Translate

Showing posts with label gender. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gender. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

The badges of identity


  1. Country of Birth
  2. Country of Residence
  3. Language spoken
  4. Religion/Politics
  5. Class
  6. Gender
  7. Age
  8. Marital status and whether a parent
  9. Sexuality
  10. Race (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NATIONALITY)
  11. Nationality (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH RACE)


People who confuse race with nationality tend to be not the brightest or best educated of people and have trouble understanding abstract ideas.

Race is something about yourself you cannot change (unless you are Michael Jackson and prepared to have cosmetic surgery.

Nationality is something you can acquire or lose, like your passport(s). Some people have more than one, someone people don't even have one.

Saturday, 24 October 2015

Feminists hoist by their own petard when they say men cannot be women

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3287810/Germaine-Greer-accuses-Caitlyn-Jenner-wanting-steal-limelight-female-Kardashians.html

The petition, which was started on Change.org by Rachael Melhuish, women's officer at Cardiff University students' union, alleged Greer has 'demonstrated misogynistic views towards trans women, including continually misgendering trans women and denying the existence of transphobia altogether'.

1. You cannot be guilt of misogyny if the people you are supposed to hate are not even women.

2.  Someone born with a penis can never be a woman and someone born with a vagina can never be a man. The reasons are rooted in biology. Males have XY chromosomes and females have XX chromosomes.

3.  Saying someone who is not a woman is not a woman is not hating them. It is only telling the truth and telling the truth may cause people who want to deny the truth to hate you.

4. Why is the state or anyone telling us whom we may not hate?

5. Telling people they cannot hate you is very likely to make them hate you.




The question Kirsty Wark should have asked Germaine Greer:

"If gender is indeed a construct then surely a man doesn't need to have a vagina to become a woman? He just needs to feel that he is a woman and have the outward appearance of a woman convincing enough to make other men think he is a woman and/or want to have sex with him under the impression that he is female."

On this matter, it would appear that the trans have the upper hand in this argument, if it is the case that gender is merely a construct ie our assigned gender roles are imposed on us by society which we are free to transcend at will. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_construction_of_gender_difference

That would have been the really interesting question for Kirsty Wark to ask, so it was really too bad she missed this golden opportunity. It would be fun to hear Julie Bindel attempt to answer it too.


Monday, 2 June 2014

How who we are allowed to have sex with affects the quality of our government

Which version do you prefer?

VERSION A:

Why sluts are bad for your race, nation and civilisation, whatever your race
Because it is OK for women to be sluts these days, women these days choose the alpha male. The alpha male is therefore the male who gets the most offers of sex from females.

The beta males who observe this then ape the behaviour of this male to whom sluts have conferred alpha status.

Sluts are stupid irresponsible and immoral women, so they are bound to choose badly and for bad reasons.

By saying it is OK for women to be sluts the characters and morals of men are ruined, precipitating a vicious cycle of degeneracy and decline.

To correct this parlous state of affairs, the practice of slut-shamiing should be re-established so that the alpha male is again chosen by beta male.

Sluts can still offer themselves to alpha males but if they get knocked up they will be given 100 lashes per illegitimate offspring. This is the only way beta males can see to it that they control who becomes the alpha male, and prevent stupid sluts from choosing bad leaders for them.

VERSION B:

Why fornicatresses are bad for your race, nation and civilisation, whatever your race

Because it is OK for women to *fornicate* these days, women these days choose the alpha male. The alpha male is therefore the male who gets the most offers of sex from fornicatresses.

The beta males who observe this then ape the behaviour of this male to whom *fornicatresses* have conferred alpha status.

*Fornicatresses* are stupid irresponsible and immoral women, so they are bound to choose badly and for bad reasons.

By saying it is OK for women to *fornicate* the characters and morals of men with whom these women fornicate are ruined, precipitating a vicious cycle of moral degeneracy as well as political, economic and social decline.

To correct this parlous state of affairs, the practice of "slut-shamiing" should be re-established so that the alpha male is again chosen by beta male.

Women can still offer themselves to alpha males but if they get knocked up they will be given 100 lashes per illegitimate offspring. This is the only way beta males can see to it that they control who becomes the alpha male, and prevent *fornicatresses* from choosing bad leaders for them.

Why is Western civilisation declining? Because


  • women do not have enough power
  • all women have the vote, most women are sluts and sluts choose the alpha male


Who should choose the alpha male of any human society?


  • The beta males whom he leads
  • Sluts


Which group do you think deserves the most political representation to keep our government small and rational?


  • SSMs and the men who impregnated them
  • Spinsters, bachelors and LGBT people
  • Married couples with children
  • Divorced men and women


To respect marriage, we have would logically have to forbid extramarital sex.


  • Disagree
  • Agree



Why are male British nationalists not interested in discussing marriage as a means of improving racial and national hygiene? Because


  • they have not been raised with the view that marriage is important
  • most of their mothers are SSMs
  • nobody else is either in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland
  • they know no one wants to marry them.
  • most of them are illegitimate
  • most of them have illegitimate offspring
  • they are only motivated by sex and they sex with sluts is easier and cheaper than getting married
  • they want sex to be cheap so they want there to be lots of sluts
  • they know discussing marriage would offend sluts and are so morally degraded and effeminate that they don't mind admitting they are lower than sluts


When do you know that democracy will continue to fail?


  • When no party will criticise sluts and SSMs
  • When slut and bastard voters outnumber married voters
  • When no party will propose to narrow the franchise


Which group do you think is in the majority?


  • SSMs and the men who impregnated them
  • Married couples with children
  • Spinsters, bachelors and LGBT people
  • Divorced men and women


Atheists tend not to see the point in respecting marriage.


  • Agree
  • Disagree


Atheists tend not to think of the long term national interest and are more interested in filling their boots and using up all the stuff they can use up before they die, without caring too much about the mess they leave behind because they will be dead.


  • Disagree
  • Agree


In which party do you think is the percentage of married men with legitimate children the lowest?


  • The BNP
  • The Conservative Party
  • UKIP
  • The Labour Party
  • The LibDems


In which party do you think is the percentage of married men with legitimate children the highest?


  • The Conservative Party
  • UKIP
  • The BNP
  • The Labour Party
  • The LibDems


Which group do you think is in the minority?


  • Married couples with children
  • Bachelors, spinsters and LGBT people
  • SSMs and the men who impregnated them
  • Divorced men and women


Which group do you think would be most likely to vote in the long term national interest?


  • Married couples with children
  • SSMs and the men who impregnated them
  • Spinsters, bacehlors and LGBT people
  • Divorced men and women


Is the clearest sign of the sex difference between men and women the way they would react when you tell them that their sex organ is enormous?


  • Yes
  • No


Do you think a gay men, confirmed bachelors, SSMs or spinsters would have different priorities to married men with children and would vote differently?


  • Yes
  • No


Tuesday, 19 February 2013

The assumed gender of the DOCTOR IS FEMALE but the assumed gender of the LUNATIC IS MALE

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_Health_Act_1983#Section_12_approved_doctors


Assessment orders

Section 2 is an assessment order and lasts up to 28 days; it cannot be renewed. It can be instituted following an assessment under the Act by two doctors and an AMHP. At least one of these doctors must be a Section 12 approved doctor. The other must either have had previous acquaintance with the person under assessment, or also be a Section 12 approved doctor. This latter rule can be broken in an emergency situation where the person is not known to any available doctors and two Section 12 approved doctors cannot be found. In any case, the two doctors must not be employed in the same service, to ensure independence. Commonly, in order to satisfy this requirement, a psychiatrist will perform a joint assessment with a general practitioner (GP). A Mental Health Act assessment can take place anywhere, but commonly occurs in a hospital, at a police station, or in a person’s home.

If the two doctors agree that the person is suffering from a mental disorder, and that this is of a nature or to a degree that, despite his refusal to go to hospital, he ought to be detained in hospital in the interest of his own health, his safety, or for the protection of others, they complete a medical recommendation form and give this to the AMHP. If the AMHP agrees that there is no viable alternative to detaining the person in hospital, she will complete an application form requesting that the hospital managers detain the person. He will then be transported to hospital and the period of assessment begins. Treatment, such as medication, can be given against the person’s wishes under Section 2 assessment orders, as observation of response to treatment constitutes part of the assessment process.




It is rather sinister, is it not, that the gender of the person requesting the detention of the lunatic is assumed to be female, while the gender of the lunatic is assumed to male?

However, I am sure most men won't have noticed or really don't mind.  Most of them are too fucking thick and degenerate now anyway to know they are being insulted.  

Most of them are fine about this assumption anyway, aren't you, boys?  

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...