Translate

Showing posts with label Michael Voris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Voris. Show all posts

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

How social conservatives should deal with Liberal Jews in positions of influence in the West

The solution is to state the problem of liberalism and discredit liberals and liberalism which would include Liberal Jews.

It is easily demonstrated that liberalism caused feminism and feminism causes degeneracy. Degeneracy would adversely affect Jews living in the West too, causing them to give up the high-maintenance observance that is obviously beyond the degenerate to even understand, let alone practise. It would therefore be for the good of both Jews and gentiles that a government governing in the long term national interest kicks out feminism. Men both Jewish and gentile should cooperate to kick out feminism even if in the short to medium term they risk withdrawal of sexual access and even divorce under the insane rules of no fault divorce.

Any social conservative debating with a Liberal Jew should draw his attention to this truly magnificent denunciation of Liberal Jews by Melanie Phillips.



http://www.melaniephillips.com/sea-change-american-jewry/

Dov Fischer, an adjunct professor of law and American orthodox rabbi:


We are socially conservative and economically capitalist because we take the Torah laws seriously. We give charity without the Government teaching us about morality because we are commanded to give. Contrary to stereotypes, we are brutally honest in business at great personal economic loss. We set aside a tenth of our earnings for charity. Our marriages are heterosexual. And several of us Orthodox rabbis even file amicus curiae briefs in the United States Supreme Court supporting religious positions taken by groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor.


It is so painful today for contemporary American Orthodox Jews to read daily media reports that typically ignore us, in an attempt to paint almost all Jews as liberal… Our organizations never get quoted. Our public affairs policy positions never get reported. Thus, for example, when an agglomeration of the most liberal left rabbis — the non-Orthodox rabbis — announce that they will not participate in a phone call with the President of the United States, the media splash the news. But why is “Dog Bites Man” news? These are the same Democrat liberal rabbis who fell over themselves to hail Obama, even as Obama allowed the United Nations to proclaim that Jews have no historical bond to any part of Jerusalem, even as Obama brushed off an anti-Jewish Radical Islamist terror attack at a kosher grocery in France as a case of “random violence,” even as Obama proceeded with the Iran deal. The bigger news story that the media fail to report is that the 1,000 members of the Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America did not join in the boycott announcement. Nor did the Agudath Israel of America. Nor did the rabbinical body of the 140-synagogue National Council of Young Israel. Nor did the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, comprised of some 1,000 affiliated synagogues. Nor did the 200-plus rabbis of the Coalition for Jewish Values. The media blacked out the news that the majority of all seminary-ordained rabbis in the United States are Orthodox and that they gladly would participate in a phone call with the President of the United States.


In the same way, several Jewish organizations that historically were associated with protecting Jewish rights in the past have been taken over by the Democrats, converting them into de facto arms of the Left. The Anti-Defamation League, for example, now is run by a former Obama staffer, and he has turned ADL into a virtual Democrat mouthpiece. Similarly, an organization bearing the name of the precious youthful innocent Holocaust victim and heroine, Anne Frank, now is run by a former New Jersey Gay Marriage activist, an extreme leftist, and he now leverages the Anne Frank name to attack conservatives and Republicans, and runs around to media all-too-willing to give him a megaphone, calling exceptional conservative allies of the Jewish community and of Israel “anti-Semites.” 


What makes Jews hateful to the gentile is the perception that gentiles in their own land cannot mock or criticise the Jew because of Holocaust denial laws. The rule of law is so weak countries that allow Holocaust denial unofficially treat Holocaust denial as if it were a crime. It would be nice if there was at least one Jewish lawyer in Britain prepared to stand up for the rule of law as Alan Dershowitz does. Is that really too much to hope for?

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10108/the-origin-of-fake-news-in-holocaust-denial





https://alisonchabloz.wordpress.com/

My hope is that one day these ancestral hatreds of Jew and gentile will cease and Alison be given a part in Fiddler on the Roof. I can  just see Alison playing Golde, can't you?

Even Jews themselves have got into trouble over Holocaust denial laws the most prominent of which is the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu himself.

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/netanyahu-catching-flak-for-holocaust-denial/2015/10/21/

Natanyahu said. “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, but only to expel them.

Another prominent Jew who got into trouble over Holocaust denial is Rabbi Mizrachi.

Mizrachi suggested the behavior of non-religious Jews as a cause for Nazi atrocities and warned that slack observance could bring about “further tragedy.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-rabbi-not-even-1-million-jews-killed-in-holocaust/


Catholic Church a haunt for gay men since the 1940s, according to Michael Voris.

The problem has always been with Assimilated Jews and a corruptible and corrupt priesthood ie people who ignore and then forget the founding principles of their religion/ideology in the heedless pursuit of short-term expediency.

There is something rotten in the state of Denmark. 

Those who think the Third Temple should be built clearly have not learned from history. Let us hope they will not be condemned to learn its harsh lessons again.  The Al-Aqsa Mosque is therefore fine where it is.

The Liberal Jew can be equated with the elitist Sadducees so eager to collaborate with their Roman overlords and be Hellenised. Such a Jew would be sexually liberated and indifferent to the pain caused by neoliberal and neoconservative policies that cause social problems and provoke terrorism.

The Conservative Jew is analogous to the married taxpaying father trying to do his to do his best by his children and family while staying faithful to his traditions without which he knows he could not even be said to have traditions to be faithful to. Such a Jew would be inclined to and does in fact vote for anti-immigration parties even as he knows a significant number of its supporters are in fact anti-Semites.

Thursday, 7 September 2017

Michael Voris's dishonest objection to Islam that quotes no verses from the Koran and makes no sense at all

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-the-abrahamic-religions

Michael Voris:
Islam preaches, as one of its fundamental foundational beliefs, that no human can ever be united to god or Allah in Arabic. The closest that humans can attain to god or Allah is the will of Allah but not the divinity itself. That is completely unapproachable, according to Islam. Furthermore, Islam teaches that god is so powerful that he can actually change his own will, which of course opens up a plethora of philosophical problems and internal inconsistencies, not the least of which is, for the time being, Allah has decreed that Islam is the way to him and Mohammed is his prophet. But what if Allah changes his will in this regard, which according to Islam, he is certainly free and powerful enough to do. That's a problem too large for Muslim scholars to even consider, much less overcome. At the end of the day, Islam makes no sense.
It is actually this critique of Islam that makes no sense.

If it did, you would be only too happy to get in touch to tell me exactly what Voris meant by this. As it happens, it means precisely nothing. Islam implicitly accepts the fusion of politics and religion because it advocates theocracy - a form of government Jews, Christians and Muslims living in the West are too cowardly to discuss.

I can't discuss it with him or even post a comment there, because Church Militant have banned me from posting.

If Christians were really serious about promoting Christianity, they would have to revive the Blasphemy Act 1697.  How would you feel about that?

Islam on the other hand would guarantee freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256

Even Stefan Molyneux who has written a book on The Art of The Argument won't discuss it with me. What is he afraid of? I promise not to even read his book before debating with him.




My invitation to Stefan Molyneux for a debate on the logic of theocracy

Wednesday, 19 July 2017

Me and Mr Jones


Below are the topics Dr E Michael Jones and I discussed:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IC_codes




https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/half-of-priests-and-bishops-are-gay

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory_(fictional)

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=6&verse=159

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/10554866/Iran-attempts-to-reverse-falling-birth-rate.html

https://matadornetwork.com/abroad/how-to-piss-off-a-pole/

In the long run we are all Hungry Ghosts

Hitler’s Finances and the Myth of Nazi Anti-Usury Activism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hentai

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_pornography

The term was initially coined by Flavius Josephus in the first century A.D. to describe the characteristic government of the Jews. Josephus argued that while mankind had developed many forms of rule, most could be subsumed under the following three types: monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy. The government of the Jews, however, was unique. Josephus offered the term "theocracy" to describe this polity, ordained by Moses, in which God is sovereign and his word is law. 

Mike told me I inhabited a Manichean universe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manichaeism

I suppose he means he thinks I see the world in black and white and my world is binary. There is a reason why computers use binary code!

http://nookkin.com/articles/computer-science/why-computers-use-binary.ndoc

The binary system was chosen only because it is quite easy to distinguish the presence of an electric current from an absense of electric current, especially when working with trillions of such connections. 


E Michael Jones has re-posted my video on his YouTube channel and you may wish to go there for a more Catholic reaction.


My second discussion with E Michael Jones

Topics discussed: 

  • Iran
  • Yvonne Ridley
  • The Pill
  • feminism
  • Nation of Islam
  • Methodists
  • Iranian Revolution
  • sexual morality
  • demographics
  • Methodism
  • John Wesley
  • Steve Bannon
  • Islam
  • Jamaica
  • Confucius
  • theocracy
  • William Hogarth
  • Catholic Church
  • moral relativism
  • Libido Dominandi
  • Turkey
  • logos
  • St Augustine
  • chastity
  • Thomas Aquinas
  • Plato

Same video as above but with comments from Catholics who follow E Michael Jones

Saturday, 20 May 2017

Today, I discovered White Sharia







White Sharia is discussed from 15th minute


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Koranism-657868884251333/

https://www.dailystormer.com/what-is-white-sharia-and-what-choices-do-i-have-in-accepting-it-or-not/

http://shoebat.com/2017/04/15/major-national-socialist-website-now-openly-promotes-white-sharia-we-warned-you-this-was-coming/

What happens to people who say we should return to Christian morality?

They are mercilessly mocked.

The late Mrs Whitehouse was mercilessly mocked.

No one takes Christianity seriously, and even if they did, it is hard to defend because of the requirement to believe in the doctrine of the Trinity, which is controversial enough even amongst Christians.

Not only that, the Catholic Church, the most powerful church in the world, now has a liberal Pope and is hopelessly mired in the paedo priests scandal. It no longer has moral authority and clergy are afraid of discussing morality or anything controversial to do with standards of sexual morality.  If clergy got into trouble with the media over standing up for a principle, they would be hung out to dry and their career obstructed and ended.

Michael Voris and the Church Militant are now classified as extremist just for holding on the Catholic principles.

Catholics who take Catholicism seriously are on the whole middle aged to elderly with the young not much interested. No revolution ever was organised by the senescent and elderly.

There is no prospect of sedevacantism succeeding without armed force and no prospect of acquiring this armed force in a society that is overwhelmingly atheist.

If you wanted to use religion as a basis of effecting a revolution, it would not be Christianity, simply because it is perceived as stale, tried and failed. It is perceived to be the the religion of the senescent and is certainly not in the ascendant. If Catholicism is a moon, it is waning, not waxing. We also know that the reason why Catholic clergy are so supine is because they know that the only choice left to them in the face of accusations of paedo priests is simply to surrender and submit to the prevailing matriarchy and hope they get to keep their position and pensions while they live.

There  is only one religion that causes consternation and controversy in the political establishment, and it is the one Islamophobes hate and fear.

Oderint dum metuant.

Like it or not, the Koran is the only reliable source of social conservatism, and social conservatism is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy and nationalism.

Without leadership and without being encouraged or exhorted to do so, people will not voluntarily and naturally turn from vice to virtue.  If Europeans spontaneously and suddenly felt an overwhelming desire for religion and social conservatism, they would not be turning to the tired, stale and failed religion of the elders.  The church has been completely rotted by feminism and it stinks to high heaven. The old may cling to Christianity, but the young know it is not for them if they want a future for themselves, their children, their descendants and their nation.

The young already despise the old for the way they have frittered away their inheritance, or they would when they think about it.  Baby boomers have been identified as the ones most liberal and most irresponsible, socially and fiscally. They are the ones now in charge and therefore the ones in denial while they continue to fuck things up.

If we think we are on our way out, we just do what we are comfortable with: go to church and pray the way we used to, and hope the church and the clergyman we are used to continues to exist until we ourselves are no longer in need of it.

Christianity is not going to inspire anyone capable of effecting a change. Only the young are capable of doing so. The young will have no time or patience for the platitudes of the elderly about to fade away who are not thinking about the future of the next generation, only about staying well within their own comfort zone and pretending to themselves and to next generation that they did nothing wrong.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/30/us/church-militant-theology-is-put-to-new-and-politicized-use.html

Michael Voris of Church Militant is fighting a losing battle because he will never get enough Catholics to join his cause to make Catholicism both powerful or viable without a counter-revolution. Even if Voris were already Pope now, he would still be compromised and cucked the way Trump is, with the deep state gunning for him. Whatever populist ideology the people would back at the risk of life, limb and property to effect a counter-revolution against the sex revolution and matriarchy cannot be done on the back of Catholicism or any other established church for all the obvious reasons of being perceived to be old, tired, weak, corrupt, effeminate and fatally feminised.

Even the Greek Orthodox Church is compromised.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/orthodox-give-highest-award-to-pro-abort-biden...for-defending-human-rights

Presumably this is why the Greeks are in the state they're in: in debt and for all practical purposes enslaved.

13:11 Koran:

God does not change the lot of those who do not change what is in their hearts. 

Secular Koranism

https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Koranism-657868884251333/

https://www.dailystormer.com/what-is-white-sharia-and-what-choices-do-i-have-in-accepting-it-or-not/

http://shoebat.com/2017/04/15/major-national-socialist-website-now-openly-promotes-white-sharia-we-warned-you-this-was-coming/

Overhauling Islam: Representation, Construction, and Cooption of “Moderate Islam” in Western Europe



Tuesday, 31 May 2016

Catholic angry that the doctrine of the Trinity is no longer compulsory for Catholics



Believing that Jesus is God is the sine qua non of Christianity.

What does this mean?

It means that if you don't believe Jesus is God, you ain't Christian, and only Christians go to heaven.

This was what Christians were told in pre-Enlightenment days. If you questioned this, you will find yourself falling foul of the Blasphemy Act 1697.

It made it an offence for any person, educated in or having made profession of the Christian religion, by writing, preaching, teaching or advised speaking, to deny the Holy Trinity, to claim there is more than one god, to deny the truth of Christianity and to deny the Bible as divine authority.

The first offence resulted in being rendered incapable of holding any office or place of trust. The second offence resulted in being rendered incapable of bringing any action, of being guardian or executor, or of taking a legacy or deed of gift, and three years imprisonment without bail.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_Act_1697

That Jesus is the Son of God who was also God the Father who sacrificed his only son to take away our sins was the best spin his apostles could put on Jesus being a crucified revolutionary.

You would have thought that Christians would find Islam a more attractive and rational faith, but they just like the Jews preferred to ignore the Koranic injunction not to continue just as their ancestors did, just because their ancestors did it.

http://quran.com/2/170

YUSUFALI: When it is said to them: "Follow what Allah hath revealed:" They say: "Nay! we shall follow the ways of our fathers." What! even though their fathers Were void of wisdom and guidance?
PICKTHAL: And when it is said unto them: Follow that which Allah hath revealed, they say: We follow that wherein we found our fathers. What! Even though their fathers were wholly unintelligent and had no guidance?
SHAKIR: And when it is said to them, Follow what Allah has revealed, they say: Nay! we follow what we found our fathers upon. What! and though their fathers had no sense at all, nor did they follow the right way.  

The purpose of the Trinity is clear, at least to me. It was a conceit propagated by Christians who wanted to feel special and better than Jews. In more totalitarian, credulous and obedient times, it was easy to keep this belief going, but not in the 21st century.

Christianity has therefore under threat since the Enlightenment. Islam however does not require us to believe in an absurdity, only in what we would like to believe in anyway ie that we could have a personal God who is omnipotent and morally perfect. By merely wishing for His existence and behaving as if we believed in Him by obeying His laws because we want to be good, mere mortals can by doing this bring God into existence as well as heaven to reward ourselves and those whom we love, and hell to punish our enemies..

What's not to like?

Shakespeare realised the profound irony of God being conjured out of the imagination, creativity of mere mortal and fallible men. 

What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculties! in form and moving, how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension, how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?

It is surely time for 21st century man to cast aside the totalitarian nonsense that is the Trinity, accept the necessity of the rule of law to keep us on the straight and narrow of morality and keep our souls and civilisation in good order. 


Friday, 18 December 2015

Michael Voris: "The Catholic Church has a homosexual priest problem."



This mindset — this lackluster, lukewarm, status quo, never-rock-the-boat approach — is destroying the Church from within. Men like Cdl. Dolan are allowed to pass over scandals and ignore them because they know they will never be called out or challenged by those milquetoast lackeys more concerned about their careers and money than the truth and souls.

This is exactly how the whole homosexual priest sex abuse scandal went on for so long, this same attitude. Homosexual men have infiltrated the Church for decades, and whether they intended to or not — some did probably, others not — they have been part of a destruction of the Faith that staggers the mind. And their accomplices among the hierarchy are even more staggering. The very men consecrated to protect and love the sheep have abandoned them for every corruption conceivable. The silence around this evil, the participation in these evils, the refusal and denial of so many regarding this evil, shows how deeply the diabolical has dug its way into the Church. 


https://www.facebook.com/Michael-Voris-for-Pope-or-President-or-both-1492050997746004/

https://www.facebook.com/Should-the-Pope-convert-to-Islam-141277252691901/?fref=ts

https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Koranism-657868884251333/?fref=ts

https://www.facebook.com/Does-promoting-gay-marriage-cause-degeneracy-210948989029916/?fref=ts

Saturday, 23 May 2015

Debate against gay marriage was never going to be won by senescent, uncool, cowardly and technophobic Irishmen and Irishwomen


What to say against gay marriage

Ireland gay marriage referendum results: yes vote expected


There was even a men's right activist who was too afraid of telling me how he would vote in the gay marriage referendum. The cowardice and ineptitude of these people is almost beyond belief. You can understand how easily how people would just vote the other way just to spite them because everything about them is so rankly unappealing.



Wednesday, 20 May 2015

Michael Voris: Western civilisation falls/Homo-hegemony begins on 22 May 2015




Sodomite homo cake Christian bakers will be forced to bake.

http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/irish-law-christians-must-bake-cake-supporting-gay-marriage

Under Islam we would have seen off gay cake and gay marriage no problemo.

004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.


http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-magazine-dabiq-threatens-rome-crusaders-flying-islamic-state-flag-vatican-front-cover-1469712

I think it is only a matter of time before Michael Voris converts to Islam, if only to punish libtards and gay sissy Catholic clergy. Then things will start to get really interesting.

Which group would God if He exists support?

a) the global matriarchy who wants to spread gay marriage all over the world like manure whose men fear and worship sluts while denying God's existence and flout His laws

b) the global patriarchy who forbid extramarital sex while fearing and worshipping an omnipotent and perfectly moral God

Is ISIS the global patriarchy asserting itself?

Full text: bin Laden's 'letter to America' listing Islam's casus beli against America and her NATO vassal states



Thursday, 14 May 2015

Human rights v Religion "debate" is really ALL ABOUT LGBT SEX


Andrew Copson is gay.






http://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/the-vortex-the-persecutions-purpose

... a number of corporations in the U.S., for example, have begun letting their employees know that the company line is to accept and even promote same-sex sodomy relationships, and the unspoken reality is: You better toe the line.

In fact, it's not so unspoken depending on what company you might work for. When it comes to federal government contracts, for example, Obama has imposed his edict that you can't be awarded a government contract if your company doesn't celebrate sodomy.

Then there is the further escalation up the formal scale with cases where sticking to your religious beliefs can get you sued, such as the case with Catholic schools who make hiring and firing policies based on adherence to Catholic teaching. 

The push is on, and will achieve a whole new reality when the U.S. Supreme Court puts it seal of approval at the end of June on homosexual sexual activity as marriage. This is all preparing the ground for persecution. The time will come — at your job, in the courts, somewhere, someplace — where you will have to offer a pinch of incense to the gods of sex in a sex-crazed culture, or face being officially ostracized.

As we said, that's already the case with trying to secure a government contract. Foreign aid is already dependent on this as well — and will continue under a Hillary Clinton White House. These people and their underlings are controlled by the diabolical, and the diabolical's single goal is the eradication of the [Biblical teachings and patriarchal moral values]. 



Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...