Monica Lewinsky:
"Women are not immune to misogyny.”
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/16/monica-lewinsky-shame-sticks-like-tar-jon-ronson?CMP=share_btn_fb
Shaming sluts is now called misogyny, but how can it be misogynistic for a chaste woman to criticise sluts?
The nature and purpose of slut-shaming is explained at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming
It would only be so if all women were sluts. The feminist presumption seems to be that all women are sluts, when it is in fact perfectly possible to be a woman and not a slut.
The false conflation of women and sluts serves a feminist purpose, of course, which to protect sluts from criticism, allowing them to hide behind a screen of general womanhood. This conflation is also also apparently and partially true, because most Western women are indeed sluts.
Lewinsky is of course America's most infamous slut, and Americans both men and women are very angry and ashamed of her. Respectable men who have a reputation to lose dare not be in the same room alone with her, and her name is enough to make any Presidential candidate leave the room.
Men know that women like her are everywhere, lurking behind every corner ready to make a man an offer he cannot refuse, like this slut who then wreaked vengeance on this taxi driver when he did indeed refuse.
Men of average firmness of mind already know that they would be suckers for an attractive woman offering to suck their cocks. They just would not be able to refuse, and they know it. Even thinking of it now results in an unwelcome tumescence, doesn't it, guys? The idea of having your cock sucked by an attractive woman against your will is somehow irresistibly arousing and must be the male equivalent of the female rape fantasy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_fantasy
If women are the weaker sex, then Western men are the even weaker sex, in thrall to the cock-sucking slut round every corner whom they both welcome and dread in equal measure.
Basically, sluts get men into trouble. Lots of sluts get lots of men into trouble and then their civilisation is in trouble.
Would a virgin suck off a man she didn't even have vaginal intercourse with?
Would a virgin suck off a man not her husband and then boast about it to a colleague?
Lewinsky was a SLUT.
Or does anyone think Lewinsky a virgin when she sucked off the President?
In 1992, she allegedly began a five-year affair with Andy Bleiler, her married former high school drama instructor.
quran.com/24/2 would solve men's problems with sluts and allow them to gain a semblance of masculinity. Did I hear someone yell "Over our dead bodies?"
Monica Lewinsky: ‘The shame sticks to you like tar’ https://t.co/7FGsiKzzFt A cautionary tale to sluts: DON'T SUCK THE PRESIDENT'S COCK.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 16, 2016
Monica Lewinsky: ‘The shame sticks to you like tar’ https://t.co/7FGsiKzzFt Unless you are the First Lady, DON'T SUCK THE PRESIDENT'S COCK.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 16, 2016
Monica Lewinsky: ‘The shame sticks to you like tar’ https://t.co/7FGsiKzzFt Are there any nunneries for her to join? She could still do porn— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 16, 2016
Apart from becoming a porn actress, what else could Mon… — She could convert to Islam as a sign of remorse for her… https://t.co/VsN20ySdZK— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 16, 2016
Apart from becoming a nun, porn actress and converting … — You are testing my ingenuity. Perhaps she could find a … https://t.co/jbahGTdTf8— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 16, 2016
I have heard that American women sell kisses at fairs. Perhaps Monica Lewinsky could auction blo… — Excellent idea! https://t.co/jO6EIbKp41— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 16, 2016
29 comments:
When Monica Lewinsky came out with her affair with Bill Clinton all the Americans and Canadians said she was honest. Really those Americans do not know the difference between honesty and treachery. This was a secret between her and Clinton and she opened out and slandered the name of Bill Clinton.
She didn't slander him. It's not slander if you're telling the truth.
That is the reason I say that the Americans do not know the difference between Truth and Treachery. What Monica did was a breach of trust. Why did the Americans not open up the affair between President Kennedy and Merilyn Monroe. I have heard he had sex with almost every woman that came close to him.
The point was that she shouldn't have sucked the President's cock.
She had no choice but to tell the truth after she was found out.
Interestingly, under Koranic law, Clinton did no wrong, right, CH?
Of course he did, he had sexual relations with a woman not his wife.
He did not have *intercourse* with her. He was just sitting there and she mesmerised him with her sweet talk and he let her do what she did, but he just sat there with his stiff cock letting her do what she did .....
A man is not supposed to "go in unto" any woman other than his wife.
024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.
He did not "go into her". He was just sitting there minding his own business, and this harlot mesmerised him with her sweet talk ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZACs5sNVQds
To be guilty of adultery or fornication, penetration of the vagina has to take place.
However, she would be found guilty of lewdness.
004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.
It was not a sin against the country but was a sin against his wife. If his wife did not mind it why do the others care. The Bible tolerates polygamy but is totally against touching another man's wife.
How do you know his wife didn't mind? We're not even talking about "the country". Why are you inserting yourself into the conversation when you can't even keep up with arguments?
and no one gives a damn what the bible says. The bible is completely unsuitable as any sort of moral guide, as you lot can't even agree on which version of the bible to use.
I don't think Monica Lewinsky is a slut; she was a stupid girl who threw herself at a man, who used her. If you want to see a slut, check out Janice Dickinson.
Actually, a slut is a fornicatress and having sex just once with a man not your husband makes you technically a slut.
A woman who gives a blowjob to a man unasked without ever first having full intercourse with him must be a slut. I would be surprised if Lewinsky was actually a virgin at the time of the Clinton BJ.
Does getting drunk once make you a lush? Be sensible Claire; you don't usually talk rubbish,
No, but if you have ever fornicated, you are a fornicator or fornicatress. That is Catholic teaching anyway.
You are an atheist like me.
You don't have to believe in God to SEE THE POINT OF THESE RULES.
It is the breaking of these rules by both men and women that has resulted in the oppression of men by women.
Are you telling me you don't see this?
Hinduism confirms this too.
The Bhagavad Gita:
"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."
"Out of the corruption of SLUTS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."
"Out of the corruption of TOLERATING SLUTS AND BASTARDS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."
If you have ever murdered, you are a murderer.
If you haver stolen, you are a thief.
Fortunately, having a hangover once does not make you a drunkard.
Lewinsky was young and stupid - we've all been there. She was love sick too. Don't let her sucking a man's dick define her life.
Whether she likes it or not, it has.
Not with me.
What else defines her? Whingeing about the bad publicity afterwards?
You feel protective towards her because you wouldn't mind having sex with her.
Not in the slightest; she is certainly attractive but sex has nothing to do with it.
If she were fat and ugly you wouldn't be so protective towards her.
Just admit what it is that subconsciously motivates you to be protective of her.
I know you are desperate for pussy. You all are, and you know you can't resist it.
That is why you worship the slut. You don't want to marry, you just want to fuck some slut you find irresistible. Be honest now.
Sigh - it has nothing to do with sex. Or women. I would say the same thing about anyone who has been stupid when young.
Yes, we agree that Lewinsky was a stupid slut. So what is the problem?
I mustn't be rude about her? I mustn't be rude about her because she is a woman you want to protect because you fancy her?
She is still being stupid by hanging around and not slinging her hook.
On the one hand you complain about feminism, on the other you worship the very thing that gives feminists their power over you: sluts.
About time you put two and two together.
Holy shit she looks better with diet n age
"Would a virgin suck off a man she didn't even have vaginal intercourse with?"
Obviously you aren't familiar with "good Catholic girls who are saving themselves for marriage". Some of the nastiest freaks on the planet.
I am suddenly reminded of an Iranian schoolgirl I knew from boarding school who boasted she had had anal sex with her boyfriend but was still a virgin ....
Bill Clinton was president of her country. Monica was an intern in the White House. And under president Bill Clinton. She needed a man , according to her. Bill is master seducer of Minds and Bodies of women. He is also very handsome and powerful. What do we expect from a very young unexposed girl , Monica Lewinsky.
Even she admitted she threw herself at him.
Post a Comment