https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-the-abrahamic-religions
Michael Voris:
If it did, you would be only too happy to get in touch to tell me exactly what Voris meant by this. As it happens, it means precisely nothing. Islam implicitly accepts the fusion of politics and religion because it advocates theocracy - a form of government Jews, Christians and Muslims living in the West are too cowardly to discuss.
I can't discuss it with him or even post a comment there, because Church Militant have banned me from posting.
If Christians were really serious about promoting Christianity, they would have to revive the Blasphemy Act 1697. How would you feel about that?
Islam on the other hand would guarantee freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256
Even Stefan Molyneux who has written a book on The Art of The Argument won't discuss it with me. What is he afraid of? I promise not to even read his book before debating with him.
My invitation to Stefan Molyneux for a debate on the logic of theocracy
Michael Voris:
Islam preaches, as one of its fundamental foundational beliefs, that no human can ever be united to god or Allah in Arabic. The closest that humans can attain to god or Allah is the will of Allah but not the divinity itself. That is completely unapproachable, according to Islam. Furthermore, Islam teaches that god is so powerful that he can actually change his own will, which of course opens up a plethora of philosophical problems and internal inconsistencies, not the least of which is, for the time being, Allah has decreed that Islam is the way to him and Mohammed is his prophet. But what if Allah changes his will in this regard, which according to Islam, he is certainly free and powerful enough to do. That's a problem too large for Muslim scholars to even consider, much less overcome. At the end of the day, Islam makes no sense.It is actually this critique of Islam that makes no sense.
If it did, you would be only too happy to get in touch to tell me exactly what Voris meant by this. As it happens, it means precisely nothing. Islam implicitly accepts the fusion of politics and religion because it advocates theocracy - a form of government Jews, Christians and Muslims living in the West are too cowardly to discuss.
I can't discuss it with him or even post a comment there, because Church Militant have banned me from posting.
If Christians were really serious about promoting Christianity, they would have to revive the Blasphemy Act 1697. How would you feel about that?
Islam on the other hand would guarantee freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256
Even Stefan Molyneux who has written a book on The Art of The Argument won't discuss it with me. What is he afraid of? I promise not to even read his book before debating with him.
Now Available: The Art of The Argument: Western Civilization's Last Standhttps://t.co/MVd0EHd0BX#TheArtofTheArgument pic.twitter.com/Oe37yQLROu— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) August 30, 2017
My invitation to Stefan Molyneux for a debate on the logic of theocracy
No comments:
Post a Comment