I complain about Greg Johnson

Sorry about it ending rather abruptly when I was talking about white genocide, but I am sure you get the gist of it. I don't know why that keeps happening.

The bit you missed was me complaining that he says he is too busy to discuss Heidegger and authenticity with me.

UK needs migration because Britons are 'so bloody stupid', says peer who wrote Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/18/pro-eu-peer-lord-kerr-says-uk-needs-migration-because-britons-ar/?fbclid=IwAR2pyzp7uZlT7Lw8nMEj4nYvbo0MUR0E1bY6_9F190ZMKLOemcvXfZjP7vQ

Fathers are sleazy and mothers are lazy: What foreign au pairs REALLY think of British parents
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

https://quran.com/24/2

https://quran.com/2/275-285?translations=20

White Nationalism is a busted flush if White Nationalists refuse to discuss what religion to follow post-pogrom
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/11/white-nationalism-is-busted-flush-if.html

Greg Johnson and I talk about sex and his latest book

Islam v Islamophobes

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/07/28/of-course-we-preach-hatred-anjem-choudary-and-gang-take-to-london-streets/

“Some people say we preach hatred. Of course we preach hatred,” cried Choudary emphatically. 

We should hate evil and love good.

How can we tell the difference between good and evil?

It is really very simple.

What is encouraged by the Koran is good.

What is forbidden by the Koran is evil.

What more do you need to know?

 To hear Anjem Choudary admit that he preaches hatred, go to 2:11

Muslims are assured of victory even if hopelessly outnumbered.

008.065
YUSUFALI: O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding.
PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence.
SHAKIR: O Prophet! urge the believers to war; if there are twenty patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a hundred of you they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they are a people who do not understand.

008.066
YUSUFALI: For the present, Allah hath lightened your (task), for He knoweth that there is a weak spot in you: But (even so), if there are a hundred of you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred, and if a thousand, they will vanquish two thousand, with the leave of Allah: for Allah is with those who patiently persevere.
PICKTHAL: Now hath Allah lightened your burden, for He knoweth that there is weakness in you. So if there be of you a steadfast hundred they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a thousand (steadfast) they shall overcome two thousand by permission of Allah. Allah is with the steadfast.
SHAKIR: For the present Allah has made light your burden, and He knows that there is weakness in you; so if there are a hundred patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a thousand they shall overcome two thousand by Allah's permission, and Allah is with the patient.


The NF was formed in 1967.

The BNP was formed in 1982.

Choudary came to the notice of the public in 2003.

Nationalism is nowhere, but Islam is in our consciousness.

From what I have observed of Muslims, Muslim men are more masculine, energetic, educated, intelligent, purposeful and better-organised than the Islamophobes who hate and fear them, evidenced in the utter collapse of the parties dedicated to Islamophobia, anti-semitism and hatred of other races. They are also younger and more technologically savvy than the senescent and technophobic Islamophobes.

Muslim men also tend to marry and have legitimate offspring and stay together for their children, while Islamophobes tend to be gay like Douglas Murray or tend to have bastards with their women who are mostly sluts. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html In other words, Islamophobes are irrational degenerates and irrational degenerate effeminates cannot win any war against those who are not degenerate who are neither effeminate nor irrational.

70% of convicted prisoners were singly parented.

The writing is on the wall, but that just means that the Islamophobes are just going to pretend that they can't read.

Atheist Islamophobes like to pretend they are more rational than Muslims, but anyone can see that it ain't so. You may hate what ISIS are saying and doing, but you would be clear about what they want and do. Has the UK government explained to your satisfaction what UK foreign policy is all about? Why won't they? MPs cannot explain its rationale even to themselves.

The British political establishment talks about extremism without being able to define it, other than to set British values in stone with their ridiculous definition of "democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs".

Imagine a Victorian Briton reading this arrant nonsense. Will he recognise these PC Libtard values as British values? Would he be appalled that this piece of arrant nonsense that states what British values are has been set in stone for all eternity?

Individual liberty to be a slut - how good is that for the long term national interest when all the degenerate bastards are born?

Traditionally married couples are to respect gaily "married" couples? Why should those who expend their time, energy and resources and make sacrifices to bring up the next generation be treated as equal to those who have purely recreational sex all their lives and don't care what happens to their country after they are dead?

The liberal political establishment will not be answering these questions nor will the liberal media be asking them. Both are hopelessly corrupt and unfit for their designated purpose.

The British government does not see as its role the duty to promote the long term national interest and the British media, instead of asking questions, look the other way.

Therefore the only alternative to this nonsense remains Islam, I have reluctantly concluded.

What makes a violent extremist?

There is no mystery to this. Muslims are more likely to make sacrifices for Muslims than degenerate selfish atheist libtards for other degenerate selfish atheist libtards.

E O Wilson:

"Selfishness beats altruism in groups. Altruistic groups beat selfish groups, and everything else is commentary."

"Human nature is hung in the balance: our behaviour driven by selfishness and our desire to co-operate to ensure the survival of the group."

"The tension between individual and group selection is the tension between sin and virtue."

God if He exists is Darwinian. He means to demonstrate to us that those who follow His laws most closely will triumph over those who flout His laws. For this reason it is not looking good for the West, even if ISIS do occasionally misinterpret the Koran. 

Richard Edmonds of the NF on the two ruinous world wars Britain inexplicably fought

7 August 2015
rttimes.co.uk

British foreign policy has been insane for approximately 100 years.

British domestic policy has been insane for approximately half that time.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/why-i-would-be-pleased-to-see-statue-of.html

When you ask a lunatic what he thinks he is doing, he sometimes manages to give what sounds like an intelligible answer.  However, when you enquire further, you discover that he has become catatonic and is not responding at all.

Why did Britain enter two ruinous wars?  Can any British historian explain this?

Actually, not even the Right who denounce the warmongers in the Liberal government of Asquith as well as the Conservative government of Chamberlain, can explain this.  

But I can.  The answer lies in Gilbert & Sullivan's IOLANTHE.

ACT II.
Scene. — Palace Yard, Westminster, Westminster Holly L, Pri-
vate Willis discovered on Sentry, R, Night.
^ SONG.— WILLIS. 

When all night long a chap remains
On sentry-go, to chase monotony
He exercises of his brains :
That is, assuming that he's got any.
Though never nurtured in the lap
Of luxury, yet, I admonish you,
I am an intellectual chap.
And think of things that would astonish you.
I often think it's comical (fal, lal, la !)
How Nature always does contrive (fal, lal, la !)
That every boy and every gal
That's born into the world alive
Is either a little Liberal
Or else a little Conservattve.
Fal, lal, la I
When in that house MPs divide.
If they've a brain and cerebellum too,
They've got to leave that brain outside
And vote just as their leaders tell 'em to.
But then the prospect of a lot
Of dull MPs in close proximity.
All thinking for themselves, is what
No man can face with equanimity*.
Then let's rejoice with loud fal, lal, fal, lal, la I
That Nature wisely does contrive (fal, lal, la !)
That every boy and every gal
That's born into the world alive
Is either a little Liberal
Or else a little Conservative.
Fal, lal, la! 

*  http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html  Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill never got anywhere, did it?

What does this mean?

Are MPs too stupid to see the cause of their own oppression?

Or are they too afraid to complain about it?

Why do successive governments contrive to facilitate immigration when they know their voters hate it?  Do they know what they are doing, or are they being a combination of mad, stupid and evil?

The answers to these questions are contained in the following:

1. Representative Democracy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligopoly  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy
2. Indiscriminate universal suffrage.  The welfare-dependent should be disenfranchised.  
3. The lack of protection of the rights of party members making them afraid to criticise or question party policy or their leader  http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html 
4. The lack of a one-party state whose operation would necessarily become more transparent than the current apparent abundance and confusion of choice.  Joining the wrong one could easily ruin your political career.  
5. Feminism and the Single Mother Factor that inclines politicians to the Left to attract the votes of spoilt, irresponsible and parasitical women who never think of the long term national interest.  http://www.examiner.com/article/how-the-single-mother-factor-was-responsible-for-obama-s-win-1
6. The matriarchy we have been living in is irrational and causes men to behave irrationally too.  http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/hflttww.html  
7. The principle of free speech is not understood, not even by the nationalist parties who complain about a lack of free speech.  
8. Nobody trusts anyone and no one can rely on anyone because they have no code of honour and the idea of behaving like gentlemen with a sense of fair play has long since been lost, if it ever existed.  

Claire Khaw prepared to raise funds to buy BNP from Nick Griffin to rehabilitate the decrepit image of nationalism

1. How much would I have to pay him to annul my expulsion in 2011 and put me into a position where I can contest the 2015 BNP leadership election?
2. Is it just him I have to bribe or are there members on the Advisory Council I would have to bribe as well?

If I am told the minimum he would be prepared to accept, I can go about the business of raising funds as soon as possible.

Then everyone would be happy, wouldn't they?

Who would be happy?

1. Existing BNP members who have seen the civic nationalist light.  
2. Former BNP members who have seen the civic nationalist light.
3. Beneficiaries of the ethno-nationalist exodus from the BNP - the NF and the BDP come to mind.
4. Nationalists in general because they would enjoy discussing the situation with each other and having hissy fits all over the place.  
5. The BNP as a whole because people will join either to vote for Nick Griffin or vote for me.  The BNP would then be fattened by increased membership.  
6. Nationalists who think lots of lovely publicity for the party and nationalism in general would be a good thing.
7. Nationalists who think I would be a good leader because they trust me and like me.  
8. Eurosceptics and disgruntled Conservatives, as well as Libertarians, and maybe even Muslims who would just love my ideas. 
9. Nationalists like Dave Jones who love to hate me and my ideas would also be over the moon. 
10. The lower middle classes and those who aspire to better themselves and are prepared to work hard and be sensible.  The New Model Civic Nationalist Antifeminist BNP would be a party that will craft policies specially to benefit the lower middle classes.  
11. The British people when the benign effects of my radical exciting non-racist low-tax low-regulation social conservative policies have had a chance to come to fruition.
12. Antifeminists who will be delighted to have a party that unambiguously challenges feminism.
13. Disgruntled Conservatives who will be delighted that a political genius such as me is taking an interest in their cause.
14. UKIP people who think it is just stupid and snobbish to ban ex-BNP members from joining their party.
15. Anyone who just enjoys a good ideological debate conducted in the public eye.   
16. Anyone who thinks that a one-party state is the only way to preserve the integrity of Conservatism.
17. Anyone who relishes discussing the disestablishment of the Anglican Church.
18. Anyone who relishes discussing the establishment of a new British religious institution that will replace the feminists, Reds and Commie Pinkos in the Church.  
19. My friends and supporters who want the new British national character to be known as being rational, robust and resourceful, instead of being degenerate, illegitimate and effeminate, and those who wish the concept of civic virtue to be restored.  http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Roman_virtues
20. Anyone who wants a referendum on the EU.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura
21. Anyone who wants a flat rate income tax of 20%.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums 
22. Anyone who wants to reintroduce fault into divorce by means of making it compulsory to agree a marriage contract before being allowed to marry.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_in_Islam
23. Anyone who knows that the institution of the family can only be supported by the institution of marriage, and anyone who knows that marriage is only for a man and a woman.  
24. Anyone who wants to repeal the Equality Act 2010 which is nothing more or less than totalitarian thoughtcrime legislation.  http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php  2:256  "There is no compulsion in belief."  
25. Anyone who wants to narrow the franchise to taxpayers only.
26. Anyone who wants to abolish inheritance tax.
27. Anyone who wants to abolish the civil partnership.
28. Anyone who wants to reintroduce capital punishment.
29. Anyone who wants to reintroduce corporal punishment.  
30. Anyone who wants to abolish the welfare state. 
31. Anyone who wants to abolish usury.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usury 
32. Anyone who agrees with me that the patriarchy is the lesser evil ie the beta male.
33. Anyone who believes in selective education and traditional teaching methods.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2009/02/new-model-comprehensive-by-tories.html

The list is quite long, is it not, considering how many people must already doubt my sanity for proposing this.

Oh, and I would start a BNP debating society to raise the standards of political debate.

Pretty comprehensive, huh?

Here is a message received 15/9 from a disgruntled BNP member:

"No meetings attended because no organisers thus no questions.  That was NG strategy.  No communication other than his own.  Minimal possibility of leadership challenge.  Hopes for enough mug donation to fund his own EU campaign.  Meanwhile blocks genuine democratic development.  Serves state interest."

 In fact, to achieve lasting credit, he should annul my expulsion now, announce his retirement and appoint me as Acting Chairman, without asking for payment at all.   But I know that is too much to hope for.  

I suggest that those of you who are going to the conference will discuss this earnestly and seriously with each other.  

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/2013-party-conference-1

3.2.1 Our Party is a party of British Nationalism, both ethnic and civic,
we are committed to the principle of national sovereignty in all our British
Homeland affairs and of self determination and sovereignty in all Indigenous
British affairs. We are pledged to the continued creation, fostering, maintenance
and existence of a unity and of the integrity of the Indigenous British and of the
government of the countries of England, Scotland and Wales and Northern
Ireland, and of Eire which together, and as further expanded in Schedule 1
(“Interpretation Rules”), are referred to in this, our Constitution, as our “British
Homeland”.

would be changed to:

"Our party is a party of civic nationalism committed to promoting the long-term national interest through the judicious balancing of the conflicting needs and wants of British citizens of different races, classes, religions, genders, ages and abilities. That we should have liberty is all that they can agree on, and it is the policy of this party that the British peoples shall have liberty from unnecessary laws and oppressive taxes.   We are pledged to maintain the United Kingdom of Great Britain and the establishment of meritocracy facilitated by social mobility. Social mobility can only be facilitated by a free and excellent selective education system."

So how much do you want, Nick?    

It is my hope that Nick Griffin will see the good sense of annulling my membership and putting me in the position of being able to be a leadership contender, without any financial inducements at all. It would create great interest in the party and attract new members who would either want to join the party to vote for or against me.

It just wouldn't look good on him if he asked for a large sum of money, even if he were given it.

If he asked for a small sum of money it would make him look cheap.

The best thing for him to do is just let me back into the party so I can sort out its image and ideology.

However, if he does require a financial payment, it would be as well to ask for it before the leadership contest in 2015, after which interest in the party would dwindle dramatically.

What is the least he will accept for putting into motion the steps that will give me control of the party?

When he names a price, after you have agreed the principle of accepting payment for giving me control of the party, then I can go about the business of getting the money together.  

Really, it is a win-win solution for everyone.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/is-200k-too-much-to-pay-nick-griffin-to.html mentions what Eddy Butler thought it would require to induce Nick Griffin to retire.

Those of you thinking of going to the conference should print this out and take it to the Blackpool Conference on 28-29 September 2013, so you can discuss it with each other.

It is no longer true that there are no new ideas in nationalism; I have delivered them by the lorry-load.  Sadly, however, not much attempt will be made to discuss them because these people don't like thinking, and don't like putting thoughts to action, and Nick Griffin won't want to give me any credit for any of my ideas.   I believe he even goes around calling me a Nazi.

Maybe you can put him right at conference.  Anyone who likes any of my ideas should of course get in touch.

Nationalist parties unable to put the political establishment on the defensive

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NgRxunKAT0M

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/emma-west-%E2%80%93-victim-multicultural-judicial-system

Instead of whingeing about persecution, nationalist parties should have demanded to know why the CPS deliberately exacerbated racial tensions, instead of fining her for breach of the peace or being drunk and disorderly.

It is patently obvious that over-charging her with s 4 of the Public Order Act 1986 was deliberate and malicious and not in the public interest.

The legal phrases of malicious prosecution and abuse of process come to mind.

Shame I ain't Media Spokesman for the BNP, eh?

God forbid that Nick Griffin should allow anything constructive to be done to help the white working classes apart from whingeing about Muslims.  

Nationalists who wish to remain politically active should join mainstream parties to subvert their liberal agenda from within

Any reading of Hope Not Hate will show that nationalism outside UKIP is in a state of deep disarray, afflicted by arrests, scandals, ideological confusion as they are.

If you are educated, personable, intelligent and don't mind joining the mainstream  parties in order to subvert their liberal agenda, then you should join the LibLabCon or UKIP and subscribe to this blog so that you are ideologically aware and effective at persuasion.   

If you have been a member of UKIP's prohibited list of parties at http://www.ukip.org/helpukip you should just join the LibLabCon if you can bear to.  

"Membership is not available to anyone who is or has previously been a member of

• the British National Party
• National Front
• British Freedom Party
• British People's Party
• English Defence League
• Britain First or 
• the UK First Party. 

Any applications made from people who are or have been members of these organisations will be refused, and any subscriptions collected will be refunded.

By applying for membership you certify that you are not and have never been a member of either of these parties."

From within the party you can change the views of the leadership and have access to more hearts and minds than if you were in one of those pariah  parties.

If you cannot bear to do that, and cannot bear not to be among like-minded people then then by all means be exploited by the likes of Nick Griffin and suffer the indignities of being mocked by the Reds and Far Left, as you wish.  At least you will enjoy a sense of comradeship, eh?  

Until you fall out with your former comrades.

As you can see from the exchange below, they are not really the best of kind of people, nor do they always act rationally or consistently.  Their grasp of the concept of principle is often confused with the personal.   You have been warned.

British Nationalist (now in National Front) Richard Edmonds tells us where he gets his underwear

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ILaNNTPw_Q

and also that the West is bankrupt.   

Why does the Traditional Britain Group dislike me?

Why has TBG disabled me from commenting on their Facebook page?

Apart from going to a few of their dinners some years back, I have had very little to do with them since the suicide of Mike Smith and after I joined the BNP.

How well I remember my surprise when I heard Gregory Lauder Frost speaking at a dinner I attended saying that forced repatriation must be implemented.

Is he in the NF then, I remember asking someone rather naively.  I was told he was far too posh to be in the NF.

I stopped attending once I accepted the invitation to join the BNP, though I accepted that it was through this dining club (which is what it really is) that put me in touch with other nationalists that eventually led to my invitation to join the BNP.

Since then I have had very little to do with them.  I have no particular interest in attending dinners in which diners preached to the converted without taking political action, in any case.   They were just a toothless dining club, I had concluded, and far too posh to do anything that smacked of genuine and effective political activism.  Imagine my surprise when I found that I had been blocked from following them on Twitter.  I really had no idea that a bunch of crusty old codgers could or would tweet or had discovered me on Twitter to take offence at my tweets.

Why had I taken an interest in TBG after all this time?  Someone had mentioned to me that many of them were into SSPX and that made me prick up my ears.

I checked out their Facebook page and discovered that they are having an all-day conference on 20 October as stated at http://www.eventbrite.com/event/4034557470?ref=ebtnebtckt

I thought I might attend and  posted on their Facebook page I was thinking of doing so but understood they  have some sort of a problem with me as I have been blocked from following them on Twitter.  The next thing I  knew I found myself disabled from commenting altogether.


Tom Price my Facebook friend kindly asked them on my behalf why they were blocking me, and this was the response he received:

Not really sure. All the members of the TBG committee are co-administrators of the page and at least three are very active promoting and moderating it. It may be that someone found her comments beyond the pale. Our Wall is in the public domain and we have to be careful of our public image as our enemies are watching all the time. From time to time numerous comments are removed and if people persist then they are blocked.

I certainly posted nothing at all that could be considered "beyond the pale" and merely asked why they seemed to be having a problem with me when I have had so little to do with them in recent years.

Oh, well.  I have saved myself £30 since they do not want to sell me a ticket, though I would have liked to have met Theodore Dalrymple.

AN ANALYSIS OF THE TRINITY WARD BY-ELECTION, BURNLEY by David Jones

David Jones

Though Autumn by-elections are nothing particularly special, Having been born in Burnley, and this key nationalist battleground being only seven-and-a-half miles from where I live, I was bound to take an interest in this one. The candidate, an old friend of mine (and fellow dry-stone waller) Steve Smith was coveted by both the North-West National Front (who have recruited several Burnley BNP veterans) and the Bradford-based Democratic Nationalists. in the end Steve elected to stand for the National Front because they were higher profile.

The literature took the form of cheap and nasty, badly designed, risograph printed leaflets proclaiming the NF policy of kicking the non-whites out of England, presented in newsletter format called "Burnley Nationalist", The NF put a lot of hours in, and no less five editions out,

As I see it the volume of leaflets, shoved through letterboxes by volunteers from as far as 50 miles away, should have overcome the quality - so we can only presume that it was the the "Stop Immigration - Start Repatriation" message that the voters were rejecting.

The NF must decide if the want to simply ram an unwanted "repatriation" message down the throats of the voters or employ some of the other tools of getting your people elected (better quality literature, demonstrating to voters you are competent at addressing issues that affect them, finding alternative nationalist policies that have a wider appeal etc...) Most voters who want repatriation also want their candidates to be a little more tactful about it, and most nationalist voters are agnostic on repatriation anyway. Showing the voters you have no tact will not work, even if they get twenty leaflets through the letterbox a day from you.

Having spoken to NF members, they are justifying this by saying "the voters are thick", "we were never going to win" etc. Others say, "we've made our stand". Of course it is all deluded nonsense. This year the NF' Deputy Chairman Kevin Bryan obtained respectable votes in nearby-Irwell ward, Rossendale, under the exact same electoral conditions that exist in Burnley, and the BNP have successfully taken the Trinity seat not so long ago.

Maybe the NF were just making a point, but it gives me no pleasure to see Steve Smith join Mark Leat (who got 2 votes in Stoke) and David Child (an Autistic BNP candidate from South London who also who got 26) as the poorest performing nationalists this year, nationalism cannot stand any more damage done and the damage done by this kind of a vote is very real. I'm sure the NF will do better next time but I say again the damage is done.

The fault is not Steve Smiths, while he was interim Chairman of the England First Party, he fought a much better campaign and united practically all the white voters in Burnley's majority Pakistani Ward of Daneshouse with Stoneyholme, we know that Steven is capable of better than this.

At this point I should point out that the BNP campaign for Trinity was not much better, they went from one extreme to the other, while I confess I haven't read their literature I am told it was just the type of shameless, locally-relevant, brand-promotion we are used to in the modern, "caring and compassionate" BNP. Sorry that won't get you your lost votes back either. .

Warm, fuzzy leaflets BNP leaflets promoting the BNP leadership containing nothing at all relevant to Burnley people still pulled in over three times the vote that the NF's much more intensive campaign did though. In my town, which has no history of successful nationalism I obtained a good 8.5% of the vote (253 votes) and believe me I have a lot of lesbians, yuppies and Muslim vote to overcome, plus a tarnished name. I find that is achievable because I;

1. I design quality, aesthetically-appealing literature.

2. Propagate a message that is both hard-hitting and dealing with relevant issues.

3. Have high profile in the town, regularly attend Town Council meetings and locals know who I am.

4. A reputation for sticking with my goals and giving local senior-establishment apparatchiks a headache.24 / 7.


I am fighting a Town Council by-election on October 25th, and it is my intention, as an Independent, to show my former and current friends throughout East Lancashire and the Calder Valley that there is a better way to do things. And if I get 26 votes I will be ready to stand corrected and take it all back.

The end of crude ethno-nationalism?

The result of the Trinity Ward by-election for Burnley Borough Council on 13 September 2012

Labour - Tony Martin - 493 (49.25)
Liberal Democrat - Stephanie Forrest - 256 (25.57)
Conservative - Tom Watson - 96 (9.6)
BNP - Derek Dawson - 95 (9.6)
UKIP - Craig James Ramplee - 35 (3.5)
NF - Steven Smith - 26 (2.6)

Majority 237
Turnout 1,001

The BNP claim to be both a civic and an ethno-nationalist party.  Actually, if they were really clever, they should drop race from their entire discourse.  But we know they are not really that clever and are being led by a man who has too much to lose.  Nick Griffin will not be sticking his neck out for you, BNP member or BNP supporter.   It is much more important to him to stay well within this comfort zone.  He knows which side of his bread is buttered - the EU side, for it is the EU who pays his and Nigel Farage's wages.

That is why these parties never get anywhere.  They are too busy wasting their time and energy in Brussels when they should be going up and down this country talking to the British voter, winning hearts and minds about leaving the EU.

But Brussels has created just the kind of culture and environment that these easily-impressed MEPs like, rubbing shoulders with bureaucrats and people whom they think are bigwigs.  That is why the Eurosceptic movement is precisely nowhere and neither Nigel nor Nick want Claire and Dave in their parties, however brilliant and bold they are, indeed, especially if they are brilliant and bold.

David Jones will not be mentioning race at all in his campaign (Polling Day 25 October 2012).   He will be talking only about issues that affect and will be of interest to all British citizens who live in this country.

David Jones - campaigning for family values and smaller government

There is SECRET Facebook group administered by a UKIP man who wants to sterilise women who want abortions

It is called Exchanging Ideas.   You can join this secret group if you request friendship from Stuart Hamilton, the backstabbing piece of shit who used to jointly administer the group with me.

We agreed that, since I had broken the rules of secrecy, I should be seen to be punished.  I agreed that my punishment would be a week's exile.

However, he soon put up polls about whether I should remain admin and then whether I should return at all.

Of course, if the boot had been on the other foot, I would have kept to my word about letting him return after a week, and left it at that.   However, these days, in slut and bastard Britain where even educated men have no grasp of the principles of fair dealing and keeping one's word, his behaviour was only to have been expected.

And so he has banned me permanently and made Mark Barnes, the UKIP man who wants to sterilise women who want abortions and to make non-white citizens of Europe second class citizens, the group admin.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/what-ukip-man-says-about-making-non.html repeats verbatim what he said about wanting to sterilise women who want abortions and making non-European citizens in Europe second class citizens.

I was content to have it as an open group, but Stuart Hamilton wanted it closed and then finally secret.

Were we sharing porn with each other or something of that nature?  NO.

Why was he so obsessed with secrecy?

Because he feared jeopardising his social life and his chances of future employment.

I went along with it because I was at the time content to post there, and did not at the time see the harm of the group being secret.

However, when I read that a UKIP member in Exchanging Ideas, Mark Barnes, was saying that he wished to sterilise women who want an abortion, and that he wished to make non-Europeans living in Europe second class citizens, I could not hep but want an answer to this question:

"Why is this intensely chauvinistic and misogynistic man who wishes to treat other races as second class citizens and sterilise women who want an abortion in UKIP while I am forbidden to join just because I  am ex-BNP?"

What Mark Barnes wants goes much further than the BNP after all.  He really should join the NF with views like his.  However, he is too cowardly and hypocritical to do so and already knows the NF are full of proles he despises and wouldn't be seen dead with.

Also, his wife might object and his business might suffer.

So there you are.  Anyway, Mark Barnes is currently administrator of this secret Facebook group full of people who fear to express their political views in an open group.

That group is now cursed.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/466234513398453/ is a new group I have set up, called PUBLIC debate which is an OPEN group, for people who are not afraid to say what they mean, and who are able to defend their views morally and intellectually, but if not, withdraw them.

UKIP Crodyon Chairman Joan Tyndall was formerly an NF member, I am told

http://croydon.ukip.org/articles/819-2010-general-election-cautious-optimism

I have been informed by a nationalist source that Joan Tyndall, Chairman of Croydon UKIP was a member of the NF.

Would anyone from UKIP care to tell me what will happen to this woman  if this is found to be true?

First the Reds came ..

http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/archive/ukip-at-the-crossroads

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came

First they came for the NF,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't in the NF.

Then they came for the BNP,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't in the BNP.

Then they came for UKIP,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't in UKIP.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

More praise from men for the Goddess of Reason

http://newsfromatlantis.freeforums.org/claire-khaw-a-woman-with-some-refreshing-views-t282.html

"I find her views 1000 times better than those of the BNP, who are absolute shit, almost as shit as the mainstream parties. Why? Because she actually gets the point that so many people in society don't. I voted for the BNP and National Front a couple of times, but such parties are completely pointless. You cannot change an entire culture with a shit political party which has an aura of white male sexual frustration about it." 

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t868460/
Someone on Stormfront describes me as "stunning" and it clear that a significant number of nationalists are "obsessed" by me.

I am dubbed the Goddess of Reason. at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/racial-harmony-and-inter-racial.html?showComment=1341851724662#c4858751905075547572  

WHY BRITISH NATIONALISM IS COLLAPSING AND THE UNITY OPTIONS ON OFFER by David Jones

Honoured Guest Blogger David Jones  (Over the Farm Gate)

I think, by now, even the most ardent sticks in the mud supporting Nick Griffin can, seeing the dismal election results, no longer all is fine and dandy in UK Nationalism.

The poor showing by the BNP in comparison to both other parties and their previous vote cannot be glossed over with sugar-coated begging letters from Welshpool. Confidence in Nationalist Politics is at an all time low. I know that because even I've been feeling the biting pinch upon the morale of all those that call ourselves English/ British Nationalists.

Despite a rash of "Unity Meetings" around the land, I fear that the agenda/ s at play are not unity but self/ brand interest.

There are essentially two currents flowing in that circuit.

The first is a push to promote the National Front, the main asset there being Richard Edmonds. This is not a genuine unity effort in my opinion, no disrespect to the ex-BNP officials now working hard within the NF, but a recruitment drive. When I was an NF member in late 2003, I was told that the NF believed that progress was only possible if the other parties are undermined and marginalised, that attitude in my opinion is part of the NF's DNA and will never change. Whatever the sound logic of that, the fact remains that other parties exist, and such an attitude is bound to rouse hostility from other groups. It did from me anyway, but I have a strong belief that submission to another group or its philosophy constitutes a strong personal defeat - hence my hatred of organised religion.

The second current is the Brons-Lewthwaite axis. This is a northern based push to promote an alliance of northern-based parties and rebel BNP members around the DN Party, and employing a sportingly co-operative Andrew Brons MEP as their main event, with support from the England-First and British Movement. This for all its faults will be the better option for those seeking competent organisers to work with. Their website and propaganda could do with a makeover though but they appear to know their business.

Caught up in the currents are the London-based IONA and New Right, who appear to be a in quarrel with each other but these can be dismissed as talking shops, and they have been pushed down into the flyweight division since their recent loss of the late Jonathan Bowden, the talented orator. We may safely disregard the BNP from the equation now as I think we already know.

Opens two distinct possibilities:

1. The vast number of independent nationalists and freelancers have an greatly increased chance of influencing the shape of things to come. If, that is, we can drag them away from their PC's and present our common demands and grievances. There is an enormous pool of talent going to waste here.

2. If the DN Party/Brons axis is centred in the North and the NF camp operates out of London, the exception being East Lancashire, there exists a strong possibility of infighting over the influence of nationalism in East Lancashire. With a strong NF presence in Rochdale & Rossendale that feels no love lost against the England-First Party in Preston and the increasing DN Party presence in Burnley then we could see the real battle lines drawn in this "unity effort".

Interesting times lie ahead. The NF wouldn't attend the Unity meeting I attended in Burnley and the theme there was "Nationalism in One County".

This could be a highly intriguing time for an independent nationalist hoping to fight a by election in nearby Todmorden in November, with the Lancashire County Council seats up next year in May 2013.

I don't want to miss this history in the making.

David Jones,
Todmorden, East Lancashire.

In praise of loyalist Griffinites of the BNP

They at least have got their heads screwed on.  There is no other party to go to.   

There is the NF which unashamedly and uncompromisingly states its desire to forcibly repatriate non-white British citizens.  Even the BNP abandoned this years go.

There is the British Freedom Party with its EDL add-on members, whose dress sense and demeanour could certainly not be said to be a credit to the British.   

There is the English Democrats, permeable and bland, whose strategy appears to be about taking any UKIP and BNP reject while boring the voter to death.   

Even after so many years of complaining about Nick Griffin's leadership, no one so far has emerged to rival him as leader.  

Why would the loyalists swap being on the inside of the party and being in the mainstream of nationalism and join a party certain to be even more ineffective and disappointing than the party they are already a member of?

(Ex-BNP members cannot even join UKIP who won't have anyone who was ever in the BNP.  It seems in this regard the Conservative Party is more forgiving.)

Can there really be such a lack of talent and courage in the nationalist movement?  Sadly, this appears to be the case, and so I reluctantly step into the breach and offer myself as leader.   

The only way forward is civic nationalism, ie non-racist nationalism.  And what better way of showing the voter you have changed your ways by having I, Claire Khaw, as your leader if you are a nationalist?

Now, let us be honest here.  If I were white and male, would nationalists not me falling over themselves begging me to be their leader?

Of course they would!

Nationalist Unity Meeting 17 May 2012

I enquired what was decided at the meeting.  My sources inform me that they discussed whether or not to form another party and get the 65 year old retirement aged Andrew Brons to be the figurehead.

I have no idea why nationalists would think that yet another nationalist micro-party with a leader older and slower than Nick Griffin, defeated in a leadership election, could ever be more successful than the current BNP, especially one that has decided to dissociate itself from me because it is pretending that I endorse the actions of Breivik when I have taken every care to say that Breivik is a terrorist and that it is possible for nationalists to gain influence even under the current rules, but only if they are strategically astute.

Perhaps it is yet another disease of the mind that Western men are currently afflicted by.

The last time I attended such a meeting, I told them that they needed to find a leader who is obviously better than Nick Griffin, but I fear that they either did not understand the implication of my words or cannot quite grasp that Andrew Brons is obviously not better than Nick Griffin, since he was defeated in a leadership contest.

If I had been allowed to attend, and not shunned because Richard Edmonds has chosen to pretend that I endorse the actions of Breivik (whom I had described as a terrorist on numerous occasions), I would have said the same thing, and doubtless they would have listened just as uncomprehendingly and carried on just as before.

I wonder if this proposed party that would have Andrew Brons as figurehead would have an ideology that is ethno-nationalist, or civic nationalist.   Perhaps it did not even occur to them to address this issue at their meeting.   Since it was mostly ex-BNP members who have now gone over to the NF, they will be going back to muttering darkly about forcible repatriation again, probably, seemingly oblivious to the fact that any attempt to do so would bring about civil war, and that  British citizens who have been born here have nowhere to be "repatriated" to.

It is terribly terribly sad that they do not seem to have realised that time has moved on or heard of the old Texan saying "If all you do is all you ever did, then all you'll get is all you ever got" - defeat and disappointment.

Most of my ex-BNP buddies have gone to the English Democrats (who are too bland and boring) or the NF (who are too full of stick in the mud dinosaurs who have not noticed that the non-white British citizens they would like to repatriate have been born here for three generations now).

Ironically and laughably, they like to pretend that they are more intellectually and socially respectable than me and claim falsely that I endorse Breivik's actions (even though they cannot find anything I have said in words and deed to prove this), when it is they who fear and hate Muslims more than me.

In fact, I do not fear Muslims at all.  In fact, I think there is much of their religion that the British used to follow before the Muslims arrived.   In fact, I propose that Islam - and a distinctly Anglicised form of it, with Anglican forms of worship in Churches with carols and hymns, pews and pulpits (but with Trinitarian elements excised) should be made the national state religion after the current lot of third-rate minds incapable of discussing morality beyond tolerating every damn single evil thing, openly gay priests, women, socialists, liberals and feminist clergymen have been defenestrated and dramatically disestablished.

Predictably, I have not been given the opportunity of putting it to put it to them that civic nationalism will give ethno-nationalists more of what they want than ethno-nationalism.  Perhaps they already know this, but don't care, as long as they can keep themselves busy going round ever-decreasing circles.

Even I would be give nationalists a sense of a new dawn than Andrew Brons ever would.  Many at the last meeting I attended complained of the tardiness and ineffectiveness of his actions, always too little, always too late.

I really do not think they want success, but prefer the failure that fuels their grievance, because that is all they ever knew and all they will ever know.   Put to them a new idea and they will behave in exactly the way a vampire would  if you offered them a phial of holy water or a wreathe of garlic.   You cannot help the Undead, especially if they do not want to be helped.

Perhaps the only future for the independent nationalist who refuses to give up is to infiltrate the established parties.   The Conservative Party would be the obvious choice, now that they have a seething simmering backbenchers' rebellion after having ousted Peter Bone, the most rebellious of the rebel Tory MPs.

Sadly, for most of my ex-BNP buddies, they will be too tribal and socially awkward to contemplate leaving the group of people they have met at their little social club that they fondly imagine is a political party.  

Photo taken with Kevin Watmough's phone last Thursday at Todmorden Flea Market

Taken by Steve using Kevin Watmough's phone at the flea market in Todmorden on Thursday 19 April

Kevin Watmough was in the picture, to the left of David Jones but Kev has edited himself out.

David has now been expelled from the British People's Party.

http://www.bpp.org.uk/bpptod2012.html has the BPP "Statement of Removal".

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/post-expulsion-statement-of-david-jones.html has David Jones' post-expulsion statement.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t881969/ has a thread asking "Dave Jones BPP-WTF's going on here?"

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t882196/ discusses his post-expulsion statement.


Is Nationalism really about not having yourself photographed with other races?  (Kevin Watmough made a point of cutting himself out of the photo.)

There is now talk about the BPP merging with the NF.  If David and I have in any way advanced the cause of nationalist unity, then I am glad.  It is actually easier to have all the ethnos in one-party rather than dotted about here and there in their tribal divided way being stand-offish with each other.

John Tyndall:

"The little men who talk about uniting Britain, the white race, Europe or whatever you prefer, cannot even unite themselves. Any talk of a common fight against a common enemy is treated by them as a sinister plot to undermine their own precious private identities."

The Right "... is an incohesive mass of jealously squabbling tin-pot Caesars, more concerned with the pursuance of private vendettas than with the aim of ultimate national salvation."

When a foreigner arrives and asks the locals "Take me to your leader" that is precisely what she wishes to be done, and not be asked silly questions such as "Er, which leader do you mean?"

I actually understand a little why they might hate and fear me so much though.   Even if they thought I would be the best person for the job, they wouldn't let me do it because of their white male pride.   They would rather have the weeds of Ethno-Nationalism than the fruits of Civic Nationalism, I know, I know.

Some of them perhaps fear that I might "take over" and turn Britain into a Caliphate, who knows?

There are some who think I am too friendly with Griffin because of that photo at
http://twitpic.com/9acwig

My expulsion, quasi-proscription and then being blocked from following Nick Griffin's tweets would suggest that he and I are not on the best of terms.

Perhaps they fear that I am creating a Cult of Personality.  Yes, I have to admit that.  There is no point in entering politics and then being shy and retiring because people will just ignore you and forget you and not know what you stand for.

I will do anything within reason and the law to get myself noticed and talked about, in order to promote myself and my ideas.

The wiser ones will already know that I can accomplish more in a shorter space of time than they can, because I am neither male nor white.   I also do not have a wife who would divorce me for my political views.

If you are considered a pariah and wanted someone to represent people like you and promote your interests, would you hire someone in a similarly lowly position to represent your interests?

Would a sane lunatic wish another lunatic to represent his interests?  I rather think not.  If he were a sane lunatic he would choose someone who was not a lunatic either.

Of course, the liberals consider me a pariah because I now do not have a party, but that can be easily remedied by starting one, perhaps with David Jones, representing Ethno- and Civic Nationalist Unity that is intended to rival and surpass the BNP and give its activists better working conditions and more rights.

What is there not to like about this idea, once you have gotten over the fact that I am female and not white, as long as I do my job which is to make Nationalism intellectually and socially respectable?

It is not like you are doing the job so well that you don't need any help.

It is not as if I am not offering you all something new, exciting and different.  I am offering you something that will change the existing order, sooner rather than later.

Doubtless you will be a little suspicious of my motives, but I am only doing this because I can't bear to watch you all wasting your time, dithering about and literally destroying yourselves.

I am not the sort who will watch a drowning man drown when I could easily throw him a rope or a life saving ring.
  
I promise to stand aside for anyone who is better suited for the job when he appears on the scene, but not before.

In any party that I form, the noble nationalist tradition of having a leadership election ever year will be established as soon as the membership numbers and available talent make it a worthwhile exercise.  I will be the most exciting caretaker leader you can ever hope to have.

I ask again: what is there not to like?

A demonstration of how nationalists are their own worst enemy

This was what started as a light-hearted discussion that generated into the unfriending of me by the wife of the leader of the British People's Party.

By publicising this exchange I do not feel I am betraying a confidence, since Facebook is semi-public anyway and I know my walls are regularly mined for information and used as a notice board amongst nationalists.

All who write on my walls should know this by now.

This exchange demonstrates:

1.  the self-destructive tendencies and the essential immaturity of the ethno-nationalists, as well as their divisions.

2.  the havoc caused by an interfering woman who is not even a member.

3.  that not everyone is made for politics  (The "Far Right" may have their strong views about Jews, Muslims and foreigners but they mostly lack the background, character and temperament for the sustained effort of politicking.  There is already a dearth of talent in the big parties anyway, so it should not surprise you to learn that this is even worse in the smaller Eurosceptic parties whose members are conscripted by their grievance.  Politics is a vocation, because only someone who has a calling would wish to undergo the thankless task of standing up for principles and then being shot in the back by the very people you had thought are supposed to be on the same side as you.)

4.  political activism is not about attending anti-Islam demos the odd weekend, having a day out with your mates and a drink afterwards

5.  politics is about getting the balance right between standing for your principles and yielding where you must

6.  politics is about sustained effort that permeates all your life and thinking and David Jones, the BPP Town Council candidate for 3 May, is the only nationalist I have met so far who understands this at both a theoretical and practical level.  He certainly does not deserve to have his efforts denigrated by someone who is supposed to be on his side and who is not even a member of the party.

THE POST YESTERDAY THAT LED TO THE ROW

Shit-Stirring but Frequently Helpful FB Friend LG
Rumour has it in the political scene that you are vigorously keen to join this movement. Will you please confirm it, Claire? I do know you have been considering this http://www.greensocialist.org.uk/ags/  for some time.

LG
Do you think you and Kev [leeader of the BPP] might consider an electoral pact with the Alliance for Green Socialism, Kathleen [wife of leader]?
14 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
If I were allowed to join the BPP, it would create quite a stir, wouldn't it? Hmmmmmm ....
14 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
The BPP would get a bit of publicity .... The NF would throw stones at BPP members, probably, and beat them with sticks, but it would be so much fun!
14 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
 ‎It would be so nice if Dave [Jones of Todmorden] and I could be in the same party!!
14 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
I think that is a lovely idea!
14 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Kate and Kev and Dave and Claire all in the same party - racial harmony!

Imagine: Searchlight praising us and Hope Not Hate interviewing us ...
14 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
I don't!!
14 hours ago · Like

LG
I think you'd generate attention to and interest in the party, given your wide readership. Kev used to meet with a Muslim to share information, united by their common anti-Zionism, so he isn't as closed-minded as he might appear.

Claire has been an EXCELLENT influence on David! He understands the value of unity and compromise for the long-term, wider cause, while remaining principled and relentless in maintaining his racialist views. Dave and his ilk are the best chance White Nationalism has in Britain.
14 hours ago · Unlike ·  1

Claire Khaw
Oh, please, please, please can I join the BPP, Kate? Can't we have multi-racial National Socialism?
14 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
Pretty please?
14 hours ago · Like

LG
Go on, Kate! Give her Honorary Aryan status, a privilege created just for her. She could even sign a document under your auspices agreeing to repatriate herself should the BPP seize power!
14 hours ago · Unlike ·  1

Claire Khaw
I promise that everything I do in British politics will be to help the white race!
13 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
Do you doubt my sincerity, Kathleen?????
13 hours ago · Like

LG
You should send an e-mail to Kevin Watmough with your offer to join as an Honorary Aryan willing to repatriate herself. Copy and paste the e-mail to your blog and then publicise his response. If not fruitful, the exchange will at least be humorous.
13 hours ago · Unlike ·  2

Claire Khaw
I will let Kate discuss this with Kev in her own time. I do understand the delicacy of the matter.
13 hours ago · Like

LG
http://www.democratic-republicans.us/english/english-non-whites-who-love-adolf-helpful-white-american-rancher-shot-dead-by-mexicans

ENGLISH Non-whites who love Adolf; helpful white American rancher shot dead by Mexicans
www.democratic-republicans.us
Yet another former Marine (and former CIA analyst who then got disgusted and wok...
See more

13 hours ago · Like ·

LG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxCzwz7zTco&skipcontrinter=1

Islam and the Nazis
www.youtube.com
In 1941, Haj Amin al-Husseini fled to Germany and met with Adolf Hitler, Heinric...
See more
13 hours ago · Like ·

LG
Kevin and Kate ought to know that they have nothing to fear with your membership of and co-operation with the BPP. The Führer's beliefs and actions can serve as a precedent for this.
13 hours ago · Unlike ·  1

Claire Khaw
‎"I promise that everything I do in British politics will be to help the white race, while being fair and just to the other races who are British citizens." There.
13 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Yes Claire, do email Kev and enquire! I'd be most interested in his response!
13 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
I thought you might put a good word in for me, Kathleen!
13 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw We will be on the cover of THE ROLLING STONE!
13 hours ago · Like ·  1

Kathleen Watty
I'm too fat for such publications!
13 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Haha Watty just said well she can apply but I'm keeping the money hahaha!!!! What a typical Yorkshireman's response!
13 hours ago · Like ·  1

David MountainMan Jones
You lot eh?
12 hours ago · Like

LG
Would you be happy for Claire to join the BPP, David?
12 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
Not if it would cause this kind of ruckus, I'm happy to explore ways of working with her on the internet. It would not be politic for me to say but I favour a restructuring that allows non whites to be active official supporters while keeping a white party
12 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
It is akin to a capital punishment favouring party welcoming support from murderers. I like Claire but she has no place in or around the BPP.
12 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
Maybe not in but around is another matter.
12 hours ago · Unlike ·  1

David MountainMan Jones
That around is an open question for me. Do I stop a black man  from voting for me, displaying my poster, telling people to vote for me. Around is such a loose term.
12 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
What if the Capital Punishment Party decides it wants an assasin?
12 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Votes are votes are votes are votes.
11 hours ago · Like ·  1

Kathleen Watty
You can't stop anyone from voting for you Dave. But kissing their arse to facilitate it is a no-go.
11 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
I think it is about kissing the minimum number of arses to get where you want. You always have to kiss *some* arse.
11 hours ago · Like ·  1

Kathleen Watty
Non-white arse is not kissable when you're in the BPP.
11 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw So the BPP doesn't care about getting anywhere in politics?
11 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
Apart from forcible repatriation of every non-white arse, what else does the BPP want?
11 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
The BPP is happy to progress as it is without kissing non-white arse. They are principled racialists.
11 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Apart from forcible repatriation of every non-white arse, what else does the BPP want?
11 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Www.bpp.org.uk - there is plenty of information on there, Claire. Or you could of course ask the leader!
11 hours ago
· Like

Claire Khaw
I just wondered what YOU consider important, Kathleen.
11 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
I'm not a member.
11 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
But surely you have your views on what is the next important thing after repatriation, whether or not you are a member?
11 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
I believe they should focus on issues such as the elderly freezing and starving to death while the government hands over millions in foreign aid for a start. They need policies which everyone can relate to.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
I don't understand why you have not merged with the NF. In what regard do you differ in political objectives?
10 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
To be honest I'm not au fait with NF policies. BPP are openly national socialist, NF aren't I don't think? There are subtle differences but of late the two are working well alongside each other.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
You are not getting anywhere, are you?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/10171849


It won't be long before the very existence of parties like the BPP will be deemed to incite racial hatred.

Jailed student loses Muamba appeal | UK news | The Guardian
www.guardian.co.uk
Liam Stacey, 21, of Pontypridd, south Wales, sobbed as he was taken away followi...
See more
10 hours ago · Like ·  1 ·

Kathleen Watty
Then we have a lot in common, Claire.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
About not getting anywhere? Well, I try to get round things and not do more of the same.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Ultimately, I will get somewhere because I already get the publicity *in my own right*.
10 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Whatever your tactics, they are not working. You're still as much a nobody as you were, you just don't accept it. You're an Internet nuisance, that's about it.
10 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
We shall see, won't we, Kathleen? Being an Internet nuisance will have to do for the moment.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
The important thing is that I am known to a wide range of people, eg nationalists, Muslims, Jews, Labour, Tories, UKIP etc. My range is rather wider than being occasionally mentioned in Searchlight and Hope Not Hate.
10 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
There have been parliament debates about Kevin's activities. You do follow politicians on Twitter but it just doesn't have the same ring to it.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
I'll have a Google.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_People%27s_Party_(2005)


Well, I *nearly* had a Wikipedia entry to myself.

The British People's Party, also known as "BPP - Putting Britons First" is the t...
See more
10 hours ago · Like ·

Kathleen Watty
Why don't you just write your own?! I think that is what everyone does anyway. I don't think Kev has a Wikipedia entry.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
No, he hasn't. Writing my own would be far too egotistical. I like to think that one day someone will write it for me.
10 hours ago · Like ·  1

Kathleen Watty
Ask LG to - problem solved.
10 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
I don't think I have done anything noteworthy yet except causing nationalists to have a hissy fit at me.
10 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Agreed.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Still, it's a start!
10 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
I have never kissed anyones arse in my life, not Kevs, not my Dogs, not Claires, not Black voters, not yours, not the NF's (definently not theirs) i am my own man and always will remain so.
10 hours ago · Like ·  1

Kathleen Watty
Dave why are you STILL slagging the NF?
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Is being nice to people and saying "May I rely on your vote?" kissing arse??
10 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Depends who they are.
10 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
Because they treat me like shit, i repeat i am my own man. Not bound by any proclamation or decree. I spent my life being treat like shit and taken for granted and won't allow people to get away with it just cos its politically convenient.
10 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
I don't mind offering to help somebody who i'm asking to pay my wages. If I was a councillor my duty would be to the town, not just as an ambassador for nationalism.
10 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Huh. The ethnos can't even unite amongst themselves. I don't think they are being serious at all. They are *playing* at politics.
10 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
When you stand for election you are asking for the priveledge of representing the town you live in. You are not there to massage your own idelogical dogmas or grandstand in front of the movement. Such councillors do not usually last long. Its a job.
9 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
It is just a *hobby* for them, especially the ones who go on demos. That is how Kate and Kev can afford to "stick to their principles" and not "sell out".
9 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Therein lies the difference. Dave is trying his best to get on in the arena of real politics and elections. If you care for the white race you should be encouraging him for all his hard work instead of demoralising him.
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
He is the most dedicated white nationalist I have met IMHO.
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

Kathleen Watty
As opposed to Claire who sits in her spare room posting shite on forums and getting banned from meetings?
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
He has stuck to his principles more than, say, Eddy Butler, in an increasingly difficult environment.
9 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
I don't mind being banned from meetings after discovering what a waste of time they are. It is just a bunch of old dinosaurs getting together to chew the cud while they whinge about the government and Jews.
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
They actually don't want new ideas and new people because it is too unsettling for these old codgers! What can you do with people like that? They just want to whinge at meetings, and, er, that's it ....
9 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
I try to do my best and struggle to comprehend the arguing, your dammned if you do and dammned if you don't.
9 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Perhaps you could fund his political campaigns, Claire? Put your money where your mouth is?
9 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
Why would I fund a member of a party that won't even let me join it, Kathleen? Do you take me for a mug?
9 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
If you so fervently support Dave, then do something to help him. Leaflets etc all need paying for.
9 hours ago · Like

David MountainMan Jones
Kate if this arguing continiues i'll find a way of funding my own campaigns and save you both the bother of having this argumen. As I see it now my campaign is invaluable to todmorden, nationalism, the bpp and my consience.
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

Claire Khaw
Are you sure Kev wants you to pick fights with Dave, Kathleen?
9 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
I am not really sure what you even think you are doing picking fights with people who are supposed to be on your side. What are you trying to achieve anyway?
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

David MountainMan Jones
I don't want to pick a fight with anybody but i am no mug either. Kev and I work well together I just wish more people would take Town Hall electoral politics seriously and not nurse fantasies of a Munich Putcsh, which also failed by the way.
9 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
I am certain that the cause of most of the arguments is you, Claire. Constant tagging, wondering what me or Kev thinks. You're a shit stirrer, this is entertainment for you Claire. You spend your days trying to cause arguments, it is your little hobby. Well no more with me. I'm not playing your puerile games. You can piss off.
9 hours ago · Like

Claire Khaw
I asked because I was genuinely interested to know your views. Anyway, LG started this thread, and you just came over without anyone tagging you!
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

David MountainMan Jones Kate
I thought you'd credit me with more intelligence than that. I am not "bad influenced", as you earlier suggested, by anybody. This rows been mainly about me and i've an intensive election to fight so i'm bowing out of this argument. Can it.
9 hours ago · Like ·  1

David MountainMan Jones
Any facebook friend is entitled to discuss me if i don't like it i block them.
9 hours ago · Like

Kathleen Watty
Well you and Claire can continue your "friendship" in any manner you please. She's a shit stirrer and you seem to support her digs Dave so that's that.
9 hours ago · Like



Why I would be the best leader for the British New Right
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/why-i-would-be-best-leader-for-british.html

Nick Griffin fears to comment on Liam Stacey's disproportionate punishment - BNP not fit for puropse

http://www.facebook.com/OfficialNickGriffin

http://www.bnp.org.uk/

Liam Stacey - a white male student - was sentenced on 28 March for 56 days because he sent offensive tweets about a black footballer.

Nick "la partie c'est moi" Griffin and the BNP website has said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING on the subject.

If that is not evidence enough that he, his vassals and villeins are really not fit for the purpose of opposition, then I don't know what is.

Do NOT vote BNP if you are a nationalist.

Vote for any Eurosceptic party in the GLA elections - UKIP, NF - but don't vote BNP, ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE A NATIONALIST.

Nationalists should tell this man in no uncertain terms what they really really think of him and his leadership and the way he has run the party as if it were his own personal fiefdom by voting UKIP or NF, even as they hold their noses.

http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/london-2012-london-assembly-constituency-candidates/201220145

http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/london-2012-london-assembly-london-wide-candidates/201220151

http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/london-2012-mayor-of-london-candidates/201220140

My first choice candidate will be Ken because I despise liberal warmongering, and prefer him to a piece of gutless Etonian shit who needs a haircut.

I shall have to hold my nose and vote UKIP even if they are a bunch lily-livered tossers who won't have me in their party because they like to pretend I am racist because I was once a member of the BNP.   (This is actually ultra vires of their constitution.  For those who are not familiar with Latin, this means that the UKIP constitution does not give the the powers to do this, and their prohibition against even former members of political parties they disapprove of means they have exceeded the powers of the rule they relied on which is explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/ukip-to-readmit-claire-khaw-as-member.html)

Rodney Atkinson (brother of Rowan "Mr Bean" Atkinson), whom I saw last Friday will be the first to agree with me about the corruption of UKIP.

Everything I have proposed is RACIALLY NEUTRAL and LIBERTARIAN because it involves the repealing of an existing Act of Parliament.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/laws-i-would-repeal-if-i-were-in-power.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/why-i-would-be-best-leader-for-british.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/my-prospectus-for-dictatorship-of-one.html is where you find more of my thrillingly radical political ideas that will send a shiver down your spine.

I am also a Civic Nationalist (who wishes to devise and follow policies that are only for the National Interest, and never the personal or party interest) who wishes to question, challenge and finally laugh feminism right out of the room.