Nationalist parties unable to put the political establishment on the defensive

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NgRxunKAT0M

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/emma-west-%E2%80%93-victim-multicultural-judicial-system

Instead of whingeing about persecution, nationalist parties should have demanded to know why the CPS deliberately exacerbated racial tensions, instead of fining her for breach of the peace or being drunk and disorderly.

It is patently obvious that over-charging her with s 4 of the Public Order Act 1986 was deliberate and malicious and not in the public interest.

The legal phrases of malicious prosecution and abuse of process come to mind.

Shame I ain't Media Spokesman for the BNP, eh?

God forbid that Nick Griffin should allow anything constructive to be done to help the white working classes apart from whingeing about Muslims.  

Why did the CPS exacerbate racial tensions?

http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Emma-West-isn-t-racist-s-unwell-says-friend/story-19215366-detail/story.html#axzz2VC1w5nyt

A few decades ago, Emma West would have been treated as a drunk and dis. She would have been fined and that would have been the end of the matter.

Ditto John Galliano.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/80/section/91/enacted

Drunkenness in a public place
Any person who in any public place is guilty, while drunk, of disorderly behaviour may be arrested without warrant by any person and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £50.

For reasons best known to itself the CPS decided to exacerbate racial tensions.

http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Emma-West-isn-t-racist-s-unwell-says-friend/story-19215366-detail/story.html#axzz2VC1w5nyt

Would anyone like to explain why?