@_HenryBolton @DavidLammy @theresa_may May we have a comment from you on @MarkACollett latest video, please? https://t.co/uPcvq49cd6— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
It seems David Lammy has blocked me. https://t.co/afXYvQ8YB7 has all the tweets I sent him. I don't think they were particularly offensive.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
The problem as I see it is that white middle class female politicians despise white working class men because they don't fancy them.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
Once a woman decides that a man is not worth mating with, she has in fact written him off as a hopeless case not worth bothering with.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
Women writing off men they have no intention of mating with is in fact eugenic instinct. It is of course up to men to fend for themselves.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
In our matriarchy, women hold all the levers of power. Our PM, Home Secretary, DPP and Chairman of the Bar Council are in fact female.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
White male proles who are not trade union members have no representation at all. I doubt @_HenryBolton will be taking up their cause.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
No male politician sees any point at all in representing unskilled white men because they are electorally and economically negligible.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
When these unskilled white men join the BNP, they are also exploited by their leaders who cannot be honest with them about how things stand.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
These unskilled white men are brought up fatherlress by their single mothers, went to a sink school and are socially inadequate/unqualified.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
Unskilled under-educated socially inadequate young men are attracted to father figures in the alt-right but are a bad judge of character.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
White middle class female MPs just don't give a damn about these men at all, and neither do white middle class male MPs afraid of female MPs— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
Non-white MPs don't feel they owe these unskilled and socially inadequate young men who are probably racist anything at all.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
The Labour Party has been taken over by feminazis so all the male Labour MPs are afraid of them after what happened to Maurice Glasman.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
Do please remember that Maurice Glasman is a Jew who proposed BNP-like policies to help these gentile unskilled men and was punished for it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
Male Tory MPs are unlikely to feel that they owe these unskilled white men anything since they are not likely to vote Tory, are they?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
.@HarrietSergeant is the perfect example of a white middle class woman who did not consider white proles worthy of receiving her bounty.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
The Harriet Sergeant attitude towards white male proles can be read at https://t.co/jvv2RJaB9q— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
A white female friend of mine casually mentioned to me that men of her race who cannot compete with foreigners deserve no consideration.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
Most females really have very little sense of justice. The late Lawrence Kohlberg has research on this. https://t.co/A7ws1Wh2r9 @rabbisacks— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
You may be interested to know that @rabbisacks is debating with @carolgilligann who has dedicated her life to trashing Lawrence Kohlberg.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
http://www.europeanmedical.info/cognitive-therapy/marriage-and-family-eri.html
The marriage was not a happy one, and the Kohlbergs separated in the mid-1970s. They were finally divorced in 1985. Kohlberg began a relationship with Ann Higgins, a developmental psychologist, during his separation. They became engaged after Kohlberg's divorce, but were not married at the time of his death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Gilligan
Despite being Kohlberg's research assistant, Gilligan argued that Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development were male-oriented, which limited their ability to be generalized to females.
One criticism of Kohlberg's theory is that it emphasizes justice to the exclusion of other values, and so may not adequately address the arguments of those who value other moral aspects of actions. Carol Gilligan has argued that Kohlberg's theory is overly androcentric. Kohlberg's theory was initially developed based on empirical research using only male participants; Gilligan argued that it did not adequately describe the concerns of women. Kohlberg stated that women tend to get stuck at level 3, focusing on details of how to maintain relationships and promote the welfare of family and friends. Men are likely to move on to the abstract principles, and thus have less concern with the particulars of who is involved. Consistent with this observation, Gilligan's theory of moral development does not focus on the value of justice. She developed an alternative theory of moral reasoning based on the ethics of caring. Critics such as Christina Hoff Sommers, however, argued that Gilligan's research is ill-founded, and that no evidence exists to support her conclusion.
https://marciapally.com/On 23 October 2017 @rabbisacks will be discussing feminism, morality and religion with @carolgilligan a feminist, and @MarciaPally— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
I wonder if @rabbisacks thinks it is fair enough that these lost boys who blame Jews for their problems should continue to be ignored.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
I wonder if @rabbisacks thinks it is fair enough for the West to prioritise the preferences of feminists who don't give a damn about men.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
It will be one rabbi against two intellectual Jewesses. Who will win? https://t.co/XybXTu15L1 @carolgilligann @marcia_pally— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
I hope @rabbisacks will address the question of whether men feel laws are more just after feminist hegemony, or the opposite.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
I hope @rabbisacks will address the question of whether Jews owe antisemitic lost boys who have not had their opportunties anything at all.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
It is ironic that it was really Jews who tried to warn the gentile of their wicked ways, but were ignored and then forgotten.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameronAntifeminists should acknowledge it was Keith Joseph who gave up being Prime Minister in order to warn the gentile. https://t.co/9teiATrNsR— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2017
1 comment:
I'm glad you finally 'get it', Claire. You're a few years late, but you're still streets ahead of 99.9%, including almost-all so-called Nationalists.
Post a Comment