My comments under the video: Kevin Michael Grace On Author David Irving

MY BOOK CLUB SUGGESTION FOR LUKE FORD & CO

The measurable difference between an atheist (sexually liberated and dying childless) and a theist (staying married for the sake of the children, with the prospect of having legitimate grandchildren and descendants) is the way they behave.

If matriarchy is the problem, patriarchy is the solution.

If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle.

Christianity is kaput and Judaism is for Jews only. Hinduism and Buddhism are alien to Western traditions.

Gentlemen, I am afraid you have no choice but to adopt the ideology closest to the one that first brought you success and empire.

Your next book for your Book Cub should really be the Koran.


ON WAR AND EMPIRE

I tried to suggest to Irving that the British government would be even more invested in suppressing his version of history than the Jews themselves, but he wasn't interested in discussing it either. Over the years, people have been trying to suggest to him that WW1 is linked to the reasons for WW2, but he just wasn't interested. WW1 and WW2 were of course two ruinous British imperialistic wars gone wrong with two Pyrrhic victories. This is actually more interesting than yet another pogrom against the Jews because they must deep down be used to this sort of thing by now with their history. But WW1 and WW2 was an imperial nation shooting itself in the head twice . Britain basically played double or quits and lost. What we have to understand is this: thalossocracies are quickly formed and quickly disintegrate. Like Britain, America is also a thalossocracy.


FREE SPEECH AND SEXUAL LIBERATION

The narrowing of the boundaries of free speech is directly related to the expansion of sexual freedom. You have been bribed by the bribes of feminism and on each occasion you eagerly drink from the cups of poison regularly offered you to keep you quiescent. Why keep blaming the Jews when it is your failed religion that does not protect you from yourselves?  Don't the gentiles of gentile America have their own censorship laws? If they fail to enforce them, must they blame Jews again? These groups just push, and when each time leaderless beta males only yield like water, then they will keep pushing, won't they?

Curt Doolittle's sayings and doings on Propertarianism

Curt Doolittle:

How do men argue differently from women? Men argue strategically and women argue tactically. Men argue empirically and women argue emotionally. Men worry about the long term, women only care about the short term. The feminine method of argument has a structure and grammar.  Male argument is about science and law, female argument is about morality.

Western males have invented truth, apparently. This is very ethno-centric and obviously untrue suggesting that non-Western males cannot tell the different between falsehood and truth. Doolittle says men will speak the truth though the heavens fall, but women will do the opposite. Women will make an excuse for anything and have no sense of reciprocity. But this is not true, is it? You can also tell that a male politician is lying by the fact that his lips are moving.

We compromise with our women because we have to reproduce. We could do what the Muslims do to their women. We just have to put violence on the table and say 'Well, the end result is that this is no longer good for us. Conservatives have these values and they are better than your values empirically. Our values are eugenic, productive and evolutionary. Yours are dysgenic and unproductive and also damaging to the planet for that matter, so I don't see why we should co-operate any more. So the idea that we should keep the government of the United States or any of our governments intact rather than break them up so the people who want to go right go right and the people who want to go left go left and libertarians go wherever they choose is a great idea, but the idea that we are going to tolerate this any more, it's just off the table, so we'll just take it off the table. The eugenic people can go one way and the dysgenic people can go another. And we're able to do that. We no longer have to compromise, so we can separate. 

ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM sounds an oxymoron. Why not say meritocracy?

Naval powers get excessively libertarian and commit suicide, military powers tend to get excessively Conservative and fail to compete technologically.

Thalossocracies are by definition scattered empires and harder to keep together. Compare Britain to Russia and China.

The reality of blood and soil, race and empire

What the original people of an empire must understand is that once an empire has acquired enough land and peoples, the descendants of the people who did all the fighting will not get the credit if they suffer from degeneracy. It is the descendants of the peoples acquired who will end up receiving preferment because they are more anxious to please their imperial masters.

There must be parents who prefer their adopted children more than their own offspring if the former is industrious and deferential while the latter lazy and insolent.

Brexit because people feel a great loss of control over their lives

Today, Bourne director on Bond and Brexit https://t.co/NF4772UABS "People feel a great loss of control over their lives." #Brexit

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2016

George Bernard Shaw:

A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as a healthy man is of his bones. But if you break a nation’s nationality it will think of nothing else but getting it set again.

What do we want?

A sense of national identity and a competent government run by an alpha male leader we believe to be looking after us rather than feminists, foreigners and LGBTs.

When do we want it?

We should have it a long long time ago. Is a May administration stuffed with Yes Women and emasculated Yes Men who are charisma free zones in awe of her going to get us this?

What do you think will happen as a result of this loss of control?

More importantly, what do you think of the calibre of this MP? He was a Brexiteer who supported that unreliable and flighty woman Andrea Leadsom who displayed her legs at every opportunity to her male supporters, thus destroying the chances of this country getting a Prime Minister who is both a Brexiteer and not a woman.

Male British politicians have so utterly lost control over the situation that more of them are prepared to support an unreliable woman rather than a competent and clever male politician because they are mesmerised by her legs and she reminds them of their mummy.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/the-41-male-tory-mps-who-let-may-in-by.html

Wow! What a great reshuff so far. Very pleased with the top appointments. Extremely astute appointing by @theresa_may conducted at speed

— andrew murrison (@murrisonMP) July 13, 2016

Bowled over by strength & power of @theresa_may on social justice. Looking forward to thoughts on healthcare.

— andrew murrison (@murrisonMP) July 13, 2016

And there was me thinking @theresa_may meant business as usual. V shrewd reshuff so far 😊

— andrew murrison (@murrisonMP) July 14, 2016

What do you think having such weak male politicians will do?

It will further radicalise Muslims who are already disgusted by the degenerate and emasculated state of non-Muslim men and the egregiously low standards of sexual morality of non-Muslim women in Britain, of course. In short, a May Administration with a lesbian Education Secretary no less will only encourage and provoke our enemies.

Increasingly, radicalised Muslims will see it as their duty to take up the cudgels of exterminating the Amalekites that the Jews have given up on.

Who are the Amalekites?

I would suggest that Modern Amalekites are the peoples who do not abide by Noahide laws, even though rabbis claim that they have all died out. The Amalekites are an eternal metaphor for the ever present temptation of having low standards of sexual morality that ultimately produces a sexually degenerate matriarchy causing the decline and fall of your civilisation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/the-neanderthals-were-amalekites-god.html

A failed attempt to have a sensible discussion about Western foreign policy

In other words, a drunken yob. Mohammed Emwazi: Tanzanian officer recalls airport arrest for drunk and disorderly. http://t.co/V0XfhB5Fnx
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick It seems Mohammed Emwazi had a youthful indiscretion prior to joining ISIS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@ntfem ISIS is piracy and needs an equally ruthless force to kill it. Special forces with open rules of engagement.
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick The English considered a nation of pirates by the Spaniards. Perhaps joining ISIS like running away to sea in times past?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@ntfem Indeed. But many English privateers acted under the Kings warrant.
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick The Spaniards thought Francis Drake no better than a pirate, I am sure, when he raided their galleons for gold.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for terrorist offences.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick It is time for the British to examine geopolitics away from the narrow prism of being America's poodle and cat's paw.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@ntfem You mean the gold that the Spanish conquistadors butchered the South American Indians for?
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick You are taking a rather narrow view of things, I am afraid. Do try to see things from the point of view of the Spanish.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick In those days, those who could acquire empire did so without thought of the so called human rights of the conquered.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@ntfem No I have a very wide view of history thank you. At the time we were at war with the Spanish.
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick If the Spanish saw the English as pirates then we should reflect on how NATO members are regarded by the non-NATO world.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick It is probably very hard for you to accept that Britain is no more than an US aircraft carrier.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick The English were well-known for being slavers too and also for being drug dealers who forced opium on the Chinese.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@ntfem Why are you making assumptions of my knowledge and starting an argument with me?
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick It is infantile to pretend that the English acquired their world empire for entirely altruistic reasons. Please do grow up.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@ntfem Where did I mention altruism this morn you rude individual.
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick You seem quite unable to accept that not everyone shares your self-righteous chauvinistic view of Western foreign policy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick You were pretending that the English were morally superior to the Spanish, I believe.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@ntfem 61k tweets and no one retweets or favs them. Obviously a nutter. Goodbye.
— Preserved Killick (@PreservdKillick) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick Do u perhaps think that Western foreign policy is perfectly moral and no sane and moral person would find it objectionable?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick How can you tell that no one retweets or favourites my tweets?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

@PreservdKillick I don't think you have heard of the Wolfowitz Doctrine, have you? People who haven't should be disenfranchised IMHO.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 8, 2015

And then I was blocked.

Jonathan Bowden: Tolerance & Empire, Leftist Delusions, Islamification, Labour Liars, British Future

Full text: bin Laden's 'letter to America'