Translate

Showing posts with label Neoconservatism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Neoconservatism. Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 August 2018

The Culture War and the status quo

The Culture War is between the good guys and the bad guys. The good guys are the ones who are guided by truth, reason and morality. The bad guys are the ones who defend the status quo of feminism, and feminism is a disease of the mind that will destroy your civilisation.

If you want to continue your race, society, nation and civilisation you need to produce the next generation and parent your offspring properly. Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions. If you don't care about that, you must be one of the following:

1) You have no intention of becoming a married father.

2) You have no prospect of becoming a married father.

What if you would like to become a married father but have no prospect of becoming one?

Then you should want to effect the economic, political and social changes that would make it easier for men in theory capable of becoming married fathers to become married fathers. Currently, the law in the West punishes white heterosexual men while protecting the groups privileged by intersectional feminism.

There are really only two choices: patriarchy or matriarchy.

Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, matriarchy that of unmarried mothers.

Which society is more likely to continue in existence for the preservation of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation?

If there were a war between a society that is a patriarchy and a society that is a matriarchy, which would win?

Whether or not you have any prospect of becoming a married father, you are morally obliged to support patriarchy, if you care about truth, logic, morality and the continuation of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation.

If you don't, then you would support the status quo. The status quo is to remain in the EU and to continue with neoliberalism and neoconservatism. Supporters of globalist neoliberalism and neoconservatism would be the ones trying to impeach Trump and to stop the Republicans from winning the midterm elections in November. In Britain they would be the ones working to sabotage Brexit who hate and fear Trump and his supporters.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/08/why-feminists-are-nihilists.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 2 August 2018

How I propose to foster better Jew and gentile relations



at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, 31 July 2018

Too many Jews settling in Germany in the interwar years caused the antisemitism of Nazi Germany?

International Migration between the Two World Wars

The first sizable wave of post–World War I Jewish international migration from Eastern Europe occurred in 1918–1921, when more than 200,000 Jews emigrated from Soviet Russia to different European countries, mostly through neighboring Poland and Romania; they settled chiefly in Germany, and later in France. In the first years of the 1920s, however, many of these refugees joined the general Jewish migration movement to the United States and Palestine. Moreover, some migrated to these destinations later—especially those who escaped Germany after Hitler’s seizure of power—but in migration statistics they sometimes appeared as immigrants who originated from Russia/Soviet Union. For this reason the number of Jews who immigrated directly from Soviet Russia to the United States and Palestine is rather unclear.

www.yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Population_and_Migration/Migration_since_World_War_I

White Man's Burden 
The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. Two of them, journalists William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, say it's possible. But another journalist, Thomas Friedman (not part of the group), is skeptical 

https://www.haaretz.com/1.4764706

This suggests that too many Jews settling in Germany in the interwar years after they were kicked out by the Russians caused the antisemitism of Nazi Germany. 

When liberal Jews deliberately encouraged immigration into their host countries - in the hope that plenty of other minorities in their host country would stop them from standing out like a sore thumb and take the heat off them - I don't think they knew what they are doing.

Sometimes, you can be too clever for your own good.

They must be feeling sick as a parrot now for causing their host nation to invite in all those antisemitic Muslim migrants whose countries America had destroyed at the behest of Jewish neocons. 
at 1 comment:
Labels: , ,

Thursday, 19 April 2018

Neoconservatism is just another name for American imperialism

Leo Strauss says Classical Liberalism is the religion of American imperialism, but where is its scripture and what are its principles?

Before Conservatism, the political parties were divided between Whig and Tory. The Tories were represented by the owners of land, and the Whigs came to represent the new rich of the Industrial Revolution in favour of free trade to better sell their wares in the British Empire.

The new rich got their way when the Corn Laws were repealed which allowed them cheap imported corn for the urban proletariat.

Classical Liberalism is really Conservatism, and Conservatism was created as a defence against the ideas of the French Revolution. What the French Revolutionaries were rebelling against was the Catholic clergy. It can be deduced therefore that Conservatism was really Theocracy Lite, "lite" because it was a synthesis of the old hierarchical and patriarchal ideas of the Bible and the revolutionary idea of egalitarianism.

It is probably time to consider whether we should just have the real thing and stop pretending we know better than scripture when we are only in the mess we're in because we have ignored what are said to be God's commandments. At least with established religions their scripture does not change while what we think is our political ideology is altered with as much frequency as the leader of a political party changes his mind about something or, sometimes more frequently.

God's laws were laid down long ago and, being omniscient and morally perfect, if He exists, He does not make mistakes. A theocracy would at least stop the laws from changing so frequently because our law-makers keep making mistakes and changing their minds.

When once the Church of England was considered to be the Tory Party at area, the Tory Party is now on record of having a Prime Minister that legalised gay marriage.

We need the rules to be clear and stay the same just as we need the day to be 24 hours long and the week to be 7 days long.

The moral chaos we now have is directly related to the frequency of how often our political leaders change their minds. Women, you may have noticed, change their minds more often than men, many Western world leaders are now clueless childless women, and many Western leaders are men afraid of women.

No good will come of this.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/59/Leo_Strauss_Neoconservative
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 12 April 2018

Western media is just another arm of our neocon Deep State

The media is to give cover to our neocon politicians to vote for more war. That is all it is for now really. Future historians will look at all the media coverage and ask themselves how people can really be so stupid, but perhaps some of them will be able to read between the lines.

Anyway, it doesn't matter that most people don't believe the media narrative, it is not even there to convince us.

The anti-war demonstrations which I attended in Hyde Park in 2003 showed that most people in the West are anti-war, but our politicians ignored our wishes anyway. It was estimated that about 6 to 11 million people in total turned out in major European cities, and these are the people without access to privileged information!

Ordinary folk cannot be expected to understand the imperatives of what is really an imperial war.

Even now, most people don't really know what the Crimean War was all about. Such non-defensive imperial wars are very hard to explain to the uneducated and uninterested whose role is only to do or die and not to question why.

These days the Eastern Question is not even studied in history lessons.

The media is just another arm of the American Deep State Imperium.
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 8 August 2017

My proposed rules for admission into the alt-right

https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answers/143686234497

I don't think open homosexuals should be admitted into the alt-right, actually.

My point is that nationalism cannot be practised with patriarchy, patriarchy cannot exist without social conservatism, social conservatism cannot exist without obeying the most important rule of marriage - the forbidding and punishment of extramarital sex.

Without patriarchy, masculine men will not be produced in sufficient numbers and strength to defend the national interest so we can have rationally small and good government instead of an out of control neurotic nanny state.

You can be admitted only if you go back into the closet and are not caught cottaging.

Nor can you be admitted if you are the parent of illegitimate offspring unless you have been lashed 100 times per illegitimate offspring.

You can however be admitted if you are yourself illegitimate, because it is not your fault your mother was a fornicating slut.

I hope these rules are reasonably clear.

To control women, men must first control themselves.

This means shaming sluts.

Shaming sluts means there will be fewer of them to fuck.

But this is the sacrifice men must be prepared to make if they are going to call themselves nationalists who really really really want their country back from the Feminazi Deep State practising Transnational Progressivism, Sexual Liberation, Neoconservatism and Neoliberalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnational_progressivism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfowitz_Doctrine

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/07/20/the-reign-of-propaganda/ 
You can have sex with your wife or with prostitutes, but not with fornicating sluts and certainly not with each other.

Remember, gay sex is cheap sex. It is probably the cheapest form of sex you can have with another adult human being. Don't be a cheapskate.

But it is not at the moment safe to marry.

It will not be safe to marry until and unless no fault divorce is abolished and equality legislation is repealed.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/official-marriage-strike-by-men.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/declare-official-marriage-and-sex.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2009/07/australian-men-on-marriage-strike.html

This means you will have to campaign for the legalisation of brothels if you want to avoid having sex from women who withdraw their consent after sex in order to accuse you of rape if they feel a bit of a stupid slut for having been pumped and dumped by an unmarriageable man who didn't even want to marry them anyway.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, 7 May 2017

How MSM present neocon wars and who backs them up


If they can't get non-white women, they will get white women, especially white BBC female journalists like the ones at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/female-journalists-pro-migrant-coverage.html, to whinge for more migrants and refugees to come to the West, but it is better if they use non-white women because these women are supposed to represent the nations and races who are the victims of neocon bombing and it is more convincing coming from them.

The best combo is a non-white woman with a cute baby or child tugging at the heart strings of clueless white female voters who feel obliged to display compassion by nagging or threatening white men eg SJWs and white male politicians into taking steps to do so.

Wake up and wise up, nationalists of both sexes.

Don't let these fuckers get away with it any more.












Have you noticed that the British national interest is never ever discussed?

Why the fuck are we bombing Syria?

Because the neoconning Americans and the "defence" industry want us to and our shit for brains politicians haven't the courage or intelligence to resist them.

Why do we pretend to be surprised that Syrian refugees prefer to go to Europe than head towards Africa when they are fleeing their ravaged country?

Before that question is even asked, the discussion turns towards the plight of the refugees and the sheeple are emotionally bullied into discussing it at great length and then getting precisely nowhere.

The only thing that we are never allowed to discuss is the British national interest and why our MPs always vote for war invasion, bombing and no-fly zones. They must be in the pay of the US neocons and the defence industries, mustn't they?

Or they have shit for brains and vote however their party leader tells them to. 

Fuck this shitty system called liberal democracy. Let's just have a one party theocracy instead.

BAD FOREIGN POLICY: the two ruinous world wars Britain fought before losing its empire and becoming a US and EU vassal state

The Collapse Is Closer Than Ever
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Ron Paul: The Collapse Is Closer Than Ever








at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 11 April 2017

The neoconservative and neoliberal model of perpetuating the New World Order

1) Invite immigration, especially Muslim immigration.

2) Create hatred and resentment against Muslims by giving Muslims privileges unavailable to non-Muslims and non-Jews as well as unemployment at home so the indigenous and uneducated plebs become so stupid and desperate they join the armed forces to fight and kill Muslims in neocon wars abroad.

3) Keep them stupid by tolerating sluts and bastards and denying them free and decent selective education.

4) Rinse and repeat ad nauseam until your civilisation collapses.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 6 April 2017

After turning neocon, Trump will now walk back on his promises




















at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Trump has turned neocon, and nothing now can ever come to any good

Syria chemical attack has changed my view of Assad, says Trump
Stop all the clocks by W H Auden


 Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone,
Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone,
Silence the pianos and with muffled drum
Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come.

Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead
Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead,
Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public doves,
Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton gloves.

He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong.

 The stars are not wanted now: put out every one;
Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun;
Pour away the ocean and sweep up the wood.
For nothing now can ever come to any good.


How do you fight such a thing except question the very political system that allows the US Military Industrial Complex to run all Western governments - democracy itself?

The only countries in the world that still have an independent foreign policy is China, Russia and Iran.

How much do you think the average voter cares about foreign policy?

How much do you think the average female voter (to whom all political parties pander) care about foreign policy?


We know what happened to Athens as a result of its compulsive warmongering, do we not?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delian_League

President Eisenhower:

We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex

Is it too late now for Donald Trump to nationalise the Military Industrial Complex by Executive Order?

http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/07/06/nationalize-the-defense-industry/

That would mean an undignified W turn. 














at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Friday, 31 March 2017

Are White People the problem?



What is the problem exactly?

I think it should be re-titled "WHY ARE WHITE PEOPLE HAVING A PROBLEM WITH OTHER RACES IN THEIR COUNTRY?"

The problem is of course immigration, but they white people did it to themselves. If white people did not allow other races into their countries, then they would not be having problems with them now, would they?

If immigration is such a problem for white people, then why don't they just stop it with their democracy if most people have a problem with it? But they can't.

Why not?

Because white people cannot agree amongst themselves what they should do about immigration.

Some white people - the liberal elite - don't have a problem with immigration, but most do. It is the liberal elite who control the media and the media can make most people believe whatever the media want them to believe.

Obviously, if white people want to keep their culture and things the way they are, they have to control immigration.

If they have a problem controlling immigration, they should ask themselves why. Opinion appears to be evenly divided about immigration, but we should bear in mind that is men who are more racist than women because their interests are more directly threatened.

Have you noticed that the lionesses in the lion's harem never help the lion fight when there is a male intruder hoping to usurp him to have access to his harem?

They don't care because they want to have the cubs of the winner even as they know that the usurper if he wins will kill the cubs of the previous incumbent. It is all the same to them.

Are white men like that lion, but forced to be friendly and welcoming to potential usurpers because the lionesses prefer it and he believes in democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage?

Then more fool him.

The video only complains about Muslims and Islam, but never mentions the role of democracy, feminism and liberalism in breaking down white men's willingness to protect their interests and culture.

Feminism has utterly emasculated the white man rendering him unable even to defend a principle, let alone his nation. It is doubtful if he any longer understands what a principle is. He probably thinks having principles cramps his style, preventing him from acting on impulse, caprice and expediency. Muslims however have principles because they have religious principles which they are obliged to follow.

What principles ought we to have if we want to have principles just for the sake of having them, like a moral status symbol, to show that we are better than non-human animals who cannot be expected to know what principles are for, let alone have them?

Mine are simply to submit to truth, logic and morality. It seems there are plenty of white men who think they are too good to do that, because they are so white and clever and superior and have no need to obey any rules and can do what they like, whenever and wherever.

You may have noticed that white culture - drug culture, pub culture, the culture of entitlement and the culture of excuses - is not about supporting the institutions of marriage and the family. It is therefore inevitable that it will be replaced by Islam which has a culture of supporting marriage and family values instead of sex and drugs and rock and roll.

So what is the real problem with white people and why can't they fix their problems?

Because they are in denial about the nature of their problems and keep complaining about the symptoms of terrorism and immigration rather than curing the disease of feminism, neoliberalism and neoconservatism, which they cannot do unless they accept the truth, the operation of reason and the nature and purpose of morality.

Because they won't accept the truth, or the conclusions logic leads them towards, or the dictates of morality, they are in denial. Because if they were not in denial, I would have a job in the media or be famous by now, but it is the purpose of the corrupt liberal media to deny my existence however newsworthy I and my ideas are.

When the media of White People finally becomes fit for purpose and reports news rather than suppressing it, there might just be hope for them.


God and the demographic winter to come for the post-industrial societies of the East and West 




at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 23 March 2017

Western Man's cultural practice of mass murdering Muslims abroad and complaining about Muslim immigration and terrorism at home


This video only complains about Muslims and their propensity to terrorism, without once considering the role of UK foreign policy in provoking Muslim terrorism. So much easier to point to Muslims who are visibly different than to trouble one's pretty head about bad UK foreign policy, is it not? Demanding the mass expulsion of Muslims and the banning of Islam in the West is a much more attractive option than wondering where UK foreign policy might have gone wrong over the past century.







What year was the Brighton bomb?

What year was the Anglo-Irish Agreement?

Do you think Muslim terrorists are better at putting two and two together than shit for brains MPs sitting in Parliament as representatives of the idiocracy?

It would appear Islamophobic Western Man considers the neocon policy of bombing and invading Muslim countries as an expression of Western masculinity.

The Military Industrial Complex of the Western Man has the perfect modus operandi: keep invading Muslim countries and keep allowing Muslim immigration.

Allowing Muslim immigration while preventing people from complaining about immigration and giving Muslims special status causes Muslims to be hated, creating the desire in beta male cannon fodder to bomb and invade Muslim countries, which is brilliantly self-perpetuating.

Creating a fear of Muslims in the West also allows the state to pass ever more repressive laws to justify spying on everyone, another beneficial side effect for the intelligence community who are part of the deep state.

It cannot be healthy or decent to express your masculinity in enabling, facilitating and committing mass homicide, can it? This is after all what serial killers do.

Part of the white man's cultural identity is the belief he has the right to mass murder Muslims globally with impunity from retaliation.

When he suffers retaliation in the form terrorism in his own country, the degenerate Western matriarchy calls for the observation of pointless rituals of a minute's silence and candlelit vigils, clearly designed to generate emotion and to suppress thought so its victims never think to question Western foreign policy or their government's immigration policy, both designed to prop up the stinking degenerate matriarchy of parasitical female voters and their spawn, who are voracious clients of the welfare state.

https://www.facebook.com/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times-417696111659379/?fref=ts

Why does the white man feel he has to mass murder Muslims abroad as a cultural practice? Because at home he is a pussywhipped mangina whose social status is below that of a fornicating slut or Slut Single Mother with variously fathered feral bastards who live off his labour and his taxes whom he doesn't even get to fuck. 

Simon Sheppard on How Feminism Caused Two World Wars
"We should ask, and seek a satisfactory answer to the question: Was it a coincidence that the British government capitulated to women at precisely the same moment in history that it directed a blood feud of a savagery unknown for centuries? Extraordinary lengths were taken to prevail in the First World War, and extraordinary measures were taken rather than accede to the German and American peace overtures which were made, especially during December 1916."

"It is generally acknowledged that the First World War directly led to the Second."

"A man who has lost control at home can seek to dominate elsewhere."

"The desire to dominate and subdue women, a natural male instinct with sound evolutionary origins, was expressed another way. Germany was subjugated instead. Moreover the British government had itself become feminized, choosing as its adversary one more masculine than itself, the sort of enemy the female would choose. By attacking a more masculine opponent, males were serving the female interest."

"A nation, like a man, that is secure in itself and in its masculine capacity to control does not wish to cruelly persecute a vanquished foe. This took place after both world wars."

'... feminization played a part in the instigation and unprecedented magnitude of violence of the subsequent two world wars. One cannot help but wonder at the carnage and suffering which might have been avoided had British bobbies, on facing organized suffragette rebellion in the years around 1910, simply been told to “roll up their sleeves.” '

Why doesn't Western Man stop waging war on Muslims abroad?

Why does he continue to allow Muslim immigration into his country while he wages war against Muslims abroad? It makes no sense, but then it makes no sense for men to let irresponsible and promiscuous women have the vote and most women in the West are irresponsible and promiscuous, do not have legitimate children, are not good wives and badly parent what children they manage to have leading to a shortage of employably literate and numerate citizens, leading to a labour shortage, leading to an insatiable demand for cheaper and more willing immigrant labour.

Why does this deep-seated and long-standing problem remain addressed? Because politicians are not capable of planning beyond the next election.

How should it be addressed? My proposals to abolish multi-party democracy, abolish the welfare state, repeal pro-feminist legislation and impose a one-party Secular Koranist theocracy capable of promoting social conservatism and the long term national interest will be unlikely to get any publicity from the corrupt liberal media more in the business of suppressing news than reporting it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2728487/My-children-turned-monsters-And-says-SHONA-SIBARY-s-fault-trying-nice-liberal-parent.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/why-white-people-are-now-inferior-race.html 

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

It is impossible to get an answer from a patient who is in a catatonic state.

Is this patient's response analogous to that of the media - being able to hold an unnatural position for a surprisingly long time? 1:36 Watch out in particular for waxy flexibility, sustained abnormal position, opposition, resistance to movement, negativism including aversion

This is what the male politician secretly thinks about himself, his career and the entire political process that he wastes his life engaging in, because he won't say what needs to be said about feminism and Western foreign policy.


New President, same old neocon US foreign policy being pursued by NATO members/US vassal states

Western Man is simply in a state of neurotic suspension, on the one hand compelled to do the same thing again and again because that is what he has been doing ever he can remember, and on the other fearing the consequences when he wakes up to admit that he has been in error for God knows how long and for how many generations for allowing indiscriminate universal suffrage, tolerating widespread bastardy and allowing his addiction to extramarital sex and cheap foreign labour to go unaddressed.
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , ,

New President, same old neocon US foreign policy being pursued by NATO members/US vassal states























How Feminism Led to Two World Wars

We should ask, and seek a satisfactory answer to the question: Was it a coincidence that the British government capitulated to women at precisely the same moment in history that it directed a blood feud of a savagery unknown for centuries? Extraordinary lengths were taken to prevail in the First World War, and extraordinary measures were taken rather than accede to the German and American peace overtures which were made, especially during December 1916.

It is generally acknowledged that the First World War directly led to the Second.
A man who has lost control at home can seek to dominate elsewhere.
The desire to dominate and subdue women, a natural male instinct with sound evolutionary origins, was expressed another way. Germany was subjugated instead. Moreover the British government had itself become feminized, choosing as its adversary one more masculine than itself, the sort of enemy the female would choose. By attacking a more masculine opponent, males were serving the female interest. 
 A nation, like a man, that is secure in itself and in its masculine capacity to control does not wish to cruelly persecute a vanquished foe. This took place after both world wars.
... feminization played a part in the instigation and unprecedented magnitude of violence of the subsequent two world wars. One cannot help but wonder at the carnage and suffering which might have been avoided had British bobbies, on facing organized suffragette rebellion in the years around 1910, simply been told to “roll up their sleeves.”



9/11 was used by the US government to launch wars that have destroyed in whole or part seven countries, killing millions of peoples and producing millions of refugees. 9/11 was also used to create an American police state, which is a far greater threat to freedom and democracy than Muslim terrorism.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/09/10/911-15-years-of-a-transparent-lie-paul-craig-roberts/

https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answers/142695877761

my condolences to you and the United Kingdom at this shocking time
They were bound to get round to us sooner or later. Interesting, isn't it, that neocon policies just carry on no matter which President is in power, no matter what the presidential candidate says about ending war? It is like US foreign policy is nothing to do with POTUS. Trump is just not saying anything about foreign policy like he is not saying anything about the weather in Timbuktu, because it is nothing to do with him. What a farce of a political system democracy is. No one's in charge, everyone's doing their own thing, no one has any idea where the buck has now been passed to, until it goes bang ... 

The deep state probably threatened to murder Trump and his entire family if he didn't toe the neocon line.

What is the point of a "democracy" like this?

"Democracy" just means public ignorance and indifference to Western foreign policy and hatred of Muslims and immigrants while refusing to challenge feminism. 
 





http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/12/17/a-cia-led-coup-against-american-democracy-is-unfolding-before-our-eyes-paul-craig-roberts/

The CIA-controlled European media ... 
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, 12 January 2017

Feminism and Western Foreign Policy pointedly *not* discussed at the Progress meeting on countering Muslim terrorism




















































































































































































































































White middle class feminazis in the media who control spineless unprincipled men don't care about the morality of Western foreign policy or social policy. Those who control our media are mostly feminists, gays, atheists and the opposite of people who support marriage and family values.

Having destroyed the masculinity of men of their own race, they now wish to invite men of other races to enter their country in order to destroy their masculinity too.

Under cover of terrorism legislation, the government can easily now censor the free exchange of ideas to demonise anyone who points out an obvious truth or uses logical arguments to press his case.

When people like Anjem Choudary easily win the argument, the government simply ceases to engage with them at all and then incarcerates them.

It is not just Muslim radicals who suffer this treatment, is it? Even now as you read this, plans are afoot to impeach Donald Trump, before he has even been inaugurated.

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/12/donald-trump-may-get-impeached-within-a-year-if-you-believe-the-betting-odds-6377488/

Corporate media still has a purpose even if the rest of us already know they are the biggest manufacturers of fake news.

This is how it works: the media spin a narrative - any narrative at all, no matter how illogical, transparently false and immoral. Our politicians pretend to believe it and vote for it. 
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...