How democracy has allowed feminazis and sluts to subjugate men

Post by Claire Khaw.

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties

Greek women predictably vote for the most handsome Prime Minister

How many votes do you think the only antifeminist party in the West will get?

Presumption of innocence removed from men accused of rape by malicious neurotic drunken sluts

How does feminism work?

By getting men hooked on slut sex and then incentivising the slut to accuse him of rape with the prospect of receiving £11,000 if he is convicted.  

Rape compensation cut overturned

What is "rape culture"?

Telling the jury to prefer the evidence of the complainant. 

First they came for those falsely accused of paedophilia, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a man falsely accused of paedophilia.

Then they came for  those falsely accused of a historic sexual offence, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a a man falsely accused of a historic sexual offence.

Then they came for those falsely accused of rape, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a not a man falsely accused of rape.


Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.


Sex with consent can still be rape.
http://metro.co.uk/2013/04/24/sex-with-consent-can-still-be-rape-3665975/

Do not expect justice in UK feminazi libtard courts and judges, especially if you are accused of a historic sexual offence.

Men are being deliberately victimised for being heterosexual by the matriarchy.

Who do you think will be better at fighting this matriarchal shit? Mike Buchanan and his beta male prospective parliamentary candidates or me?

Even the word of a kiss and tell slut is worth more than the word of a prince

End this feminazi shit NOW.

A politically correct DPP, rape and the worrying question: how DO men prove consent, asks SARAH VINE

If men can no longer pump and dump sluts, perhaps more of them will fuck and kill them now after new CPS guidelines? http://t.co/zDD5zcdPGI
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2015

New CPS guidelines by Alison Saunders - *GUARANTEED* to fuel misogyny. http://t.co/zDD5zcdPGI
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2015

If this country is well-governed, y is this feminazi in a position to ruin so many lives in pursuance of her agenda? http://t.co/zDD5zcdPGI
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2015

Did the Crown Prosecution Service exceed its powers as John Humphrys was suggesting to Alison Saunders?

@JonHolb The DPP is amenable to judicial review as http://t.co/hVRKXS7CU6 demonstrates. Is @MikeBuchanan11 interested in pursuing this?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2015

A suggested new way of conducting rape trials under feminazi DPP's new rule that accused must prove complainant consented

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/campaigners-hail-dpps-tough-new-rape-guidelines-as-huge-step-forward-10009595.html

Police given new guidance to combat rape 'myths'

The best way of dealing with a tsunami of rape accusations by sluts is to forbid extramarital sex and punish both parties with 100 lashes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

How about hiring actors to re-enact rape complainant's/defendant's version of events in court instead of hiring lawyers? @RADA_London
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@cpsuk @AGO_UK A novel way of conducting rape trials with jobs for the boys and girls at @RADA_London explained at https://t.co/BOIRnSnof7
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

V.impressed by Alison Saunders. Doing the best she can to address our catastrophic failure on rape, without chiping away at legal standards.
— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) January 29, 2015

@IanDunt I guess the Editor of the Erotic Review wouldn't know much about the criminal standard of proof or the presumption of innocence.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@ntfem Your inaccuracies began with your first point and continued enthusiastically to the end.
— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) January 29, 2015

@IanDunt Whatever you are, you must be naive in the extreme if you are in any way reassured by the reassurances of a feminazi.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

There is no more obvious sign that someone has nothing to contribute than a Ukip logo in their profile.
— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) January 29, 2015

@benohanlon That was me @IanDunt was referring to after I mocked him for finding new rape guidelines reassuring. http://t.co/nRBk0ZRg55
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@ntfem @IanDunt authorities asking you how you knew they were saying 'Yes' isn't the same as 'proof or convict'. How does it change the law?
— Ben (@benohanlon) January 29, 2015

@benohanlon @IanDunt Any rule proposed by a feminazi is not going to intentionally benefit men accused of rape.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@ntfem @IanDunt that's not what I asked. I asked if the law was changing and if so how? Do you know?
— Ben (@benohanlon) January 29, 2015

@benohanlon @IanDunt The onus is now on the accused to prove the complainant consented rather than for her to prove she was raped.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@ntfem @IanDunt well, No, that's my point. All the article says is that the police have to ask. Not that the defendant has to prove it.
— Ben (@benohanlon) January 29, 2015

@benohanlon @IanDunt There are none so blind as those who will not see. If it pleases the feminazi campaigners you should be very afraid.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@ntfem @IanDunt maybe but I choose not to live in fear :)
— Ben (@benohanlon) January 29, 2015

@benohanlon @IanDunt Perhaps you don't have much to do with women anyway from the look of your profile pic and your gay-looking dog.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@ntfem @IanDunt that escalated quickly! I don't have much to do with the kind of women you're talking about. Maybe I make better decisions?
— Ben (@benohanlon) January 29, 2015

@benohanlon @IanDunt I was talking about the principle of the thing, and you are saying "I'm all right, Jack."
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

@ntfem @IanDunt I'm walking away from this conversation now. Good night.
— Ben (@benohanlon) January 29, 2015

@benohanlon @IanDunt I wasn't expecting much of a debate from libtards anyway. They seem congenitally incapable of it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 29, 2015

What can you do if you are a man wanting to protest against feminazi defenestration of the presumption of innocence?

All you can do is vote for this pathetic beta male whose beta male prospective parliamentary candidates will never get anywhere.

Men must prove a woman said 'Yes' under tough new rape rules http://t.co/IC6Q8j7dbQ
— Mike Buchanan (@MikeBuchanan11) January 29, 2015

Beta male Mike Buchanan and his beta male supporters who are not up to supporting the institution of marriage refuse to accept that the only way men can get back their former status is to collectively respect marriage, which logically and necessarily means forbidding extramarital sex. I know they are all unmarriageable and don't want to marry anyway. And that is why the future is Islamic because Muslims are now the only people in the West prepared to forbid extramarital sex to re-establish the patriarchy and defenestrate the matriarchy.

How many votes do you think Mike Buchanan's antifeminist party will get?

UKIP, as you can see from http://www.ukip.org/100_days_till_the_election_100_reasons_to_vote_ukip are too terrified of alienating the female vote to tackle this.

Remember, feminism is about getting men hooked on slut sex and then accusing them of rape when the slut in question is neurotic, malicious or cannot remember why she fucked him and decides to retrospectively withdraw consent.

Godfrey Bloom - 'Why Traditionalism and Libertarianism are not incompatible

Godfrey Bloom does *not* mention how feminism increased the size of the state and our taxes