On being often compared to Adolf Hitler

Someone said to me today: "Some people have compared you to Adolf Hitler. I bet you did Nazi that one coming."

"But how am I like Adolf Hitler?" I asked in dismay.

"Probably because of your views on euthanasia of the disabled."

It should be noted that I at no time advocated a policy of systematic extermination of all who are disabled though many of enemies like to pretend that I did. My brand of Libertarian Eugenics consists only of legalising the practice of infanticide by the parents of the victim.  This means that up to the age of 12 months, parents of unwanted babies may dispose of them without getting into trouble with the law in rather the same way that the Ancient Greeks exposed their unwanted young.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide#Greece_and_Rome

This would considerably speed up the adoption process too, and obviate the need for social workers, adoption agencies and the like saving the taxpayer billions of pounds.

I really don't mind discussing the subject of EUGENICS.

Infanticide was not exactly unknown way, way, way before Hitler was even a twinkle in his father's eye.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwifery#Early_historical_perspective

"After the delivery, the midwife made the initial call on whether or not an infant was healthy and fit to rear. She inspected the newborn for congenital deformities and testing its cry to hear whether or not it was robust and hearty. Ultimately, midwives made a determination about the chances for an infant’s survival and likely recommended that a newborn with any severe deformities be exposed."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

"Eugenics is the "applied science or the bio-social movement which advocates the use of practices aimed at improving the genetic composition of a population", usually referring to the manipulation of human populations."

"Eugenics was widely popular in the early decades of the 20th century. The First International Congress of Eugenics in 1912 was supported by many prominent persons, including: its president Leonard Darwin, the son of Charles Darwin; honorary vice-president Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty and future Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; Auguste Forel, famous Swiss pathologist; Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone; among other prominent people."

http://www.prometheism.net/articles/ancient.htm is where you will find Allen Roper's essay on ANCIENT EUGENICS argues the MORAL case for Eugenics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pater_familias#Children

"The laws of the Twelve Tables required the pater familias to ensure that "obviously deformed" infants were put to death. The survival of congenitally disabled adults—conspicuously evidenced among the elite by the partially lame Emperor Claudius—demonstrates that personal choice was exercised in the matter."

I don't mind undertaking the task of explaining again and again these agreed facts of Western history to ignorant Westerners who have not been taught their own history in their morbidly feminised curriculum after they abandoned the Classics.

I don't mind explaining again and again that the institution of Marriage is Eugenic in intention, just like laws prohibiting incest.

Feminism is of course anti-eugenic because it promotes gender equality which encourages female promiscuity.

A matriarchy is a society which condones female promiscuity while a patriarchy is a society which condones male promiscuity.

What is wrong with female promiscuity?  Because it tolerates widespread illegitimacy.

Why is widespread illegitimacy a Bad Thing?  Because it tolerates and makes excuses for ever-lowering standards of behaviour, morality and educational standards, leading to the decline and fall of your society, race, nation and civilisation.

In a degenerate society, women find good men dull and bad men attractive, and are not punished for this preference.

Women, because of their weak, conformist and masochistic nature, will tolerate most evils while their strong maternal instincts seek outlet through the care of the helpless and the pathetic.  In those whose instincts are mainly masochistic, the more pathetic their offspring, the greater their status.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchausen_syndrome_by_proxy

It has been noted that the most notorious cases of Munchausen by Proxy cases are women.

If only people would concentrate on what I am saying rather than wondering whether I am like Hitler in their infantile way.

I have no intention of having a union with Austria, or of invading Czechoslovakia or Poland.  In fact, if truth be told, I am really a bit of a peace-nik who believes in good old fashioned family values and the virtues of good government by a wise, courageous and rational political class capable of directing their minds to the principles of good husbandry in the long-term national interest and never again towards bribing the voters with their own money to their own long-term detriment for the sake of  a miserable term in office in which they will do very little good.

http://www.bing.com/Dictionary/search?q=define+husbandry&qpvt=husbandry&FORM=DTPDIA

I am really not at all like Hitler.

Man's Greatest Achievement is the Creation of God

The only thing that distinguishes Man from lower animals is our ability to reason better than they how best to obtain pleasure and avoid pain in the long term. It was after all Man who created God and the institution of marriage. That must be Man's greatest achievement of all time.

God was created through an act of thinking, when Man conceived of a being that is unique, omnipotent and omniscient - a supreme being.

Having created God in his mind, by an act of thinking, Man simply started behaving as if God existed, Pygmalion-like, in just the same way a troubled child is encouraged by a child psychologist to have an imaginary friend.  That was how God came into existence.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pygmalion_(mythology)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_friend

Lust is a deadly sin when we have extra-marital sex, yet is instantly converted into something good and godly if we are married.   It has all the mysteries of transubstantiation yet can be explained quite simply.


If you are a woman, it is much easier to get a man to have sex with you than it is to get him to marry you.


Woman, do not take the easy way out and misuse the sexual instinct to prove - exactly what?  That a man will have sex with you because you are not smelly, old, repulsive or diseased?


Let us therefore use this instrument of good government that is God to obtain pleasure and avoid pain in the long term.   

Most of us are not saints and philosophers and do not care about the long term if the short term beckons with promises of pleasure.  Most of us are therefore like lower animals, and will not change our behaviour except through fear and pain.  Only a general belief in an omnipotent and omniscient God will make these lower human beings do the right thing therefore.  God is after all cheaper than CCTV and less intrusive than thoughtcrime laws.

Let us have the humility once again to pick up this much-used and much-abused Instrument of Good Government and vow to try harder and do better this time.

Liberals have their own priesthood too, do they not?  They have their own - dread word - theocracy, ie their  people who have the power to initiate, pass and enforce laws and also start wars that kill and torture people for unfair, irrational and unkind reasons.

Liberals believe in Free Love which would lead to a matriarchy, ie a society that condones female promiscuity.   Female promiscuity is logically, biologically and inevitably the facilitator of male promiscuity.

Anti-liberals (who believe that God serves the purpose of assisting us in our government, morality and spirituality) believe that a patriarchy which condones male promiscuity is the lesser evil, and those in charge of the ship of state always have a duty to choose the lesser evil in the long term.

The reason they do not is because our political system and political establishment is now infected by matriarchal dementia.

If the matriarchal dementia we are now suffering from is terminal and irreversible then the patient should at least know what he is dying of. 

BNP Political Broadcast

http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/05/european-elections-broadcast-2009/

A rather thrilling broadcast, with portentous music. Nick Griffin looking magisterial but spoiling it a little by moving his right arm awkwardly as he speaks.

I cannot help but suspect that the desk he is sitting at is not really his. The Bible on its stand, the ink blotter somehow doesn't feel authentic.

Nice desk, though.

Though slick and well-produced, it does not even begin to deal with why this country is so fucked up.

I would like to make the following points:

1. One's ancestors dying in wars does not give any of us an automatic right to ward off the invasion of trespassers or conquerors.
2. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
3. Liberalism, in the form of the welfare state, feminism, tolerance of promiscuity, single parenthood, ever lower standards of education and behaviour, are the major causes of national decline.
4. Britain has allowed itself to become a Nation of Bastards.
5. The begetters of bastards, as well as those who allow it to flourish unchecked, through refusing to confront its causes, ie promiscuity and welfare-dependency, are really the ones to blame for national decline.
6. Blaming opportunistic foreigners who know the locals have priced themselves out of jobs, and who know that British employers in fact prefer them because they work harder, is mere scapegoating.
7. Let us hope the BNP will one day have policies that suggest that they know the causes of national decline, instead of complaining about the symptoms, eg Muslims, terrorism, PC legislation, foreigners.
8. Will the BNP dare question the kind of totalitarian feminism that leads to female promiscuity, paedophilia, unwanted pregnancy, single mummery, family breakdown and ever more depraved criminals, like the boyfriend of the mother of the late Baby P?
9. Or are they so pussy-whipped they intend to leave that sort of thing to the Muslims?

Anti-cervical cancer drug shunned by schools, parents and girls

A CATHOLIC school has become the first in the country to block a project to vaccinate girls against cervical cancer.Governors of St Monica's High School in
Bury - who have previously criticised the jab for `encouraging sexual promiscuity' - have decided they don't want pupils vaccinated on school grounds.The government plans to give injections to girls aged 12 and 13 to protect them against the sexually- transmitted papilloma virus, linked to cervical cancer. Experts believe the programme, which consists of three injections over six months, will eventually save hundreds of lives a year.

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1068563_school_blocks_cervical_cancer_jabs

Goodness knows where the government is finding the money for this anti-cervical cancer vaccination that no one wants in our Credit Crunchy time.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-561827/Anti-cancer-jab-shunned-One-girls-refuses-vaccine-guard-cervical-virus.html

Perhaps someone in the NHS has "done a deal" with the pharmaceutical company that manufactures this drug?

That it is moral hazard would be the parent's first fear. If this jab is supposed to give immunity from the sexually-transmitted kind of cervical cancer it is meant to prevent, then it would give British schoolgirls - known throughout the world for their promiscuity and unplanned pregnancy - one less reason to keep their knickers on.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-299691/Teen-pregnancy-soars.html

To deal with the problem, a government study brightly suggests that schoolchildren should be shown the pleasures oral sex, ie schoolgirls should give schoolboys blowjobs when sex is expected, to avoid unwanted teenage pregnancy.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/may/09/society.schools

This sounds remarkably like a society that is about to lose all its marbles in pursuit of sexual gratification.

Why is the single-minded pursuit of sexual gratification to the exclusion of everything else a Bad Thing?

For those of us who have not had lessons about the Birds and the Bees, I will explain briefly.

Having it off whenever, wherever with whoever, leads to unplanned pregnancy.

Unplanned pregnancy leads to illegitimacy and there is already a lot of it about.

In 1993, just over a third – 34.5 per cent – of all births in Britain occurred outside of wedlock, already high by European standards. When Murray looked at the British underclass in 1989, he made a conservative estimate that by 1999, on a linear trend, more than 40 per cent of births would be to single women.

He was right. According to the latest figures from the ONS, by 2004, this had
grown to 42 per cent (the equivalent US figure was 35 per cent). This is an
exceptional rise. It is likely on this trend that the majority of all babies produced in Britain in a decade will be born to single or unmarried mothers. They already are in Wales, and in a host of other places you care to name across Britain: in Sunderland, Newcastle, Manchester, Nottingham, Dundee, Glasgow, Stoke, Norwich, Plymouth, Weymouth and Belfast. In Hartlepool, Blackpool, Liverpool and Lincoln, the illegitimacy rates are already over 60 per cent. Figures also confirm that pregnancy is no longer seen as a trigger for marriage. In 1992, 27,200 girls aged 15-19 were married and by 2003, this had more than halved to just 11,700; this at a time when the birth rate amongst single women under twenty remained stable at roughly 25 per 1,000. A similar pattern has occurred in older age groups. The result is that more babies are being born outside of marriage, and more children are growing up without a stable parental relationship.

Why is bastardy a Bad Thing?

The evidence has long shown us that teenage pregnancy and illegitimacy is encouraged by welfare, and absent fathers and single mothers damage children’s emotional and psychological development, often permanently. Dozens of social science and economic research papers have been published in the US since the 1970s proving these points, including one of the most influential, by Mikhail Bernstam of the Hoover Institution at Stanford in 1988, that showed that childbearing by young unmarried women increased by 6 percent in response to a 10 percent increase in monthly welfare benefits; among blacks, the increase could be as high as 10 percent (Mikhail S. Bernstam, “Malthus and Evolution of the Welfare State: An Essay on the Second Invisible Hand, Parts I and II”, Hoover Institution,1988).

While there have been some studies that argue the causality is unclear or there is no net impact overall, there has never been a paper which proves that welfare actually promotes marriage and the maintenance of stable families, nor any that show that children benefit from being born into broken homes. The consensus is that out-of-wedlock birth and growing up in a single-parent family means the child tends to experience retarded cognitive development; lower educational achievement; lower job attainment; increased behaviour and emotional problems; lower impulse control; and retarded social development.

Unsurprisingly, such children are far more likely to engage in early sexual activity; have children out of wedlock; be on welfare as adults; and engage in criminal activity.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/article_assets/articledir_1/652/The_Underclass_and_Crime%20final.pdf

How typical that the state should be paying good money to encourage precisely the very activity that will make teenage pregnancy more likely.

What sort of message does this free anti-cervical cancer vaccine give British schoolgirls?

Let me venture to put it together in way even a sink-school educated British schoolgirl can understand:

1. No need to worry about getting sexually-transmitted cervical cancer after your jab.
2. It is OK to have unprotected sex when you have the jab.
3. It is OK to have sex as soon as you have the jab.

Do we really need to encourage them to have more sex??

Is this the sort of message we want to give to the mothers of the next generation of illegitimate children?

Visit www.divorcereform.org/crime.html for horrifying statistics on the crime rate amongst the illegitimate and the singly-parented.