British schoolchildren taught by 5th columnist BNP activists?

More distressing school stories!

School receptionist faces sack because her 5 year old daughter frightened another child claiming it would "go to hell" if it did not believe in Jesus.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1142967/School-receptionist-faces-sack-year-old-daughter-told-talking-God.html

If I had been the headteacher I would have said:

"There, there. Not everybody believes there is even a hell. The
worst thing that will happen to you will be in this world. Dying full of
regrets and unforgiven for all your sins will be quite bad enough.
Afterwards people will still talk about you for a while and discuss the things
you did that were right or wrong, and then it will be well and truly over,
unless you are famous, like all the characters from history you have already
learnt about such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela
...."

These days you cannot even let your child bring in a peanut butter sandwich for lunch in case another child with a nut allergy might steal your child's sandwich, eat it and die. This is because under health and safety regulations teaching staff must protect our obese, allergic, neurotic and pregnant children from all foreseeable danger. Otherwise, they will just fall over and die if they come across anything as threatening as a peanut butter sandwich, a Home Truth, a Hurt Feeling or a Great Disappointment.

Remember the story about the teacher fired because she told her 10 year olds Santa did not exist?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1093535/Primary-school-teacher-told-children-Santa-does-exist-fired.html

Here is yet another distressing school story to show why this country is going to the dogs because taught by fools or the malicious and the vicious, who want to turn them into foul-mouthed promiscuous pregnant intoxicated illegitimate illiterate innumerate Santa-believing unemployables.

They will of course be voting BNP when they find themselves unable to compete with foreigners, even in the McJobs they are currently being made fit for.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/4689964/School-pupils-asked-to-grade-rude-words-on-scale-of-offensiveness.html

Children as young as 5 will be given sex education.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7684810.stm


Is there a 5th columnist of BNP activist-teachers in British secondary schools bent on turning our children into CHAVs, in order to recruit the next generation of BNP voters?

I think we should be told.

After all the BNP are also known as the CHAV Party. There is already a clear connection.

It is also very interesting that the BNP continue to bleat about bringing back grammar schools.

As some of us are aware, grammar schools are full of the pushy middle classes. In the urban areas grammar schools are populated mainly by non-white children of even pushier parents who have been having their children tutored for their 11+ since Year 4. (It is well known that non-white parents are far pushier than white parents.)

We all know that the typical urban white working class won't even have a look in. Most of them will not even have heard of grammar schools. If they have they would think "It's not for the likes of us."

BNP education policy is just as much a slap in the face to the white working classes as Labour's.

At least David Cameron has now said he would send his children to the local comp - the only courageous thing he has said so far.

Is an admission of racial inferiority also "racist"?

This was the rather interesting question asked by Independent Councillor Chris Cook at http://www.chris-cooke.co.uk/ in our regular debates on race and Islam who is, like me, independently-minded and prefers the a la carte method of ordering our political dishes (as demonstrated at http://www.1party4all.co.uk/) rather than the limited fare that is the set menu offered by the Big 3 political parties. He is currently having trouble with the UAF (United Against Fascism) brigade who believe that BNP supporters and sympathisers should be silenced and removed rather than defeated by argument. (Although generally sympathetic to the BNP and saying that they should remain an all-white party, Chris who was one of the founder members of the SDP, is in fact dead against the death penalty, one of the staples of the BNP policy "diet".)

Like most people, I agree with some BNP policies and abjure the others. How could one not, for instance, support their intention to raise the threshold for paying income tax to £15,000 per annum, whatever race or religion one might be??

http://www.bnp.org.uk/pdf_files/minimanifesto2007.pdf

When I attended the anti-Iraq war march in 2003 at Hyde Park I noticed to my surprise that the BNP were represented as were the Muslims. That there were and are in fact more people and parties against the war than were for it I am cerrtain. That this country was nevertheless dragged into it just because dimwit sheep-like Conservatives like Boris Johnson and David Cameron were also bamboozled into supporting it, is infuriating to say the least. From this surprising revelation came the seeds of http://www.1party4all.co.uk/ - an opinion-polling direct democracy website that makes the most of our agreement rather than allows it to be diluted under the irrational and oligarchical multi-party system led by "leaders" who do not seem to be displaying prudence, principle, talent or any understanding of realpolitik.

But I digress.

As I was saying, Chris wondered whether it would in fact be racist to make an admission of racial inferiority. If it is racist to regard one's race as better than all the others, surely the converse is also "racist"? After all, one cannot logically have superior races without inferior races.

I wonder what would happen if the BNP started saying more loudly: "We the white indigenous British are as a rule indolent, illegitimate, innumerate, illiterate, racially inferior and have very weak cultural traditions. We therefore need state protection from the better-organised, more family-orientated and better-educated foreign hordes who are now taking over our land and taking the bread from our mouths."

Actually, that is what some of them have been saying, who clamour for minority status and ask for whites-only council housing. This can only be described as the English urban equivalent of territorial reservations for the Australian Aborigines and Native Americans. I don't know about anyone else, but I find this display of defeatism in the English saddening and embarrassing.

The answer is "yes" - it is also "racist" to claim the converse of racial inferiority. There you go: the BNP are racist through and through - surprise, surprise! On the one hand, some of them feel superior to foreigners yet on the other hand claim that crafty better-organised foreigners exploit their political system better than they do.

However, it is still legal to have a sincerely-held beliefs and opinions in this country, however irrational, such as Feng Shui, numerology, astrology, the belief that Christ is Son of God, witchcraft, homeopathic medicine, etc.

But for how much longer?