Mark Collett's alleged Jewish heritage

Does Mark Collett - former BNP member infamous for his controversial views on Jews - have Jewish heritage while being unaware of it? Years ago, I pointed out to Mark that he did look as if he could be Jewish. Indeed, he looked so Jewish that I assumed that I was not the first person to point this out to him. He remained silent.

Rabbi Mizrachi himself admits that there are many people who think they are Jews but are not, and many people who think they are gentile but are in fact Jews. One could end up being a self-hating Jew. Self-loathing has long been regarded as a sign of mental illness and a feature of living in the early 21st century West is its ever rising levels of mental illness.

Is the West capable of correcting itself before it ends up gouging out its own eyes in despair and self-loathing, as Oedipus did?
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/the-oedipus-trilogy/play-summary/oedipus-the-king

The tragedy of Oedipus Rex is about a man who didn't know his parents. He ended up murdering his father in a road rage incident and having sex with a cougar that turned out to be his mother.

If we didn't know who our parents are, we could end up committing incest with our sibling, sugar daddy or cougar.

Isn't it already painfully obvious that condoning casual sex would inevitably lead to dysgenics and degeneracy?

Interestingly, it was the the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who pointed out to the British in 1974 in his Edgbaston speech that they were destroying their "human stock" by condoning unmarried parenthood. He paid dearly for pointing out the obvious when he found himself apologising for his speech. A man who was widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting found himself serving under Margaret Thatcher, Britain's first female Prime Minister - the first milestone of matriarchy. Before Keith Joseph, it was Enoch Powell who destroyed his career by pointing out the obvious. Unlike Joseph, he did not apologise.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Why won't nationalists talk about marriage and family values instead of endlessly obsessing about Jews?

We know who we is in power by those we dare not criticise, and I don't mean the Jews. They now have a representative in Downing Street, sharing the bedroom of the British Prime Minister.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Blue Labour thinking, with its emphasis on community-led solutions, is being touted as the party's version of the Big Society, and it's also possible that his emphasis on "family, faith and flag" will be a means of Labour outflanking the coalition on the right. The feminazis of the Labour Party destroyed his career.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/19/lord-glasman-radical-traditionalist

The feminazis of the Labour Party Helen Goodman and Harriet Harman destroying Maurice Glasman's career
https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/06/blue-labour-john-era-goodman

Why is no journalist asking what Shaun Wright meant when he asked "Why are you picking on Rotherham?"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11060608/Why-are-you-picking-on-Rotherham-pleaded-Shaun-Wright.html

Are all UK journalists also involved in a cover up?

http://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/08/28/rotherham-scandal-pcc-shaun-wright-prevented-public-from-criticising-police/#comment-56609

I actually sympathise with the police who are even now accused of being institutionally racist. Were they supposed to investigate all cases of alleged under-aged sex or just cases of alleged under-aged sex taking place between white females and Asian males? If so, this policy would be rightly flagged as sexist and racist, and I can see exactly why the cops preferred to expend their energy and resources doing something else and not “go there”.

We already know that coppers prefer not to waste their time investigating complaints made by complainants who blow hot and cold, such as in domestic violence cases, don't we?

Understandably, they tend not to take seriously complainants who are known to make a complaint and then subsequently withdraw it and go back to the alleged abuser to resume a physical relationship with him and turning it into a pattern of behaviour.

Understandably, they will regard all these cases of under-aged schoolgirls from certain backgrounds making these complaints as not to be taken seriously.

Even "Emma" admitted that she subsequently went back to her abusers and resumed having sex with them.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28948660

What the fuck were the police supposed to do?

Even  if everyone in the police and the local council resigned, the real culprits will still not be apprehended.

Who are the real culprits then?

They are social attitudes - the liberal social attitudes which condone extramarital sex.

Once you condone extramarital sex, you will find yourself condoning under-aged sex. The slippery slope argument has been proven yet again.

How many of you in practice condone under-aged sex?

If you found your under-aged daughter to be sexually active what would you do - put her on on the pill?

That is condoning under-aged sex, isn't it?

We know what happened to the daughter of a British mother who did precisely that.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2008/03/more-on-slags-and-slappers.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2008/03/why-slags-and-slappers-are-bad-for.html

Oh, and Tracey Emin's mum put her on the pill too when she discovered that Emin was having under-aged sex.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/10627613/I-have-never-actually-loved-properly-before-says-artist-Tracey-Emin.html

So, what are we asking the police to do?

Not bother if the under-aged female is having sex with a under-aged boy of her age?

Not bother if the under-aged female is having sex with an under-aged boy of her age and race?

What age does the male having sex with the under-aged girl have to be for the police start taking an interest?

Why have an age of consent if in practice people ignore it anyway and get away with it?

Were

Lord Fraser of Tullybelton  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Fraser,_Baron_Fraser_of_Tullybelton
Lord Scarman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Scarman
Lord Bridge of Harwich http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Bridge
Lord Brandon of Oakbrook http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Brandon
Lord Templeman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Templeman

also guilty of condoning under-aged sex?

If it quacks like duck, walks like a duck, is it a duck?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillick_competence

"the court held that 'parental rights' did not exist, other than to safeguard the best interests of a minor."

What is the definition of the best interests of a minor? When a knocked-up schoolgirl wants an abortion, of course.

What if the knocked-up schoolgirl doesn't want an abortion but its parents do? The knocked-up schoolgirl gets to have it in defiance of her parents' wishes, of course, who may then kick her out out of the family home, but then the state will give her council accommodation.  

Are the police aware of the concept of Gillick competence?

Should the police be made aware of the concept of Gillick competence?

Should the police be expected to apply the rule of Gillick competence?

What is this principle exactly that establishes that an under-aged girl already having under-aged sex is legally competent to obtain contraception and abortions without telling her parents? It is the Gillick principle. Poor Mrs Gillick whose crowning humiliation was to have this principle named after her by liberal judges ...

When a fish rots, it rots from the head down, does it not?

Have you had under-aged sex?

Do you have friends who have had under-aged sex?

Have you or any of your friends ever made jokes about children having under-aged sex?

Do you think an adult woman in authority such as a teacher seducing an under-aged boy is funny?

Do you as a man wish you had enjoyed the experience of under-aged sex?

Then you would condone under-aged sex in general, wouldn't you?

In this kind of environment, do you think sex predators of any race and religion would make the most of the easy pickings available, with so much low-hanging fruit, so to speak?

Do you think this is a Muslim problem or a social attitudes problem?

Do you think unfit mothers who don't care what their daughters get up and/or who have abandoned them to care homes have no responsibility at all for this state of affairs?

Do you find it easier and more convenient to blame Muslims and Islam for this rather than blame the lax social  attitudes of non-Muslim Britons towards extramarital sex that has resulted in this state of affairs?

Are you an Islamophobe who relishes the the idea of blaming Muslims and Islam for a state of affairs that your own culture and morality is really responsible for?

Have you always hated Muslims anyway?

Finally, again, can you answer the question of what you think Shaun Wright meant when he asked "Why are you picking on Rotheram?"

Why sacking everyone in Rotheram local government will do NO GOOD AT ALL

Sex between 13-year-olds is NORMAL, says controversial 'traffic light tool' sent to schools to teach about relationships

In the interests of justice Rolf Harris should be found not guilty even if he was

Even if he was guilty, I want him to get off because it sickens and disgusts me that such stale accusations that cannot be independently corroborated can even make it to court.

Against the persecution of men by the matriarchy

Should men like Rolf Harris be given the benefit of the doubt by the law, or should women who accuse men like Rolf Harris?

Please give reasons for your answer.

Like ·  · Share

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2624114/Rolf-Harris-trial-hears-confession-letter-alleged-victims-father.html

In the days before PC Libtardism and Feminism had complete matriarchal hegemony, if the Prosecution didn't think the evidence would stand up in trial, they wouldn't pursue it. They would never allow uncorroborated testimony to go to trial. Now of course they are obliged to take any stale accusation by any slag seriously, so it is only one person's word against another.

Who will the jury favour?

They will favour whoever they like most, of course.

How many unschooled plebs will allow themselves to think Harris probably did it after reading http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/crime/rolf-harris-groped-eight-year-old-at-portsmouth-community-centre-1-6050507#.U24wTQ1_I8M.twitter? People like that don't care about principle, do they? People like that love sticking the knife into anyone who has had more success in life than they have, just cos they can.

An arrogant shit like Max Clifford never stood a chance.

Obviously, quite a few people are happy with a legal system in which only the popular get justice, but then people do get the government they deserve, don't they?

Most people are dumb plebs and don't get how being OK about this sort of accusation makes them vulnerable to accusations like this too.

A lot of it is just envy and the schandenfreude that lowly men get out of seeing the rich and famous brought low.

I would even go so far as to say that even if Rolf Harris and Max Clifford were in fact guilty I want them both to get off, because if they were found guilty on with this kind of evidence, innocent people will also in future be easily convicted on this kind of "evidence" too. One of these days these innocent people will be people known to us who are family, neighbours and friends or even - SHOCK HORROR - ourselves.

"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer",

...as expressed by the English jurist William Blackstone in his seminal work, Commentaries on the Laws of England, published in the 1760s.

It is worthwhile to note that the actual numbers are not generally seen as important, so much as the idea that the State should not cause undue or mistaken harm "just in case". Historically, the details of the ratio change, but the message that government and the courts must err on the side of innocence is constant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone's_formulation 

Obviously, these people who gloat and say "no smoke without fire" think it will never happen to them, particularly if they are female. But you could be female and still be the victim of this sort of thing if your father were accused and had to pay compo to these false accusers out of what you would have inherited, like Louise Clifford, or if you are the wife of a man falsely accused.

I certainly don't want some alcoholic slag who fucked up her life to ruin my childhood memory of Rolf Harris because she couldn't bring herself to say no, or her mother never thought to tell her to say no, or if her liberal parents were just too dumb and negligent to issue all the proper warnings an adolescent female would need to be issued with to see that she is not sexually exploited and abused by any passing sex predator.

I know even saying this sort of thing leaves you vulnerable to accusations of being a "paedo supporter", but at least I am not the kind of paedo supporter that Harriet Harman is.

It is time British parents were taught how to properly parent and for sex and relationship education to be properly taught since most of them these days are dumb degenerate liberal parents who no longer know how to parent their adolescent daughters.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2008/10/sex-and-relationship-education.html

I know of an Asian parent who refuses to let her daughter go on any sleep-overs unless she has spoken to her parents. Interestingly, she has not expressed the slightest interest in learning any English.  She probably knows about the English to be aware that the average British mother has a 50/50 chance of being an SSM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html who probably has some paedo shacked up with her or a queue of unsuitable men waiting outside her bedroom door hoping to bang her or her daughter, or her daughter's friends, preferably all at the same time.

"If paedophiles are mosquitoes, then SSMs are stagnant pools of water."  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

The worst example of a British parent not taking responsibility can be found in the infamous and embarrassing story of Fiona McKeown.  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/minister-says-dead-girls-mother-was-irresponsible-794456.html At least, I was embarrassed enough to suggest that the police charge her with aiding and abetting the commission of a sexual offence against her own daughter by allowing the holiday guide to have sex with her under-aged daughter, but I already know that the average liberal parent feels no shame and takes no responsibility, and will be very angry with me indeed for pointing this out.

I welcome their hatred.

Remember, gentlemen, that the modus operandi of the matriarchy is to tempt men into having sex with sluts and then use this against them later. The solution for men is to admit that they need protection from sluts and admit that they are the weaker sex as far as saying no to no-strings sex is concerned.  To give men sex is as easy as giving someone who is permanently hungry a free meal.  To get a woman to give you sex is like getting a woman to cook you a meal, and nothing feminists can think of will gainsay this fact of life and human nature.

Who will be next if Rolf Harris falls?  Walt Disney?

How many elderly and dead white males will these DISGUSTING feminists and slags out for a bit of compo have in their sights?  

I may not be white and I may not be male, but I want it on record that someone - even if it was only me - protested at this evil and insanity while the degenerate beta males living in a matriarchy joined in the denunciation of paedos, gloated as the formerly alpha males they envied for their success fell into disgrace, or cowered or pretended not to notice. You all know who you are.  

Solution: NO MORE FUCKING SLEEP-OVERS.  Most of us already know - like that Asian parent who refuses to learn English obviously does - that that is when most teens in the West get together to watch porn, have under-aged sex, get knocked up, take drugs and get drunk, don't we?    

The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all.

-Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women

I suppose in view of the above there is a reason why 2:282 seems to suggest that that one man's testimony is to be treated as equivalent to two women's.  http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php  The Koran also warns men about their wives at http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=64&verse=14


https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rolf-Harris-is-NOT-guilty-beyond-all-reasonable-doubt/581502161968627?fref=ts

OFFICIAL: Britain now no longer has any alpha males

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27259318
Max Clifford jailed for eight years for sex assaults

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-27253880
Jeremy Clarkson: BBC upbraids presenter over 'racist' clip

https://www.facebook.com/pages/IC3s-and-IC5s-for-Jeremy-Clarkson-and-Free-Speech/1430217037233292?fref=ts


I know the British Prime Minister is officially considered the alpha male of Britain, but we all know that the British ceased to respect their Prime Ministers a long time ago.  Therefore only powerful men who were not politicians were the unofficial alpha males of Britain, but one by one they have been systematically persecuted and humiliated.

While feminists may shrug indifferently or even cackle with glee at these men getting their comeuppance, it will come to the notice of the foreigner that the British do not in fact have an alpha male to represent them, and treat them accordingly.

From now on British men who no longer have free speech are officially lower than women who could well be making false accusations using a legal process that is the opposite of fair.

I fear for these men, especially those who are now ignorant and arrogant enough to still be in denial. We know what happens to a nation that is known not to have masculine and parental authority, in which every policy is subverted to the preferences of the slut and whose men are afraid not only of their women, but the worst of their women.

http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/harman-urges-bbc-to-sack-clarkson
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/pie-controversy-harriet-harman-has-got-this-one-wrong-9162728.html
Harriet Harman urges the BBC to sack Clarkson.

Will the woman said to be a one of the "covert supporters of child abuse" calling for the sacking of Jeremy Clarkson get her way? If so, this means that the position of men - even men perceived to be alpha males in Britain - is precariously low.  In truth, there is no alpha male of Britain, for no man can be said to be an alpha male if he fears to criticise the morals of the omega female, and the SSM https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts  is the classic example of the omega female. Because of how representative democracy works in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage, the alpha male of Britain and all the others who aspire to take his position are too afraid to offend the omega female, who have the vote.

It can be seen that if Clifford had not been arrogant and defiant, and instead bowed his head, complained of a rotten childhood and being abused by his father or even cried a little at how suicidal the whole business had made him, he might have gotten off.

That's all right then. Men just have to shuffle around like a servile servant, submissive and supplicating, to stay out of trouble. A life worse than death was what women used to be threatened with if they were immoral. Now men are afraid of immoral women.

The solution is simple: narrow the franchise, abolish representative democracy, introduce the practise of slut-shaming and respecting marriage, but the men are now too afraid and risk-averse to even protest.

This is how civilisations die.

Woman said to be one of the "covert supporters of child abuse" calls for the sacking of Jeremy Clarkson. 

Mary Kenny on the Marc Coleman Show discussing PIE, Paedophilia and Harriet Harman

https://twitter.com/MaryKenny4/status/440190449135788032

http://www.newstalk.ie/player/shows/The_Marc_Coleman_Show/12/8112/02nd_March_2014_-_The_Marc_Coleman_Show_Part_1 Mary Kenny from 35th minute

Incredibly complacent interview.  "Crisis?  What crisis?" - Mary Kenny.

Everything is fine because her daughter in law seems terribly keen on starting a family.

What happens when she tires of your son and decides to divorce him and deprive him of his offspring? Won't you then be deprived of your grandchildren?

http://player.fm/series/one-to-one/onetoone-21212-yasmin-alibhai-brown-talks-to-a-grandmother-who-hasnt-seen-her-grandchild-for-years

Dear Marc Coleman

I understand that Mary Kenny was on your show last night.  

If I had known earlier, I would have sent you this list of questions for you to ask her.

1. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html Does she know that 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did?
2. What does this say about the difference between how men and women think and vote?
3. Does she have any explanation for this?
4. Does she support gay marriage?
5. Is she still a feminist?
6. Does feminism undermine marriage?
7. If feminism undermines marriage, is feminism evil?
8. Does feminism cause widespread illegitimacy?
9. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517 When David Starkey said the whites have become black, did he mean that illegitimacy amongst whites was slowly matching the levels of black illegitimacy?
10. If crime is linked to illegitimacy, and feminism causes illegitimacy, is feminism evil?
11. Does she know that the percentage of mothers with illegitimate offspring in Jamaica is 85%? https://old.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html
12. If feminists and liberals say sex between consenting adults is OK, it was inevitable that they would soon go down the slippery slope of saying sex between consenting parties is also OK, even if they are not adults.  Does she think this adequately explains the truth of the liberal position on sex, which is that sex between consenting adults would soon be elided into sex between consenting parties?
13. The Bonobo monkey is matriarchal. Does this mean that it must also be liberal and feminist?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo#Sexual_social_behavior
14. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SX7eX5mtiV0  Would she agree that this sort of behaviour explains why the Bonobo are still fucking around in trees while humans have evolved?
15. Would she like to consider the possibility that humans might regress into barbarism if they made sexual liberation the be all and end all to their pathetic effeminate and atheistic lives?
16. Would she agree that the British did rather better for themselves when they sublimated their sexual urges?
17. Would she agree that all advanced civilisations are patriarchal?
18. Would she agree that all primitive or declining civilisations are matriarchal?
19. Would she agree that all patriarchies respect marriage in order to remain patriarchal?
20. Would she agree that social conservatism means being prepared to respect marriage?
21. Would she agree that respecting marriage must necessarily mean forbidding extramarital sex?
22. Would she agree that legalising "gay marriage" amounts to desecrating the institution of marriage?
23. Would she agree that feminism causes immigration?
24. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2009/04/louis-theroux-place-for-paedophiles.html Would she agree that feminism causes paedophilia?  
25. Is the emasculation of men a good thing
26. Does feminism cause men to be bad women and women to be bad men?

Regards 

Claire Khaw

'We can't prove sex with children does them harm' says Labour-linked NCCL

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL#.UxMSyKeQx7A.facebook

'We can't prove sex with children does them harm' says Labour-linked NCCL

Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

As you can see below, a libertarian father who clearly detests paedophiles and who would savagely murder them if he could get away with it could not articulate the harm of allowing adults to have sex with children.

• 4 hours ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw What is the harm of adults having sex with children? You people have not addressed this question at all.

  about an hour ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Libertarianism aside, I would shoot off the fingers, toes, testicles, cock, ears, nose and cut out the tongue of any pedophile who touched my kids. I would the gouge out both his eyes and leave him alive.
  
  There are probably some creative things one can do with burrowing animals, insects or snakes and people's internals that I would have to also investigate in detail before planning any such revenge.

  about an hour ago · Edited · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw What is the harm of adults having sex with children?

  about an hour ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski My principle is like this. If my daughter can vote she is free to make choices. Until that day any boy her age is suspect; any man my age is dead.

  about an hour ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw What is the harm of adults having sex with children?

  about an hour ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski My gun

  about an hour ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw What is the harm of adults having sex with children?

  52 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski My gun putting a bullet in their body

  51 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw What is the harm *to children* of adults having sex with them?

  49 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw You are being strangely inarticulate today, Rafal.

  46 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski It isnt harmful enough?

  44 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Probably the very tiiiiiiiiiiiny minority who ever claim it was good for them

  43 minutes ago · Edited · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw I am writing a post about this and I just wondered if supposedly educated people can say why having sex with children is harmful to the children, to the adults and to society in general. 
  
  What are the moral reasons for forbidding paedophilia?

  42 minutes ago · Edited · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw You may wish to consider the behaviour of the Bonobo monkey.
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo
  

  
  

  Bonobo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  en.wikipedia.org
  

  The bonobo (/bəˈnoʊboʊ/ or /ˈbɒnəboʊ/), Pan paniscus, formerly called the pygmy ...See more

  41 minutes ago · Like · Remove Preview
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Why?

  40 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski We arent even monkeys

  39 minutes ago · Unlike · 1
• 

  Claire Khaw I get the impression that liberals rather like and approve of the Bonobo monkey because its social organisation is matriarchal.

  39 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Why not use the greeks as a better example?

  36 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw How would I use the Greeks?

  36 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Who is a liberal?

  36 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Socrates was a kiddie fiddler

  36 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski At least use an example people could admire

  35 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Monkeys?

  35 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw Patricia Hewitt, people who call themselves liberals, people who call themselves Conservatives, even. 
  
  Liberals say sex between consenting adults is OK. I suppose from this position it is easy to get on the slippery slope of saying sex between consenting *parties whether adult or not* is also OK.

  34 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw It doesn't really matter who did it. What we want to know is whether adults having sex with children causes harm. NCCL said they couldn't see the harm of it. You obviously disagree, so what is the harm you see?

  33 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski I take it from the victims. Tell me how many have come out to say their molestor was really a lover. Any stats on that?

  28 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw It has been said about paedophile victims that they find giving evidence at the trial of their attacker more traumatic than the sex attack itself. 
  
  This feeling may also be shared by rape victims giving evidence at trial.

  2 minutes ago · Edited · Like
• 

  Rafal Pruszyn-ski Because they feat their attacker

  24 minutes ago · Like
• 

  Claire Khaw I think these people just dislike having their motives questioned or their past sexual history examined in a public court.

  23 minutes ago · Like

Liberals say sex between consenting adults is OK. I suppose from this position it is easy to get on the slippery slope of saying sex between consenting parties whether adult or not is also OK.

Incest, bestiality and necrophilia would be OK with them too, presumably.

When we finally decide to respect marriage we could just keep it simple and stick to the following rules:

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/017-qmt.php#017.032

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/024-qmt.php#024.002

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/024-qmt.php#024.004

http://quran.com/4/22

http://quran.com/4/23