The brain drain of the white race

Pity Western Man, now so terrified of being falsely and maliciously accused of a historic sexual offence and so trigger-happy that he will shoot anyone in front of him, even one who is attempting to defend him.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Those who are not afraid to challenge the matriarchy are intellectual mediocrities, low status under-educated men who condemn themselves the moment they open their mouths with their rabid racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia, bad grammar, regional accent and beta male persona.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Unmarriageable atheist bachelors AKA MGTOW are the other half of the problem of matriarchy. Unmarriageable men means increased bastardy which means more tolerance of bastardy and fornicating sluts meaning more and more of the same until an Islamic takeover, I suppose.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In a matriarchy, all men are beta males subject to the whims of the fornicating slut and unmarried mother. The instantly alpha male would be a man of requisite status and charisma prepared to challenge and defeat it. No one man with anything to lose at all will come forward.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

The fact that no man with anything to lose will emerge to challenge the matriarchy is because such a man would already know he cannot rely on the loyalty of the beta males below, who are not only low status, but men of infamous for their disloyalty and inability to follow orders.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Proletarian white males complaining about immigration are mostly fatherless low-skilled socially retarded with some behavioural problem usually caused by drug/drink-dependency. No one in nationalism would even dare deny this. No marriage, no family values, no religion, no morals.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

No morals, no male solidarity, no co-operation possible to deal with the eternal enemies of society and civilisation: sluts and socialists who have a symbiotic relationship. This means there is only a degenerate culture no sane and moral immigrant would want to integrate into.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

And so this, in a nutshell, is why the white man's status in his own land has become progressively lower (pun intended) over the decades. The immigrant male knows white men are too afraid to challenge their own women and too divided to protest effectively.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Because their own women reject them, they turn gay to get cheap sex from each other. Soon they will grow old and die without issue and descendants and wonder what happened to their lives and their country, blaming Jews, Muslims and foreigners as they breathe their last.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

You don't know what you've got till it's gone. Can you imagine such men restoring the patriarchy or restoring the patriarchy with such low status degenerate unmarriageable leaderless men whom no one wants to lead? They are indeed being warehoused for extinction.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In the meantime, what are white women to do? The marriageable of them will try to marry marriageable men, and they will not be men of their own race whom they already despise: feminised and impoverished.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

What about marriageable white men already aware of the moral devastation wreaked by feminism? They'll reject white women. I recently heard of Asian Aryanism, a term used for white nationalists who reject white women and take up with Oriental women because of their sensible views.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

To secure their own reproductive rights within their own lifetimes, white men and women feel they have to mate with other races in order to have legitimate progeny and bring them up with a spouse who believes in family values. This is the deadly reality of racial degeneracy.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Are you surprised that "mainstream" alt-right YouTubers such as @MillennialWoes and @MarkACollett won't discuss any of this with me? I have the solution but it is what their subscribers cannot bear to hear, so they promulgate race war or urge some form of displacement activity.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I hope to demonstrate that the principles of nationalism are the same for every race and nation: patriarchy supported by marriage using a moral system whose laws support marriage. This can only mean Islam if you are a gentile in the West, because Christianity is kaput.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I have been saying for years that sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and the only protection against this is the practice of slut-shaming that is required by any religion that promotes patriarchal moral values. These would be the five world religions, but as you know, all religions can be subverted once they ignore their own rules and people either don't notice or don't care.

The sexually-liberated atheist is more prone to doing this than a Jew or a Muslim because Jews and Muslims are more likely to know about the prohibition against premarital sex than the atheist, even if they do not agree with it.

The trouble with nationalists is that they are atheist antisemites and Islamophobes who would rather die than even be seen to be investigating the religion of those they hate and fear with any show of objective impartiality.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage. Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage. Without the patriarchy, not enough good strong men will be produced to defend the national interest. If Western men were mostly Christian husbands and fathers of legitimate offspring, they wouldn't and needn't put up with the matriarchy for even a minute.

Without the family and a functioning religion, men are atomised and competing against each other for the sexual favours of immoral women, incapable of co-operating with each other to deal with their internal enemies: sluts and socialists.

Without patriarchy there is no hierarchy and therefore no accountability.

A matriarchy is basically buck-passing politicians who will blame other buck-passing politicians where the apparent leader is really not in control of anything and cannot rely on the loyalty of beta males to support him. This makes him cowardly, hesitant and cautious and also means nothing much will be done in Trump's term of office.

Without patriarchy, no one in a senior political position will stick his neck out to defend the beta males below. Enoch Powell and Keith Joseph tried to point out the obvious, but had their careers destroyed.

Because courage and truth is not rewarded, no more politicians will speak it on your behalves.

Not only is pointing out the obvious unrewarded, it will get you ignored even by the people who are supposed to be on your side who cannot bear to accept the truth either.

The problem with atheism is that the atheist can only think in terms of his own life and does not care what happens after he is dead, especially if he has no biological investment in the next generation.

Most white nationalists are atheist unmarriageable bachelors which means they are easily intimidated and bribed.

Without religion, there is no possibility of enjoying the inter-generational co-operation that Jews and Muslims enjoy which means each generation of nationalists has to more or less reinvent the wheel.

Often, I feel that nationalists of the previous generation would actually hate to see the younger generation succeed where they have failed.

As far as the younger generation are concerned, they are now so atomised that they cannot form a political party or even discuss anything other than what they imagine their YouTube subscribers want to hear.

And this is why none of them will talk to me. It is abuse of power really, but they don't see anything wrong with that either.

If you really are a political activist, you owe it to your cause to seek the truth and operate on logic, guided by your principles. This is the very least that is required.

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.

Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.

Intellectual corruption leads to the inability to form logical conclusions based on indisputable facts and solve political problems guided by moral principles. Only those from a religious background practising family values would have internalised the categorical imperative to have principles and follow them. The illegitimate, singly parented and the badly schooled will find this almost impossible to do, however patient you are with him. Believe me, I have tried.

The degenerate who has difficulty understanding the nature and purpose of principles will have greater difficulty applying them if they their morality is non-existent. Most of them will have difficulty even recognising a situation when the exercise of principle is required, because they are accustomed to responding instinctively and thoughtlessly to the promptings of their baser appetites. If sex is offered, they will take it, even if they have already said they are not looking for a relationship and would even agree with you that immoral women who are also bad parents of illegitimate offspring cause the social problems of immigration they are always complaining about.

Such degenerates are only left with denial, apathy and the stated intention to leave the country if it all gets too much to bear.  

The enemy within of nationalism - the promiscuous female nationalists fear to offend

Understand your class system. The BNP are considered lower class losers who are expected to put up with this kind of thing because they are lower class losers. It really is as simple as that. Nick Griffin doesn't want any educated middle class professional joining the BNP because he doesn't want any leadership rivals.

The problem is therefore

1. the pariah status of lower class voters who are anti-immigration

2. the fact that the leader of the lower class voters are anti-immigration doesn't want to change its image of being a party of lower class voters who are anti-immigration

UKIP doesn't want anyone who ever joined the party of lower class racist voters to join them.

What nationalists in the prohibited list of parties and organisations that cannot join UKIP could most usefully do is to debunk ethno-nationalism and become civic nationalists, but I can't see that happening because they confuse a political party with a social club and believe that their political activism is the repetition of their desire to repatriate non-white British citizens.

They will insist on their right to say they want to send every non-white home even as they know how unrealistic and deluded it is to ask for that. They are not the brightest bulbs in the box, after all.

They insist on asking for all or nothing even though knowing that asking for all means they will end up getting nothing.

It is just the mulish stupidity that gives them their pariah status ie not only are they racist, they are also STUPID. They are so stupid they have no idea how much they are despised for both their views, their social status and their dress sense.

They never want to discuss anything ideological because they know they will end up fighting each other, and they can be pretty unpleasant to each other, as we all know.

In the meantime, Nick Griffin regards them as a source of income. He is not interested in helping them, only in milking them by feeding their grievances.

If he cared about them, he would drag them kicking and screaming into civic nationalism, but he cannot be bothered with these stupid vicious people, even though the success of Front Nationale has shown quite conclusively that the way forward is civic nationalism.

Is there another rival nationalist party in France? Nope, nothing that need worry Marine Le Pen.

She tellingly said that her party is closer to UKIP than it is to the BNP.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/letters/8230286/Marine-Le-Pens-emulation-of-Ukip-shows-Euroscepticism-is-growing-across-the-EU.html

Uneducated people tend not to get the significance of ideology and it is true that most BNP supporters will not understand why it is necessary for nationalists to embrace civic nationalism.

These uneducated and ignorant people see nationalism as asserting the right to say they want to repatriate non-white British citizens, even as they know it does them no good.

Because they are seen as so uneducated, racist, lower class and unpleasant, no one will give them the time of day apart from their leader, who only wants to squeeze money out of them.

Anyone who is leadership material in the BNP would be marginalised and expelled anyway, because Nick Griffin wants to stay top dog whether or not it is in the interests of his cause or not.

If he cared about his cause he would encourage people of talent to join and stay, but he does not. He only cares that he stays leader of the BNP.

Because he does not care about the people who supports the BNP, he sees it as more than his job's worth to tell them why the political establishment despises them and no sane British employer wants to hire a British worker who cannot compete against unskilled manual labour from abroad, probably because they are obese, or disabled or have learning difficulties as well as mental health issues with a few substance abuse, behavioural addictions and drink problems thrown in.

The fact is that the white working class are not fit for purpose.

Does Nick Griffin tell them that? Of course not. He tells them it is all the fault of the Jews and the Muslims.

There is only one person in the land prepared to tell the white indigenous working classes exactly what is wrong with them and why they are so despised, but she was expelled at the behest of an unmarried single mother with illegitimate and disabled offspring.

Single mothers with illegitimate and disabled offspring actually wield a disproportionate amount of power, because there are so many of them and they have the vote.

These women, who are members of the parasitic pornocracy who wield such power over both nationalists and the political establishment, are the result of over half a century of feminism and that other grave and continuing error - indiscriminate universal suffrage.

The reason why there are so many immigrants in this country is because British mothers do not have enough children and do not bring up or educate those that they have properly.

We all know that the teaching profession is female-dominated and have been trying to hide their failure for years.

But is any British man or even leader of a political party prepared to say that?

Of courser not. He is so afraid of them (because they have the vote) that he prefers to blame the symptoms of his malaise than point to its cause - the matriarchy that has established itself on the foundations of feminism, indiscriminate universal suffrage and no-fault divorce.

Any race of men who are known to be afraid of their women will be treated with contempt by other races whose men are not afraid of the worst of their women, the unmarried single mother with illegitimate and disabled offspring.

In fact, these days the white man is generally supposed to be a paedophile and his women considered sluts.

However, so effeminate and degraded is the white man now that he is either unaware of the contempt in which he is held by other races, or affects not to care.

In other races, there remains a visceral disgust for the promiscuous female. It probably comes from a collective memory of how degraded a society becomes when it allows the preferences of these women and their offspring to dominate their society, and is followed by invasion, conquest, exploitation and slavery.

The reason the promiscuous female is instinctively hated and despised is because when there are too many of them, standards of education and morality decline, and men become afraid of women. What can be more humiliating than to have to admit that you are afraid of people who are in most cases stupider, poorer and weaker than you?

Only men without honour and who feel no shame and who have no masculine pride would admit to this.

Yes, it is indeed the case that the enemy is within. It is in your trousers and between your legs and between your ears in the way that the default position of the average British male is that of rational cowardice and his degenerate inability to understand the purpose of abstract concepts such as honour and courage.  

Men fear the wrath of promiscuous women when they are so impoverished that the only kind of sex they can hope for is sex from a slut.

If they want sex from such a woman, he must take care not to offend her by calling a spade a spade and, of course, a slut a slut.

A slut is anyone prepared to have sex with a man not her husband. A worse kind of slut is one who gets knocked up. The worst kind is one who goes on to have her illegitimate offspring at the expense of the taxpayer.

The Catholic Church is no longer prepared to call a slut a slut because it is afraid of the predictable accusations of homosexual and paedophile celibate priests.

The worst kind of man is a man who pretends he can see nothing at all wrong in all this, especially if he calls himself a nationalist.

If you want to know when the rot started, it was when the institution of marriage was no longer respected.

It was no longer respected when no-fault divorce was introduced. When that happened the fact that your marriage certificate has now become a piece of paper not fit to wipe your arse on was only inevitable.

To desecrate marriage further, treat the unmarried mother better than married parents by allowing her to live off the taxpayer.

To desecrate marriage even further, give it to same sex couples as a sex toy to use for when they want to say they love each other, until they no longer do.

In the Land of Compulsory Fornication that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland the Slut Single Mum is Queen and the men drones.

Have you noticed how feminists never ever consider the long term national interest between pauses of "Gimme, gimme, gimme"?

It is an alien concept to them.  It is like asking a serial killer to consider the feelings of the loved ones of his murdered victims.

How can such a nation, based on such immoral and demented principles, ever prosper again?

Man created God to protect him from the promiscuous female.  Now, the effeminate man no longer believes in God.   Even those who acknowledge the usefulness of God do not have the conviction to use Him as an instrument of government, even as he knows that a general belief in God was an essential prop in making  people respect the institutions of marriage.

Marriage is eugenic, illegitimacy dysgenic.

Soon, the white man will be so degenerate that he will no longer be able to grasp these concepts.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/why-white-race-is-declining-in-numbers.html

Returning to barbarism means behaving like animals, and animals are not known for their ability to grasp and use abstract concepts.

Let the West then be the perfect demonstration of how condoning extramarital sex can end your civilisation.

WHY WHITE WOMEN NO LONGER FANCY WHITE MEN AND PREFER MUSLIMS
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/05/muslims-dominate-the-natives-on-the-streets-of-norway/

COUNTRIES WHERE GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL ALSO HAVE A HIGH RATE OF ILLEGITIMACY ie most of their women are slut single mums
http://www.allaboutlove.org/same-sex-marriage-countries.htm

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Spinster-Single-Mums-a-burden-on-the-state/417696111659379

AN ICY LESSON FOR UKIP FROM FINLAND by David Jones

(By David Jones, Independent Pennine Nationalist,
Todmorden, East Lancashire)

I have observed the close (second place) victory in Finland of the True Finns, a populist, right-wing party that has a platform similar to that of the UK Independence Party, in this most liberal of Scandanavian nations the Finnish voters have rediscovered a sense.

This party, which has been in the doldrums of electoral politics and was on the verge of being out flanked by the Finnish SKS-Vahapoulie (sort of their version of our BNP, whose only real asset is their popular leader, the tough guy, of Arctic politics Olavi Mäenpaa has been comfortably holding a seat on Turku City Council for over a decade) and facing political extinction.

Over the last two electoral cycles, True Finns have been rising metiorically however, their success is rare and is only comparable to the success of the "Serbian Radical Party", the Polands "Self Defence Party" and the "Union Attack" Party in Bulgaria, and far outstrips the sucess of Marine Le Pen (of France' FN Party) and even the Vlaams Belang (of the ethnically Dutch portion of Belgium).

So what catapulted this tiny right wing party in Finland most comparable to UKIP to the doors of Helsinki?

Simple, they broke the class divide and directed their appeal at the PRODUCTIVE population of the Finnish society, that is to say they broke with the concept that they must appeal to the middle-class while Mäenpaa's SKS-Vahapoulie appealed to the working-class.

The campaign of the True Finns united the working class tool machinist and his local warehouse owner, it united the timber merchant and the carpenter, the doctor and scientist with the guy that cleaned his windows. They were all behind a common patriotic populist agenda.

There is a lesson for UKIP here!

Many of UKIPs members are, lets be honest, outright snobs who just don't want to be associated with the BNP, it has nothing to do with differences of economic policy which don't matter since neither the BNP or UKIP will be picking the wallpaper for No. 10 any time soon.

Add to the snobbishness the establishment agenda, Nigel Farage is perfectly aware that he will only be able to keep his wealthy support and excessive media coverage is by banging on about how his party are going to destroy the BNP (which is doing a pretty good job at destroying itself), if you don't believe me then listen to him rouse loud cheers from the lefties of the Radio 4 studio audiences while he rants against the BNP on Jonathan Dimbleby's "Any Questions" which he appears to be on every third week.

Well the love affair between the UAF and UKIP was only useful while UKIP was needed to tap the BNP from the middle classes, and now there's no BNP votes left to tap, rest assured that UKIP will come under the same fire from the UAF that the BNP did.

So now we have plenty of despondant ex-BNP looking for a new home, where will they go? Well, not UKIP! Seems UKIP can't stand the smell of the working class BNP and have banned former members from joining UKIP.

Shame really because not only will these lads bring fresh support for them but also will most likely be less likely to leave the party, which rest assured the local wealthy donors will do, the second they see their name in the local paper printed by some National Union of Journalists hack branding them "fascists" and "nazis".

Also, we must encourage local UKIP branch officials to prepare for this and start reaching out
and recruiting solid, working class patriots - don't wait for an order from the top to do that.

Also UKIP officials can drop the use of the colour pink and use purple when they have their Rosettes stamped and literature printed, as well as start taking up a the kind of local community polticking that made the BNP so sucessful here in the Pennines.

Of course to do any of that they must lift the proscription on the BNP, gradually in needed, ie have the ban expire after having been out of the BNP for two years, or put it at the discretion of the local branch.

What are they afraid of anyway? The hardliners have already left and joined the National Front!

If UKIP made the party a no go area for the UAF, who have been infiltrating its youth wing "Young Independence" for years, lifted its proscription on the BNP, recruited some genuine working class and stopped parding around in pink to please the feminists then they could, I'm certain, enjoy the same electoral sucess that their counterparts in Finland have seen.

On racial superiority 14/88

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=14%2F88

The essence of racial supremacy is not going on about it. It is already ASSUMED. If you have to go on about it, you are already fucked.

A man who is always telling others what a gentleman he is can't possibly be one.

A lady can be a woman who appears ladylike or has high standars of chastity.  The moment she refers to her high standards of chastity she will immediately make her listener imagine her in a compromising position.

Aristocrats find it painfully embarrassing to be with vulgar people. It is vulgar to clamorously claim superiority over other races. When you really are the race who is currently master of the universe, no one questions you. When you have to assert it, you have already lost it.

It is probably the difference between a multi-millionaire who never discusses money and a social climber who is always trying to find out how much everyone earns and telling everyone how much he earns.

Or a celebrity being outraged at being treated badly in a restaurant.

To say to the rude and incompetent waiter "Don't you know who I am?" would be quite counter- productive, because the answer is already NO, which would leave one open to further humiliation.

I think it is time to shut up about racial superiority and think about how to be gentleman and ladies.  It is when other races believe your race to be mostly gentlemen and ladies that you can claim and assert racial superiority.  When other races already know you are mostly sluts and bastards they will assuredly treat you like niggers when you are skint.

Sadly, the white people who wish to assert racial supremacy tend to be the less educated and from the lower classes - precisely the sort who are not ladies and gentlemen.

A decent civic nationalist movement should therefore attract the support of people with a bit of money, but the small-minded and the insecure nationalist leadership that clings to its core supporters for dear life like a timid child to its mother's apron strings could never reach the critical mass required for any change to happen. After all, who would want to vote for an insecure child who clings to its lower class supporters for dear electoral life and wishes to be identified with those people ad infinitum? Sadly, such a leadership reinforces a sense of racial inferiority and despair, too scared to even tell its own members that the reason why white working class people are mostly scared, skint and stupid and rejected in employment by employers seeking unskilled labour these days is because they are mostly low paid sluts and bastards with low standards of education and behaviour who are abused and exploited by their leadership, and who have nowhere to go but the English Democrats if they are expelled for criticising the leader.

How can a race of skint, scared and stupid sluts and bastards possibly assert racial superiority?

They can't and they won't.

I feel deeply sorry for them and want to help them, but know they will not let go of their racial pride by supporting me.  If I were white and male they would go for me all right, but I am female and foreign, so that's me out.

"God does not change the lot of those who do not change what is in their hearts."