How the BNP has helped me achieve political definition

This is cut and pasted from a Facebook exchange with two South African/Zimbabwean white Libertarian Facebook friends because I can't be bothered to write it up.  My comments are in bold.

"The unemployed get a pay rise, the "civil" service get iron-clad, gold-plated pensions and the working schmuck pays. How is that egalitarian? Here's an idea... people say there's no work. In the same breath, they say immigrants are taking all the work. But if the immigrants are taking the work, then there IS work. We have this amusing little concept in countries were benefits are non-existence. It's called competition. Yes, it's a long word, but I think you'll find it's great fun."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs/8934771/Incentive-to-work-has-been-cut-says-Iain-Duncan-Smith.html


REASON WHY BRITISH EMPLOYERS WON'T HIRE BRITISH EMPLOYEES: WHITE WORKING CLASSES NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE.

Brown should know that there are lots of SCHMUCKS in Britain who haven't been to Peterhouse and have been failed by their shithole sink schools run by feminist-indoctrinated lefties, who teach them nothing but how to have sex with all and sundry and not feel guilty about that. Maybe you would just like to shoot these school-leavers no one wants to hire in the head and be done with it?

You know, these SCHMUCKS that no one wants to hire have a party that are supposed to stand up for people like them but, you know what, it is so incompetent, corrupt and ignorant, that it just pushes the immigration issue and goes for easy targets like Muslims which are the symptom rather than the CAUSE. 

The truth is that no British employer would want to hire the useless ignorant, illiterate, innumerate, illegitimate SCHMUCKS that state education churns out. They would rather gouge out their eyes, shoot themselves or close down their businesses than hire white trash.

You may be over-reacting. 23 million Britons do work. Another 6 million are employed by the state or its agencies. Most of them are white. The wrong done is by protecting the unemployed and the state-employed at the expense of the rest.

We are talking about unskilled labour. Obviously, the middle classes will see to it that their children go to decent schools and can find jobs in clerical and skilled and semi-skilled manual work. 

 SELECTIVE EDUCATION NEEDED TO HELP BRIGHT WHITE WORKING CLASS CHILDREN

The unskilled labour comes from abroad. Even if there are white indigenous wanting to do the work British employers will reject them, because they know they are very likely to be useless or won't fit in with the foreign workforce which constitutes the majority.

You may be aware that in the good old days, a poor working class school child would have the option of doing his or her 11+ and going to a grammar school while those who didn't would go to their secondary modern schools which would have a more vocational syllabus. 

No longer.

The working, I mean lower classes now have equality of failure. 

 MOST WORKING CLASS WHITES DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT A GRAMMAR SCHOOL IS

The typical working class person will probably not have heard of a grammar school and if that is explained to him or her will say "It's not for the likes of us."

That is because it is stuffed full of the children of middle class parents with sharp elbows.

 HOW THE BNP CAN MAKE ITSELF MORE ATTRACTIVE TO THE WHITE MIDDLE CLASSES

Anyway, the BNP could have become more popular, by going on about education which would have made the middle classes like them and trust them a bit more. 

But no, they thought the safest option was to complain about immigrants and Muslims, because everyone hates immigrants and Muslims and nobody really cares about education any more because most Britons are as thick as SHIT.

 WHITE AFRICANS TREAT WHITE BRITONS LIKE THE LAZY BLEKS THEY ARE

I have noticed that the average Zimbabwean I meet is very well-educated compared to the uneducated illiterate, innumerate and illegitimate local white Briton. South African whites are also very impressive. White Britons hate them of course, because White South Africans look down their noses at local Britons and treat them like they treat the blacks in South Africa, probably.

HOW EMIGRATION CAN HELP YOU PRESERVE THE BEST OF YOUR WHITE CULTURE INSTEAD OF STAYING HOME ON WELFARE WHINGEING.

There is something rather curious about living in a foreign country. You try to preserve your culture and are more likely to preserve the best of what it is about your civilisation, than if you just stayed at home and slowly sink into depravity and become a member of the underclass.

THE EXPLOITATION OF BNP MEMBERS BY THEIR LEADER WHO IS NOT INTERESTED IN HELPING THEM, MERELY IN EXPLOITING THEIR MISERY AND MARGINALISATION

These BNP supporters are, let's face it, not the brightest bulbs in their boxes, and are in class terms the lowest of the low, so they are easy to despise and dismiss. They are also being exploited by their leader. 

Anyone who has anything to do with the party will be basically dipped in shit.

Not that I am complaining because I understand at a profound level that politics is a very dirty business.

 WHY BRITISH EDUCATION HAS NOT BEEN FIXED BY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS

As I was saying, no British politician will fix the mess of the education system because - it may not surprise you to hear - it cannot be fixed in one term of office!

Even the pruning of the welfare state has to be carefully managed, or you will have rioting, looting, anarchy, disorder and violence.

A ONE-PARTY STATE CAN BE LIBERTARIAN

Having done a lot of work in both India and China, I would note that China is not the megalith of State control it is assumed to be. There is a very interesting interaction between central, regional and local - and the individual is fairly often able to completely ignore these instruments of government.Central government, however, does build nice roads.

And that is why I want a one-party state really. And also to fix education and to avoid the natural divisions of society from being exploited by enemies both internal and external.

There is an inconsistency in your position Clare - you can not claim to be in favour of small government, yet at the same time seek to champion the so-called "white working class"? The BNP et al. are socialists. They are afraid of free markets, open competition, and they have been treated with kid gloves and their prejudices pandered to. They do not want less Government, they want more Government.

There is no inconsistency in my position at all. 

If I were indeed dictator of Britain, do you think I could afford the needs of the MAJORITY of the populace, ie the white working classes?

I hope you don't really think I agree with every single policy in the BNP manifesto!

While they do ask for grammar schools in their manifesto, it is something that is virtually never mentioned, because most of the white working clases no longer know what it is.

I have made a point of not pandering to BNP prejudices, I think. Indeed, I have made a point of telling them exactly what I think is wrong with them [ie that they are mostly sluts and bastards who put up with their women making poor reproductive choices because so many of them are riddled with illegitimacy]. That was why I was expelled.

I am like the man in all those Bateman cartoons ....

Phew! Now that is revealing. You mix Libertarianism with Authoritarianism, which is like vinegar with water. You then suggest that your position is Marxist - to command the heights - then with a twist, throw in a dash of Machiavelli. I see you have been keeping up with your political philosophy classes. The question is - why bother with them? They are irrelevant. Who cares what their gripes and groans are. Get rid of the welfare State, and those that can swim will swim, and those that can not, will sink. That is the way things should be.

Actually, they are not. The BNP is my vehicle to political recognition.

And the great thing is that I joined them because they really are the party with the most policies I agree with, so I have done nothing unprincipled. 

I am of course famous for being the only non-white female in an ethno-nationalist party that used to say it wanted to forcibly repatriate all non-white British citizens. 

This may suggest to some that I have this thing called the courage of my convictions. 

I have after all been saying for many years now that the only way for us as individual voters to influence the government is to vote for the party with the most policies we agree with. 

If that is the BNP then so be it. If just enough people did it to frighten the government they would soon be adopting BNP policies. There was never any danger of there being a BNP government anyway. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-384167/Most-Britons-actually-support-BNP-policies.html

So the main motivation is simple Machiavelli - pure expediency. So what do you actually believe?

WHY I BELIEVE THE MECHANISM OF A ONE-PARTY STATE IS THE BEST WAY OF RESOLVING IN A TIMELY MANNER INEVITABLE POLITICAL DIFFERENCES

I genuinely believe in promoting the national interest and creating mechanisms and institutions in which the national interest can best be promoted - the first of which is the one-party state.

Of course it is welfarism that is destroying the future of this country as well as destroying the quality of the next generation, who will be mostly sluts and bastards.

It is quite obvious to many, but many refuse to say it openly, loudly, repeatedly or coherently. 

The reason why the liberal political establishment refuse to discuss this is simply because they have all been complicit in promoting the welfare state. 

To discuss this rationally would mean admitting mistakes of decades and this they could never do without a ruinous loss of authority.