

The media no longer even cares what the ordinary voter thinks, but is just there as a way of writing history before it has happened. Future historians will think what they saw on media was the justification for war and the preponderance of the media material will be pro-war.

There were all those anti-war protests in 2003.

Apparently, either 6 to 11 million or 8 to 30 million people participated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_February_2003_anti-war_protests

Apparently, at least 6 million Westerners who demonstrated could deduce from the facts alone that war was not a good idea but Western politicians who were supposed to be more informed than us, could not.

Democracy is nothing but a cover for war.

We are Athens, Russia is Sparta, and NATO is the Delian League. Ukraine is the latest Delos.

Probably, Muslims will be the New Romans.

https://www.facebook.com/Americans-Against-Aggressive-Neocon-Foreign-Policy-416842915167525/
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 21 March 2018

Marriage and democracy

Only those who are parents of legitimate offspring or want to become parents of legitimate offspring would support marriage. If there are more parents of bastard offspring and more bastards than there are those who are legitimate, then you would expect slut single mothers, morally compromised slut fuckers who have sired bastard offspring, sodomites and bastards not to support marriage. Since this is already the case, it highlights the moral bankruptcy of democracy and tells us it is time to take it out with the trash.

What does it mean to support marriage?

The most important rule of marriage is the forbidding and punishing of extramarital sex since the purpose of doing so is to make couples marry in order to have the right to have sex and children with each other.

If you allow people to have sex outside marriage ie fornication, sodomy, adultery etc, then people would predictably use these marriage substitutes to have exclusively recreational sex all their lives and not be troubled by the expense and inconvenience of rearing of the next generation either properly or at all.

A declining birth rate is a sign of a dying civilisation that cannot even replace itself in sufficient numbers to fight a successful defensive war. This means that such a society would have the characteristic of a risk-averse elderly woman and nations with this characteristic will be easily conquered by nations with the characteristic of enterprising young fighting men.

Slut single mothers, men who have sired bastard offspring with slut single mothers, bastards and sodomites who acknowledge that the next generation would be better off brought up by two married parents living together would at least support marriage in principle if not in practice, if they cared about the national interest.

If slut single mothers, fathers of bastards and LGBTs can neither acknowledge this truth nor accept the imperative of promoting the national interest, then they are clearly doubly subversive, making it even more justifiable to ignore their anti-marriage views. The views of those who are both selfish and intellectually dishonest should certainly be ignored.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, 3 February 2018

Democracy should be taken out with the trash because it has obviously corrupted the morals of the public

The Death of Illegitimacy [AKA
THE DEATH OF PATRIARCHY AND MARRIAGE IN BRITAIN]

Archive on 4

 Illegitimacy once meant you were a 'bastard'. The MP Caroline Flint wants to know what the word 'illegitimate' means now.

Caroline has always been open about her unmarried Mum having her when she was 17 years old and that she had her first son before she got married. Caroline describes her own family's story as a Catherine Cookson novel. There are suspicions that her widowed great-grandmother had an illegitimate child. Her grandmother's older sister had an illegitimate child during WW1 with an American soldier who was brought up as though his mother was his sister.

She explores the archives to find out if the stigma has died out with social historian Jane Robinson and discusses the issue with best-selling crime author Martina Cole and fellow MP Jess Phillips. Martina, who is also an ambassador for the single parent families' charity Gingerbread, became a single parent by choice when she was 18 and then again 20 years later. Jess conceived her son when she was 22 and had been with her boyfriend for barely a month.

Is the biggest deal today not whether a child is illegitimate but whether she bears her father's surname? Has the cloak of illegitimacy really fallen because daddy is willing to say publicly: she's mine?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3777053/The-feminists-turning-British-justice-against-men-writes-LAURA-PERRINS.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/why-is-alison-saunders-of-gender.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/is-crown-prosecution-service-exceeding.html


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron


at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Tuesday, 9 May 2017

Why men will never get back their country again as long as democratic politicians keep chasing the female vote

Points to note:

1) Trump lost the popular vote in 2017. (This means Hillary Clinton got more votes from women than Trump from men.) There are more female voters than male voters in the US.

2) There are more Frenchwomen who are voters than there are Frenchmen who are voters.

3) The average age of the French citizen is 41.

4) 41+ is the age of the cougar.

5) Macron is a cub.

6) Frenchwomen voting for Macron were more numerous than Frenchmen voting for Le Pen.

7) Most Frenchwomen voting for Macron probably imagined themselves as being cougar to the President of France who would be their cub. If you are going to be cougar to a cub, the most perfect high status cub would be the alpha male of your country with no desire for children of his own.

8) Widow-burning was practised by Hindus and they didn't even have to worry about the unintended consequences of female suffrage in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage.

9) Those who prefer security to liberty deserve neither.

10) Let's face it: women prefer security to liberty.

11) Men who allow the female preference to predominate without successfully challenging it deserve neither freedom nor liberty.

12) Denial is a feminine vice.

13) The conquered takes on the mindset of their conqueror.

14) Beta males without an alpha male leader are like women because no beta male will accept the authority of another. Therefore beta males without an alpha male leader will be just a bunch of women bitching about each other with each other, who will never get it together to overthrow the matriarchy.

15) If Trump cannot do it, how can Marine Le Pen do it?

16) Will Marine Le Pen win in 2022? What will the average age of the French be by then? We know how sentimental and stubborn old people can be, don't we?

17) Old people have the luxury of denial because they think that by the time the shit hits the fan they will be long gone.


From the 4th minute:

"That 85% of women voting for Macron doesn't seem to be substantiated or substantiable."

VOTERS WHO VOTED FOR LE PEN

44% of voters aged 18 - 24.

38% of voters aged 25 - 34

40%  of voters aged 35 - 49

36% of voters aged 50 - 64

20% of voters aged 60+

"The pensioners and baby boomers are really against Le Pen. Only 1 in 5 of the voted Le Pen."

"The younger you are, the more likely you are to vote for Le Pen."

If you are on your pension, you are more likely to want immigrants to keep coming to pay for your pension.







Greg Johnson:

We just have to wait for the baby boomers to die.
Democracy is a dumb system because most people are too dumb to vote for their own survival.  
Democracy is a bad idea because people need paternalism. If you give people the vote and you allow their media and their political system to be dominated by enemies and rootless people and sociopaths, chances are they are going to make the wrong decision. You need to take that decision away from them and you need better elites. 
We have to replace the political establishment before it replaces us.
If we have to end democracy, that's all well and good because people flourish under a certain degree of paternalism. 
We're miserable today because we are too free.  
The proposal to change the name of Front Nationale is fake and gay.  
The left have been changing the electorate to make it totally impossible to allow the French to control their destiny.  
Race replacement makes democracy illegitimate.  
Le Pen should have challenged the legitimacy of the election.


Sensible women would vote to abolish female suffrage too. For every sensible female voter there are 12 silly female voters. Sensible women would therefore vote to deprive themselves of the vote. 

MW:

It is inevitable that whites wake up, it is inevitable that once they do they will take action, and it's inevitable that once they take action they will win.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, 23 March 2017

Western Man's cultural practice of mass murdering Muslims abroad and complaining about Muslim immigration and terrorism at home


This video only complains about Muslims and their propensity to terrorism, without once considering the role of UK foreign policy in provoking Muslim terrorism. So much easier to point to Muslims who are visibly different than to trouble one's pretty head about bad UK foreign policy, is it not? Demanding the mass expulsion of Muslims and the banning of Islam in the West is a much more attractive option than wondering where UK foreign policy might have gone wrong over the past century.







What year was the Brighton bomb?

What year was the Anglo-Irish Agreement?

Do you think Muslim terrorists are better at putting two and two together than shit for brains MPs sitting in Parliament as representatives of the idiocracy?

It would appear Islamophobic Western Man considers the neocon policy of bombing and invading Muslim countries as an expression of Western masculinity.

The Military Industrial Complex of the Western Man has the perfect modus operandi: keep invading Muslim countries and keep allowing Muslim immigration.

Allowing Muslim immigration while preventing people from complaining about immigration and giving Muslims special status causes Muslims to be hated, creating the desire in beta male cannon fodder to bomb and invade Muslim countries, which is brilliantly self-perpetuating.

Creating a fear of Muslims in the West also allows the state to pass ever more repressive laws to justify spying on everyone, another beneficial side effect for the intelligence community who are part of the deep state.

It cannot be healthy or decent to express your masculinity in enabling, facilitating and committing mass homicide, can it? This is after all what serial killers do.

Part of the white man's cultural identity is the belief he has the right to mass murder Muslims globally with impunity from retaliation.

When he suffers retaliation in the form terrorism in his own country, the degenerate Western matriarchy calls for the observation of pointless rituals of a minute's silence and candlelit vigils, clearly designed to generate emotion and to suppress thought so its victims never think to question Western foreign policy or their government's immigration policy, both designed to prop up the stinking degenerate matriarchy of parasitical female voters and their spawn, who are voracious clients of the welfare state.

https://www.facebook.com/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times-417696111659379/?fref=ts

Why does the white man feel he has to mass murder Muslims abroad as a cultural practice? Because at home he is a pussywhipped mangina whose social status is below that of a fornicating slut or Slut Single Mother with variously fathered feral bastards who live off his labour and his taxes whom he doesn't even get to fuck. 

Simon Sheppard on How Feminism Caused Two World Wars
"We should ask, and seek a satisfactory answer to the question: Was it a coincidence that the British government capitulated to women at precisely the same moment in history that it directed a blood feud of a savagery unknown for centuries? Extraordinary lengths were taken to prevail in the First World War, and extraordinary measures were taken rather than accede to the German and American peace overtures which were made, especially during December 1916."

"It is generally acknowledged that the First World War directly led to the Second."

"A man who has lost control at home can seek to dominate elsewhere."

"The desire to dominate and subdue women, a natural male instinct with sound evolutionary origins, was expressed another way. Germany was subjugated instead. Moreover the British government had itself become feminized, choosing as its adversary one more masculine than itself, the sort of enemy the female would choose. By attacking a more masculine opponent, males were serving the female interest."

"A nation, like a man, that is secure in itself and in its masculine capacity to control does not wish to cruelly persecute a vanquished foe. This took place after both world wars."

'... feminization played a part in the instigation and unprecedented magnitude of violence of the subsequent two world wars. One cannot help but wonder at the carnage and suffering which might have been avoided had British bobbies, on facing organized suffragette rebellion in the years around 1910, simply been told to “roll up their sleeves.” '

Why doesn't Western Man stop waging war on Muslims abroad?

Why does he continue to allow Muslim immigration into his country while he wages war against Muslims abroad? It makes no sense, but then it makes no sense for men to let irresponsible and promiscuous women have the vote and most women in the West are irresponsible and promiscuous, do not have legitimate children, are not good wives and badly parent what children they manage to have leading to a shortage of employably literate and numerate citizens, leading to a labour shortage, leading to an insatiable demand for cheaper and more willing immigrant labour.

Why does this deep-seated and long-standing problem remain addressed? Because politicians are not capable of planning beyond the next election.

How should it be addressed? My proposals to abolish multi-party democracy, abolish the welfare state, repeal pro-feminist legislation and impose a one-party Secular Koranist theocracy capable of promoting social conservatism and the long term national interest will be unlikely to get any publicity from the corrupt liberal media more in the business of suppressing news than reporting it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2728487/My-children-turned-monsters-And-says-SHONA-SIBARY-s-fault-trying-nice-liberal-parent.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/why-white-people-are-now-inferior-race.html 

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

It is impossible to get an answer from a patient who is in a catatonic state.

Is this patient's response analogous to that of the media - being able to hold an unnatural position for a surprisingly long time? 1:36 Watch out in particular for waxy flexibility, sustained abnormal position, opposition, resistance to movement, negativism including aversion

This is what the male politician secretly thinks about himself, his career and the entire political process that he wastes his life engaging in, because he won't say what needs to be said about feminism and Western foreign policy.


New President, same old neocon US foreign policy being pursued by NATO members/US vassal states

Western Man is simply in a state of neurotic suspension, on the one hand compelled to do the same thing again and again because that is what he has been doing ever he can remember, and on the other fearing the consequences when he wakes up to admit that he has been in error for God knows how long and for how many generations for allowing indiscriminate universal suffrage, tolerating widespread bastardy and allowing his addiction to extramarital sex and cheap foreign labour to go unaddressed.
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, 31 October 2016

The Best of Brexit, the Quantum Particles of Politics and the Real Horro...




From 8th minute Dambisa Moyo:

The World Economic Forum has issued a report talking about how they have just done a survey across developed countries that are mainly democratic and countries are mainly authoritarian and people in authoritarian states trust their leaders much more than people in democratic states, so it is that kind of evidence that makes me queasy to just say 'Oh, democracy is the answer.'
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Friday, 23 September 2016

The true status of men in the West



Feminism causes immigration and turns women into sluts. 

How long are British men going to put up with this disgusting treachery from their immoral women? Have they no sense of shame? Don't they even care what other nations think of them?

If I am taken away by the agents of the Big Sister State for my heresy against their sacred religion of feminism and their sacrament of sluttery, I expect British men to defend me, because no one else has gone out his way to say what I have said and done what I have done to warn them of their folly of worshiping sluts. I am not even a white or male, but just want to live in a country where the men are not afraid of immoral women whose morals are lower than that of even a common prostitute. Is that really too much to ask?
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, 17 June 2016

Which political system would you choose?

a) Under a matriarchy, all men are lower than sluts, and the buck keeps being passed like a parcel until it blows up. In a matriarchy the beta male is shat and pissed on. They think they are electing a leader at general elections, but all leaders of all political parties are only interested in chasing the female vote and serving foreign interests. Any political system that is underpays its parliamentarians with a crap education system is going to have the blind leading the blind. Democracy is just feminist-spawned degenerate idiocracy in which all the politicians with principles are beta male charisma-free zones, and the sexy ones charlatans and convictionless cunts.



b) Under a patriarchy, the buck stops with the alpha male. In a patriarchy, beta males get to choose a leader who will protect their interests who need not pander to irresponsible unmarried single mothers because social parasites will be irrelevant to political decision-making because they won't even be voting, because only taxpayers would have the vote, and the low-waged would be relieved of the burden of paying taxes as well as that of voting.

Which you gonna choose?

Yeah, some of you would still choose the matriarchy/democracy/liberalism/feminism, I know. LOSERS.

Oh, and vote Brexit to be closer to getting the patriarchy any sane and decent person would want. 
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, 2 May 2016

National parlour game being played by British politicians - fiddling while Rome burns

Questions for Dr Feldman and Shami Chakrabarti on anti-Semitism

WHY DEMOCRACY IS DOOMED

Instead of discussing important affairs of state rationally, British politicians occupy themselves playing a parlour game.




at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, 8 January 2016

Justin Webb interviewing two women from Germany about Cologne attacks on New Year's Day 2016

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06twjtk

8:43
Chancellor Angela Merkel has said Germany must have a "fundamental" debate about how to integrate new migrants after a wave of sexual assaults on New Year’s Eve which have been blamed on migrants. Speaking in the programme is journalist and activist Kubra Gumusay and editor-in-chief of Bild Zeitung - Germany’s most read newspaper - Tanit Koch.

Kubra Gamusay is an oxymoronic Muslim Feminist, which Justin Webb omitted to mention. You can hear her witter on about Muslim feminism at http://www.islamandfeminism.org/kuumlbra-guumlmuuml351ay.html

Bild Zeitung is the German equivalent of The Sun, which Webb also omitted to mention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild

Despite being often recognised as a right-wing publication, in January 2015 Bild began a petition against PEGIDA, an anti-Islamisation protest group.



JW:

Germany is having an anguished debate about the attacks around New Year on women walking in and around the railway station in Cologne. The Right accuse the establishment of covering up the crimes of Muslim immigrants, including some from Syria and North Africa. The establishment is reacting in pretty pained fashion. Angela Merkel speaking yesterday in Berlin saying deportation should be considered for foreigners who commit crimes. Let's talk to Kubra Gumasay who is a journalist and activist in Hamburg and to Tanit Koch who is Editor In Chief of Bild Zeitung which is Germany's most-read newspaper. Good morning to you both. 

The wittering women chorus:

Good morning, Justin! 

JW:

Kubra, first of all: does everyone accept now this was mishandled?

KG:

Well certainly yes especially since after the events it was found out that many women who have been sexually assaulted had struggled and reporting especially the way the victims have been dealt with. There were quite a few problems with the event in specific but in general what we have right now is a problem in the way we talk about these topics. Sexism is an issue in Germany not only within the immigrant community but also within the immigrant communities. We are now having a debate that focuses on the other, the immigrant, the refugee as the barbarians who are coming into our country to basically assault our women - those sexist men - and we are now experiencing a very racist turn of the debate. 

JW:

Tanit Koch, would that racist turn be avoided if the truth was told earlier about incidents like this?

TK:

Absolutely. I am not actually sure there is a "racist turn". There is some issues that haven't been addressed during the last years or decades which should have been addressed before are now in the focus. I absolutely think that the - forgive the language - cock-up by the police and police communication in Cologne certainly has not helped at all but actually worsened the matter of people distrusting the establishment, politicians and the media. 

What I would have said if asked this question:

"Of course not. Germany is now experiencing an unprecedented flood of immigration that is pouring oil on the fire of pre-existing racial tensions caused by uncontrolled immigration and Islamophobia general to liberal democracies towards Islamic State. The foreigners and immigrants the Germans most particularly hate and fear are Muslim migrants, and it is this group that is reported to have molested German women. Xenophobia includes hatred and fear of foreigners, and the most foreign of foreigners are foreigners of another race, especially if their religion has values you already know to be opposed to yours. Islamic State are Muslim and Islamic State jihadis come from Syria and North Africa. The men reported to have molested German women during the New Year were men of that religion coming from precisely these places. The hatred and fear is both racial and religious as well as deeply and undeniably visceral."    

JW:

And of course it wasn't just the police, was it, the state broadcasters as well have had to apologise because they didn't report the facts even though they knew them.

TK:

Well, they have apologised. I think you shouldn't over-estimate that one incident because that was the [inaudible] of news at seven o'clock and reported the incidents later on that day so they apologise for not doing main news which definitely was a mistake and is absolutely feeding into the trust issue raised by radical right wing movements and parties.

[Of course Koch doesn't want the German public to make too  much of the media not broadcasting the truth, being Editor in Chief of the Bild and therefore part of the media herself!]

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/08/cologne-attacks-hard-questions-new-years-eve?CMP=fb_gu

Gaby Hinsliff:

Many Germans are asking why politicians, police and broadcasters seem so reluctant to discuss what happened under cover of the crowds (the state broadcaster EZF apologised for not covering the attacks until Tuesday), and whether it’s because the attackers are widely described as looking Arab or north African. Which is why, of course, liberals like me are reluctant to talk about it.

The parallels between German politicians’ discomfort over Cologne and Britain’s response to predominantly Asian gangs grooming girls in Rotherham for sexual exploitation aren’t exact, but there are lessons to be learned.

The first is that pushing victims under the carpet for the sake of cohesion is dangerous. When allegations about older Asian men preying on white girls in northern cities initially surfaced, well over a decade ago, it was the BNP that first took up the cudgels. Unfortunately, that meant journalists and politicians instinctively shied away, wary of giving the BNP publicity.

By trying not to give succour to racists, the risk is that we end up miserably self-censoring.
You really can't trust these liberal cunts, who have absolutely no fucking idea about journalistic integrity, can you? But at least Gaby Hinsliff is coming clean now. Most white middle class women think foreign males are interesting and more worthy of attention than men of their own race and emasculated white men allow them to indulge this preference. They don't even know they are doing it. It is as natural to them as picking up a baby and cooing at it.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/harriet-and-hoods.html


What I would have said if asked this question:

"Germans have indeed lost faith in their government and their media, which they now know to be rotten with Political Correctness. It was after all their Chancellor Angela Merkel who invited the migrants to Germany in the first place, only to withdraw her invitation a week later, like an indecisive and neurotic woman who enjoys playing with a man's feelings, just because he allows her to. The suspicion that only pro-migrant reports were allowed by the media was not particular to Germany, for the BBC, CNN and other Western liberal media are just as guilty. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/female-journalists-pro-migrant-coverage.html The best thing pro-migrant politicians such as Merkel and Reker can do for themselves and their people is to resign, and let those more in touch with the understandable anxieties of the German people take their places. Germany should close its borders, leave the EU and lie down quietly in a dark room and reflect on its future. Denial is a feminine vice and more denial at this stage would only enrage German public opinion. That public life is filled with ranks of vacillating and incompetent women who constantly pull their punches and witter on about their nonsense such as Muslim Feminism and Germany integrating yet more aliens will just infuriate an already irritated and anxious German public. All female journalists guilty of a pro-migrant stance should also resign."
Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males by Simon Sheppard" 

 JW:

Kubra Gumasha, do you accept that there is a real risk to not just women's rights actually but other rights as well that our accepted and seen as part of secular modern European society that are not necessarily respected by some of those who come in and that has to be said plainly?


KW:

No, I certainly agree that people who come into Germany should who fled to Germany and seek rescue here are not people who went through integration process who have basically declared that they will comply with all of the values here. That certainly hasn't happened so obviously I don't expect that we won't have any issues with that. I mean that is a struggle that we will be something we have to deal with that in the future and I do believe that we will actually be able to manage that, it's just the way we handle it and at this point Germany has missed in the past years the point we should have talked about who we are as a country, who do we mean when we say "we". We have not yet managed to be a society that is inclusive, that speaks of "we" and then includes people who have not been born in Germany but certainly do feel German, who have a German passport, speak the language so what we need right now in Germany is a debate on who we are and who we want to be.

 What I would have said if asked this question:

"What has to be said plainly is that no nation that already has an immigrant problem should be accepting any more of these migrants. Those already here can be used as slave labour or have the option of being returned to where they came if they object to being used as slave labour. The perception that these migrant swarms who molest European women are somehow privileged over European men will create a simmering resentment that could be the source of riots and, perhaps, revolution."

 JW:

Is that the debate you are going to get now, Tanit Koch?

TW:

Actually, I think the debate we are going to have is what we expect of people coming into the country that have been treated - as you yourself the BBC have reported - with great hospitality that those people have to understand what our way of life is not just our views but our way of life. I am bit frustrated that in particular Cologne had these appalling incidents because I have lived there myself and Cologne is the party city of Germany which has a history and prides itself on its great tolerance and openness towards people coming into that city from all over the world so the debate is going to be not just how to reassure ourselves of what we are and who we are but also to tackle certain issues that have come into the country because of course when you haven't grown up in Germany you cannot possibly be used to our way of life but people who do not abide with the law simply have to learn that this cannot be accepted. 
INTERVIEW ENDS.

What I would have said if asked this question:

"The topics of debate should be as follows:

 1) How Europeans managed to get themselves into this situation in the first place. (It was feminism causing the European birth rate to decline that caused the labour shortage making immigrant labour so attractive to governments of senescent and shrinking populations afraid of alienating the female vote by telling women to have more babies earlier and bring them up properly as stay at home wives. The illegitimate offspring of single mothers entering the educational system would inevitably lower standards of education and behaviour making the next generation of indigenous labour less attractive but immigrant labour more attractive as employees to German businesses. A generous welfare state is also a disincentive to work.) The Pill, the Sexual Revolution and abortions- all may share some blame for our dependency on immigration.

 2) Where these migrant/refugee swarms came from. They are of course from the countries that NATO so blithely bombed at the behest of the Americans. Even as Hitler plotted to expel the Jews from Germany, he had in mind somewhere to send them - Madagascar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan 
Incompetent and short-sighted European governments bombing Syria never even considered for a moment where those escaping their bombing would go - to Europe, as it turned out. The Cost Germany Is Paying For Washington’s Wars

3) If we were a proper dictatorship, our benign dictator would have made the women have enough legitimate children younger and made the proles work, without giving a stuff about their so-called human rights. If this had happened, there would be no need for immigrant labour. Anti-immigration parties should tell their supporters exactly what they have to do if they want to solve the problem: abolish the welfare state, marry earlier, have more children and abolish all anti-discrimination pro-feminist legislation."

 Do you just get the feeling that my suggestions will not be acknowledged, let alone discussed in mainstream media?

Do you think ISIS would just let anyone come into their country, molest their women and then let an idiotic Muslim woman who thinks she is a feminist witter on about Islamic State's national identity not being sufficiently inclusive to the kuffar, eh, eh, eh?


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 27 September 2015

British values/morality v Islamic values/morality

According to Ofsted, 'fundamental British values' are:


  • democracy
  • the rule of law
  • individual liberty
  • mutual respect for and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs and for those without faith.


What are Islamic values? Are they necessarily antithetical to British values?

Islamic morality can be defined because its rules of morality can be easily ascertainable by reference to the Koran eg the prohibition of usury, pork, gambling, alcohol, extramarital sex.

British values cannot be similarly established because there is no authoritative book with the title "British Morality For All Time" said to be written by the Greatest Liberal of All Time. Liberals will doubtless be dismayed to know that the Koran is obviously conceptually superior any other idea including liberalism because it is said to be the directly transcribed Word of God.

Islamic morality is intended to be universal and eternal, unlike British morality, which is indistinguishable from British values and British culture. British values were defined under a Conservative government whose leader and Prime Minister legalised gay marriage. British values were only defined British values in response to those who sought to challenge it by asking the government what they were.  The most fundamental British value is of course the right to have extramarital sex, which is now regarded as an inalienable human right. The evil consequences of these values have been described at http://uk.reuters.com/article/2007/11/12/uk-britain-motto-idUKL1256515520071112

In my view, the exercise of defining British values is futile and illogical.  It is illogical to define British values simply because they are bound to change if it is indeed the case that British values means British morality and it is the law's role to limit our immorality. The law changes from time to time and government to government. After a revolution, the morality that emerges is bound to be radically different to the morality that was in existence before the revolution. To advocate the return to pre-revolutionary laws would mean one is a reactionary, or a counter-revolutionary and therefore a security threat to the current regime, with grave consequences for our reputation, career and perhaps liberty and life itself. Even without a revolution, morality changes but more gradually, for example when a Labour government repeals a law passed by a Conservative government or vice versa, or when a Conservative Prime Minister legalises gay marriage.

On the grounds of individual liberty we should of course be allowed to say that the current system of morality is not one we ought to have, give reasons and propose changes which can only be done by changing the law (eg repealing or passing an Act of Parliament) or by changing the government (eg Labour, Conservative, UKIP etc) or indeed changing  the entire system of government (eg from a representative democracy to a Caliphate, dictatorship, one-party state, theocracy etc).

If we cannot do this without being arrested for inviting support for a proscribed organisation under s 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000, as Anjem Choudary was, are even those who articulated and commissioned the declaration of British values breaking their own rules?

If the government is breaking its own rules - the one concerning upholding the rule of law as well as the one about individual liberty (which must surely include freedom of  expression and freedom of belief) - then British values as pronounced by the British government is a sham.  They were only declared so that those who question and challenge it can be demonised as extremists and then categorised as potential terrorists, as a way of intimidating those who are thinking of speaking out as well as punishing those who already have. 
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 16 September 2015

Why non-Muslim male Britons haven't got it in them to fight feminazism


Alison Saunders, *Head of the CPS*, wants more men to be convicted of rape on the accusation of drunken slags who were up for a shag anyway

Why is Alison Saunders of the *gender imbalanced* London CPS "disappointed" that John Terry was acquitted of a racially aggravated offence?

Did the Crown Prosecution Service exceed its powers as John Humphrys was suggesting to Alison Saunders?

Philosophical and legal questions on rape

How democracy has allowed feminazis and sluts to subjugate men

BBC Woman's Hour should be prosecuted for conspiring to corrupt the morals of the public but the DPP is a feminazi


UK in 'ever-losing battle' over online radicalisation, says Lady Warsi


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...