@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam Were liberals killing indiscriminately when it nuked two Japanese cities?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam How many Iraqis were killed indiscriminately as a result of the Iraq invasion?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam How many Syrians were killed indiscriminately as a result of the West's bombing campaign?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam How many Libyans were killed indiscriminately after Gaddafi was overthrown by the West?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
Was @Freedland telling gentiles not to even refer to Jews or Zionists *at all*? We could call them neocons, I suppose. #r4sunday— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
It is interesting @Freedland is now suggesting gentiles should henceforth refrain from referring to Jews or Zionists as a rule. #r4sunday— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
What would @Freedland like to happen to gentiles who inadvertently say "Jews" or "Zionists"? Ostracisation? Exile? Stoning? #r4sunday— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
It seems @Freedland is saying gentiles shouldn't mention Jews or Zionists at all, unless in flattering terms. Free speech, anyone? #r4sunday— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
Jonathan @Freedland warns gentiles against saying "Jews" or "Zionists" unless in flattering terms. 25:24 https://t.co/pNVSUxmmpe #r4sunday— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
@intelligent50 @AnthonyLarme @RichardDawkins @drangiehobbs Only after an Islamic Revolution will slut-shaming be adopted.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Western academia is now so corrupt and cowardly they won't even discuss urgent social and ideological matters.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The Pope is making clear he knows which side of his bread is buttered, and it is not the Catholic side.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@AnthonyLarme There is no responsible adult at all in the entire Western liberal establishment.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@AnthonyLarme No rational and moral person would want to see their descendants in such moral danger without saying or doing something.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The reason Radical Muslims turn to terrorism is cos they know their concerns will be dismissed/denigrated/not properly debated— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@Raedwald Muslims are supposed to believe that the Koran is God's word and have noticed that UK laws directly contradict God's laws.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@Raedwald Jews and Christians who ignore the Old and New Testament are HORRIFIED that Muslims won't do the same to the Koran.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik Muslims should give Trevor Phillips a copy of the Koran with a blue pencil so he can tell them which bits he would like excised.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik Jews and Christians who routinely ignore their scripture expect Muslims to ignore theirs too. Why do you think this is?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik Is social conservatism a bad thing? Only to liberals and the liberal political establishment who cannot abide it at all.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik Perhaps you should consider the nature and purpose of social conservatism instead of treating it like some kind of disease?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik How would you define social conservatism? I would define it as forbidding extramarital sex explicitly forbidden in Bible/Koran.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik In the 21st century West, anyone who uncompromisingly supports the institution of marriage becomes a political pariah.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik The more sexually licentious non-Muslim Britons become, the more socially conservative will British Muslims become.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik The more degenerate and sexually depraved our matriarchy becomes, the more Muslims will favour the patriarchy Islam supports.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@kenanmalik Every Liberal action has a Conservative reaction.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
Secular, post-religious liberalism may not be compatible with the continuation of Western hegemony. https://t.co/3crfVnelxm— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
I learn from Trevor Phillips that Islam may not necessarily be compatible with secular, post-religious liberalism: https://t.co/QG1KUVGc90— Tom Holland (@holland_tom) April 10, 2016
@holland_tom Just like Christianity.— R I Moore (@RIMooreHistory) April 10, 2016
@RIMooreHistory Is it just a coincidence, do u think, that secular, post-religious liberalism emerged from Christian, not Muslim, societies?— Tom Holland (@holland_tom) April 11, 2016
@holland_tom @RIMooreHistory It emerged in spite of Christianity, not because of it— Averil Cameron (@19Averil) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Christianity being weaker than Judaism and Islam fell to Liberalism more easily.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
— Averil Cameron (@19Averil) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Jews observe their Sabbath, Muslims pray 5 times a day, what do Christians even do to be Christian?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
— Averil Cameron (@19Averil) April 11, 2016
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory My point is that Jews and Muslims do more for their religion than Christians do now.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Jews and Muslims because they do more than Christians for their faith are stronger than Christians.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory The West perceived by Muslims to be controlled by Jews. This neatly explains rising anti-Semitism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Neocon foreign policy is perceived to originate from the Israel lobby in the US.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Why are Western countries - are Western leaders really even Christian? - being controlled by Jews?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Why r Westerners unable even to discuss the POSSIBILITY of a Jewish conspiracy without consequences?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory If gentiles are unable to discuss possibility of a Jewish conspiracy then gentiles r lower than Jews.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Why are Western gentiles lower than Jews in their own country? There must be a Jewish conspiracy!— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Y is Xtian West being controlled by Jews/threatened by Muslims? Cos Westerners neglect their religion— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know Westerners neglect their religion? Cos we already know Christianity has failed.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know Christianity has failed? Because Christian clergy ignore Biblical scripture.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know Xtian clergy ignore Biblical scripture? Cos the C of E preaches tolerance of sin.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know the C of E preaches tolerance of sin? Because it never ever condemns it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Not only has C of E been preaching tolerance of sin for decades, Catholics are now going the same way— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Decades of feminism eradicated Christianity, now suffering from anomie, atomised and fragmented.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Muslims, having seen the consequences of degenerate feminism, cling ever more fiercely to Islam.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil While @holland_tom speaks of "secular, post-religious liberalism" approvingly, he ignores its malign consequences. @RIMooreHistory— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil When @holland_tom praises Xtianity 4 allowing secular/post-religious liberalism 2 emerge he's praising its failure.@RIMooreHistory— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory A properly Christian nation would have resisted feminism which in turn caused Muslim immigration.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
@19Averil Incoherent/irrational of @holland_tom to praise weakness of Xtianity resulting in increased anxiety over Muslims. @RIMooreHistory— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment