New Archbishop of Canterbury has already gone native

Justin Welby: Gone native already

http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/pages/blog.html

He ends by saying after a few paragraphs of hand-wringing incoherent bleeding heart liberal drivel:

So this is not a great, grand political gesture, but a reasoned questioning of something that a lot of people are concerned about. It is not me saying the government is evil (I am much less cynical than many about politicians of all sides), but that I don’t agree on this particular bit of a programme which in general is incredibly brave. Perhaps a little less heat and a little more clarity would help.

Rowan Williams could have written this himself.

Paraphrased, it just says:

"I have to say this sort of thing because I am now the AB of C and Commie Pinko Liberal ABs of Cs have a long-standing tradition of being obliged to say shit like this."   

Anyway, it is clear that "ABCJustin" as he now calls himself is a Commie Pinko Liberal precisely because he wants female bishops and will whine in a leftist way about any cut the government proposes.

He will be supporting gay marriage next, probably.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2292420/Now-Welby-wants-civil-unions-straight-couples-He-risks-undermining-marriage-warn-critics.html

As we all know, most women are conformists and the orthodoxy they currently conform to is Commie Pinko Liberal Feminism.  When you become aware of how many women there are who are now in senior positions in journalism and other media, you will know why the West is now afflicted and dying of Commie Pinko Liberal Feminism.

Look at the list at https://twitter.com/1party4all/journalists/members if you don't believe me, and note not just the number of female journalists but also the number of editors who are female and Commie Pinko Liberal Feminist.

I hate to say this, but the brains of men fall out when they see a woman they fancy.  Yesterday, a male friend who is educated, professional and legally-trained (but who identifies himself as a UKIP-Conservative) was cooing about Anna Soubry and Harriet Harman.

I am considering only letting ugly, but clever and good people enter politics when I am Dictator of Britain.

It now occurs to me that the niqab was really to protect men from women.   

"Liberty" denies Philip Hollobone MP his liberty to withhold his services from sinister women in masks known to be religious zealots

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10750908

Damian Green is a cowardly piece of shit, but then he is a Tory MP and we can expect no better from the likes of him.  I do wonder what Philip Davies MP thinks.  I know he says he is a Libertarian but does not want a ban.  I am a Libertarian and want a ban on the grounds that:

1.  it brings Islam into hatred, ridicule and contempt

2.  it is in fact unIslamic - the Koran tells Muslims not to worship ostentatiously.  This means Muslims should not draw undue attention to themselves, but of course women riddled by feminine neuroses don't get this and want to indulge their neuroses while making an ostentatious show of piety.

It is for the prevention of crime and the protection of the reputation of Islam that feminine neurosis should not be indulged in this way. 

This practice after all brings Islam into hatred, ridicule and contempt by right-thinking members of society. 

007.205
YUSUFALI: And do thou (O reader!) Bring thy Lord to remembrance in thy (very) soul, with humility and in reverence, without loudness in words, in the mornings and evenings; and be not thou of those who are unheedful.
PICKTHAL: And do thou (O Muhammad) remember thy Lord within thyself humbly and with awe, below thy breath, at morn and evening. And be not thou of the neglectful.
SHAKIR: And remember your Lord within yourself humbly and fearing and in a voice not loud in the morning and the evening and be not of the heedless ones.

Good to be quoted at http://www.fontcraft.com/liberty/?p=25936

A properly-attired Muslim: "ornaments" = cleavage and thighs

Here is what I hope is an Islamic argument for the banning of the niqab for the protection of Muslims and the prevention of crime and Islamophobia.

24:31 contains the dress code for a properly-attired Muslim woman.

http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/024.qmt.html

Way I look at it, no cleavage should be on view. That's it.

A woman's "ornaments" are her breasts and thighs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_%28breasts%29

Arguably, an ugly woman has no ornaments at all and everything about a beautiful woman is an ornament, including her eyes, which you cannot cover or you would be blinding her. I suppose you could argue that a beautiful woman must always wear sunglasses in a public place, but that would just be impractical and extreme.

Having dealt with a woman's upper torso, we now, er, "lower our gaze" to her lower torso.

Therefore, you have some sort of sensible rule. I would suggest that modest dress includes skirts.

Let us say then that anything above a woman's knee is an ornament, and skirts, to be modest, should cover a woman's thighs.

In one morning I have single-handedly resolved and pronounced upon the proper dress code for all decent, right-minded women, Muslim and non-Muslim, for all time.

In a perfect world, I would be called upon to be the Mufti of Britain.