Critical mass for any idea can in theory only be reached when it is taken up by at least a second person capable of persuading others - unlikely in a nation of senescent degenerate atheist men cowed by feminism, crippled by lust, anger, pride, envy, sloth, gluttony and greed.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Feminised senescent men will not be taking leaps of faith. They don't believe in God, let alone have faith things will turn out well if they stand up for any principle or take any risk. Yet these men think themselves better than Jews and Muslims they are always complaining about.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Because they have no principles and don't think they need them, they will not be capable of feeling shame or acting honourably or even discussing ideas rationally and honestly without telling lies and breaking promises. Such men will be moved only by bribes and threats.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
But why a theocracy if you are an atheist or agnostic? The more thoughtful atheist who cares about posterity and has an investment in the next generation would not want to bequeath a hostile environment for marriage and a high crime rate to his descendants,, would he?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If the laws of a theocracy that creates male solidarity enabling human co-operation to deal with a society's internal and external enemies that preserves the identity of a nation, cultivating national pride. Degenerates and feminists wouldn't care about this.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If the laws of a theocracy that creates male solidarity enabling human co-operation to deal with a society's internal and external enemies that preserves the identity of a nation, cultivating national pride. Degenerates and feminists wouldn't care about this.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If the laws of a theocracy that creates male solidarity enabling human co-operation to deal with a society's internal and external enemies that preserves the identity of a nation, cultivating national pride. Degenerates and feminists wouldn't care about this.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Why shouldn't we aspire to live in a nation that is proud of its identity? What exactly is so wrong and evil about this? It is only like every child aspiring to live an independent life, to do what being an adult requires. Why can't we have this without being called fascists?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
The US Deep State does not want a world of independent nations having their own foreign policy and so requires us all to be liberal democracies so that it can easily bribe or blackmail key politicians into submitting to it, rig our elections and destabilise our governments.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Interestingly, Russia is technically a liberal democracy, but that is not enough for the American imperialists because, despite being crippled by having to govern under such a system, Putin acts in the Russian national interest and refuses to submit to the neocons.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
How much less anxious would you feel if you genuinely felt your government was looking after your national interest, instead of harbouring a distinct suspicion that your robotic childless female puppet leader would not hesitate a moment to sell you for meat if it suited her?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
The benefit of having a supreme authority - even if the Abrahamic God does not in fact exist - to appeal to is real indeed. Even if He does not exist, what are said to be laws can easily be found in scripture. And therefore the solution to all the ills of feminism is at hand.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
To whom would my solution appeal to? Why, all the previously successful men - from Rolf Harris to Taria Ramadan - who are now being accused of historic sexual offences already knowing that an accusation is now as good as a conviction in the Kangaroo Courts of our Matriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
And so there is a bargain indeed to be struck between Islam and the growing numbers of terrified men with something to lose if an immoral woman falsely and maliciously accuses them of a historic sexual offence. Ya better all start thinking about the deal before you end up in jail— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Not only will you end up in jail because some immoral woman falsely and maliciously accused you of a historic sexual offence, your property will be confiscated preventing its transmission to your offspring. The revolution eventually devours its children, you know.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
So no, I am not appealing just to the lower classes who are despised and marginalised, illegitimate and under-educated with substance abuse problems, because they have lost their ability to become of part of the labour force. These people have been warehoused for extinction.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
One small step to take is to submit to truth, logic and morality, if you know the purpose of morality, and it ain't about getting you to heaven. For me, immortality is a mention in the history books, an occasional nod from posterity, an acknowledgement of achievement, if any.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
The benefits of a having a supreme authority would be obvious to any lawyer who has heard of the Supreme Court - the final court of appeal in your legal system. If you were to say God is your final authority, you would have to obey His laws and we know He won't be adding to them.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If you're a libertarian, you'd want your society to have the minimum number of laws and the lowest possible taxes. Feminism in its dementia keeps changing and adding to its laws to disguise its failure and to intimidate opponents. If you want a smaller state, choose theocracy.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
A theocracy must logically appeal to those who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring with their spouse. Therefore those who refuse to give up extramarital sex would predictably object to the restoration of the patriarchy which would treat them as sex offenders.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Does any species enjoy sexual liberation? Do their females let them? If they did they too would be extinct, if these females let any passing male impregnate just for the fun of recreational sex without choosing carefully the father of their offspring. Marriage is eugenic.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
It is morally obscene, intellectually repugnant to call yourself truthful, rational and moral if you seek dismiss the issues I have raised without discussing them properly. We live in an age of moral obscenity, of intellectual abeyance. There are no rational courageous moral men.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
An entire civilisation that does not have a single rational courageous moral man capable of discussing the issues I have raised deserves to become extinct, does it not?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment