THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label racial superiority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racial superiority. Show all posts
Since Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism, it must be because gentiles found something admirable or enviable in Jews and/or Judaism.
After all, getting their homeland back after 2000 years of exile is no mean feat. The least you can do in the name of racial superiority is to be in existence to enter the competition.
If you wish to remain a gentile, then you can only choose between Christianity and Islam.
Why not Hinduism or Buddhism? Because they are even more alien to the traditions of the West than Islam and the delinquent Westerner now desperately needs boundaries and structure in his national life as well as hope for the future. The Koran is the best available guide for him on the question of changing the rules so that they are fair to his women and minorities after the patriarchy is restored.
Let us hope it will not be too long before Western Man submits to the Truth, Logic and Morality of another Abrahamic faith after recognising that the one of his ancestors has absolutely failed along with his political system of indiscriminate universal suffrage that has now created a rapacious parasitic class.
Obviously, only 24:2 of the Koran quran.com/24/2 is capable of shaming the shameless slut with public corporal punishment to discourage her from producing badly parented bastards who become the underachievers, criminals, knife crime perpetrators and knife crime victims of the next generation. Such women are the agents of degeneracy, and it is time they are acknowledged to be the agents of decline, dementia and the death of your civilisation.
If Jews are indeed a superior race, then the gentile should defer to them and seek their advice because there now is an urgent question:
Is Christianity or Islam more in conformity with the Noahide laws and why?
It cannot be Christianity, because worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God, as the Doctrine of the Trinity requires, is undeniably idolatry and absolutely forbidden by the Noahide laws.
If the West is currently being punished by the disease of the mind that is feminism, it must be because God has finally decided to punish the Post-Christian for 2000 years of idolatry.
If asked whether your race or religion is more important to you, how would you answer? Only if you are an observant Jew could you honestly answer that both are logically and necessarily equally important.
What bemuses me about white supremacists about their racial superiority is their inability to go with the logic of racial superiority. The following questions should occur to the thinking racist:
1) If racial superiority exists, does it really only rest on the colour of one's skin?
2) If racial superiority is not just about the colour of one's skin, does it rest on military, social, economic, political and moral superiority?
3) If racial superiority rests on military superiority, then racial superiority rests on science and technology upon which perceived social, economic and political and moral superiority rests.
4) The question of how military superiority is gained must be asked. It seems to me that this was kick-started by the Industrial Revolution which was all about selling stuff everyone round the world wanted to buy, and how to make them most profitably and cheaply, which was what science and technology was all about. Obviously, with all the SSMs (Slut Single Mothers) and variously fathered and badly parented illegitimate offspring that state schools have to take, you cannot expect this tradition to be kept up, particularly when one of the two parties of government refuse to countenance selective education, and this hurts the working classes by depriving them of the opportunity to better themselves.
5) It is your culture that enables you to maintain your military superiority. The Pyrrhic victories of WW1 and WW2 over Germany only sent the British into a tailspin of social unrest. After WW1 there was the General Strike of 1925, when the working classes felt they had died like flies in the Great War for nothing very much. Mosley's attempt to correct the situation failed, because what he wanted to do was correct the political system itself, proposing to abolish the Upper House and replacing it with Fascist Corporatism and a pruned Lower House. Instead of being more careful about whom they went to war with, the British thought they would finish the job with Germany in WW2. Again, they failed, but this time decided to let their hair down and everything hang out with their welfare state and their swinging. This accelerated their degeneracy and explains how they have got to the pretty pass of white men now being helpless against a Muslim invasion and their women totally out of control and hating them.
The BUF was anti-communist and protectionist, and proposed replacing parliamentary democracy with executives elected to represent specific industries, trades or other professional interest groups—a system similar to the corporatism of the Italian fascists. Unlike the Italian system, British fascist corporatism planned to replace the House of Lords with elected executives drawn from major industries, the clergy, and colonies. The House of Commons was to be reduced to allow for a faster, "less factionist" democracy.
Am I alone in thinking that on the whole Mosley's proposals for reform seem sensible enough?
6) Culture is really the practices that the law allows, and the law is a reflection of whatever the current political orthodoxy - a mixture of religion and political tradition - permits. So now we approach again my pet theory, which is that Christianity has failed. Christianity has obviously failed because it has not protected the foolish British from their avoidable folly of following their ridiculous liberalism and the brain-numbing stupidity of their idolatrous Christianity. All the things they could have done to avoid the folly of declaring two World Wars on Germany would have been prevented by Islam as well as the post-war self-indulgence of not parenting their children properly and sinking into a culture of wine, women and song leading to the progressive (pun intended) enfeeblement of mind, body and spirit.
Returning to the subject of racial superiority, it does appear that racial superiority is only military superiority and military superiority is obtained by the happenstance of history eg the Industrial Revolution, an unplanned population explosion, and geopolitics. It is obvious that racial superiority is not permanent and relies on the rules one practices in one's racial group. Even Hitler did not assume that the Germans were so superior and perfect that they need do nothing more other than to marinate in their racial superiority. Indeed, he could be said to be urging Germans to strive and fight in order to become superior or perhaps just as good as the British. He was probably content with being just as good with what everyone thought were the masters of the universe of the time, the British.
Assuming that you are a racist who believes in the concept of racial superiority, the next question is to ask yourself must be "Who is the most racially superior race of all?" The Romans were once racially superior because they were militarily superior, but when they declined they eventually lost their culture of producing soldiers to conquer other lands, and lost the taste for conquest, sinking into decadence, wine, women and song. Why, a Roman emperor even changed his religion in an attempt to arrest decline. In the end, Rome was sacked, and the Roman Empire is no more. You cannot be racially superior to anyone if you no longer even exist.
Who, then, is racially superior? Not the Europeans in the great scheme of things, I'm afraid, simply because military superiority does not last forever, as I have easily demonstrated with the Romans, if you do not inculcate a culture, political system or maintain a religion that perpetuates it. You may technically be at the top of the tree, but you may just fall off if you suffer a dizzy spell it even if no one pulls you off.
To be racially superior one has to satisfy the condition of being in existence and of at the very least holding territory. Racial superiority does not necessarily rest on numbers, but numbers help if you are in the business of acquiring more territory. Israeli Zionist Jews are insisting that they have no imperial ambitions and simply want to live in Israel in peace. The Chinese already have enough on their plate and have for centuries been sucking their pencils on the question of their proper relationship with the rest of the world.
The top dogs of racial superiority are Jews and Chinese, simply because they have been around so long. I would award the top prize to the Jews, because they at least have bothered to write things down properly in their scripture and had a head start. Unlike the Chinese, Jews also had the perspicacity to attribute their survival to their God, to stop themselves from becoming too big-headed.
According to the Chinese calendar it is the year 4715. According to the Hebrew calendar it is the year 5778.
Now that we know that Jews are racially superior, we have to ask ourselves why they are racially superior. Clearly, it is their religion. Clearly, their religion is so obviously superior that two of the most famous attempts to adapt Judaism for gentiles are universally acknowledged to be Christianity and Islam. Christianity is now kaput, so the next religion of the West has to be Islam. It is really as a simple as an arithmetical problem. You have 3. You take 2 away and have 1 left. The one left is Islam, and the answer is the answer even if you don't like it.
My hypothesis can even be mathematically proven if we can agree that what made Britain great was the fact that it was the first nation in the world to have a world empire.
How did they lose their empire? The most proximate cause was WW2. It has been said by A J P Taylor that WW2 was a continuation of WW1. Why did the British declare war on Germany in WW1? Because the Liberal PM Asquith thought a short successful war would make him more likely to win the General Election of 1915. Imagine, losing your world empire because the Liberal Party wanted to win an election that was subsequently cancelled! You would have thought that the British by now would have realised their error or could have accepted Mosley's attempt to correct it, but what their political leaders lacked in wisdom was equalled and exceeded by their stubborn pride and chauvinism.
It is easily provable that the great upheavals suffered by the British would have been easily avoided if they had been Muslim and followed the Koran. The Koran only allows defensive wars and neither WW1 nor WW2 could by any stretch of the imagination be called defensive. British foreign policy was impelled primarily by a dog in the manger attitude towards Germany because it saw Germany as a rival and a threat. It is the equivalent of a foolish Monopoly player buying up properties he didn't want just to prevent his opponent from completing his set and bankrupting himself in the process and not being able to make the most of any opportunities he landed on, because he was mortgaged to the hilt.
Now they are the poodle of Uncle Sam and remain a vassal state of the EU, with approximately half its citizens begging to retain this status and its male MPs too terrified to question the parasitic nature of feminism for fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence. How are the mighty fallen.
What is the sex of the Prime Minister?
What is the sex of the Home Secretary?
What is the sex of the Commissioner of Police?
What is the sex of the Director of Public Prosecutions?
What is the sex of the Chairman of the Bar Council?
What is the sex of the Director General of the CBI?
Is the Archbishop of Canterbury a bastard?
Has Peter Hitchens called himself a feminist?
Is Roger Scruton, the Conservative Philosopher, too afraid of his wife to challenge feminism?
Is Philip Davies MP, who used to challenge feminism too afraid to continuing doing so now because the feminazis have got him by the goolies?
What is the very least your religion should be doing?
Supporting marriage and the family.
This is what all the five world religions have in common.
Oh, and telling the truth, behaving honourably so men can co-operate with each other to defeat the internal and external enemies of their nation.
The eternal enemies of society and civilisation are sluts and socialists.
Patriarchy must therefore be regarded as the foundation of all civilisations. When your national religion no longer sanctifies marriage, it must be regarded as having failed.
How do you know when your religion no longer sanctifies marriage?
When your society is no longer a patriarchy.
How do you know when your society is no longer a patriarchy?
When your government no longer prioritises the preferences of married fathers and instead panders to the female voter which means it has become a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who are the bad parents of their illegitimate children who will not grow into productive citizens but become the adult criminals of the future.
No other country has over 85 per cent of babies born to unmarried mothers and over 50 per cent without registered fathers. No other country routinely discusses parenthood in such relationship neutral terms as 'baby father' and 'baby mother'. No other country so readily accepts absent fatherhood or brings up children so carelessly. And no other country not at war has such a high murder rate.
There is only one objective way of measuring racial superiority and it is in terms of how much territory one race with a common language, culture, religion and government controls through military superiority, and for how long.
It really is as simple as that.
I believe the most racist of racists would acknowledge that one does not become effortlessly superior to other races just by pointing to the colour of one's skin, one must back it up with overwhelming force.
If the white race has acquired military and global supremacy, something in the nature of white culture must have produced this.
This culture and knowledge must have come from its laws, its laws must come from its history and government, its government must have come from its politics, its politics must have come from its religion, and it is our religion that guides our morality, law, politics and government.
Our civilisation flourishes when our government is good, and stagnates and declines if we have bad leaders and bad government.
If we have bad leaders, we must analyse the failures of their selection. The pool of political talent in Britain is infamously small and shallow. This is so because of its defective education system, its divisive class system, its snobbery topped with complacency, chauvinism, the operation of democracy that submits to feminism as well as the defects of the British religion. For the avoidance of doubt, the British religion is not Christianity, a religion more honoured in the breach than in its observance. The British religion is feminism, the deity the British worship is the slut and the sacrament they practice to honour this deity is fornication.
Jews are superior to the White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) simply because they as a tribe control who becomes the US Presidential candidate in the world's most militarily powerful nation through the Israel lobby. This is because the divisiveness and vulnerabilities of the Western political system allows them to do so.
Why are these vulnerabilities not patched?
Because our intellectuals, politicians and media are weak and corrupt for they prioritise perpetuating their practice of voters voting every five years for different political parties even as this system has demonstrably produced increasingly poor and corruptible politicians as well as bad to worse governments.
The media are not interested in discussing this or allowing me a platform on which to discuss this. They are mostly taken over by feminists and their running dogs and they certainly do not want to help me challenge the matriarchy or even do their job ie report news that is newsworthy, if it goes against the position they have taken. According to them, I should not even exist, and if they ignore me long enough, I will get tired, go away and one day die. Denial is a feminine vice.
The fact is that nobody is interested in truth, logic or morality, not even those who complain about their government.
Those who might have an interest in allowing these matters to be discussed ie nationalist YouTubers see me as a rival and do not particularly want to do anything that could possibly help me or allow me to share the limelight. Besides, they find many of my ideas uncomfortable and disturbing and would rather not discuss them at all.
They probably resent being told these things by a female, foreigner and a non-white.
I note however that white sharia has become a meme.
"Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man’s genetic lineage—the notion that a man’s intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors."
Racists are just people who are just wrong about their race being inherently better than others, but whose pride prevents them from acknowledging that this may not be true for all time.
Is it racist to hate and fear other races? Is it always irrational to hate and fear strangers and foreigners?
Only the fool would unhesitatingly say yes or no.
It depends.
When people have nothing left - when they have no pride, no culture, no family, no education, no future - I suppose they are left only with the colour of their skin to be proud of, which no one can take away.
The idea of racial superiority is a fallacy anyway. Even racists admit it as they vociferously claim that the white race is better than any other while complaining about their helplessness in stopping other races from coming into their land (because their own government doesn't care enough about them to even warn and admonish them) and how their women piss on them while they have sex with whoever they like, including men of other races.
Even as they assert racial superiority they are acknowledging their abject degradation.
Racism, as far as I am concerned, is like a minor celebrity who is receiving bad service in a restaurant by an insolent waiter who clearly do not know who the hell he is.
What will happen when he stupidly says "Don't you know I am?"
"No. Who the fuck are you?"
It is not what we look like that will save us from doom, but how what we believe, which makes us do the things we do. What we do will make us happy and glorious, or lose us our marbles and turn us into despised paupers.
The essence of racial supremacy is not going on about it. It is already ASSUMED. If you have to go on about it, you are already fucked.
A man who is always telling others what a gentleman he is can't possibly be one.
A lady can be a woman who appears ladylike or has high standars of chastity. The moment she refers to her high standards of chastity she will immediately make her listener imagine her in a compromising position.
Aristocrats find it painfully embarrassing to be with vulgar people. It is vulgar to clamorously claim superiority over other races. When you really are the race who is currently master of the universe, no one questions you. When you have to assert it, you have already lost it.
It is probably the difference between a multi-millionaire who never discusses money and a social climber who is always trying to find out how much everyone earns and telling everyone how much he earns.
Or a celebrity being outraged at being treated badly in a restaurant.
To say to the rude and incompetent waiter "Don't you know who I am?" would be quite counter- productive, because the answer is already NO, which would leave one open to further humiliation.
I think it is time to shut up about racial superiority and think about how to be gentleman and ladies. It is when other races believe your race to be mostly gentlemen and ladies that you can claim and assert racial superiority. When other races already know you are mostly sluts and bastards they will assuredly treat you like niggers when you are skint.
Sadly, the white people who wish to assert racial supremacy tend to be the less educated and from the lower classes - precisely the sort who are not ladies and gentlemen.
A decent civic nationalist movement should therefore attract the support of people with a bit of money, but the small-minded and the insecure nationalist leadership that clings to its core supporters for dear life like a timid child to its mother's apron strings could never reach the critical mass required for any change to happen. After all, who would want to vote for an insecure child who clings to its lower class supporters for dear electoral life and wishes to be identified with those people ad infinitum? Sadly, such a leadership reinforces a sense of racial inferiority and despair, too scared to even tell its own members that the reason why white working class people are mostly scared, skint and stupid and rejected in employment by employers seeking unskilled labour these days is because they are mostly low paid sluts and bastards with low standards of education and behaviour who are abused and exploited by their leadership, and who have nowhere to go but the English Democrats if they are expelled for criticising the leader.
How can a race of skint, scared and stupid sluts and bastards possibly assert racial superiority?
They can't and they won't.
I feel deeply sorry for them and want to help them, but know they will not let go of their racial pride by supporting me. If I were white and male they would go for me all right, but I am female and foreign, so that's me out.
"God does not change the lot of those who do not change what is in their hearts."
Racial superiority is all about having more money and bigger and better guns than the people whose asses you kick. It would stand to reason that this is by no means assured for all time and the colour of your skin does not protect you at all from the vicissitudes of bad government.
The reason why politically respectable white people in the liberal establishment refused to express racial pride was because they knew they were already supreme and it would just be demeaning for them to go on about it, the way the white working classes do (because they have nothing else to be proud of but the colour of their skin).
It is a bit like old rich families (ie those who are not nouveau riche) not crowing about how much they earn and own, because they are wise enough to know that ostentatiously displaying their wealth only excites hatred and envy in those who could never hope to have even a fraction of what they earn.
I happened to be born Chinese though no input of my own. I could have been born white, or black or brown, but I was born Chinese. (Those who are familiar with the rules of reincarnation will doubtless conclude that I must have been a very good person indeed in my former life.)
It is not enough to be born Chinese, however, to do what I do. One has to speak the language, know the people, know the country's history, know its political system and know its laws to do what I do, which is to presume to tell the British what is good for them. (I have been privileged by my family and cultural background to have married parents who are still married and with an extended family who filled in the gaps of my parents' parenting and who have always valued education. All this I commend to all people of all races, for I want others to also have what I have enjoyed, believing that this would make the world a better place.) I claim to be able to know better than any white indigenous Briton what is good for their country precisely because I am foreign, for sometimes you are in a better position be objective and effective if you not the person afflicted, for example, when you need a foreign object removed from your eye.
The wiser Chinese politicians who deal with foreigners would be careful not to go on about their racial superiority because that is already assumed. To go on about it would just be crass, and that was why liberal politicians would shut up poor white people who live amongst lots of black people when they do anything to assert their racial pride or show fear of other races in close proximity, eg in the Deep South and South Africa.
We should of course be generous when we can afford to be. Meanness is to be despised, especially in the wealthy, but it is quite hypocritical to be generous with other people's money and to be hospitable to foreigners on behalf of others who do not wish to be hospitable to be foreigners and whom you inconvenience because you wish to be hospitable, yet do not suffer the inconvenience and alarm that the white urban proletariat suffer when the racial composition of their neighbourhoods is changed very noticeably in a short space of time.
But white liberal politicians would always live in white neighbourhoods and be surrounded by white people and therefore feel none of the fear and hatred that white people surrounded by other races feel. To shut them up they would call them racist, and ignore, vilify and marginalise them, because they are poor and lowly and the poor and lowly are always marginalised, despised and hated, the world over.
It should be noted that these white liberal politicians are so despicably hypocritical, cowardly and callous that they do not tell tell white urban proletariat whose interests they are supposed to represent that their bastard-breeding welfare-scrounging ways are wrong, because that would lose them votes. Instead, they leave them to rot in their sink school comps, bribe them with more benefits that would make them even more useless, promiscuous and illegitimate, and only hit them on the head when they manifest any behaviour or attitude that identifies them as "racist", to shut them up.
Liberals too despise religion, feeling that they are too clever to believe in God, without for once acknowledging that the proletariat, most of whom are not moral philosophers, operate only through the promptings of their ability to feel pain and pleasure. Most of them are now promiscuous and illegitimate, but cannot or will not accept that illegitimacy is bad for them. This is because they have never had the experience of any moral teaching (Christian or otherwise) that told them that Lust is a sin and that illegitimacy is a Bad Thing for their society and their nation. It will take a great deal of patience and energy to sort them out. This is what happens when you, as an able bodied person, kick away the crutches of the moral cripple. You will find yourselves in the end obliged to carry him on your shoulders or leaving him to the wolves when he cannot keep up.
This is how things in Britain seem to me as a foreigner.
