Translate

Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts

Monday, 24 September 2018

Who becomes a terrorist and why?

Why is the Muslim in the West more likely to blow himself up than a non-Muslim? Because, after traveling across seas and continents to get to the West, he realises that his offspring if any would be illegitimate and his descendants if any would be the parents of illegitimate children, bloating the crime statistics with their criminality, disgracing him with their bastardy. His sons would be cucks and his daughters sluts and unmarried mothers. That's my theory and I'm sticking to it. Self-loathing is a very powerful emotion.
at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday, 30 May 2018

How to prevent a failed state matriarchy where random violence is committed against women (and men)



at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, 19 June 2017

A philosophical question about terrorism: Is killing people you hate just because you hate them a terrorist act?


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2017/jun/19/north-london-van-incident-finsbury-park-casualties-collides-pedestrians-live-updates

Is killing people because you hate and fear them a terrorist offence? It would depend on the motive of the perpetrator, I would suggest.

 Admittedly, this is rather nuanced.

If you were Muslim, do you think calling this a terrorist attack is appropriate?

It would appear to raise the status of the perpetrator if his motive is not self-evidently sophisticated enough to considered a terrorist act.

If A kills B because he hates him, is it a terrorist act? I would say not.

If A kills B because he hates him and his family, is it a terrorist act? I would say not.

If A kills B and the people of his race/religion because he hates B and people of B's race and religion, is it a terrorist act? It would depend on what A hoped to achieve by his mass murder. If it was just personal gratification, I would say that in itself is not enough to make it a terrorist act.
I would define terrorism as crimes committed in furtherance of a political cause.

Here is a hypothetical situation:

Someone not known by his friends and family to have converted to Islam gets a gun and a car, shoots and runs over people and is shot dead by the police. He is heard to say"Allahu akbar" by witnesses. Does this mean he is a terrorist? It would appear so, but what if his real motive was to simply run over and shoot people for the sheer hell of it and he only pretended to be a Muslim because it makes him seem scarier and more interesting?

Should this person still be considered a terrorist even if everything he did was for his own personal gratification, including that of appearing to be a Muslim terrorist just to get more column inches and publicity for his suicide?

Abbott: Finsbury Park a ‘Terror Attack’, But Westminster, Manchester, and London Bridge ‘Incidents’

Apparently, being a victim of a terrorist attack raises your status as a victim and raises the status of the perpetrator too.

If we and our loved ones are to suffer death and injury, it seems we prefer to suffer death and injury at the hands of terrorists rather than at the hands of "mere" common or garden mass-murderers.
at No comments:
Labels: ,

Monday, 5 June 2017

When violence is inevitable

Violence is inevitable when someone who has a grievance looking for the solution by negotiating with the cause of the grievance or pleading with her realises that the one causing the grievance has no intention of acknowledging the validity of the grievance at all, let alone resolving it.

This neatly explains the violence being committed by Muslim terrorists as well as the violence that was committed by anti-immigration Islamophobes such as Anders Breivik and the murderer of Jo Cox who called himself 'death to traitors, freedom for Britain' when asked to state his name at his murder trial. They are both manifestations of male rage at the consequences and conditions of living in a degenerate matriarchy.

The Forefront of Knowledge Simon Sheppard explores the mind of the spree killer

The spree killer may be at the outer boundary in the range of normal human behaviour, but nonetheless his is the natural response of the social animal provoked beyond endurance. He is merely the forerunner, and until he is given legitimate expression of his valid and justified anger, and allowed to respond to the daily injustices and affronts he must presently endure, each new atrocity will only herald more to come.

Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

If their behaviour is unlimited, females are capable of firstly, making their own males into an underclass, for example by their wholesale preference for alien males, as can readily be observed in areas with high immigrant populations. Secondly, they are capable of taking their race to the brink of, if not beyond, extinction. These are critical flaws for which accommodation cannot be countenanced.





All political parties in the West too cucked to acknowledge the evils of feminism
at 2 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

It ain't what happens to you, it's how you deal with it that matters

If it was the intention of Gavrilo Princip to make the Austrian Empire destroy itself, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand brilliantly achieved this purpose.

“It's not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.”

― Epictetus
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, 6 March 2017

An exercise for aspiring tabloid journalists

With all the facts and opinions given in the link to the rather dull and worthy piece above, turn this into something most people would want to read without falling foul of the law on defamation etc.

The subject of the interview could hardly bring herself  to finish reading the piece because she had heard it all before and had indeed written it herself anyway with minimal input from the journalist.  

Those of Facebook her friends who could bring themselves to read it from beginning to end after being begged to do so repeatedly agreed it was fair enough, but is that the point?

How does saying something perfectly truthful and perfectly dull that no one reads advance the debate? It doesn't and can't.

Tabloid journalists of the gutter press, do your worst, but within the law, please.

Your ultimate goal is the largest possible readership. 

http://www.verbalremedy.co.uk/slavery-and-sluttery-an-interview-with-claire-khaw/
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, 12 January 2017

Feminism and Western Foreign Policy pointedly *not* discussed at the Progress meeting on countering Muslim terrorism




















































































































































































































































White middle class feminazis in the media who control spineless unprincipled men don't care about the morality of Western foreign policy or social policy. Those who control our media are mostly feminists, gays, atheists and the opposite of people who support marriage and family values.

Having destroyed the masculinity of men of their own race, they now wish to invite men of other races to enter their country in order to destroy their masculinity too.

Under cover of terrorism legislation, the government can easily now censor the free exchange of ideas to demonise anyone who points out an obvious truth or uses logical arguments to press his case.

When people like Anjem Choudary easily win the argument, the government simply ceases to engage with them at all and then incarcerates them.

It is not just Muslim radicals who suffer this treatment, is it? Even now as you read this, plans are afoot to impeach Donald Trump, before he has even been inaugurated.

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/12/donald-trump-may-get-impeached-within-a-year-if-you-believe-the-betting-odds-6377488/

Corporate media still has a purpose even if the rest of us already know they are the biggest manufacturers of fake news.

This is how it works: the media spin a narrative - any narrative at all, no matter how illogical, transparently false and immoral. Our politicians pretend to believe it and vote for it. 
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 19 June 2016

Remainders have capitalised on the death of Jo Cox, leavers can do so too

I suggest using the tactic of "Look what you made me do."

Jo Cox and her ilk would not have hesitated to call anyone who dared complain about immigration a racist. That was always how polarised the debate has been. How long has the immigration debate has been simmering? I would say since Powell made his Rivers of Blood speech in 20 April 1968. The killing of Cox on 16 June 2016 represented the multicultural and multiracial melting pot boiling over. Of course, there have been inner city riots since 1968, but this is the first time an MP actually suffered directly as a result of ignoring the concerns of voters.

Apparently, Breivik murdering 69 summer campers wasn't sufficient warning in 2011 because no politicians were harmed, only the youth members of the Workers' Youth League. This should have been taken as a warning to anyone who has ever thought they could just carry on denouncing anyone who ever dares to complain as racist dinosaurs to shut them up, but still they carried on employing that tactic.


Mr Cox’s wife, Jo, is a Labour MP and former aide to Mr Brown’s wife Sarah. Mrs Cox also runs the Labour Women’s Network where she is ‘equalities and discrimination’ adviser.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298572/New-charity-scandal-Save-Children-executive-quits-women-s-complaints-inappropriate-behaviour.html#ixzz4C3OIalmv

An imaginary conversation between a recipient of Save the Children charity and its former CEO Justin Forsyth

It was probably Jo Cox who put it into Gordon Brown's head to call anyone who dared complain about immigration "bigoted", as he called called Mrs Gillian Duffy, a Labour member.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/28/gordon-brown-gillian-duffy-transcript

Her plea for her constituents to vote remain still has no solutions or words of comfort whatsoever. It is still "Put up and shut up, you plebs. They will keep coming whether you like it or not, whether we're in or out. You have no choice, and you know it. Now shut it."

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822#ixzz4BA42bFd8http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822

Just like IRA terrorism, politicians only responded when they perceived themselves to be directly threatened eg after the Brighton Bomb in 1984. When was the Anglo-Irish Agreement signed? 1985.

Leavers should point this out rather than be intimidated into silence and pulling their punches. Whatever the result, there's going to be trouble anyway.

It is time for the British to gird their loins, grit their teeth and bite the bullet.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, 18 June 2016

What is worse than being a politician who was assassinated by a terrorist?






at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

What the mad Muslim woman who beheaded a disabled child proves about liberalism

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6964584/Woman-handed-police-childs-severed-head-shouting-Allahu-Akbar-in-Russia.html

Sometimes, Muslims suffer from mental health issues.

Religion is about instilling morality for the purpose of social cohesion.

The purpose of social cohesion is to keep your group in existence, make your group stronger and its civilisation last longer.

Islamophobes who tend to be atheists/feminists/liberals know that Islam is an ideology diametrically opposed to theirs, and that is why they hate and fear Islam.

Islamophobes think they have the right to invade and bomb Muslim countries without suffering the consequences of retaliation.

They also think that their government can have policies that have been causing degeneracy for generations, yet not suffer from degeneracy or have to do anything about it, like this feminist who wrote https://kittysjones.wordpress.com/2016/02/28/adam-perkins-conservative-narratives-and-neuro-neoliberalism/ and wanted to suppress the view of an academic whose conclusions she disliked. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3456651/The-ugly-truth-benefits-CENSORED-LSE-students-academic-tried-tell-welfare-make-claimants-workshy-agressive-anti-social.html
Like bullies, they can dish it out but can't take it.

All this story proves is that every now and then Muslims go stark raving mad, just like non-Muslims.

This woman is obviously not a terrorist, but no opportunity is missed when it comes to showing one's hatred and fear of Islam and Muslims. Apparently, Islam makes you go mad, or is it because the media love stories about violent Muslims?

The media love stories about violent Muslims because they know its audience love to hate Muslims.

In the meantime, the damage being inflicted by liberalism remains unaddressed.

Professor Daniel Bell:

Liberalism, it is claimed, contributes to, or, at least, does not sufficiently take account of, the negative social and psychological effects related to the atomistic tendencies of modern liberal societies. There is undoubtedly a worrying trend in contemporary societies towards a callous individualism that ignores community and social obligations, and liberal theory does not seem up to the task of dealing with this problem.

NB: Liberalism is atomistic and degenerate Feminism.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 13 September 2015

Advice on preventing radicalisation government will ignore in favour of more restrictions on our liberties

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/133007027841


Stop giving the impression that the government is run by feminazis, imbeciles, incompetents, sexual degenerates, lunatics and extremists who will never enter into a full and frank discussion about government policies because they already know are morally and intellectually indefensible.

If not, the government would have to remove the ability of citizens to use reason and access to the news.

We should have a Saturday evening TV programme using the rules of a debating society in which all UK viewers can vote by text. It would be a hit.

Motions I'd like to see proposed are:


  1. Democracy is not serving the long term British national interest and the franchise should be narrowed under a one party state.
  2. Britain is a vassal state of the US.
  3. The American government is in the thrall of the Israel lobby, therefore the rest of the world is similarly in thrall to the Jewish and Israeli interests because Western imperialism is represented by America.
  4. Britain does not have an independent foreign policy.
  5. Britain is the 51st state of America.
  6. After WW2, the British lost their empire while the Americans gained one.
  7. No nation that calls itself a free country could with integrity claim it has free speech if Holocaust Denial legislation criminalises and imprisons historians for saying the wrong number.
  8. The cause of antisemitism worldwide is America's increasingly aggressive foreign policy, perceived to be implemented at the behest of Israel.
  9. Christianity has fallen to gay marriage, ergo Christianity has failed.
  10. Islam is the most natural replacement of the failed religion that is Christianity.
  11. Britain lost its world empire because of the operation of democracy.
  12. Sexual morality is linked to the health and duration of your civilisation.
  13. Sexual morality is really about how far society or an individual deviates from the ideal of traditional marriage: the prohibition of extramarital sex ie fornication, adultery and sodomy.
  14. Britain and the West is now a matriarchy.
  15. All advanced civilisations are patriarchal, and all declining and primitive societies are matriarchal.
  16. A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity, a matriarchy female promiscuity.
  17. Matriarchies are either primitive or degenerate.
  18. The cure for feminism is Islam.
  19. The quickest way to destroy feminism is repeal the Equality Act 2010 and abolish no fault divorce.
  20. Feminism causes degeneracy by encouraging women to be sluts.
  21. Sluts giving sex to men for free corrupts their natures lowering them in status till they are lower than the worst kind of woman - the unfit unmarried mother.
  22. When the men of your society are perceived to be in fear of the worst kind of women, you are advertising to the rest of the world that you are ripe for invasion and exploitation.
  23. Egalitarianism is based on a lie since we are patently not equal.
  24. Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society.
  25. The West is a senescent society of elderly, effete and effeminate men afraid of sluts.

Pankaj Mishra:

"Powerlessness and deprivation [felt by the emasculated beta male] are exacerbated today by the ability, boosted by digital media, to constantly compare your life with the lives of the fortunate (especially women entering the workforce or prominent in the public sphere: a common source of rage for men with siege mentalities worldwide)."


NB: There is no alpha male of Britain. There are no alpha males because no male politician has criticised the Slut Single Mother since 1974 and got away with it. Keith Joseph tried and he ended up having to stand aside for Margaret Thatcher. The British matriarchy was therefore established in 1974, 41 years ago. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Charlotte Proudman, 27, able to so easily and publicly humiliate a 57 year old Queen's Counsel just for paying her a compliment, is the consequence of all the men of Britain being lower than the worst kind of women - the unfit unmarried mother or the SSM (Slut Single Mother). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3229951/Ooh-la-la-hot-stuff-s-prim-barrister-centre-sexism-storm-said-men-ogled-web.html

If most mothers are SSMs, then most women are sluts. If most women are sluts then most men are MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers).

MCSFs are understandably despised for being weak and in fear their women and that is why Europe as a whole is being assailed by wave after wave of migrant swarms, attracted to this country by the easy favours of its women and the effeteness and effeminacy of its men who cannot stand up for a principle because of their terror of offending their feminazi women, much less prevent swarms of migrant African men from entering their countries at will. The migrant swarms now know how weak, suicidal and stupid the European man is. More of them will come till we are completely taken over, if ISIS do not invade us first. 

at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...