Why Muslims hate liberalism and how liberals are suffering from hypocrisy and dementia

@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam Were liberals killing indiscriminately when it nuked two Japanese cities?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam How many Iraqis were killed indiscriminately as a result of the Iraq invasion?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam How many Syrians were killed indiscriminately as a result of the West's bombing campaign?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

@AtyHans @Sibelius7 @joesw0rld @Campbell7_Adam How many Libyans were killed indiscriminately after Gaddafi was overthrown by the West?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

Was @Freedland telling gentiles not to even refer to Jews or Zionists *at all*? We could call them neocons, I suppose. #r4sunday

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

It is interesting @Freedland is now suggesting gentiles should henceforth refrain from referring to Jews or Zionists as a rule. #r4sunday

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

What would @Freedland like to happen to gentiles who inadvertently say "Jews" or "Zionists"? Ostracisation? Exile? Stoning? #r4sunday

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

It seems @Freedland is saying gentiles shouldn't mention Jews or Zionists at all, unless in flattering terms. Free speech, anyone? #r4sunday

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

Jonathan @Freedland warns gentiles against saying "Jews" or "Zionists" unless in flattering terms. 25:24 https://t.co/pNVSUxmmpe #r4sunday

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

@intelligent50 @AnthonyLarme @RichardDawkins @drangiehobbs Only after an Islamic Revolution will slut-shaming be adopted.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Western academia is now so corrupt and cowardly they won't even discuss urgent social and ideological matters.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The Pope is making clear he knows which side of his bread is buttered, and it is not the Catholic side.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@AnthonyLarme There is no responsible adult at all in the entire Western liberal establishment.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@AnthonyLarme No rational and moral person would want to see their descendants in such moral danger without saying or doing something.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The reason Radical Muslims turn to terrorism is cos they know their concerns will be dismissed/denigrated/not properly debated

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@Raedwald Muslims are supposed to believe that the Koran is God's word and have noticed that UK laws directly contradict God's laws.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@Raedwald Jews and Christians who ignore the Old and New Testament are HORRIFIED that Muslims won't do the same to the Koran.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik Muslims should give Trevor Phillips a copy of the Koran with a blue pencil so he can tell them which bits he would like excised.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik Jews and Christians who routinely ignore their scripture expect Muslims to ignore theirs too. Why do you think this is?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik Is social conservatism a bad thing? Only to liberals and the liberal political establishment who cannot abide it at all.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik Perhaps you should consider the nature and purpose of social conservatism instead of treating it like some kind of disease?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik How would you define social conservatism? I would define it as forbidding extramarital sex explicitly forbidden in Bible/Koran.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik In the 21st century West, anyone who uncompromisingly supports the institution of marriage becomes a political pariah.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik The more sexually licentious non-Muslim Britons become, the more socially conservative will British Muslims become.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik The more degenerate and sexually depraved our matriarchy becomes, the more Muslims will favour the patriarchy Islam supports.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@kenanmalik Every Liberal action has a Conservative reaction.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

Secular, post-religious liberalism may not be compatible with the continuation of Western hegemony. https://t.co/3crfVnelxm

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

I learn from Trevor Phillips that Islam may not necessarily be compatible with secular, post-religious liberalism: https://t.co/QG1KUVGc90

— Tom Holland (@holland_tom) April 10, 2016

@holland_tom Just like Christianity.

— R I Moore (@RIMooreHistory) April 10, 2016

@RIMooreHistory Is it just a coincidence, do u think, that secular, post-religious liberalism emerged from Christian, not Muslim, societies?

— Tom Holland (@holland_tom) April 11, 2016

@holland_tom @RIMooreHistory It emerged in spite of Christianity, not because of it

— Averil Cameron (@19Averil) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Christianity being weaker than Judaism and Islam fell to Liberalism more easily.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@ntfem @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Really?

— Averil Cameron (@19Averil) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Jews observe their Sabbath, Muslims pray 5 times a day, what do Christians even do to be Christian?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@ntfem @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory The point was about the 18th century though.

— Averil Cameron (@19Averil) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Not sure what you think the point is.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory My point is that Jews and Muslims do more for their religion than Christians do now.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Jews and Muslims because they do more than Christians for their faith are stronger than Christians.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory The West perceived by Muslims to be controlled by Jews. This neatly explains rising anti-Semitism.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Neocon foreign policy is perceived to originate from the Israel lobby in the US.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Why are Western countries - are Western leaders really even Christian? - being controlled by Jews?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Why r Westerners unable even to discuss the POSSIBILITY of a Jewish conspiracy without consequences?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory If gentiles are unable to discuss possibility of a Jewish conspiracy then gentiles r lower than Jews.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Why are Western gentiles lower than Jews in their own country? There must be a Jewish conspiracy!

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Y is Xtian West being controlled by Jews/threatened by Muslims? Cos Westerners neglect their religion

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know Westerners neglect their religion? Cos we already know Christianity has failed.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know Christianity has failed? Because Christian clergy ignore Biblical scripture.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know Xtian clergy ignore Biblical scripture? Cos the C of E preaches tolerance of sin.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory How do we know the C of E preaches tolerance of sin? Because it never ever condemns it.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Not only has C of E been preaching tolerance of sin for decades, Catholics are now going the same way

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Decades of feminism eradicated Christianity, now suffering from anomie, atomised and fragmented.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory Muslims, having seen the consequences of degenerate feminism, cling ever more fiercely to Islam.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil While @holland_tom speaks of "secular, post-religious liberalism" approvingly, he ignores its malign consequences. @RIMooreHistory

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil When @holland_tom praises Xtianity 4 allowing secular/post-religious liberalism 2 emerge he's praising its failure.@RIMooreHistory

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil @holland_tom @RIMooreHistory A properly Christian nation would have resisted feminism which in turn caused Muslim immigration.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

@19Averil Incoherent/irrational of @holland_tom to praise weakness of Xtianity resulting in increased anxiety over Muslims. @RIMooreHistory

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2016

David Starkey says things about women straight men are too afraid to say

"The term is devoid of meaning ... who knows? I don't know? I am not a geneticist" David Starkey ['would you describe yourself as racist?']
— Sunder Katwala (@sundersays) April 10, 2015

That Starkey quote was from his interview in Saturday's @Telegraph http://t.co/YT5iKc6dqZ
— Sunder Katwala (@sundersays) April 10, 2015

@sundersays Sounds rather like a yes.
— Broilster (@Broilster) April 10, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays It depends on what you mean by "racist" and Trevor Phillips has already said the truth cannot be racist.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays I would like to live in a country where there is no thoughtcrime forbidding us from thinking forbidden thoughts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays The best sign of a free country is when its citizens are allowed freedom of belief/contract/association, is it not?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays The worst sign of a tyranny is when we r accused of the worst crime in the world n that crime is not clearly defined.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays Racism is nothing more than thinking one race can be better or worse than another.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays If we as individuals r allowed to think that we are better or worse than other people why not one race about another?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays What causes racial resentment is that any race is being treated better than another for unfair and irrational reasons
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays What causes social resentment is that any group is being treated better than others for unfair and irrational reasons
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays What is unfair and what is irrational is not what the political establishment wishes to have an honest debate about.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays What is unfair and irrational is not what anyone in a position of influence wishes to have any kind of a debate about
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

I challenge Cameron/May to an open & public debate: ISLAM (Shari'ah) Vs MAN MADE LAW (Democracy) Which is better/the future for Britain?
— Anjem Choudary (@anjemchoudary) March 23, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays Anyone who wants a debate on what is unfair and irrational will predictably be denounced as racist/extremist etc.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays Not only wl the political establishment avoid a honest debate the liberal media too wl suppress any dissenting view.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Broilster @sundersays When people with a genuine grievance know that it will NEVER be honestly addressed, guess what some of them will do?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@Smithy0364 @ChrisBryant4MP Gay men are useful for the truth they tell about women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@aeon456 @xhorsechestnutx @MatthewStadlen Gay men tend to tell the truth about women and say things straight men are too afraid to say.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@aeon456 @xhorsechestnutx Because David Starkey has no wife he isn't afraid of saying anything his hypothetical wife might find offensive.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015

@aeon456 @xhorsechestnutx Because David Starkey does not want any sexual favours from women he doesn't worry about them not favouring him.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 11, 2015