Translate

Showing posts with label Maurice Glasman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maurice Glasman. Show all posts

Monday, 4 May 2020

Mark Collett's alleged Jewish heritage


Does Mark Collett - former BNP member infamous for his controversial views on Jews - have Jewish heritage while being unaware of it? Years ago, I pointed out to Mark that he did look as if he could be Jewish. Indeed, he looked so Jewish that I assumed that I was not the first person to point this out to him. He remained silent.

Rabbi Mizrachi himself admits that there are many people who think they are Jews but are not, and many people who think they are gentile but are in fact Jews. One could end up being a self-hating Jew. Self-loathing has long been regarded as a sign of mental illness and a feature of living in the early 21st century West is its ever rising levels of mental illness.

Is the West capable of correcting itself before it ends up gouging out its own eyes in despair and self-loathing, as Oedipus did?
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/the-oedipus-trilogy/play-summary/oedipus-the-king

The tragedy of Oedipus Rex is about a man who didn't know his parents. He ended up murdering his father in a road rage incident and having sex with a cougar that turned out to be his mother.

If we didn't know who our parents are, we could end up committing incest with our sibling, sugar daddy or cougar.

Isn't it already painfully obvious that condoning casual sex would inevitably lead to dysgenics and degeneracy?

Interestingly, it was the the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who pointed out to the British in 1974 in his Edgbaston speech that they were destroying their "human stock" by condoning unmarried parenthood. He paid dearly for pointing out the obvious when he found himself apologising for his speech. A man who was widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting found himself serving under Margaret Thatcher, Britain's first female Prime Minister - the first milestone of matriarchy. Before Keith Joseph, it was Enoch Powell who destroyed his career by pointing out the obvious. Unlike Joseph, he did not apologise.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Why won't nationalists talk about marriage and family values instead of endlessly obsessing about Jews?

We know who we is in power by those we dare not criticise, and I don't mean the Jews. They now have a representative in Downing Street, sharing the bedroom of the British Prime Minister.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html


Blue Labour thinking, with its emphasis on community-led solutions, is being touted as the party's version of the Big Society, and it's also possible that his emphasis on "family, faith and flag" will be a means of Labour outflanking the coalition on the right. The feminazis of the Labour Party destroyed his career.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/19/lord-glasman-radical-traditionalist

The feminazis of the Labour Party Helen Goodman and Harriet Harman destroying Maurice Glasman's career
https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/06/blue-labour-john-era-goodman

Wednesday, 20 March 2019

The repellent dishonesty of the antisemites and Islamophobes who refuse to give me a platform


Thursday, 30 August 2018

The life cycle of a matriarchy

The thing to bear in mind about the matriarchy is that it is not only a danger to the patriarchy, it is a danger to itself. When lunatics take over the asylum, they will start to destroy the asylum and then fight and kill each other.

First, the matriarchy establishes itself by bribing men with fornication until most women are sluts, most men are slut-fuckers and most children are bastards.

After the matriarchy has established itself, women who are not sluts, men who are not slut-fuckers and children who are not bastards will find themselves in the minority and fear to challenge the matriarchy knowing they are outnumbered, especially when the law states that any man may be accused of a historic sexual offence and the police have a duty to take the complainant seriously, with the result that every accusation is as good as a conviction.

When senior male politicians are silenced ie Keith Joseph, Howard Flight, Maurice Glasman and Tom Harris, the sluts, slut-fuckers and bastards will start destroying the nation and breed ever more parasites until the parasites start fighting, killing and devouring each other, ending in extinction.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/mar/05/welfare-children

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/jul/20/blue-labour-conservative-female-subservience

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Friday, 10 August 2018

Secular Koranism is the paradoxical solution for Islamophobes because it would deal with the feminazis


Tuesday, 10 April 2018

The totalitarian matriarchy of the West is systematically cultivating failure with intersectional feminism and a feminist foreign policy




https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism

centreforfeministforeignpolicy.org/the-cffp-team
Why feminism is against the national interest

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3376846/Five-years-jail-men-emotionally-bully-wives-New-law-target-bullies-control-partners-coercive-controlling-behaviour.html#ixzz44WS6SqIU


ON OUR CONFLICTING LOYALTIES AND HOW TO RESOLVE THEM TO SORT THE WHEAT OF HUMANITY FROM ITS CHAFF

We all have conflicting loyalties, to our country, religion, race, sex, friends, family etc.

The most basic one is between men and women, but that is wrong too, because there should be a moral factor involved in this ideological battle.

The starkest way to frame this culture war is between men and women who are interested in the proper parenting of their legitimate offspring, and those who are not.

It would be in the national interest to privilege married parents over unmarried parents to encourage good parenting.

My view is that anyone in favour of patriarchy should be supported whatever their sex, race or religion.

So even if you are an antisemitic and Islamophobic white nationalist you should consider supporting the replacement of Christianity with another religion capable of maintaining morality if you really interested in saving your race and nation.

If you are an Islamophobic Jew, you should consider promoting Secular Koranism if only to raise the moral standards of the Western country you and your ancestors have lived for generations so that it does not become a failed state.

I say Islam because there is no other religion or ideology strong enough to kill feminism dead.

Anti-feminist Karaite Jew encourages mosque attendance

Karaite Jew recommends Islam for atheists to better fight feminism

Jew prescribing Islam for gentiles satirises white nationalists

If Islam is Judaism Lite, then Secular Koranism is Islam Lite.

Secular Koranism is not a belief system, but a legal system.

You can be an atheist, agnostic, Jew, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist as well as a Muslim as long as you acknowledge that marriage must be supported by the law and sluts and slut-fuckers shamed.

There will however be no bedroom police so in practice you will get away with it if you are not a parent of illegitimate offspring. However, if you do, the tariff is 100 lashes per bastard.

quran.com/24/2 would send a very clear message out to women not to be sluts to stop them pumping out bastards who will become the criminals and Idiocracy of the next generation.

Once this law is in place, our male politicians will stop pandering to female voters. 

Indiscriminate universal suffrage undermines marriage and patriarchy

The average voter in the West is a female voter, and the average female voter expresses herself in these terms egged on by men who pander to them



Only then would the pro-patriarchy people become powerful enough to win. Those who cannot even bring themselves to say sluts should be shamed and extramarital sex discouraged should not be considered marriageable until unless they formally renounce these views. 

Such people should be marginalised because they are not interested in the parenting of the next generation. People who cannot even bring themselves to pay lip service to marriage are by definition unmarriageable.

Jewish wisdom on what is happening to the shrinking and senescent West

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim discusses the childless leaders of Europe and asks what this phenomenon means for the future of the West.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/dying-europes-leaders-have-no-children/news-story/9e0106b5ea1a6d05e39a57caf883db5d

THE PROBLEM WITH GENDER RELATIONS

The problem: men prefer their women to be kind and stupid. Women trying to attract male partners feel they have to pretend to be kind and stupid. Men factor this in when choosing a female partner and this is fine as long as women wield no political power, but when they do, kind and stupid women being generous to groups that threaten men's interests (eg sluts, socialists, illegal immigrants) at the expense of men of their own race and nationality would be disastrous to these men's interests.


THE PROBLEM OF INFANTILISED MEN AND WOMEN AND WHAT TO DO WITH THEM

The truth is often called ugly. People who cannot cope with the truth should be treated as children and the vote withdrawn from them.

Thursday, 12 October 2017

Nationalist men will always be keener to blame Jews and Muslims than their own treacherous women in positions of influence who don't care about them



http://www.europeanmedical.info/cognitive-therapy/marriage-and-family-eri.html

The marriage was not a happy one, and the Kohlbergs separated in the mid-1970s. They were finally divorced in 1985. Kohlberg began a relationship with Ann Higgins, a developmental psychologist, during his separation. They became engaged after Kohlberg's divorce, but were not married at the time of his death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Gilligan

Despite being Kohlberg's research assistant, Gilligan argued that Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development were male-oriented, which limited their ability to be generalized to females.

One criticism of Kohlberg's theory is that it emphasizes justice to the exclusion of other values, and so may not adequately address the arguments of those who value other moral aspects of actions. Carol Gilligan has argued that Kohlberg's theory is overly androcentric. Kohlberg's theory was initially developed based on empirical research using only male participants; Gilligan argued that it did not adequately describe the concerns of women.  Kohlberg stated that women tend to get stuck at level 3, focusing on details of how to maintain relationships and promote the welfare of family and friends. Men are likely to move on to the abstract principles, and thus have less concern with the particulars of who is involved. Consistent with this observation, Gilligan's theory of moral development does not focus on the value of justice. She developed an alternative theory of moral reasoning based on the ethics of caring. Critics such as Christina Hoff Sommers, however, argued that Gilligan's research is ill-founded, and that no evidence exists to support her conclusion.

https://marciapally.com/

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Wednesday, 11 October 2017

Jews fret over gentiles suffering family breakdown caused by rampant rampaging feminism


6th minute
Rabbi Sacks:

Why is family so important for community?

Robert Putnam:
https://www.counter-currents.com/2013/10/a-wasp-jew-harvard-universitys-robert-d-putnam/

It is the basis of community really. It is where we learn our skills dealing with other people, it is where we learn how to care for other people and it is the model for how we then reach out to the broader community ...

Rabbi Sacks [jumping in on the subject eagerly]:
So do you think the breakdown of the family over the past 50 years has had a negative impact on society as a whole?

Robert Putnam [warily and warningly]:

I don't want to get into the mode of getting moralitiscally critical of other kinds of family [waggling his hands apologetically and soothingly as if to appease the baying snarling feminazis he imagines to be screaming for his blood], single parent families and so on [How  many different kind of families are there? Families headed by two gay men bringing up daughters together? Families headed by two lesbians bringing up sons together? The mind boggles and God only knows, eh?] but I do think that the traditional family has an important advantages in terms of raising kids.

Maurice Glasman:

Politics is where you build a home together. 
Honour your relationships.

Rabbi Sacks says that the gentile community is in crisis. (Feminism, you see!)

He also says the community centre for the gentiles is the pub where they get drunk and get into fights with each other, but what can you do about people like that, eh?

Let's face it, guys and goyim. We must be in a pretty bad way if the Jews are worried about us. They are trying to help and warn us, but we are quite simply deaf, willfullyblind and heedless. 

Rabbi Sacks' nicey nicey videos with Jewish Harvard sociologists talking up the family are completely lost on the goyim who wouldn't dream of taking advice from the Archbishop of Canterbury, let alone a rabbi.

This message needs to be punched through by me with Rabbi Sacks and maybe also Melanie Phillips sitting around having a chat about putting the world to rights and socking it to them about what's wrong with the gentile and the disease of the mind he is suffering from before feminism completely rots his brain. 

Feminism threatens Jews too
Intersectionality is a code word for feminism

Alan Dershowitz, the renowned Jewish lawyer,  has noticed that intersectional feminism is the most virulent form of feminism. He has also noticed that it has identified Jews as the aristocracy of white people whom it wants to "de-privilege":

The linking of unrelated "victimizations," despite their tenuous connections, is reflective of a broader trend in hard-left politics, whereby increasingly, radical activists demand that the demonization of "Zionists"—often used as a euphemism for Jews – be included, indeed featured, in the package of causes that must to be embraced by anyone claiming the label of "progressive." Lumping seemingly disparate groups under the "umbrella of oppression" leads to the forming of alliances between causes that at best, have nothing to do with each other, and at worst, are averse to one another's stated mission. Their only common feature is that to join, they must demonize the nation state of the Jewish people.
Some intersectional feminists involved with the recent Women's March on Washington, for example, purport to be natural allies with anti-Israel Muslim groups that tolerate, if not accept, the "honor killings" and genital mutilation of women. Similarly, Jewish Voices for Peace (JVP) – an organization that calls for "an end to violence against civilians, and peace and justice for all peoples of the Middle East" – invited Rasmieh Odeh, a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and convicted terrorist, to appear as a speaker at its national conference later this month.

Perhaps a few brave Jewish intellectuals will now dare to come forward to denounce feminism before it completely destroys Western civilisation. As I understand it, most Jews would prefer to stay where they are and do not want to have to flee to Israel, which is already very crowded and surrounded by angry Arabs and Muslims. It is therefore incumbent on them to advise the governments they are living under as to the necessity and urgency of a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism as well as the repeal of all feminist legislation to avert a slide into chaos and disorder in the West.

The Bhagavad Gita:

Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.

I eagerly anticipate Rabbi Sacks' coming talks on the subject of Balaam and sexual immorality. The gentile is these days so degenerate that they only thing would grab his attention is to talk to him about sex, violence, pestilence and video games. If this doesn't get his attention, nothing will.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/balaam

I came across Balaam when I was looking for prophets the Jews had accepted who were gentile, and he is one such. As yet there is no female and gentile prophet of the Jews, but you never know, it could be me! It really is wonderful imagining how proud my dear gentile parents would be if that happened.  

Friday, 8 September 2017

In our matriarchy, the Jew is lower in status to the fornicating slut, because even the privileged Jew dares not criticise her


Facts and reason won't work on the degenerate, only fear and shame. Shame would only work on those capable of feeling shame, and the degenerate are not capable of feeling shame. Enslaved by their appetites and governed only by their emotions, the degenerate are of course easy to bribe and threaten.

What we see in the West is the wholesale abandonment of Truth, Reason and Morality as guiding principles and the total abasement of men before the pedestal on which the promiscuous woman commands him to do her bidding.

Strangely and sadly, the oppressed Western Man refuses to blame the morals of Western Woman and has convinced himself that it is the fault of a Jewish conspiracy and a Muslim invasion.

In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the fornicating slut.

In a matriarchy, no senior politician will criticise the morals of the fornicating slut.

If he does, there will be consequences.

If you don't believe me, ask yourself what happened to these Jewish men in senior positions of influence when they criticised the morals of fornicating sluts.

What happened to Keith Joseph, Prime Minister in-waiting after his Edgbaston speech in 1974? He was no longer Prime Minister in-waiting.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

What happened to Maurice Glasman of Blue Labour when he said immigration should be stopped in 2011? Helen Goodman sorted him out good and proper, didn't she?

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Even the Jewess Melanie Phillips frets about the degeneracy and dementia of the gentile, wanting Western Man to run his country properly, bewailing as I do the fact that he is now appears beyond reason.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/melanie-phillips-wests-auto-immune.html

Does Rabbi Sacks who helped set up the Marriage Foundation with Sir Paul Coleridge even mention the morals of the unmarried mother who casually conceives and casually abandons her variously fathered illegitimate offspring?



No, of course not. Even the privileged Jew is below the immoral woman in our degenerate matriarchy.

The penny has dropped for Alan Dershowitz on the nature and purpose of feminist intersectionality.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism/article/2618871

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/jews-are-also-victims-of-matriarchy.html

Feminism causes anti-Semitism (as well as degeneracy, dementia, immigration and paedophilia)

What is the attitude of the alt-right to the fornicating slut? Are they more afraid of her than they are of being exploited by Jews, invaded by Muslims, becoming the crime victims of blacks and other assorted non-white undesirables? One cannot escape the conclusion that they must be very afraid of her indeed, since she is their only source of apparently free sex if they cannot afford a wife, and most of them cannot afford a wife. Even they could afford one, they would become terrified of her right to divorce them under the rules of no fault divorce giving her the right to confiscate half their property and deprive them of their children.

What a shame then that these alt-right YouTubers are not up to discussing how the economy and society could be rejigged to make marriage a good bargain for men again.

To do this would upset the feminists and the fornicating sluts, and this would never do!

Saturday, 26 August 2017

Blame feminism, not Jews

The Jews being a superior race and group (ie more socially cohesive and genetically more intelligent because they understand the necessity of going forth and multiplying albeit within wedlock which is how they keep their traditions, their sense of identity as a people with a purpose and destiny) will be in more of a position to exploit and bully the corrupt gentile, slower on the uptake, crippled by his now established practice of fornication and a culture that celebrates it. That is why the gentile male Westerner is now helpless against the matriarchy he has helped to create, because he accepted the bribe of feminism: fornication and wants to continue to accept it.

Rabbi Sacks, Melanie Phillips, Maurice Glasman and the late Keith Joseph are trying and did try to warn the gentile, but the gentile is more interested in continuing to hate Jews than refusing the bribe of fornication which feminism continues to offer him and which he is too weak, short-termist and cowardly to refuse being the risk-averse materialistic atheist that he usually is.

Right-thinking members of society are social conservatives, which libtards now call the Far Right or Nazi or Fascist or racist or sexist. Libtards are not right-thinking members of society and libtards can be both Jew and gentile. Good Jews are the ones who take the trouble to be social conservative and to warn the gentile of no longer practising social conservatism, bad Jews are libtard and egg the gentile on in his folly and to his doom.

What is social conservatism? It just means supporting marriage - but not "gay marriage" - and practising family values.

Because the gentile Western male no longer has traditions, he only knows emotion, and that emotion is hatred. It is always easier to hate and complain about the symptoms than to cure the disease, and most people take the path of least resistance.

All political ideologies become national religions when they are adopted by the government.

Our religion is PC Liberalism, our culture is sexual liberation, our cultural product is racial degeneracy, national decline and impending chaos.

Good Jews promote bourgeois values, bad liberal assimilated Jews promote degenerate policies resulting in degeneracy.

The Bhagavad Gita:

Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Jews are also victims of the matriarchy



https://rtd.rt.com/films/no-woman-no-crime/

Israeli women lie in divorce, 99% commit perjury


Keith Joseph and Maurice Glasman were Jews who sacrificed their careers and became victims of the matriarchy to speak what they believed to be the truth.

Do not blame Jews for the insanity of our matriarchy. Blame the matriarchy itself consisting mostly of white middle class feminazis in public life who despise men of their own class and in the class beneath them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherchez_la_femme
 
Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened' 

Joseph's hopes of reaching the top were killed off by his 1974 speech.

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Asked by the Daily Telegraph's Mary Riddell whether he would support a total ban on immigration, even if just for a temporary period, Lord Glasman replied, "Yes. I would add that we should be more generous and friendly in receiving those [few] who are needed. To be more generous, we have to draw the line."

In response to a further question on whether he supported Welfare Secretary Iain Duncan-Smith's call for British jobs for British workers, he responded, ""Completely. The people who live here are the highest priority. We've got to listen and be with them. They're in the right place -- it's us who are not."

Labour Justice spokeswoman Helen Goodman circulated a critique of Blue Labour to all members of the Parliamentary Labour Party in which she claimed, "[Glasman] characterises as female all the aspects of New Labour he dislikes, whereas all the characteristics he applauds he draws as male. It looks more like something suitable for the psychotherapists' couch than a political tract."

Feminism causes anti-Semitism (as well as degeneracy, dementia, immigration and paedophilia) 

Thursday, 12 January 2017

Feminism and Western Foreign Policy pointedly *not* discussed at the Progress meeting on countering Muslim terrorism




















































































































































































































































White middle class feminazis in the media who control spineless unprincipled men don't care about the morality of Western foreign policy or social policy. Those who control our media are mostly feminists, gays, atheists and the opposite of people who support marriage and family values.

Having destroyed the masculinity of men of their own race, they now wish to invite men of other races to enter their country in order to destroy their masculinity too.

Under cover of terrorism legislation, the government can easily now censor the free exchange of ideas to demonise anyone who points out an obvious truth or uses logical arguments to press his case.

When people like Anjem Choudary easily win the argument, the government simply ceases to engage with them at all and then incarcerates them.

It is not just Muslim radicals who suffer this treatment, is it? Even now as you read this, plans are afoot to impeach Donald Trump, before he has even been inaugurated.

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/12/donald-trump-may-get-impeached-within-a-year-if-you-believe-the-betting-odds-6377488/

Corporate media still has a purpose even if the rest of us already know they are the biggest manufacturers of fake news.

This is how it works: the media spin a narrative - any narrative at all, no matter how illogical, transparently false and immoral. Our politicians pretend to believe it and vote for it. 

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...