Translate

Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Wednesday, 31 October 2018

Preventing Child Indoctrination - Creating a better Education system


MY COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO

Are you all atheists?

Why is Mike Buchanan getting involved in covert displays of antisemitism and Islamophobia by banning male circumcision instead of campaigning to abolish no fault divorce?

If most British men were married fathers in control of their families, feminists would not have seized control of the educational system and would not now be indoctrinating British children with ways of having extramarital and underage sex as well as becoming members of the opposite sex.

Did anyone mention abolishing no fault divorce?

If none of you have any prospect of becoming fathers of legitimate children, what are the reasons?

Did anyone mention criminalising fornication to make men take marriage seriously again?

Do you realise that men who are considered unmarriageable are considered lower in status than married fathers of legitimate children?

Have you considered how and why Jewish and Muslim men are more likely to marry and stay married than atheist men?

In a matriarchy, women would control the educational syllabus. That is why public education is now institutional child sexual abuse. That is why primary school children are being given sex education and told they could become a member of the opposite sex if they seek treatment early enough, while they are adolescents, before they become adults.

Low status unmarriageable and atheist beta male victims of feminism who follow an angry bitter charmless man like Mike Buchanan who is more interested in showing covert hostility to Jews and Muslims by campaigning to ban male circumcision assisted by an unmarried mother rather than campaigning to abolish no fault divorce have no chance of overthrowing the matriarchy, have they?

Is the reason why no one is interested in abolishing no fault divorce conclusive evidence that you are all unmarriageable and therefore have no interest or prospect of getting married?  If this is so, then you are low status men. If you are indeed low status men, why would anyone listen to you?

Wednesday, 7 March 2018

Nick Griffin's advice to white men: go to the same school and university he did, marry as he did, become Catholic and worship virgin mothers, and all will be well again!


https://www.facebook.com/groups/466234513398453/permalink/1750787724943119/?comment_id=1751320788223146&reply_comment_id=1752275301461028&notif_id=1520449205146745&notif_t=group_comment&ref=notif has a discussion on this.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Wednesday, 4 March 2015

Why I am not a democrat



From the 40th minute you will get all the awkward questions being asked of Michael Gove from the audience. How much if at all do you think these issues have been addressed?

Why do you think David Cameron removed Michael Gove as Education Secretary?

Because he was stepping on too many toes and people were squealing.

Why did he make Nicky Morgan Education Secretary?

Because he knew she would do NOTHING to be upset anyone till the election was over.

This was in 2013.

How much longer has democracy got left before it implodes under the weight of its own lies and contradictions?

No government will improve standards of education until and unless there is a one-party state in which leaders of the teaching unions can be dealt with swiftly and decisively.

The problems of British education are now too entrenched, long-standing and bone-deep. No government will be able to solve them in one term of office and that is why it will never be attempted as long as representative democracy continues.

Have you noticed how democracy is about doing nothing and waiting for things to fail when there is so much to be done and so little time to be lost?

Have you noticed that democracy is really about knaves soliciting the vote of fools every five years and bribing voters with their own money?

Democracy means that no one is really in charge.

Democracy means passing the buck like a parcel with a ticking bomb until it blows up in someone's face.

Time to call time on democracy, don't you think?

Indiscriminate universal suffrage and chasing the female vote has turned Western men into pathetic snivelling infantilised helpless contemptible effeminates lower than sluts

I look forward to hearing that I am now on the Domestic Extremist List because I certainly don't believe in this dishonest demented and deficient system.

I will be voting UKIP in May 2015 however simply because I know things must get worse before they get better and pain is the only language smug liberals understand.

Wednesday, 10 September 2014

Dominic Cummings won't display my comment on Michael Gove's reforms, for some reason

My comment on September 10, 2014 at 11:17 still awaiting moderation:


"We already know that the problems besetting the educational establishment are too deep-rooted to be solved in one term of government, before they are reversed by the next administration.

In Gove’s case, Cameron changed his horses in mid-stream because he feared the unpopularity of Gove’s reforms affecting votes for the Tories in GE 2015.

If that ain’t a reason to question the viability of representative democracy, I don’t know what is.

You must already know nothing will be done until the teaching unions and educational establishment are PURGED of Reds and feminists, who only strive to hide their failure by changing the curriculum yet again and the way pupil achievement is graded.

If you want to fix education, question feminism and question the basis of democracy.

What is democracy but the tyranny of people who don’t know and don’t care about foreign policy?
Democracy might just work if the overwhelming majority of us were wise and good, but you must know that this is most certainly not the case.

Most Britons are welfare-dependent, most of the proletariat are not working, most British mothers are unmarried, which means that most Britons of the next generation will be illegitimate. No good will come of this."

Wednesday, 4 December 2013

Are SSMs and tolerance of SSMs the reason why British education is falling behind?

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londoners-diary/maths-clearly-not-nut-leaders-strong-point-8629616.html

http://www.politicshome.com/uk/story/18105/

Is this woman to blame for the failure of British education?

Should she be shot as Jeremy Clarkson once suggested?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15977813

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-25187997
Are the countries who did better than Britain in the PISA tests less slut and bastard than the English and Scots?

http://neatoday.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2012PISAResultssnapshot.png has the list of countries who did better than Britain.  Are they less slut and bastard than the British?

Most British mothers are SSMs according to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

What are SSMs?  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379 explains.

http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/DYBNat/NatStatTab13.pdf and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Non_marital_by_countries.gif has statistics on illegitimacy.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-25196974
Are the Welsh more slut and bastard than the English and the Scots?

Are British parents the worst in the world?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

Is illegitimacy rather than race is the real root of crime, under-achievement and degeneracy?
https://old.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517

Is the cause of degeneracy feminism?

Does feminism encourage female promiscuity?

Does female promiscuity facilitate male promiscuity?

Does fornication lead to illegitimacy?

Does illegitimacy lead to degeneracy?

Does feminism cause women to become bad men and men to become bad women?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2175009/Our-schools-need-tough-guys-teaching-teenage-boys-feminised-men-caring-primary-level-infants.html

Should feminism be questioned, challenged, denounced and renounced, for the good and long term survival of your civilisation?  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2006/02/17/the_return_of_patriarchy?page=0,0

Are most women feminists?  I would suggest that most men and women are indeed feminists.

Who is a feminist? Someone who objects to repealing the Equality Act 2010 and who won't reintroduce fault into divorce.

The overwhelming number of voters in the West are feminists.  Even UKIP refuse to propose repealing the Equality Act 2001, which is liberal thoughtcrime.

The BNP, which used to propose repealing all anti-discrimination legislation finds itself not quite saying that any more and do not even mention it, so effeminate have they become.  Have you seen their shit heart-shaped new logo?  http://www.theguardian.com/news/blog/2011/may/12/bnp-unveils-new-logo  Whom do you think was meant to be to appeal?  Women and children, of course, who are mostly stupid.

Do they ever talk about education?  Do they fuck, most of them are so fucking thick they don't even know what a grammar school is.  Even if they knew what it was, they would say "It's not for the likes of us."  If you started talking about selective education, their mouths fall open and their eyes would close in dumb incomprehension and boredom.  They are mostly slut and bastard too and because they are most affected by sluttery and bastardy, they are the people most unlikely to help themselves.  They are actually so stupid that they don't even know why people despise them, and keep blaming the Jews and Muslims as they attend their demos to show off their non-existent dress sense and their plebeian nature while making people despise them even more.  Their leader is like a parent who lets his children do whatever they like to do "as long as they are happy".  In this way does the sluttery, bastardy and the singular lack of breeding and education lead to the decline and fall of your civilisation.  They still don't know why British employers don't want to hire British workers.  British employers don't want to hire British workers cos they are mostly slut and bastard employees  no sane employer would want to hire if the option of hiring immigrant but non-slut and non-bastard employees is available.  Apparently, they don't get it that to be hired by British employers they would have to be competitive ie be cheaper and work harder, but that is another concept that has also gone out of the window with the average degenerate nationalist.  They expected to be treated like a privileged protected species about to become extinct, but they are hardly pandas, are they?

Is the teaching-profession female-dominated?  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102759/Why-boys-failing-grade-classroom-Lack-male-teachers-reason-according-new-study.html

What is a particularly feminine vice?  I would suggest denial.

At what stage of the 5 stages of grief are the British at in accepting that their political and educational system is shit and they should do something about it, such as denounce liberalism and feminism and announce their execution at the hands of reason?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model  Not very advanced, I don't think.

Has what has been passed off as new and different ways of grading pupils and students merely been the means of hiding the failure of the corrupt and incompetent teaching establishment?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/gcse-grades-to-change-to-help-bosses-select-brightest-pupils-8916476.html suggests that previous grading systems were meant to confuse parents and employers and give pupils equality of failure while hiding the shittiness of British education and teaching.

Is the female-dominated teaching profession conspiring against boys?  You betcha.  Females like to tell males they are inferior just as much as males used to like telling females they were inferior.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1055395/Boys-raw-deal-school-education-tilted-favour-girls.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-432947/Stop-feminising-schools--boys-suffering.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7026774/Boys-failed-by-education-system-says-Eton-headmaster.html

Either that, or they remain in denial.

Is anyone going to tell them the truth?  Dare they?  Effeminate men are risk-averse and adopt feminine stratagems to protect themselves.  How long can they stay in denial?  How long is a piece of fucking string?

Thursday, 8 March 2012

This can only be introduced in Britain if schools have armed security


0843
It has been traditionally thought that fewer pupils in a classroom means a better education but according to the OECD, it makes no difference at all whether there are 20 or 30 children in a class and larger class sizes might even be better. Lucy Williamson reports from Seoul in South Korea where larger classes have had some success.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9703000/9703614.stm

In my primary and secondary schools before I came to this country, the average class size was 50.   We had corporal punishment too and many interesting forms of ritual humiliation, eg being made to stand outside the class so the headmistress doing her rounds could get to know you better, standing on your chair, standing on your desk, having your knuckles rapped.   I remember once being slapped in primary school by a male teacher for being cheeky.    

When we finished primary school we were made to climb a hill - 833 m (2,723 ft).  

I therefore had an excellent education.   Indeed, I remember the headmistress telling us in no uncertain terms that the education we were all enjoying was not only the best in the state, or best in the country, but best in the world, but we would not really know this until we were properly grown up and she dead and gone ....

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Compare and Contrast Muslim and BNP attitudes towards primary education


Fundraising Event in support of an Islamic education centre providing high quality but affordable primary schooling. By attending this event you will be helping to cuitivate the next generation of Muslims.


Highlights include:


* A luxury Three Course Meal
* Inspiring talks 
* Creche available for children over 3


It promises to be an enjoyable, memorable event for all the family.


Tickets are priced at £40.


This message I received suggests to me that Muslims think British education is degenerate and don't want to have anything to do with the kind of sex education that is being taught to primary school children or have anything to do with the children of slut and bastard non-Muslim working class whites.

Can we really blame them?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/8788444/Primaries-forced-to-give-sex-education-to-be-Healthy-Schools.html

Does the BNP say anything about education, culture and morality? Does it fuck.

Its leader is too busy exposing his sex organ to women who lead him on to think about things like that.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/237450/Ex-model-says-BNP-leader-Nick-Griffin-exposed-himself/

After his expose in the Sunday Star, BNP men appear to be saying that if a woman leads you on, you can do no other than to follow her to your doom.

It would appear that they "think" with their sex organ while they fuck up their brains with sex and drugs and rock and roll when they are not busy blaming Muslims, Jews and foreigners for their degradation.

They are certainly too pussywhipped to blame their slut and bastard women.

They are too afraid to blame their slut and bastard women because they don't want to offend the SSMs from whom they are hoping for some cheap and easy sex.

Interesting that these Muslims with proper jobs and legitimate children can afford fund-raising meals like this while it is clearly beyond the reach of the typical BNP member who doesn't give two hoots about education or the future of their illegitimate children.

If the BNP are not whingeing about Muslims, the typical BNP supporter is just not interested.

All the typical BNP member cares about is how to extract the most from the welfare state before they pop their clogs, not to mention having as much sex as possible with as many sluts who will let them have sex with them.

Not just the typical BNP member either. Atheist liberals tend only to care about how much pleasure and benefits they can extract from the state before they die.

That is why the typical BNP member - who is mostly working class and atheist - isn't interested in reforming the welfare system or criticising SSMs.

While some may even acknowledge that SSMs supported by the welfare state have done the morals of the white working classes no good at all, they are not in favour of doing anything about it, because it would  upset too many of their slut and bastard core supporters.

Most atheists - especially atheists without children for whom they feel any parental affection - cannot think in terms of posterity or the long-term national interest, or anything beyond their miserable self-interested little lives.

Nationalism must mean the moral regeneration of the British people, or it will never amount to anything.  

Monday, 5 December 2011

How the BNP has helped me achieve political definition


This is cut and pasted from a Facebook exchange with two South African/Zimbabwean white Libertarian Facebook friends because I can't be bothered to write it up.  My comments are in bold.

"The unemployed get a pay rise, the "civil" service get iron-clad, gold-plated pensions and the working schmuck pays. How is that egalitarian? Here's an idea... people say there's no work. In the same breath, they say immigrants are taking all the work. But if the immigrants are taking the work, then there IS work. We have this amusing little concept in countries were benefits are non-existence. It's called competition. Yes, it's a long word, but I think you'll find it's great fun."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs/8934771/Incentive-to-work-has-been-cut-says-Iain-Duncan-Smith.html


REASON WHY BRITISH EMPLOYERS WON'T HIRE BRITISH EMPLOYEES: WHITE WORKING CLASSES NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE.

Brown should know that there are lots of SCHMUCKS in Britain who haven't been to Peterhouse and have been failed by their shithole sink schools run by feminist-indoctrinated lefties, who teach them nothing but how to have sex with all and sundry and not feel guilty about that. Maybe you would just like to shoot these school-leavers no one wants to hire in the head and be done with it?

You know, these SCHMUCKS that no one wants to hire have a party that are supposed to stand up for people like them but, you know what, it is so incompetent, corrupt and ignorant, that it just pushes the immigration issue and goes for easy targets like Muslims which are the symptom rather than the CAUSE. 

The truth is that no British employer would want to hire the useless ignorant, illiterate, innumerate, illegitimate SCHMUCKS that state education churns out. They would rather gouge out their eyes, shoot themselves or close down their businesses than hire white trash.



You may be over-reacting. 23 million Britons do work. Another 6 million are employed by the state or its agencies. Most of them are white. The wrong done is by protecting the unemployed and the state-employed at the expense of the rest.

We are talking about unskilled labour. Obviously, the middle classes will see to it that their children go to decent schools and can find jobs in clerical and skilled and semi-skilled manual work. 
 SELECTIVE EDUCATION NEEDED TO HELP BRIGHT WHITE WORKING CLASS CHILDREN
The unskilled labour comes from abroad. Even if there are white indigenous wanting to do the work British employers will reject them, because they know they are very likely to be useless or won't fit in with the foreign workforce which constitutes the majority.

You may be aware that in the good old days, a poor working class school child would have the option of doing his or her 11+ and going to a grammar school while those who didn't would go to their secondary modern schools which would have a more vocational syllabus. 

No longer.

The working, I mean lower classes now have equality of failure. 
 MOST WORKING CLASS WHITES DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT A GRAMMAR SCHOOL IS
The typical working class person will probably not have heard of a grammar school and if that is explained to him or her will say "It's not for the likes of us."

That is because it is stuffed full of the children of middle class parents with sharp elbows.
 HOW THE BNP CAN MAKE ITSELF MORE ATTRACTIVE TO THE WHITE MIDDLE CLASSES
Anyway, the BNP could have become more popular, by going on about education which would have made the middle classes like them and trust them a bit more. 

But no, they thought the safest option was to complain about immigrants and Muslims, because everyone hates immigrants and Muslims and nobody really cares about education any more because most Britons are as thick as SHIT.
 WHITE AFRICANS TREAT WHITE BRITONS LIKE THE LAZY BLEKS THEY ARE
I have noticed that the average Zimbabwean I meet is very well-educated compared to the uneducated illiterate, innumerate and illegitimate local white Briton. South African whites are also very impressive. White Britons hate them of course, because White South Africans look down their noses at local Britons and treat them like they treat the blacks in South Africa, probably.
HOW EMIGRATION CAN HELP YOU PRESERVE THE BEST OF YOUR WHITE CULTURE INSTEAD OF STAYING HOME ON WELFARE WHINGEING.
There is something rather curious about living in a foreign country. You try to preserve your culture and are more likely to preserve the best of what it is about your civilisation, than if you just stayed at home and slowly sink into depravity and become a member of the underclass.
THE EXPLOITATION OF BNP MEMBERS BY THEIR LEADER WHO IS NOT INTERESTED IN HELPING THEM, MERELY IN EXPLOITING THEIR MISERY AND MARGINALISATION
These BNP supporters are, let's face it, not the brightest bulbs in their boxes, and are in class terms the lowest of the low, so they are easy to despise and dismiss. They are also being exploited by their leader. 

Anyone who has anything to do with the party will be basically dipped in shit.

Not that I am complaining because I understand at a profound level that politics is a very dirty business.

 WHY BRITISH EDUCATION HAS NOT BEEN FIXED BY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS
As I was saying, no British politician will fix the mess of the education system because - it may not surprise you to hear - it cannot be fixed in one term of office!

Even the pruning of the welfare state has to be carefully managed, or you will have rioting, looting, anarchy, disorder and violence.

A ONE-PARTY STATE CAN BE LIBERTARIAN

Having done a lot of work in both India and China, I would note that China is not the megalith of State control it is assumed to be. There is a very interesting interaction between central, regional and local - and the individual is fairly often able to completely ignore these instruments of government.Central government, however, does build nice roads.

And that is why I want a one-party state really. And also to fix education and to avoid the natural divisions of society from being exploited by enemies both internal and external.


There is an inconsistency in your position Clare - you can not claim to be in favour of small government, yet at the same time seek to champion the so-called "white working class"? The BNP et al. are socialists. They are afraid of free markets, open competition, and they have been treated with kid gloves and their prejudices pandered to. They do not want less Government, they want more Government.

There is no inconsistency in my position at all. 

If I were indeed dictator of Britain, do you think I could afford the needs of the MAJORITY of the populace, ie the white working classes?

I hope you don't really think I agree with every single policy in the BNP manifesto!


While they do ask for grammar schools in their manifesto, it is something that is virtually never mentioned, because most of the white working clases no longer know what it is.

I have made a point of not pandering to BNP prejudices, I think. Indeed, I have made a point of telling them exactly what I think is wrong with them [ie that they are mostly sluts and bastards who put up with their women making poor reproductive choices because so many of them are riddled with illegitimacy]. That was why I was expelled.

I am like the man in all those Bateman cartoons ....



Phew! Now that is revealing. You mix Libertarianism with Authoritarianism, which is like vinegar with water. You then suggest that your position is Marxist - to command the heights - then with a twist, throw in a dash of Machiavelli. I see you have been keeping up with your political philosophy classes. The question is - why bother with them? They are irrelevant. Who cares what their gripes and groans are. Get rid of the welfare State, and those that can swim will swim, and those that can not, will sink. That is the way things should be.

Actually, they are not. The BNP is my vehicle to political recognition.

And the great thing is that I joined them because they really are the party with the most policies I agree with, so I have done nothing unprincipled. 

I am of course famous for being the only non-white female in an ethno-nationalist party that used to say it wanted to forcibly repatriate all non-white British citizens. 

This may suggest to some that I have this thing called the courage of my convictions. 

I have after all been saying for many years now that the only way for us as individual voters to influence the government is to vote for the party with the most policies we agree with. 

If that is the BNP then so be it. If just enough people did it to frighten the government they would soon be adopting BNP policies. There was never any danger of there being a BNP government anyway. 


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-384167/Most-Britons-actually-support-BNP-policies.html


So the main motivation is simple Machiavelli - pure expediency. So what do you actually believe?
WHY I BELIEVE THE MECHANISM OF A ONE-PARTY STATE IS THE BEST WAY OF RESOLVING IN A TIMELY MANNER INEVITABLE POLITICAL DIFFERENCES
I genuinely believe in promoting the national interest and creating mechanisms and institutions in which the national interest can best be promoted - the first of which is the one-party state.

Of course it is welfarism that is destroying the future of this country as well as destroying the quality of the next generation, who will be mostly sluts and bastards.

It is quite obvious to many, but many refuse to say it openly, loudly, repeatedly or coherently. 

The reason why the liberal political establishment refuse to discuss this is simply because they have all been complicit in promoting the welfare state. 

To discuss this rationally would mean admitting mistakes of decades and this they could never do without a ruinous loss of authority.

Sunday, 1 May 2011

Cowardly Cameron and his "Calm down, dear" comment

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1381128/MP-Angela-Eagle-sexism-row-David-Camerons-calm-dear-putdown-PMQs.html

The Prime Minister’s spokesman said:

‘Let’s not over-analyse something that was clearly a humorous remark. He was mimicking a popular TV advert. Clearly no offence was meant.’

If you make a joke the intention is to laugh at the subject of the joke.  To laugh at someone is to mock them. To mock them is to intentionally cause offence.
To say that you did not mean to intentionally cause offence is clearly a lie.

Cameron is not a gentleman, for a gentleman never unknowingly causes offence nor does he tell an obvious lie to get himself out of trouble, underestimating the stupidity of the even the incorrigibly stupid British public and the incorrigibly stupid MPs who cannot spot a lie even after it has boldly strode up to them and poked them in the eye.

Now, will Ed Miliband take him up and invite him to repeat again that he did not intend to offend Angela Eagle by that comment?

And if Cameron says that he in fact did not intend to offend Angela Eagle, is he not immediately guilty of misleading Parliament with a transparent lie?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_mislead_parliament

Is Cameron the best Eton can produce?

Would your son not be better off being sent to the lower local sink school comp for a better standard of moral education and drug-dealing?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1364692.ece

If Cameron is the best Eton (supposedly the best school money can buy) can manage to produce then you know this country is in trouble.  But hey, you already know that, didn't you?  

Saturday, 12 March 2011

Alison Wolf should know that education and training will never be fixed under the current political system


http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/articles/a0075281/alison-wolf-writes-for-the-times-about-her-review-of-vocational-education

No government is going to touch British education with a bargepole.  That is because it will take more than five years to fix and require more drastic action than the teaching unions, parents and pupils are prepared to stomach.

Any political party that attempts to do this will get all the flak but none of the kudos, and that is why no one is prepared to risk opening that can of worms.

So what we really need is a revolution, and after that a one-party state.

A typical British politician cannot be expected to say such things of course, so it suits successive governments to pretend there isn't a problem or that they are in the process of fixing it.

Starting a new educational initiative starts time running again, until it fails whereupon a new initiative will be started and time will start running again.

In the meantime continue to sweep the dust under the carpet until the nation is nothing but dust and ashes peopled only with paedophile bastard slut single mother barbarians not fit even to be enslaved.  

Saturday, 23 October 2010

The parlous state of British schools, education and training

Someone on Facebook commented that "3rd generation [non-whites] and beyond seems to suffer from the same degree of apathy as found in the UK."

In case you haven't heard or noticed, British edu kay shun is an international scandal.

That is why British employers don't want British workers and why the working classes are no longer fit for purpose.

Successive generations of immigrants have been Anglicised and turned into degenerate, drug-taking, binge-drinking, whingeing Britons.

Successive governments have simply replaced the generations they have made useless with a new influx of foreigners.

This is because they cannot and dare not cut the Gordian knot or clean the Augean stables that is the British teaching establishment.


That is why a one-party state is required to effect all the necessary changes.

Tuesday, 21 September 2010

Unequal Opportunities, BBC2, 20 September 2010, Why UK Education is so crap


http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2010/sep/19/john-humphrys-schools-social-class

Typical class war crap the liberal (AKA Commie - let's not mince our words) establishment is blaming the parlous state of British education on. 

http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=371509533894&share_id=103363703060245&comments=1#s103363703060245

Rich kids have access to good schools, private tuition, music lessons and books at home. Poor kids get started with a liberal dose of "progressive" education, one-parent families and are sent to the nearest sink school with other loser kids and loser teachers.

Unofficial Quality Guide to Schools: The fewer male teachers there are the more crap the school is going to be. We all know how disgracefully female-dominated the teaching profession is, and how they conspire to big up the achievements of girls while denigrating and marginalising boys. (Male teachers are probably in daily terror of being accused of sexual harassment or paedophilia by malicious female teachers who take a dislike to them because they dare to disagree with them over anything.) 

With no male role models in either primary or secondary schools for these singly mothered children it is no wonder they go off the rails.

Singly mothered children and single mothers are of course sacred cows that cannot be questioned and criticised, in our totalitarian feminist state.

I bet John Humphrys will not be committing the lese majeste of suggesting that feminism and the female-dominated teaching profession is responsible for the depths of the disgrace that is British education, which is run with the apparent purpose of making the British male even more useless than he already is.
 20 September 2010 at 08:04

Selective education is the answer of course, and the return of grammar schools, but, apparently, these days, if you ask for such a thing you belong to the lunatic fringe or the "Far Right" - both UKIP and the BNP are the only parties you may have heard of offering grammar schools in their manifestos.

Mixed ability teaching compels everyone to go at the pace of the slowest.

This rather explains why no British employer would hire a British school-leaver if they have the option of hiring a non-British employee untainted by a British state education.

Where is the sense of breeding a class of educationally inadequate youngsters and then refusing to do anything about it when the folly of doing so is pointed out?

I wonder if the Far Wrong have any explanations for this insane state of affairs.
20 September 2010  at 08:33

Academy and free schools - not subject to the Freedom of Information Act, are a big fat con, a distraction and another fine example of tinkering around at the edges.

The reason why the Tories won't tackle education properly is because they already know that:

1. 5 years is not long enough to sort the mess that is British education out.

2. they would get all the flak but none of the kudos

3. it would all be reversed at the next election

4. there is no one left in this country to give children a decent education and we would have to hire teachers from Singapore, Zimbabwe etc where they still teach properly and hire armed guards to guarantee their safety

That is why, really, that I conclude that a one-party state is really the only way forward to arrest the apparently irreversible decline facing this country before the British are reduced to resorting to piracy and prostitution as a national occupation.


If John Humphrys does not mention

1. the sheer numbers of singly-mothered children with behavioural problems spoiling it for others,

2. the ideological constraints the liberal teaching profession against anything to do with imposing discipline,

3. the skill at which the female-dominated teaching profession covers up the failure of its policies using opaque and subjective grading criteria resulting in the dilution of academic standards,

because of the predictable ideological constraints of the BBC against questioning feminism leading to female promiscuity leading to single motherhood, then we will know, won't we?

20 September 2010 at 08:44 

Did anyone see UNEQUAL OPPORTUNITIES last night?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00txmtm/Unequal_Opportunities_with_John_Humphrys/

If so, did they notice how it just regurgitated all the problems without proposing a solution, apart from... the one about abolishing all private schools, an idea mooted by a comp-educated schoolgirl in Kirby?

John Humphrys said nothing about

- the quality of teacher training
- the inability to teach the 3 Rs
- the mirage of choice
- the female-dominated teaching profession that is so harmful to boys

If you could only shop at Harrods and could afford to do so every day, would you choose to shop at Morrison's???

A complete and utter waste of time and one-hour.

Yes, abolishing all private schools *is* the only way forward. But wouldn't that require a revolution, though?

So why can't we have school-leavers with just a handful of O levels getting a job at the local newspaper, the way John Humphrys did?

Because they are taught useless rubbish for too many years, and no one in the liberal establishment has the wit or courage to point this out, because that would offend

1. the feminists
2. the female-dominated teaching establishment who so cleverly disguise the failure of their policies with opaque and incomprehensible grading criteria
3. the single mothers who send their unsocialised children to schools to spoil it for others
4. the working mums who want it all and consequently have no time to teach their children any manners
5. the single mothers who bring up their children fatherlessly, and who turn their sons into emasculated men or allow them to become feral youth
6. the single mothers whose daughters notice the queue of unsuitable lovers outside their mother's bedroom and think "what's good enough for my mum is good enough for me", perpetuating a vicious cycle.
 

http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/education/901058-Education-and-social-mobility I suppose it is pretty obvious why he does not want want to offend the Mumsnetters, who represent the matriarchy that all men must consult and genuflect to.  Mumsnet represents a goodly proportion of single and working mothers who are, because they happen to be middle class, are in effect beyond criticism, however fatuous the views they express.

If you want to know what's wrong with parenthood, children and women in Britain, look no further than Mumsnet! 

Friday, 6 November 2009

British "Edukayshun" - why dumbing-down continues apace

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8345453.stm

Science exams with no mathematical content. More sex education at ever younger ages. More cookery lessons. Is the government trying to turn us into a country of maids or prostitutes and people stupid enough to keep voting for them again and again?

Will single mothers have their variously-fathered children exported abroad as pets for rich Africans who want to adopt a white baby because they are so cute, with their blond hair and blue eyes? I think we should be told.

Perhaps they will soon be having lap dancing lessons at schools or acting lessons for those who want to train for a career in porn. Soon the women of this country will be using their vaginas to shoot peas out of shooters, just as they do in Thai sex shows.

Dumbing-down and teaching them cookery, and turning our boys into cooking catamites and our girls into maids and sex workers is surely cheaper and easier than teaching them anything as inconvenient as science and maths, or languages and literature.

If our boys tried drug-dealing they might have difficulty working out the change and the quantities to be sold, and then they will get upset and cry and have to be comforted. Better not then.

Thursday, 1 October 2009

Zimbabweans better-educated than Britons

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Inclusive+education+in+Zimbabwe:+policy,+curriculum,+practice,...-a0168163364


I am thinking of emigrating to Zimbabwe because I think this country is going to the dogs.

Have you noticed how well-educated Zimbabweans, both black and white, are?

Robert Mugabe's education system is better than Gordon Brown's education system. Zimbabwe has one of the highest literacy rates in the world. 90% according to UNICEF in 2006.

They even have this very modern and clever thing which the most powerful nation in the world has: a one-party state. No doubt the Chinese suggested this, and they were not too proud to try it out. It would appear that things have improved for the average Zimbabwean too.

Robert Mugabe is a much more amusing and charming leader than Brown - full of memorable soundbites and impish mischief. Even while he insults the West one cannot help but smile indulgently at him, because he is so entertainingly rude.

"I do not have a problem with the British people, only with Number Ten," he said, with a twinkle in his eye.

I, at any rate, cannot help liking him a little bit, and admiring his media savvy which is equal if not actually superior to Lord Mandelson's ...

Perhaps a Robert Mugabe Leadership and Charm School could be established and Gordon Brown be his first student?

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

Why the British are either very stupid or very demented

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8160000/8160335.stm

This is the running order of today's Today programme with my comments saying why we are a country of consisting of demented old women being governed by a bunch of demented old women whose opposition is another bunch of feeble-minded old women.


0752
A 22-year-old man from east London who began binge-drinking at 13 has died after being denied a life-saving liver transplant. Professor Ian Gilmore, president of the Royal College of Physicians, explains the story of Gary Reinbach, who was given only a few weeks to live after developing cirrhosis of the liver.

"Good!" is my response to the ritual hand-wringing. Does anyone in his right mind even think this alcoholic loser even deserves chicken liver pate on toast?


0810
Britain's professions have become more socially exclusive, a report
into social mobility suggests. Former cabinet minister Alan Milburn, the author of the report, discusses his findings.

Well, of course. Knowing what we do about Britain's state comprehensives, which 80% of children attend, why would anyone give these crap-educated children the time of day at all? Most of them can't barely read, write, spell or count. The ones that can count a little are wobbly on their time tables. Everything is being progressively dumbed-down, even as the educational establishment pretends that children must be getting cleverer because more of them are getting grades that say they have got A and A*.

That is because they think we have been dumbed-down too.

In British schools, sex education consists of teaching children the Joy of Sex, ie telling them how to do it, instead of telling them that bringing yet another little bastard into the world is a bad thing for them and a bad thing for the society they live in.

Yet, mildly suggest that child benefit be withdrawn from these teen parents, and you get a chorus of disapproval, because it sounds uncompassionate.

The preponderence of the inadequately-parented illegitimate in our schools means that education must be progressively dumbed-down to accommodate their propensity for indiscipline, underaged sex and violence, obesity, autism, violence and neurosis.

But no one mentions or acknowledges this, of course.


0832
The head of the army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, is said to have
infuriated ministers last week by publicly calling for more troops and better equipment in Afghanistan. Today presenter Sarah Montague reports from Afghanistan and talks to Sir Richard about his last journey to Afghanistan before he retires after 40 years of service.

Well, good on you for standing up for the cannon-fodder, General, but there is really no point throwing good money after bad, and sending more people to die in the 21st century Western equivalent of the Peloponnesian War while you're about it. (You know, the one that Athens and Sparta waged with each other for 28 years and which ultimately destroyed Athens.)

0838
Despite overall crime falling by 5% in 2008/9, the fear of crime seems
to go on rising. Filmmaker Roger Graef, who has tried to answer that question in a programme for BBC One, explains why people are more fearful than they used to be.
Because even dumbed-down Britons are not so dumbed-down that they would believe any government statistic now, to give them some credit ...

0851
Universities should take into account the social background of the
people who apply for courses, a report into social mobility suggests. Shaun Bailey, a youth worker and prospective Conservative party candidate for Hammersmith, and Dr Lee Elliot Major, research director at the Sutton Trust, discuss whether working class pupils should be given special consideration.
If working class people are going to be given a hand-up because they can't quite make it on their own merits - who would want someone from the Peckham Academy in their university unless they start running a course in Degree Level Drug-Dealing, Pimping, Gun Crime and General Gangsterism - why not give a hand-up to lunatics, retards and those suffering from dementia?

Why not indeed?

What a pity there is no dementia test we can make our leaders take, to show how utterly divorced they are from reality, morality and anything that could be described as responsibility and good sense.

If we do not do anything about this, then even death by swine flu is too good for us.

The latest insane suggestion - that schools that would re-open in autum be closed to contain the pandemic - suggests that even the demented know this and are trying to escape their fate by proposing what they think might be solutions.

Let us therefore just speak the truth to each other before the filth and madness that we have accumulated for so long falls on us and buries us alive.

It is the only way to enjoy our last days, is it not?

Friday, 10 July 2009

Science teacher brains 14 year old schoolboy

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25759888-401,00.html

49 year old science teacher Peter Harvey attacks 14 year old Jack Waterhouse at All Saints Roman Catholic School in Mansfield, Notts.

A correspondent involved in education says:


Good 4 the Science Teacher who tried 2 murder a rebellious boy pupil! Serious head injuries. Every teacher wld like 2 murder at least one pupil! Many teachers will b envious of the Mansfield science teacher who has actually succeeded in fulfilling every teacher's fantasy of really braining one of the little devils!

Many teachers feel in their heart of hearts they would like 2 brain the "little" devils - many of whom r 6 foot tall or more & don't know their own strength.

It was the fault of the headmistress, who was not up 2 the job of keeping discipline in a big comprehensive & she failed 2 protect that science teacher from bullying by pupils, until he had a breakdown & ended in Clink.


I too am pretty certain that the teacher was sorely provoked, knowing what I know of the likely behaviour of the typical British teenager.

It seems Peter Harvey had only just returned from stress-related leave.

If we do not address the behaviour of the typical British teenage boy - some of whom are known to go around raping female teachers - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/05/ukcrime.schools - or who murder headmasters such as Philip Lawrence - there may well be a shoot'em up rampage by a teacher before too long, along the lines of Columbine, but perpetrated by a member of the teaching profession ...

No doubt the government and its opposition will continue pretending all is well in our wonderful (third) world class education system, which is now so efficiently educating our children to make them fit for a life of catering, chambermaiding, TV cookery, pop idolatry, soccer stardom, gangstas, lap dancing and white slavery.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/5787816/Alternative-maths-A-level-branded-mindless.html

Mick Brookes, General Secretary of National Association of Head Teachers, interviewed on Channel 4 last night on the subject of the new Alternative Maths A level, clearly approved of the latest teaching scam of dumbing down. Perhaps this is something to do with hoping that the chances of his members being stabbed by bored, unteachable, singly-parented feral schoolboys who object to being challenged by academic rigour and classroom discipline would be thereby diminished.

There is a group on Facebook called "In Support of Mr Peter Harvey (All Saints' R.C. School, Mansfield)" which readers may wish to check out.

Friday, 20 February 2009

British schoolchildren taught by 5th columnist BNP activists?

More distressing school stories!

School receptionist faces sack because her 5 year old daughter frightened another child claiming it would "go to hell" if it did not believe in Jesus.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1142967/School-receptionist-faces-sack-year-old-daughter-told-talking-God.html

If I had been the headteacher I would have said:



"There, there. Not everybody believes there is even a hell. The
worst thing that will happen to you will be in this world. Dying full of
regrets and unforgiven for all your sins will be quite bad enough.
Afterwards people will still talk about you for a while and discuss the things
you did that were right or wrong, and then it will be well and truly over,
unless you are famous, like all the characters from history you have already
learnt about such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela
...."

These days you cannot even let your child bring in a peanut butter sandwich for lunch in case another child with a nut allergy might steal your child's sandwich, eat it and die. This is because under health and safety regulations teaching staff must protect our obese, allergic, neurotic and pregnant children from all foreseeable danger. Otherwise, they will just fall over and die if they come across anything as threatening as a peanut butter sandwich, a Home Truth, a Hurt Feeling or a Great Disappointment.

Remember the story about the teacher fired because she told her 10 year olds Santa did not exist?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1093535/Primary-school-teacher-told-children-Santa-does-exist-fired.html

Here is yet another distressing school story to show why this country is going to the dogs because taught by fools or the malicious and the vicious, who want to turn them into foul-mouthed promiscuous pregnant intoxicated illegitimate illiterate innumerate Santa-believing unemployables.

They will of course be voting BNP when they find themselves unable to compete with foreigners, even in the McJobs they are currently being made fit for.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/4689964/School-pupils-asked-to-grade-rude-words-on-scale-of-offensiveness.html

Children as young as 5 will be given sex education.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7684810.stm


Is there a 5th columnist of BNP activist-teachers in British secondary schools bent on turning our children into CHAVs, in order to recruit the next generation of BNP voters?

I think we should be told.

After all the BNP are also known as the CHAV Party. There is already a clear connection.

It is also very interesting that the BNP continue to bleat about bringing back grammar schools.

As some of us are aware, grammar schools are full of the pushy middle classes. In the urban areas grammar schools are populated mainly by non-white children of even pushier parents who have been having their children tutored for their 11+ since Year 4. (It is well known that non-white parents are far pushier than white parents.)

We all know that the typical urban white working class won't even have a look in. Most of them will not even have heard of grammar schools. If they have they would think "It's not for the likes of us."

BNP education policy is just as much a slap in the face to the white working classes as Labour's.

At least David Cameron has now said he would send his children to the local comp - the only courageous thing he has said so far.

Monday, 9 February 2009

The New Model Comprehensive and Tory Education Policy

It remains to be seen if David Cameron's proclamation that he will send his children to the local comp is as brave as it sounds, and how much his proposals will be watered-down by the time he gets round to being in a position to do anything about the national disgrace that is British "education".

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/4540693/David-Cameron-unveils-new-Tory-vision-for-comprehensive-education.html

The New Model Comprehensive must have all of the following features:

1. Use a standardised national syllabus that apply to British schoolchildren, ie they should acquire the same body of knowledge and are tested in the same way

2. Have both subjective and objective testing for every subject, ie multiple choice/fill-in-the-blanks for objective tests, essays/projects for subjective assessment

3. Have marks out of 100 for both subjective and objective testing.

4. Stream on the basis of a child's average marks in all subjects

5. Have a termly report of the child's position in class.  

6. Be single sex to help prevent unwanted teenage pregnancy

7. Have the option of corporal punishment and expulsion to re-establish an atmosphere of discipline and respect for teachers

8. Have Schools of Correction for those who refuse or cannot adapt to Normal School

9. Rid itself of the personalised curriculum that is currently so fashionable but which has the effect of hiding the failure of the educational establishment in their purpose of educating our children. Personalised curricula dumbs down. Objective criteria to assess a child's knowledge of what "every schoolchild ought to know" is the only way for transparent and easy-to-understand grading and testing criteria that does not require two pages of notes to explain to already dumbed-down parents.

10.  Teach logic in schools.

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...