@pperrin Voters who don't care about Western foreign policy be made to care about it by terrorists who kill them on grounds of nationality.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 28, 2015
@ntfem They won't care about foreign policy, they will go elsewhere for their holidays...
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 28, 2015
@pperrin Don’t care was made to care,
Don’t care was hung:
Don’t care was put in a pot
And boiled till he was done.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 28, 2015
.@ntfem But 'caring' is on a trajectory to give UK strong borders, and keep UK safe while stupid EU burns... works for me.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 28, 2015
@pperrin How likely are we to have a UKIP government in our lifetime? I think we are more likely to have an ISIS government than a UKIP one.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 28, 2015
.@ntfem ISIS are no more my enemy than the EU commission is. Both would have me erased from existence.
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 28, 2015
@pperrin I imagine if we had an ISIS government they would keep out illegal immigrants better.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 28, 2015
@pperrin I have a feeling that under an ISIS government we would have a low crime rate.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 28, 2015
@ntfem Tunisia cheap? Absolutely - it is going for a song now https://t.co/jWRhsOQyBZ
— Paul Perrin (@pperrin) June 28, 2015
@pperrin Not all Muslims are radicalised, and not all radicalised Muslims become terrorists.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin If Muslim terrorism is caused by Western foreign policy then it is easier to that than stop Muslims from being radicalised.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
It is easier to change that ....
@pperrin To be radicalised is to come to the conclusion that participating in the political process is an exercise in futility.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin Anders Breivik was radicalised and was self-radicalised by exercising his ability to observe and reason.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin The only way to prevent radicalisation is to convince citizens that participating in the political process is *not* futile.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin The only way to convince citizens that participating in the political process is not futile is to allow open debate and resolution.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin From what the government is saying, it is pretty clear that it has no intention of changing its foreign policy to suit objectors.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin Government response to threat of terrorism is simply to take away more of our liberties and impose more restrictions on speech.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin The response of the government is to show that it has factored in the cost of foreign policy and show it is not changing anything.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
The cost of pursuing British foreign policy is Britons becoming the victims of terrorist violence.
The posh boys of Eton would never be seen dead in a place like Sousse.
@pperrin If you can't beat them, join them? To this end I have devised Secular Koranism. http://t.co/2HKPKUbYSZ
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin Secular Koranism explained at http://t.co/2HKPKUbYSZ would allow the West to control the interpretation of the Koran.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
@pperrin I am suggesting that the *proposed* implementation of Secular Koranism would #prevent the radicalisation of Muslims in the West.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 29, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment