Some questions on insanity

Are women more likely to suffer from insanity than men? If so, what is the reason? Because women tend to be more subjective and tend to regard truth and logic as an obstacle to their wishes rather than as a tool for solving problems?

Subjectivity/Femininity/Insanity v Objectivity/Masculinity/Sanity

Who should win?

Who would God want to win if He exists?

Even if God does not in fact exist, He must be male, because it must have been a man who conceived of Him and then wielded God as an instrument of government.

It is impossible to imagine a woman as being the first person in the world to have thought up such an entity.

Sane people form theories based on their observations of the world around them while the insane, stubborn, stupid and arrogant fit the world into their theories, however ill-fitting, and never learn from their mistakes because they are too proud to admit having made them.

Is there a difference between being wrong and being mad? The consequences however are the same: disaster.

Insanity: being persistently, immovably and fundamentally in error about some important fact.

Is it possible that the entire West is mad?

Which is more frightening: to be insane or to discover that everyone around you is in fact insane?

Are the international matriarchy mad prideful sinners indulging their passions to self-destruction? #neocons #neoliberalism #libtards #sluts pic.twitter.com/gC6OWr4EZW

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 14, 2017

What is worse than being a politician who was assassinated by a terrorist?

If you were a rational politician and knew you had to be killed, by whom would you choose to be killed? #JoCoxMP

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 18, 2016

@PhilipCJames The kindest thing to say to the loved ones of an assassinated politician is "At least s/he was killed for his/her principles."

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 18, 2016

@PhilipCJames "At least s/he wasn't killed by an escaped lunatic who thought the deceased was someone else. That would be really pointless."

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 18, 2016

@PhilipCJames "At least the deceased politician did have principles and died for them. Many living ones have none to die for" and so on.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 18, 2016

@PhilipCJames What's worse than being a politician assassinated by a terrorist? Being killed by a lunatic who mistook you for someone else.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 18, 2016

What the mad Muslim woman who beheaded a disabled child proves about liberalism

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6964584/Woman-handed-police-childs-severed-head-shouting-Allahu-Akbar-in-Russia.html

Sometimes, Muslims suffer from mental health issues.

Religion is about instilling morality for the purpose of social cohesion.

The purpose of social cohesion is to keep your group in existence, make your group stronger and its civilisation last longer.

Islamophobes who tend to be atheists/feminists/liberals know that Islam is an ideology diametrically opposed to theirs, and that is why they hate and fear Islam.

Islamophobes think they have the right to invade and bomb Muslim countries without suffering the consequences of retaliation.

They also think that their government can have policies that have been causing degeneracy for generations, yet not suffer from degeneracy or have to do anything about it, like this feminist who wrote https://kittysjones.wordpress.com/2016/02/28/adam-perkins-conservative-narratives-and-neuro-neoliberalism/ and wanted to suppress the view of an academic whose conclusions she disliked. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3456651/The-ugly-truth-benefits-CENSORED-LSE-students-academic-tried-tell-welfare-make-claimants-workshy-agressive-anti-social.html
Like bullies, they can dish it out but can't take it.

All this story proves is that every now and then Muslims go stark raving mad, just like non-Muslims.

This woman is obviously not a terrorist, but no opportunity is missed when it comes to showing one's hatred and fear of Islam and Muslims. Apparently, Islam makes you go mad, or is it because the media love stories about violent Muslims?

The media love stories about violent Muslims because they know its audience love to hate Muslims.

In the meantime, the damage being inflicted by liberalism remains unaddressed.

Professor Daniel Bell:

Liberalism, it is claimed, contributes to, or, at least, does not sufficiently take account of, the negative social and psychological effects related to the atomistic tendencies of modern liberal societies. There is undoubtedly a worrying trend in contemporary societies towards a callous individualism that ignores community and social obligations, and liberal theory does not seem up to the task of dealing with this problem.

NB: Liberalism is atomistic and degenerate Feminism.

Claire Khaw's miscellaneous aphorisms

FORGIVENESS

"Forgiving your enemies serves a very practical purpose.  All those who participate successfully in politics know the utility of having a forgiving nature, for it is this that disarms our enemies."


ABOUT ME

1. "All the evidence against me is already online."
2. "I am the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a woman."
3. "My reputation for alleged lunacy and insanity comes not from saying things that I feel to be true, but for daring to say them."
4. "Women are as afraid of being accused of hard-heartedness in  precisely the same way that men used to be afraid of being accused of effeminacy.  I, being the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a woman, would rather be hated for telling the truth than to be loved for the lies I tell." 
5. "I have deconstructed and reconstructed God."
6. "I am a Jew at heart, but in practice a Muslim."
7. "I delight in my ideas being tested to destruction. The trouble is getting people to even approach them to have a look."
8. "If I am biased, I am biased in favour of Truth and Reason."

HAPPINESS

"To be happy one must first learn to be content."

REASON AND EMOTION

Our Emotions are the means by which we gauge the Quality of our Reason. If we do unwise things, we suffer emotional distress. If we use our Reason and behave wisely, we experience the emotional gratification of thinking ourselves wise, beloved, good and fortunate."

COWARDICE

"So many cynics are afraid to defend good ideas that they want to be the first to sneer at them so as not to appear fools for ever supporting what they feel can only fail."

INSANITY

“Insanity is when you are mistaken as to some material and fundamental fact and cannot and will not be corrected. It is not when you are morally wrong.”



AFTERLIFE

1. "Your soul is the memory you leave behind, which takes on an existence independent of you after you have died."
2. "The only afterlife we have is the reputation we leave behind."

MORALITY

"We are what we are. Some of us care about what we ought to be."

EXTREMISM

"People call deviating from the norm "extreme". It is as well to deviate from the irrational, if the norm is irrational."

Anders Breivik - mad or logical?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_Rules

http://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/commentisfree/2011/jul/29/anders-behring-breivik-norway-madness

A selection of comments:

Mine are the ones in bold.

"Mad" does not mean "morally wrong".

"Mad" means "mistaken as to some fundamental fact", as far as I am concerned.

He clearly thought the end justified the means.

What is insane about carrying your beliefs into action unless there is something wrong with what you believe?

I don't think you need to be a psychiatrist to decide on whether someone is mad. 

I have an easy to remember definition:
"Insanity is when you are mistaken as to some material and fundamental fact and cannot and will not be corrected. It is not when you are just morally wrong."

Abolition of the insanity defense. Insanity is a legal concept involving the courtroom determination that a person is not capable of forming conscious intent and, therefore, cannot be held responsible for an otherwise criminal act. The opinions of experts about the "mental state" of defendants ought to be inadmissible in court, exactly as the opinions of experts about the "religious state" of defendants are inadmissible. No one ought to be excused of lawbreaking or any other offense on the basis of so-called expert opinion rendered by psychiatric or mental health experts. Excusing a person of responsibility for an otherwise criminal act on the basis of inability to form conscious intent is an act of legal mercy masquerading as an act of medical science. Being merciful or merciless toward lawbreakers is a moral and legal matter, unrelated to the actual or alleged expertise of medical and mental health professionals. (Thomas Szasz)

Breivik more or less said "I did it because it is the only language they understand."

And even now they don't get it!

The test should be, of course, whether Breivik wants to take responsibility for his crimes, and it is clear that he does.

Breivik is a terrorist, pure and simple, and should be treated and dealt with as such.

Madness and what it means

Madness is but a state of being in profound error, though many people seem to think that to qualify for this, all you have to do is diverge from current political orthodoxies.