Translate

Showing posts with label radicalisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label radicalisation. Show all posts

Thursday, 31 May 2018

What the liberal establishment mean when they say Muslims have been radicalised



What does radicalisation mean?

If you propose a radical course of action, does that mean you are radicalised?

Extreme error requires extreme correction, does it not?

Is there anything inherently immoral about proposing a radical course of action if you think only radical action would solve the problem, whatever it is?

Is radicalisation another way of calling someone an extremist and is calling someone an extremist a way of marginalising and ultimately dismissing and ignoring his views? Radicalisation is a word you use to smear your political opponents. If you believe the status quo is perfect, then you would view any attempt to change it as subversive, evil and dangerous. But if the status quo is perfect, as you claim, then why is there a problem of "radicalisation"?

If you tell someone who disagrees with you that it is your intention to smear him, marginalise his views and then ignore his views after you have dismissed them as radical and extremist, do you think he will change his mind about whatever he thinks the problem is?  

Sunday, 13 September 2015

Advice on preventing radicalisation government will ignore in favour of more restrictions on our liberties

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/133007027841


Stop giving the impression that the government is run by feminazis, imbeciles, incompetents, sexual degenerates, lunatics and extremists who will never enter into a full and frank discussion about government policies because they already know are morally and intellectually indefensible.

If not, the government would have to remove the ability of citizens to use reason and access to the news.

We should have a Saturday evening TV programme using the rules of a debating society in which all UK viewers can vote by text. It would be a hit.

Motions I'd like to see proposed are:


  1. Democracy is not serving the long term British national interest and the franchise should be narrowed under a one party state.
  2. Britain is a vassal state of the US.
  3. The American government is in the thrall of the Israel lobby, therefore the rest of the world is similarly in thrall to the Jewish and Israeli interests because Western imperialism is represented by America.
  4. Britain does not have an independent foreign policy.
  5. Britain is the 51st state of America.
  6. After WW2, the British lost their empire while the Americans gained one.
  7. No nation that calls itself a free country could with integrity claim it has free speech if Holocaust Denial legislation criminalises and imprisons historians for saying the wrong number.
  8. The cause of antisemitism worldwide is America's increasingly aggressive foreign policy, perceived to be implemented at the behest of Israel.
  9. Christianity has fallen to gay marriage, ergo Christianity has failed.
  10. Islam is the most natural replacement of the failed religion that is Christianity.
  11. Britain lost its world empire because of the operation of democracy.
  12. Sexual morality is linked to the health and duration of your civilisation.
  13. Sexual morality is really about how far society or an individual deviates from the ideal of traditional marriage: the prohibition of extramarital sex ie fornication, adultery and sodomy.
  14. Britain and the West is now a matriarchy.
  15. All advanced civilisations are patriarchal, and all declining and primitive societies are matriarchal.
  16. A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity, a matriarchy female promiscuity.
  17. Matriarchies are either primitive or degenerate.
  18. The cure for feminism is Islam.
  19. The quickest way to destroy feminism is repeal the Equality Act 2010 and abolish no fault divorce.
  20. Feminism causes degeneracy by encouraging women to be sluts.
  21. Sluts giving sex to men for free corrupts their natures lowering them in status till they are lower than the worst kind of woman - the unfit unmarried mother.
  22. When the men of your society are perceived to be in fear of the worst kind of women, you are advertising to the rest of the world that you are ripe for invasion and exploitation.
  23. Egalitarianism is based on a lie since we are patently not equal.
  24. Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society.
  25. The West is a senescent society of elderly, effete and effeminate men afraid of sluts.

Pankaj Mishra:

"Powerlessness and deprivation [felt by the emasculated beta male] are exacerbated today by the ability, boosted by digital media, to constantly compare your life with the lives of the fortunate (especially women entering the workforce or prominent in the public sphere: a common source of rage for men with siege mentalities worldwide)."


NB: There is no alpha male of Britain. There are no alpha males because no male politician has criticised the Slut Single Mother since 1974 and got away with it. Keith Joseph tried and he ended up having to stand aside for Margaret Thatcher. The British matriarchy was therefore established in 1974, 41 years ago. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Charlotte Proudman, 27, able to so easily and publicly humiliate a 57 year old Queen's Counsel just for paying her a compliment, is the consequence of all the men of Britain being lower than the worst kind of women - the unfit unmarried mother or the SSM (Slut Single Mother). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3229951/Ooh-la-la-hot-stuff-s-prim-barrister-centre-sexism-storm-said-men-ogled-web.html

If most mothers are SSMs, then most women are sluts. If most women are sluts then most men are MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers).

MCSFs are understandably despised for being weak and in fear their women and that is why Europe as a whole is being assailed by wave after wave of migrant swarms, attracted to this country by the easy favours of its women and the effeteness and effeminacy of its men who cannot stand up for a principle because of their terror of offending their feminazi women, much less prevent swarms of migrant African men from entering their countries at will. The migrant swarms now know how weak, suicidal and stupid the European man is. More of them will come till we are completely taken over, if ISIS do not invade us first. 

Friday, 17 July 2015

How to prevent radicalisation

http://fox59.com/2015/07/16/active-shooter-incident-reported-at-tennessee-naval-center/

The only way to prevent radicalisation is to stop people from thinking and forming their own conclusions about the evil criminal enterprise that is Western foreign policy.

The radicalised are divided between those who would never commit violence in pursuance of a political cause and those who would.

Young men are more prepared to do this kind of thing than senescent and effeminate men of the West, but this sort of thing is not unheard of in the white atheist male, if you can remember Anders Breivik.

Eventually, Western governments will make themselves so unpopular that they will be overthrown and an alternative form of government will replace the stinking shit that is liberal democracy.

You see, these radicalised Muslims have worked out that Western foreign policy is the result of Western democracy, and they have formed the very rational conclusion that they must destroy Western democracy to effect a change in Western foreign policy.

What is Western democracy but the declared indifference of Islamophobic Western voters to Western foreign policy?

Quite a few of them unashamedly say they want to kill Muslims for being Muslims and seem to be of the view that their NATO God of War can do no wrong and that American Exceptionalism is justified.

These Muslim terrorists, if they speak to non-Muslim Western citizens at all, would know how much the Western political classes are already despised.

Soon, our government will want to prevent us from forming the conclusions I have formed and disseminating these conclusions.

When Western governments ban free speech and criminalise views, Western civilisation as we know it will have been destroyed by the degenerate effeminate political classes who are currently run government and politics.

When they do this, it will be a signal for dissidents to rise up against the government.

The degenerate political classes are hoist by their own petard having painted themselves into a corner of policy contradictions and ideological inconsistencies. Indeed, it is nothing short of political and ideological dementia and a sign of mass and collective insanity. Every move they make puts them in check or checkmate.

Even if these degenerates go so far as to conduct a pogrom, expel or execute all Muslims in the West for being Muslims, close down every mosque, burn every Koran they can lay their filthy degenerate slut-stained hands on and ban Islam, THEY WILL HAVE LOST.

They will have lost because if they ban free speech and abolish the principle of religious freedom, then Western civilisation as know it will have ended.

Abolishing free speech and religious freedom would be the equivalent of Muslims giving up two of their five pillars of Islam.

These degenerate white men even get brown women to fight their filthy wars.

Meet the Kurdish Women Fighting ISIS in Syria

The female Kurdish pop star with assault rifle rings who inspires troops with her songs about destroying ISIS

ISIS beheads Kurdish female fighter “Rehana”

That is of course conclusive evidence that Western men no longer have any masculine pride and are no longer capable of feeling shame.

But then what can we expect of men who are lower than sluts, who don't mind being lower than sluts and who will continue denying that they are lower than sluts because they have taken on the feminine vice of denial?

These men white men are now so demented that they have now agreed to pay a foreign woman woman lots of money to prosecute and persecute them for years and years.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/13/child-abuse-inquiry-judge-pay-package-lowell-goddard

Today, on BBC Woman's Hour at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b061twpp female MPs were whingeing about the fact that there has never been a female Defence Secretary. That would be just too demoralising and insulting to the Armed Forces and would result in a coup d'etat, probably.

We already have a female Home Secretary in the position of wishing to wound but being afraid to strike about the water cannons so thoughtfully purchased by the London Mayor.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33538171

As I have pointed out many a time already, ISIS is the international patriarchy declaring war on the international matriarchy.

The world is now divided between those who think extramarital sex is a human right, and those who don't want this kind of degenerate shit because they have seen what it has done to the white man.

How do you know if your society is degenerate?

By these signs:

  1. Most voters are degenerate bastards and sluts http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html who care more about having their right to have extramarital sex than in supporting the institution of marriage. 
  2. No one will acknowledge that the only way to support marriage is to have laws that support marriage which punishes extramarital sex or to have a religion that makes people think they will go to hell if they have extramarital sex.
  3. No political party will support marriage because they know most voters are sluts and bastards
  4. Most people won't know what degeneracy means because most people are degenerates. 
  5. Most people will deny they are degenerates because they degenerate.
  6. Most people will say degeneracy doesn't matter because degenerates would say that, wouldn't they?

It would be the easiest thing to discourage thought and the forming of reasonable and logical conclusions from undisputed facts from a society of degenerates who would never stand up for any principle, truth or viewpoint.

Monday, 29 June 2015

By refusing to discuss foreign policy the government merely entrenches the positions of radicalised Muslim youth

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/06/21/baroness-warsi-cameron-muslim-speech-condone_n_7630402.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11427370/Islamic-radicals-at-the-heart-of-Whitehall.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3132209/Don-t-alienate-terror-Tory-Muslim-tells-Cameron-urges-communities-speak-out.html

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/07/exclusive-hopeless-warsi-resists-david-camerons-fight-against-extremism/

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jan/24/baroness-warsi-coalition-assault-muslims

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/baroness-warsi-tells-david-cameron-to-stop-demonising-muslims-after-isis-comments-10333647.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b060ppmb/victoria-derbyshire-29062015

From 1:31:

Nadhim Zahawi:

"There is no point talking to these people because these people want to attack our values."

Victoria Derbyshire:

"Didn't people say that about the IRA at one point?"

Nadhim Zahawi:

"This is not the same thing. This is very different."

And that's it. This is what passes for "debate" on the BBC.





Whether the West likes it or not Islamic State considers itself a state and behaves like a state.




What to do to prevent radicalisation: implement Secular Koranism


It is easier to change that ....


The cost of pursuing British foreign policy is Britons becoming the victims of terrorist violence.

The posh boys of Eton would never be seen dead in a place like Sousse.



Monday, 22 June 2015

How much is Dr Qadri proposing to sell his #JihadAgainstISIS curriculum to the UK government?

The person Sarah Montague should have been interviewing about British Muslim adolescents joining ISIS must surely be Anjem Choudary or even me, at a pinch.

You do not even have to be Muslim to know why they want to join.

The point is that Western governments are not going to change Western foreign policy for the sake of a bunch of Muslims even they do up sticks and go fight in Islamic State.

They know that they will have to put up with terrorism if they want to continue with their foreign policy, so that is what they will do. Because this is indeed the case, all they have to do now is to smear any Muslim who points to Western foreign policy as a factor in radicalisation. Foreign policy a no-go area and anyone who gives it  more than a cursory mention in these discussions will be branded an Islamist apologist, an extremist and to be spied on and their liberty restricted.

Instead, taxpayers' money will be poured into the pockets of charlatans like Qadri and those whose solutions accept the narrative that Western foreign policy can do no wrong and that the Western God of War that is NATO is always right and never wrong.

Qadri's solution is to use his curriculum to indoctrinate all Muslim schoolchildren as to the infallibility of Western foreign policy and probably tell them to report their parents if they even so much as try to suggest to their children that NATO is sometimes wrong.

Not only are Muslim parents expected to remain silent about their views on UK foreign policy they must actively praise and worship NATO as a deity who must always be worshipped and never questioned and always denounce as blasphemers, extremists and potential terrorists anyone who deviates from this narrative.

I hope this is now reasonably clear.



Why Muslims and non-Muslims keep wanting to join ISIS

How to *peacefully* protest against Western foreign policy

Is Sima Kotecha stupid or is she DELIBERATELY avoiding mentioning FOREIGN POLICY?




http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05zhhht From 1:36




http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/10/tahir-ul-qadri-political-enigma-pakistan-2014102271530973245.html

Sarah Montague:

What can be done to stop young Muslims from radicalisd here and then going on to fight with Islamic State with Syria and Iraq? Dr Mohammad Tahir ul Qadri is politician in Islam and a Sufi Islamic scholar who has issued a fatwa against terrorism. He is in London to launch his counter terrorism curriculum which he thinks should be taught to all Muslim schoolchildren. I spoke to him last night asked him where the responsibility lay - why are so many people becoming radicalised?

Qadri:

The problem of radicalisation has not been properly tackled for the last many many years. Unfortunately people in the government and agencies who have been tackling the matter of extremism they have been dividing the matter of extremism into two categories: violent extremism and non-violent extremism. By this division I think they have been allowing extremism to grow into terrorism. Extremism is extremism. Extremism which is non-violent today will become violent ultimately because it has to convert into terrorism finally and then the whole issue becomes very difficult to be tackled. 

Sarah Montague:

You make the point that government agencies have been making this distinction but it makes one wonder given what you are saying whether the Prime Minister is right when he says that some Muslims are quietly condoning the extremist ideology rather than confronting it. So it is the Muslim community themselves who should be doing this?

Qadri:

First of all I have heard Prime Minister's speech. He has I think as far as I understood eliminated this division of violent extremism and non-violent so I think he is 100% right. As far as the Muslim communities are concerned I also agree with this one point: there are some people within Muslim community who are silent on this issue or who condone it silently. Again it opens the door to justification for any kind of terrorism in any name for any faith.

Sarah Montague:

But what is it then? Who is it who needs to speak out and try to reach out to people who might be on this path?

Qadri:

First of all, this becomes the responsibility of Muslim communities, Muslim leaders, imams, clerics. This should be taught right from the beginning in the mosques, in seminaries, in madrassas and at state level in all schools. It should be taught that extremism is something which is clear enmity to humanity and this is against the teachings of the Koran.  

Sarah Montague:

Are you suggesting this should be part of the national curriculum?

Qadri:

Yes, it should be on curriculum. Peace should be taken as peace studies as a subject. Deradicalisation should be taken as a subject. Counter-terrorism should be taken as a subject. The problem is that we have not been addressing this issue on theological front and on ideological front. We have been taking it just as a political economical social issue. Although there can be and there are I don't deny it political influences and socio-economic and local circumstances also influence the youth and international situations do influence but the foremost responsibility I would say is - this is a khawarij philosophy - this is a self-concocted philosophy, ideology and concept by wrong interpretation of Koranic teachings.

Sarah Montague:

It's been perverted and it is the responsibility of communities and government to tackle that ideology head-on?

Qadri:

They have to take it in a theological and ideological manner that this is a khawarij ideology is totally condoned [sic] and extremely condemned by the Holy Prophet in his time. We should not remain silent.

Sarah Montague:

Can I ask you is it possible that somebody could be radicalised solely by what they see online or must there also be someone in their local community encouraging it?

Qadri:

Both things I agree. They are both reasons. In local communities there are somebody maybe prevailing on them and making their mindset and number two by and by remaining silent and condoning silently also creates this space.

Sarah Montague:

If, as you seem to be suggesting, other Islamic leaders are reluctant to criticise it, why do you think that is?

Qadri:

Maybe they think they are feeling insecure. There is nobody in other countries to protect them or they are themselves confused conceptually.  

Sarah Montague:

There is another argument which is that there is a pull from what they are saying online and what is being preached, but there is also a push factor. These are perhaps young people who don't feel that they belong here. Is it perhaps that they are second generation in this country and they feel that they neither know their parents' original communities or their new ones: they don't feel they belong.

Qadri:

I think whether this is a  matter of second generation or third generation if the wrong message continues to be carried and it goes on influencing the minds of the next generation then at any time anyone can get affected and in addition to that international situation sometimes not always in your favour. Whatever politically internationally is happening is not according to your wish or according to your desire so there are many issues which may create further frustrations and hatred against one another. So we should continue this message and we should try to influence the generations whether second or third or fourth to always be peaceful or always condoning acts of extremism acts of terrorism wherever it is. It should be put on the curriculum. It should be made compulsory for Muslim students and should be made optional for non-Muslim students, but they should be taught the actual real teachings of Koran and Sunnah based on love and tolerance and co-existence and togetherness.




It is interesting that Qadri thinks condone and condemn are synonyms.

The questions no Western journalist will ask are as follows:


  1. If there are just wars, surely there must logically and necessarily be just acts of terrorism?
  2. Is terrorism intrinsically worse than war?
  3. Isn't terrorism just a poor man's war?
  4. Isn't all terrorism without exception a response to bad government policy?
  5. Isn't one man's terrorist another man's freedom fighter?
  6. Wasn't Nelson Mandela imprisoned for terrorist offences?
  7. Why was Nelson Mandela - a former terrorist - later considered a world statesman?
  8. Why are Sinn Fein now considered respectable when the voices of their leaders was not even allowed on the BBC? 
  9. If both terrorism and war have the effect of killing non-combatants, does terrorism have the virtue of killing fewer of them?
  10. Does Britain have an independent foreign policy or is it just a US missile base?
  11. Would you agree that Britain has had an irrational foreign policy for over 100 years?
  12. Is it possible that Muslim terrorists commit their terrorism in the knowledge that the Israel lobby controls American politics and that Britain is but a mere vassal state of the US who are in turn controlled by the Israel lobby?
  13. Could the antisemitism of the 21st century harboured by Muslims towards Jews be explained by Question 12?
  14. Would any Western journalist be sacked the moment he or she asked any of the above questions?
  15. Would any Muslim in the West be branded an extremist the moment they made any of the points contained in the questions above?
  16. Why would any questioning, informed and intelligent adolescent trust any information received from Western media, if they already knew the answers to the questions I have asked?
  17. Is not the government's and the media's refusal to ask and address these questions in themselves a major factor in radicalisation?
  18. What are we to think if Western media and governments refuse to address these questions honestly and directly?
  19. If Western governments and media pointedly refuse to discuss these questions what are we to think? 
http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/press/quilliam-alert-quilliam-welcomes-the-minhaj-ul-quran-initiative-to-prevent-islamist-radicalisation/

http://www.pat.com.pk/english/tid/13644/About-PAT/ is the party that Dr Qadri leads. Does it sound libtard enough to be backed by the Neocons?

Can a book help Muslims beat extremism?

Is Sima Kotecha stupid or is she DELIBERATELY avoiding mentioning FOREIGN POLICY?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05zhhht

Sime Kotecha's report from 2:20.


Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Why Muslims and non-Muslims keep wanting to join ISIS


The shit irrelevant response I received from this libtard:

What sort of shit response are we going to get from the government, I wonder.

Chris  Maslanka calls himself an "Author, broadcaster, devout sceptic, failed astronaut, Enigmatist of St Catherine's, Oxford" but that is the best response he can give. What  turd-brains Oxbridge produces these days in the degenerate West! Another reason why adolescent Muslims want to join ISIS, I guess.



Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Inept anti-ISIS propaganda by Muslim comedian will probably have opposite effect


Friday, 19 September 2014

Claire Khaw's top tips on how to deal with radicalisation, terrorism and IS









How easy it is to be "radicalised", just by discussing this video.  

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/claire-khaw-refuses-to-condemn.html
Condemning terrorism is a distraction from condemning UK foreign policy

​@WoodStoneAndSteel asks about the lolcows of the world

2:00   Incorrect diagnosis Chaste women 3:00  Political economy Abolishing no fault force 5:00  Socialising 6:00  Disposable relationships 7...