Translate

Showing posts with label Harriet Sergeant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harriet Sergeant. Show all posts

Monday, 14 May 2018

How Jordan Peterson could have defended patriarchy

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0b2gsct

First question to Jordan Peterson:

What is the last rule that would go if you all the other eleven had to go?

His answer was that he would have the rule that one is to take personal responsibility, which is a synthesis of the 12 rules.

Sutcliffe says Peterson doesn't believe patriarchy exists, and Peterson did not demur. 

I would have said patriarchy exists as a concept, and that the West is certainly not a patriarchy, but rather a matriarchy. 

A lost opportunity.

When the feminist Irishwoman says patriarchy exists because there is domestic violence and complains that not enough men are convicted for domestic violence, Peterson should have pointed out that patriarchy is primarily about whether society practises marriage, not whether men perpetrate violence on women. There will be more serial killers and rapists of women in a matriarchy, though in a patriarchy where most women are married, the preponderance of violence suffered by women would come from their husband for logistical reasons, as you would expect.


Sutcliffe queries the subtitle of his book THE ANTIDOTE TO CHAOS and asks why not THE MIDDLE WAY subtly suggesting that Peterson is an extremist. 

My answer:

"You are presuming to tell me how to title my book, presumably because you have been instructed to suggest that I am an extremist. So how am I an extremist?"

Sutcliffe goes on to accuse Peterson of "gendering" order and chaos. Why should they be gendered at all, Sutcliffe asks.

"Because feminism has gone too far and we now live in a matriarchy, which is chaotic," I would have said. 

He instead talks about Mother Nature being destructive and plenipotential and says order is patriarchal. 

Sutcliffe immediately says: " I thought you didn't believe in the patriarchy!"

Peterson says "Patriarchy in one sense has become synonymous with arbitrary tyranny and oppression and I don't regard our culture as being arbitrarily tyrannical and oppressive, and I don't believe in the narrative that pits women against men or men against women as the core narrative of our culture which is absurd."

Sutcliffe also asks Peterson why he thinks consciousness is masculine. 

Peterson says it is symbolic. 

Sutcliffe quotes from Peterson:

"It is certain that a woman needs consciousness to be rescued and as noted above, consciousness is symbolically masculine and has been since the beginning of time."

He points out to Peterson "But consciousness is an intellectual concept. It doesn't have a gender." 

Peterson: "Consciousness isn't an intellectual concept, it is a phenomenon." 

Sutcliffe: "It is a thing in the world."

Peterson: "The conceptualisation of it is an intellectual construct." 

Sutcliffe: "In what sense is it masculine?"

Peterson: "It is masculine symbolically. It is a core element of fundamental mythology. It has been a principle of metaphorical cognition forever. It is not an arbitrary decision by any stretch of the imagination." 

Sutcliffe: "It is an inherited decision, but I am curious about the way you treat some cultures. You write:

'We learn to live together and organise our complex societies slowly and incrementally over vast stretches of time and we do not understand with sufficient exactitude why what we are doing works.'

It seems to me that begs a very large question, which is: works for whom? A lot of people think it doesn't work, which is why social change is about. That's why societies and civilisations alter over time. Works for whom?"

Peterson: "It might be better to ask 'Works compared to what?' There's a handful of society in the world - perhaps 30 or 40 - that are functioning at a pretty high level. Those are the countries that everyone wants to immigrate to. There's inequality within those cultures, but you can't lay that at the feet of those cultures. Inequality is a much deeper problem than what you can lay at the feet of a political or economic system, so works by historical standards including works for the past 150 years." 

Sutcliffe: "I assume you agree with female suffrage and that women should have a vote." 

Peterson: "Sure." [Not a word about narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only if he is too frightened to go the whole hog of saying that female suffrage was probably a terrible mistake.]

Sutcliffe: "120 years ago, that would have been a radical and disruptive idea to have. People would have advanced exactly the same arguments you advanced about inherited social traditions, about the way things have been done. Scientists would have advanced information, a phrenologist would have come along and said 'Women's bump of electoral selection is smaller than men ... "

Instead of going down this blind alley, Peterson should just have said

"Men are more rational than women on the whole, and have a more developed sense of justice as well as being generally more forgiving" 

and invited them to disprove it. He probably would have enjoyed a scene of the feminist Irishwoman having a fit of the vapours with Tom Sutcliffe running off to fetch her smelling salts. 

Sutcliffe then suggests he is trying to incite fascism by saying that the more society feminises men, the more likely they are to embrace fascist ideologies.

Peterson says that is obviously true. 

Sutcliffe calls it a classic abuser's exculpation. It is a withdrawal from responsibility: you made me hit you.

Peterson: "It is not a justification, it is an observation of what's likely to happen if you push people too far in a particular direction. It is a warning, not a justification."

Sutcliffe: "The solution to that is not to worry about feminising men, but to worry about them joining fascist organisations."



Peterson: "No, I think it is to worry that steep unequal hierarchies will produce desperate young men and that is a critique of hierarchy, by the way."

My answer would have been: 

"It is about social justice, gender justice and a warning that if enough people get angry enough about the unfairness of the rules, they will want to change them. Allow them the means to change them peacefully, or they will use violence."




Simon Sheppard explores the mind of the spree killer

The Elliott Rodger Analysis of gender relations

Husain agrees with Martin Amis that sexual frustration is entangled in the impulse to terrorist glory.


A discussion I had about Jordan Peterson with a beta male
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, 12 October 2017

Nationalist men will always be keener to blame Jews and Muslims than their own treacherous women in positions of influence who don't care about them



http://www.europeanmedical.info/cognitive-therapy/marriage-and-family-eri.html

The marriage was not a happy one, and the Kohlbergs separated in the mid-1970s. They were finally divorced in 1985. Kohlberg began a relationship with Ann Higgins, a developmental psychologist, during his separation. They became engaged after Kohlberg's divorce, but were not married at the time of his death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Gilligan

Despite being Kohlberg's research assistant, Gilligan argued that Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development were male-oriented, which limited their ability to be generalized to females.

One criticism of Kohlberg's theory is that it emphasizes justice to the exclusion of other values, and so may not adequately address the arguments of those who value other moral aspects of actions. Carol Gilligan has argued that Kohlberg's theory is overly androcentric. Kohlberg's theory was initially developed based on empirical research using only male participants; Gilligan argued that it did not adequately describe the concerns of women.  Kohlberg stated that women tend to get stuck at level 3, focusing on details of how to maintain relationships and promote the welfare of family and friends. Men are likely to move on to the abstract principles, and thus have less concern with the particulars of who is involved. Consistent with this observation, Gilligan's theory of moral development does not focus on the value of justice. She developed an alternative theory of moral reasoning based on the ethics of caring. Critics such as Christina Hoff Sommers, however, argued that Gilligan's research is ill-founded, and that no evidence exists to support her conclusion.

https://marciapally.com/

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, 8 January 2016

Justin Webb interviewing two women from Germany about Cologne attacks on New Year's Day 2016

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06twjtk

8:43
Chancellor Angela Merkel has said Germany must have a "fundamental" debate about how to integrate new migrants after a wave of sexual assaults on New Year’s Eve which have been blamed on migrants. Speaking in the programme is journalist and activist Kubra Gumusay and editor-in-chief of Bild Zeitung - Germany’s most read newspaper - Tanit Koch.

Kubra Gamusay is an oxymoronic Muslim Feminist, which Justin Webb omitted to mention. You can hear her witter on about Muslim feminism at http://www.islamandfeminism.org/kuumlbra-guumlmuuml351ay.html

Bild Zeitung is the German equivalent of The Sun, which Webb also omitted to mention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild

Despite being often recognised as a right-wing publication, in January 2015 Bild began a petition against PEGIDA, an anti-Islamisation protest group.



JW:

Germany is having an anguished debate about the attacks around New Year on women walking in and around the railway station in Cologne. The Right accuse the establishment of covering up the crimes of Muslim immigrants, including some from Syria and North Africa. The establishment is reacting in pretty pained fashion. Angela Merkel speaking yesterday in Berlin saying deportation should be considered for foreigners who commit crimes. Let's talk to Kubra Gumasay who is a journalist and activist in Hamburg and to Tanit Koch who is Editor In Chief of Bild Zeitung which is Germany's most-read newspaper. Good morning to you both. 

The wittering women chorus:

Good morning, Justin! 

JW:

Kubra, first of all: does everyone accept now this was mishandled?

KG:

Well certainly yes especially since after the events it was found out that many women who have been sexually assaulted had struggled and reporting especially the way the victims have been dealt with. There were quite a few problems with the event in specific but in general what we have right now is a problem in the way we talk about these topics. Sexism is an issue in Germany not only within the immigrant community but also within the immigrant communities. We are now having a debate that focuses on the other, the immigrant, the refugee as the barbarians who are coming into our country to basically assault our women - those sexist men - and we are now experiencing a very racist turn of the debate. 

JW:

Tanit Koch, would that racist turn be avoided if the truth was told earlier about incidents like this?

TK:

Absolutely. I am not actually sure there is a "racist turn". There is some issues that haven't been addressed during the last years or decades which should have been addressed before are now in the focus. I absolutely think that the - forgive the language - cock-up by the police and police communication in Cologne certainly has not helped at all but actually worsened the matter of people distrusting the establishment, politicians and the media. 

What I would have said if asked this question:

"Of course not. Germany is now experiencing an unprecedented flood of immigration that is pouring oil on the fire of pre-existing racial tensions caused by uncontrolled immigration and Islamophobia general to liberal democracies towards Islamic State. The foreigners and immigrants the Germans most particularly hate and fear are Muslim migrants, and it is this group that is reported to have molested German women. Xenophobia includes hatred and fear of foreigners, and the most foreign of foreigners are foreigners of another race, especially if their religion has values you already know to be opposed to yours. Islamic State are Muslim and Islamic State jihadis come from Syria and North Africa. The men reported to have molested German women during the New Year were men of that religion coming from precisely these places. The hatred and fear is both racial and religious as well as deeply and undeniably visceral."    

JW:

And of course it wasn't just the police, was it, the state broadcasters as well have had to apologise because they didn't report the facts even though they knew them.

TK:

Well, they have apologised. I think you shouldn't over-estimate that one incident because that was the [inaudible] of news at seven o'clock and reported the incidents later on that day so they apologise for not doing main news which definitely was a mistake and is absolutely feeding into the trust issue raised by radical right wing movements and parties.

[Of course Koch doesn't want the German public to make too  much of the media not broadcasting the truth, being Editor in Chief of the Bild and therefore part of the media herself!]

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/08/cologne-attacks-hard-questions-new-years-eve?CMP=fb_gu

Gaby Hinsliff:

Many Germans are asking why politicians, police and broadcasters seem so reluctant to discuss what happened under cover of the crowds (the state broadcaster EZF apologised for not covering the attacks until Tuesday), and whether it’s because the attackers are widely described as looking Arab or north African. Which is why, of course, liberals like me are reluctant to talk about it.

The parallels between German politicians’ discomfort over Cologne and Britain’s response to predominantly Asian gangs grooming girls in Rotherham for sexual exploitation aren’t exact, but there are lessons to be learned.

The first is that pushing victims under the carpet for the sake of cohesion is dangerous. When allegations about older Asian men preying on white girls in northern cities initially surfaced, well over a decade ago, it was the BNP that first took up the cudgels. Unfortunately, that meant journalists and politicians instinctively shied away, wary of giving the BNP publicity.

By trying not to give succour to racists, the risk is that we end up miserably self-censoring.
You really can't trust these liberal cunts, who have absolutely no fucking idea about journalistic integrity, can you? But at least Gaby Hinsliff is coming clean now. Most white middle class women think foreign males are interesting and more worthy of attention than men of their own race and emasculated white men allow them to indulge this preference. They don't even know they are doing it. It is as natural to them as picking up a baby and cooing at it.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/harriet-and-hoods.html


What I would have said if asked this question:

"Germans have indeed lost faith in their government and their media, which they now know to be rotten with Political Correctness. It was after all their Chancellor Angela Merkel who invited the migrants to Germany in the first place, only to withdraw her invitation a week later, like an indecisive and neurotic woman who enjoys playing with a man's feelings, just because he allows her to. The suspicion that only pro-migrant reports were allowed by the media was not particular to Germany, for the BBC, CNN and other Western liberal media are just as guilty. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/female-journalists-pro-migrant-coverage.html The best thing pro-migrant politicians such as Merkel and Reker can do for themselves and their people is to resign, and let those more in touch with the understandable anxieties of the German people take their places. Germany should close its borders, leave the EU and lie down quietly in a dark room and reflect on its future. Denial is a feminine vice and more denial at this stage would only enrage German public opinion. That public life is filled with ranks of vacillating and incompetent women who constantly pull their punches and witter on about their nonsense such as Muslim Feminism and Germany integrating yet more aliens will just infuriate an already irritated and anxious German public. All female journalists guilty of a pro-migrant stance should also resign."
Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males by Simon Sheppard" 

 JW:

Kubra Gumasha, do you accept that there is a real risk to not just women's rights actually but other rights as well that our accepted and seen as part of secular modern European society that are not necessarily respected by some of those who come in and that has to be said plainly?


KW:

No, I certainly agree that people who come into Germany should who fled to Germany and seek rescue here are not people who went through integration process who have basically declared that they will comply with all of the values here. That certainly hasn't happened so obviously I don't expect that we won't have any issues with that. I mean that is a struggle that we will be something we have to deal with that in the future and I do believe that we will actually be able to manage that, it's just the way we handle it and at this point Germany has missed in the past years the point we should have talked about who we are as a country, who do we mean when we say "we". We have not yet managed to be a society that is inclusive, that speaks of "we" and then includes people who have not been born in Germany but certainly do feel German, who have a German passport, speak the language so what we need right now in Germany is a debate on who we are and who we want to be.

 What I would have said if asked this question:

"What has to be said plainly is that no nation that already has an immigrant problem should be accepting any more of these migrants. Those already here can be used as slave labour or have the option of being returned to where they came if they object to being used as slave labour. The perception that these migrant swarms who molest European women are somehow privileged over European men will create a simmering resentment that could be the source of riots and, perhaps, revolution."

 JW:

Is that the debate you are going to get now, Tanit Koch?

TW:

Actually, I think the debate we are going to have is what we expect of people coming into the country that have been treated - as you yourself the BBC have reported - with great hospitality that those people have to understand what our way of life is not just our views but our way of life. I am bit frustrated that in particular Cologne had these appalling incidents because I have lived there myself and Cologne is the party city of Germany which has a history and prides itself on its great tolerance and openness towards people coming into that city from all over the world so the debate is going to be not just how to reassure ourselves of what we are and who we are but also to tackle certain issues that have come into the country because of course when you haven't grown up in Germany you cannot possibly be used to our way of life but people who do not abide with the law simply have to learn that this cannot be accepted. 
INTERVIEW ENDS.

What I would have said if asked this question:

"The topics of debate should be as follows:

 1) How Europeans managed to get themselves into this situation in the first place. (It was feminism causing the European birth rate to decline that caused the labour shortage making immigrant labour so attractive to governments of senescent and shrinking populations afraid of alienating the female vote by telling women to have more babies earlier and bring them up properly as stay at home wives. The illegitimate offspring of single mothers entering the educational system would inevitably lower standards of education and behaviour making the next generation of indigenous labour less attractive but immigrant labour more attractive as employees to German businesses. A generous welfare state is also a disincentive to work.) The Pill, the Sexual Revolution and abortions- all may share some blame for our dependency on immigration.

 2) Where these migrant/refugee swarms came from. They are of course from the countries that NATO so blithely bombed at the behest of the Americans. Even as Hitler plotted to expel the Jews from Germany, he had in mind somewhere to send them - Madagascar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan 
Incompetent and short-sighted European governments bombing Syria never even considered for a moment where those escaping their bombing would go - to Europe, as it turned out. The Cost Germany Is Paying For Washington’s Wars

3) If we were a proper dictatorship, our benign dictator would have made the women have enough legitimate children younger and made the proles work, without giving a stuff about their so-called human rights. If this had happened, there would be no need for immigrant labour. Anti-immigration parties should tell their supporters exactly what they have to do if they want to solve the problem: abolish the welfare state, marry earlier, have more children and abolish all anti-discrimination pro-feminist legislation."

 Do you just get the feeling that my suggestions will not be acknowledged, let alone discussed in mainstream media?

Do you think ISIS would just let anyone come into their country, molest their women and then let an idiotic Muslim woman who thinks she is a feminist witter on about Islamic State's national identity not being sufficiently inclusive to the kuffar, eh, eh, eh?


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 21 November 2014

White feminists REPULSED by anti-immigration white proletariat and DON'T CARE what happens to them

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/deputy-head-quits-after-being-7827685

James Inman, the headteacher who puts gel on his hair - ugh -  who punished  pupil Tommie Rose for his enterprise. Are men in positions of responsibility who put gel on their hair not DISGUSTING?? [SHUDDER] How likely are they to be MCSFs? 
MCSF and other acronyms explained

Tommie Rose, white, is punished.
Young Entrepreneur Of The Week: Bejay Mulenga

Bejay Mulenga, black, is praised.


But we all know about white middle class women who hate and fear white working class boys and who like posing with young men of another race because they are cute, exotic etc, right?




Titillating photograph of Harriet Sergeant and her boys from the hood gives publicity to her potboiler that does NOT condemn illegitimacy

Harriet Sergeant - tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime?  Not bloody likely.   She is a woman after all, and will probably defend to the death the right of sluts to have babies at the expense of the taxpayer because she is a woman herself.  She has a son, but does she care enough about him to denounce feminism?

We also know who is in charge of the matriarchy and it sure as hell ain't the white working class female whom these white SNOBBISH middle class professional women despise together with their male counterparts. In fact, these snobbish white middle class professional women enjoy sneering at the working classes of their own race.

NATIONALIST MEN SHOULD GET THIS:
White women in charge of public affairs in the class above you hate you, fear you, sneer at you and don't care about you.

Know thyself, and know thine enemy.




David Willetts blames feminism over lack of jobs for working men Conservative minister's comments on social mobility trigger criticism from the Labour party and the TUC
David Willetts was MADE TO APOLOGISE for saying this.

Why Lee Rigby's mother will NEVER be ennobled by the matriarchy, unlike the professional victim that is Stephen Lawrence's mother

Would Blue Labour's conservatism lead us back to female subservience?
We know what happened to Lord Glasman, don't we? The feminazis in the Labour Party stuck their stilettos into him and destroyed his career, and Ed Miliband went along with it because he is a pissing cunting shitting pussy-whipped morally-compromised slut-fucker who would not have bothered marrying the mother of his then illegitimate offspring if he had not become the leader of the Labour Party.



http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia

Ambitious young women today are taught to ignore or suppress every natural instinct, if it conflicts with the feminist agenda posed on them. All literary and artistic works, no matter how great, that document the ambivalence of female sexuality they are trained to dismiss as “misogynous.” In other words, their minds are being programmed to secede from their bodies … there is a huge gap between feminist rhetoric and women’s actual sex lives, where feminism is of little help except with a certain stratum of deferential, malleable, white middle-class men.

Middle-class men, neutered by office life and daunted by feminist rhetoric, are shrinking. Lesbianism is increasing, since anxious, unmasculine men have little to offer. Women are simply more interesting to them. Male homosexuality is increasing, because masculinity is in crisis and because maternal consciousness, severed from the support network of the extended family, has become a psychotic system, forcing the young to struggle for life against clinging personal fantasy.

White middle-class girls at the elite colleges and universities seem to want the world handed to them on a platter. They have been sheltered, coddled and flattered. Having taught at a wide variety of institutions over my ill-starred career, I have observed that working-class or lower-middle-class girls, who are from financially struggling families and must take a patchwork of menial jobs to stay in school, are usually the least hospitable to feminist rhetoric. They see life as it is and have fewer illusions about sex. It is affluent, upper-middle class students who most spout the party line — as if the grisly hyperemotionalism of feminist jargon satisfies their hunger for meaningful experiences outside their eventless upbringing. In the absence of war, invent one.
at 19 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 5 April 2014

Nationalist anger at Marks & Spencer making a "leading lady" out of Doreen Lawrence

I suppose it could be said that even if Lady Lawrence were not making milking her victimhood to the last drop for all it was worth, her body shape of that of the middle-aged matron would be useful to Marks & Spencer intent on appealing to women with Lady Lawrence's body shape.
http://www.marksandspencer.com/twiggy-for-mands-collection-floral-lace-dress-with-secret-support/p/p22292302 would make her look the part when she goes to the House of Lords (or similar) to whinge about her victimhood or any other business.

http://www.marksandspencer.com/twiggy-for-mands-collection-floral-lace-dress-with-secret-support/p/p22292302

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/doreen-lawrence-for-marks--spencer-mother-of-murdered-teenager-stephen-lawrence-set-to-appear-alongside-emma-thompson-and-annie-lennox-in-new-campaign-9190058.html

http://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2014/02/26/campaign-to-make-lee-rigbys-mother-a-baroness/

Below are some choice nationalist comments to a proposal to boycott M&S:

"Boycott? Can't afford to shop there anyway"

"We are second class citizens in our own country I'm sick of her and her drug dealing son in the papers and on tv all the time"

"To be fair though, Doreen is one of the world's most beautiful and glamorous fashion icons..."

"Clearly that's why she was chosen"

"Can they make it any clearer - that we don't count, that one hundred years after the start of the 'war to end all wars' we are nothing in our own country?"

"M&S paid for the Community Security Trust. The CST are a Jewish vigilante group that spent most if their activities "smashing up National Front meetings". This is what their founder told me."

What about Lee Rigby's mum?  Is there a campaign to make Mrs Rigby one of the "leading ladies" of M&S in 2015?

The mother of Lee Rigby and her husband wearing a UKIP tie

If not, why not?

Answers on a postcard, or a comment below, please.

http://www.buyexcalibur.co.uk/products.php?cat=11
BNP tie

http://store.ukip.org/product-p/017.htm
UKIP tie (UKIP tie cheaper than BNP tie!)

Is it cos she would spoil it for the other leading ladies that M&S might choose?  The other leading ladies would of course be fashionable metropolitan liberals who would cringe at the idea of being associated with a despised member of the white lower classes, who might vote UKIP, or, worse, vote BNP.  The photo shoots would be not be a success.

Would the likes of Emma Thompson be cuddling up to the mother of Lee Rigby?  Her husband wore a UKIP tie on TV! 


Would the likes of Emma Thompson be so casually putting her hand on the shoulder of Lee Rigby's mum?  Why, she is practically BNP!  Consummate actress though she is, she would be struggling to repress her feelings of revulsion ...

This photo of those who showed up for the sentencing of Lee Rigby's murderers and the feelings of revulsion it arouses in the metropolitan liberal elite is the reason why Lee Rigby's mum won't be one of  next year's M&S "leading ladies" even though she is an even greater victim than the mother of Stephen Lawrence. Lower class white people are lower than the lower class black criminals as far as white middle class liberals are concerned.
Harriet Sergeant, a member of the white liberal metropolitan elite posing with black gangstas.  Would she be seen *dead* near lower class criminal *whites*?  What do you think?

What have white working class culture got to offer?  Chas and Dave?  Morris dancing?

And this, boys and girls, is why Lyn Rigby won't be invited to become one of the leading ladies of M&S next year or ever, even though her son is the biggest victim ever.

POSTSCRIPT:

A socialist Facebook friend ironically proclaimed:

"All together now! Join the campaign for for Ms. Khurvaceous Khaw to be the new M & S model heartthrob!"

Well, I wouldn't mind being one of M&S leading ladies cuddling up to Mishal Husain, Suzanne Moore, Cathy Newman, Harriet Sergeant, Anne McElvoy etc and getting all those free clothes next year.  The person I would most like to cuddle up to is really Delia Smith, hint, hint, hint, M&S!

What about Blue Harbour?  Will we find the likes of Nick Griffin and Nigel Farage looking good in smart casual? Or do all the male models of Blue Harbour have to be beautiful young men?  Would M&S like to explain the reason for this blatant sexism?  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, 25 June 2012

Harriet Sergeant does not condemn the causes of crime and gang culture - SLUT SINGLE MUMS



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2163396/A-middle-class-mother-hoodies.html



Titillating photograph of Harriet Sergeant and her boys from the hood gives publicity to her potboiler that does NOT condemn illegitimacy


http://harrietsergeant.com/articles/fixing-broken-britain/

Below is what she says about illegitimacy:


Despite the huge amount of evidence of the harm this causes children (mothers of children on the “at risk” register, for example, are five times more likely to be single teenage mothers), the Labour government made single motherhood an attractive proposition.

Since 1997 a single mother of two children has seen her benefits increase by 85%. We watched the effects of that policy play out on our streets every night last week.

To accuse these young girls of being feckless is unjust. They are merely responding to the economics of the situation. They are as much victims of the crisis in our schools and the perverse influence of benefits as teenage boys. What future is there for a girl who leaves school without a qualification? Whereas boys take to crime, girls get pregnant.

Ministers talk of family breakdown, but there is no family to break down. More than half of single mothers have never lived with a boyfriend. The state has taken over the role of both husband and employer.

Take just one example: single mothers. Mash’s older sister, a single mother of 22, admitted she would love to get married: “But all the men I know are in prison or deal drugs. I don’t know one man with a job.”

Like all the people and organisations she complains about, Harriet Sergeant only proposes to deal with the SYMPTOMS but not the causes, probably because she a dirty rotten feminist IN DENIAL about the causes of crime and gang culture - stupid sluts opening their legs at the drop of a pair of trousers and disdaining to practice effective contraception because they want to progress on the slut ladder of becoming a welfare mum with variously fathered feral bastards which the taxpaying men of Paedo Bastard Britain Fatso Slutland are too limp-dicked to protest.

Harriet Sergeant - tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime?  Not bloody likely.   She is a woman after all, and will probably defend to the death the right of sluts to have babies at the expense of the taxpayer because she is a woman herself.  She has a son, but does she care enough about him to denounce feminism?  


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2164185/The-day-Kray-gang-robber-taught-hoodie-crime-doesnt-pay-The-middle-class-mother-befriended-teenage-thugs-dressed-suit-encounter-shocked-core.html

Nope, nothing here either about what to do with scummy slut single mums who breed their verminous spawn who will become the criminals of the next generation.  Not a dicky bird.

Maybe the next one, eh?

Her book is now being serialised in the Mail, so give her a chance.  She may possibly get round to mentioning SLUT SINGLE MUMS which I suspect her feminine feminist sympathies will probably prevent her from criticising.  She probably has quite a few friends who are also slut single mums and she doesn't want to hurt their feelings.  Girls stick together at the expense of boys, even mothers who have sons want to keep all the feminist privileges they have acquired at the expense of men, even if that will fuck up their sons' futures and the future of their own country.

That's shitty stinking fucking evil feminist ideology for you, eh?

If nothing about criticising slut single mums come out in the other parts of her serialised book, perhaps some might think she deserves the fate of Marie Antoinette whom she so strikingly resembles.

Harriet says there is a whole chapter devoted to the subject of single mums in her book, out 12 July.   I will make a point of popping into Waterstone's to see if there is anything at all constructive being proposed about dealing with the causes and consequences of state-sponsored slut single mummery.

http://www.teachit.so/index_htm_files/Wasted.pdf has a book written by Harriet with a chapter devoted to single mums, from page 19.   Nothing was proposed however, about stigmatising these women or even endorsing the Just Say No recommendation of Nadine Dorries MP.

Let us hope the chapter on single mums in her new book is rather more constructive.  Then I will happily eat my words and hat about Harriet being an evil feminist who refuses to criticise the morals of British women just because she is one herself.

I may even attend the book launch, if I am not escorted off the premises by her minders who may consist of members the gang she has been hanging out with.   If so, I may even buy a copy and ask her to to dedicate it 'To Claire "Robespierre" Khaw, With love and best wishes from Harriet "Marie Antoinette" Sergeant'

When Enoch Powell talked about a nation busily engaged in heaping up their own funeral pyre, he didn't know the half of it.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...