- Because avoiding sexual immorality should not be optional and should have the law's support
- Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if it punishes forbidden behaviour
- Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if the forbidden behaviour is generally agreed to be immoral
- Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if it is all of the above and believed to be from the most powerful entity conceivable whose wisdom affirms an obvious universal and eternal truth from generation to generation
- Because it would dispense with the need to relearn the lessons of history and biology, of nature and nurture over and over again
THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label eugenics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eugenics. Show all posts
Sunday, 8 December 2019
Why theocracy is the strongest and most stable form of the rule of law
Tuesday, 21 August 2018
Religion as the basis of the continuation of Jewish and gentile national identity
2:00 The difference between Christian reasoning and Jewish and Muslim reasoning
2:45 Christian values
3:00 Christian values that Baruch finds abhorrent
3:45 Christianity is about saying you believe things which you may not necessarily believe in to be one of the gang, Judaism and Islam is about actually doing things in a rule-based way.
4:30 "The more disturbing aspects of fundamentalist Christianity" - the threat of hell
8:00 The universal love of Christianity
9:00 Islam is also claims this
9:15 Ditto Judaism
10:00 Eastern religions are not monotheist at all.
11:00 If you don't believe in the Trinity, you are not Christian
12:00 Justice and Love
14:00 Compassion for the criminal
14:30 The mumsy view of Christianity: forgive everything, tolerate everything
16:00 The idolatry and blasphemy of the Trinity
17:00 Jews are understandably shy of pointing out to Christians the idolatry of Christianity bearing in mind their tradition of persecuting of Jews
17:30 The chaos of Christianity according to Baruch
18:30 Jews and Muslims pray to the ineffable Abrahamic God, while Christians pray to an executed revolutionary or his mum
19:30 God is rather more than the mumsy comforting woman who is your mate's mum that you might bump into at the supermarket
20:00 Shavuot - the cosmic marriage between God and Jews https://www.huffingtonpost.com/levi-benshmuel/shavuot-love-lessons-from_b_872203.html
The Bible also says this about God: “And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A6&version=NIV
23:00 Secular Koranism is just a boring little idea to prop up the patriarchy and deprive you of extramarital sex to continue the existence of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation
26:00 Marriage is a eugenic game of musical chairs being played from generation to generation
27:00 Conservatism
28:00 Gay marriage
29:00 Flexible monogamy is a lower standard than traditional marriage
30:00 John Major's Back to Basics campaign
30:30 The meaninglessness of unprincipled mainstream of Conservatism which brought in gay marriage under a Conservative Prime Minister
32:00 But for Judaism, Jews would not exist.
33:00 Marriage is an institution for all advanced civilisations, not just for the Abrahamic faiths
34:00 The nihilism of atheism and childlessness
35:00 If Baruch had children, he would want to pass on Judaism to his offspring
37:00 The benefit of having a cultural identity imposed on you even if you reject it at the time or subsequently reject it
39:00 Tradition is what we do to please our fathers.
40:00 White nationalists don't even have a cultural identity to reject and now have to go about creating an identity that they can accept and they cannot agree on this. Most are antisemites, many are not even Christian, and those who want to regress into paganism will not have the support of the majority. White nationalism is dead in the water if white nationalists refuse to acknowledge the need to restore the patriarchy and continue to reject the utility of organised religion.
42:00 Spiritual self-transcendence
45:00 Football matches
46:00 Football chants and war cries https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxL24XYFV7w
https://politiikasta.fi/football-chants-war-chants/
47:00 Participating in a Mexican wave at a Madonna concert
49:00 War, good government and foreign policy should be in the natioanal interest, otherwise people would kill and be killed for the ambitions of their corrupt politicians.
51:00 It doesn't profit members of the Armed Forces to think too deeply about foreign policy
53:00 You don't need nationalism to be a good citizen, says Baruch.
54:00 I define nationalism as the ideology of promoting the national interest. This does not mean indscriminate aggression and warfare.
55:00 Secular Koranism and the National Interest
57:00 The nation is the group all of us can join that is big enough to matter and small enough to care.
58:00 Judaism managed to keep a people without land together for 2000 years and enabled them to their return to their homeland. Christianity and Islam represent attempts by the gentile to adapt Judaism for gentiles
59:00 Patriarchy
1:00:00 100 lashes as a means of effective slut-shaming quran.com/24/2
1:02:00 What are these Conservative principles? Can you find them in the constitution of the Conservative Party? Nope. http://politike.al/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Statuti-i-Partise-Konservatore-Britani.pdf
1:03:00 Ann Widdecombe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Widdecombe http://www.annwiddecombe.com/
1:05:00 The Tories and Labour only represent entrenched class interests
1:05:30 The one party state
1:06:00 Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill https://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html
1:09:00 The principle of promoting the national interest would be the primary and officially stated principle of party. Members would have the right to propose policies and criticise party policy on grounds of the national interest and their free speech would be fiercely protected.
1:11:00 The selection process of party representatives administering regions
1:12:00 There will be a committee to decide which policies are permissible or impermissible on grounds of national interest
1:15:00 The NHS
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/nhs-pharmaceutical-companies-access-to-drugs-costing-lives-a7836891.html
1:17:00 The slut-shaming of Secular Koranism quran.com/24/2
1:18:00 Lifelike baby dolls designed to deter teenagers from having children actually RAISE pregnancy rates
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3758479/Lifelike-baby-dolls-designed-deter-teenagers-having-children-actually-RAISE-pregnancy-rates.html
1:22:00 Public housing and property prices
1:23:00 The banning of usury
1:23:30 20% flat rate income tax https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
1:26:00 We must not confuse charity with tax
1:27:00 Hedge funds charge a 20% performance fee https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/11/the-20-percent-club-hedge-fund-stars-of-an-industry-rebound.html
1:30:00 I ignore all the Hadith that contradicts the Koran.
1:31:00 The punishment of stoning/Rajm or capital punishment for adultery is unique in Islamic law in that it conflicts with the Qur'anic prescription for premarital and extramarital sex (zina). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajm
1:33:00 No bedroom police to punish those guilty of fornication.
1:35:00 "Let no man guilty of adultery or fornication marry and but a woman similarly guilty, or an Unbeliever: nor let any but such a man or an Unbeliever marry such a woman: to the Believers such a thing is forbidden."
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=24&verse=3
1:38:00 SSMs - not all mothers are single mothers, not all single mothers are never married mothers. SSMs are a group within a group within a group. You can only be an SSM if you have illegitimate offspring.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2009/11/3-degrees-of-culpability-in-single.html
1:40:00 Slut-shaming
1:42:00 "Most children growing up are not growing up in single parent families," says Baruch. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html
Out-of-Wedlock Births Rise Worldwide
https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide
1:43:00 The current crime wave
"By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up divorced. A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared."http://rightwingnews.com/top-news/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_London
1:47:00 Warnings of 'public health emergency' as violent crime surges
Murders and knife crimes soar in England and Wales as police detection rate hits record low
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/19/knife-crime-up-16-per-cent-england-and-wales
Met Police to stop investigating some 'low-level' crimes in response to £400m funding cuts
Officer warns change could have 'horrendous' impact on victims of offences including burglary and car crime
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/met-police-spending-cuts-400-million-funding-london-crimes-not-investigated-burglary-assault-a8002746.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237626056_TO_BELIEVE_OR_NOT_TO_BELIEVE_POLICE_RESPONSES_TO_WOMEN_RAPE_COMPLAINANTS
1:50:00 'Is it her job to give an opinion?' Nigel Farage TEARS INTO Met Police chief over Boris
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1001499/Boris-Johnson-burka-news-Nigel-Farage-Met-Police-commissioner-Theresa-May
1:53:00 Transcript of what I said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show in 2 March 2011
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html
What I propose is already being done
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/02/what-i-propose-is-already-being-done.html
1:58:00 http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=6&verse=151
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=17&verse=31
2:03:00 The rules of intersectional status acquisition http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-role-of-intersectional-feminism.html
2:05:00 Roger Scruton influenced by Kant.
2:07:00 Pater familias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pater_familias
2:08:00 Bread and circuses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses
2:08:30 ISIS are the mercenaries of the West http://nena-news.it/west-created-islamic-state/
Wednesday, 23 May 2018
When the quality of the gene pool of your nation deteriorates and shrinks
Women who sleep with sexy Chads that won't commit to them are ruined for life. https://t.co/P6gFdkRTyL— Roosh (@rooshv) May 23, 2018
Great summary of how casual sex is killing our society. It's a prisoner's dilemma that's being played out to the worst possible conclusion, with neither participant acting toward a mutual goal.— Samseau (@Sam_seau) May 23, 2018
This kind of wisdom only the manosphere provides: https://t.co/JsO5Whdbos pic.twitter.com/Qp2k1xsDvc
Monday, 30 April 2018
Have a smaller state, have a theocracy that will eradicate feminism
Critical mass for any idea can in theory only be reached when it is taken up by at least a second person capable of persuading others - unlikely in a nation of senescent degenerate atheist men cowed by feminism, crippled by lust, anger, pride, envy, sloth, gluttony and greed.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Feminised senescent men will not be taking leaps of faith. They don't believe in God, let alone have faith things will turn out well if they stand up for any principle or take any risk. Yet these men think themselves better than Jews and Muslims they are always complaining about.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Because they have no principles and don't think they need them, they will not be capable of feeling shame or acting honourably or even discussing ideas rationally and honestly without telling lies and breaking promises. Such men will be moved only by bribes and threats.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
But why a theocracy if you are an atheist or agnostic? The more thoughtful atheist who cares about posterity and has an investment in the next generation would not want to bequeath a hostile environment for marriage and a high crime rate to his descendants,, would he?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If the laws of a theocracy that creates male solidarity enabling human co-operation to deal with a society's internal and external enemies that preserves the identity of a nation, cultivating national pride. Degenerates and feminists wouldn't care about this.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If the laws of a theocracy that creates male solidarity enabling human co-operation to deal with a society's internal and external enemies that preserves the identity of a nation, cultivating national pride. Degenerates and feminists wouldn't care about this.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If the laws of a theocracy that creates male solidarity enabling human co-operation to deal with a society's internal and external enemies that preserves the identity of a nation, cultivating national pride. Degenerates and feminists wouldn't care about this.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Why shouldn't we aspire to live in a nation that is proud of its identity? What exactly is so wrong and evil about this? It is only like every child aspiring to live an independent life, to do what being an adult requires. Why can't we have this without being called fascists?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
The US Deep State does not want a world of independent nations having their own foreign policy and so requires us all to be liberal democracies so that it can easily bribe or blackmail key politicians into submitting to it, rig our elections and destabilise our governments.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Interestingly, Russia is technically a liberal democracy, but that is not enough for the American imperialists because, despite being crippled by having to govern under such a system, Putin acts in the Russian national interest and refuses to submit to the neocons.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
How much less anxious would you feel if you genuinely felt your government was looking after your national interest, instead of harbouring a distinct suspicion that your robotic childless female puppet leader would not hesitate a moment to sell you for meat if it suited her?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
The benefit of having a supreme authority - even if the Abrahamic God does not in fact exist - to appeal to is real indeed. Even if He does not exist, what are said to be laws can easily be found in scripture. And therefore the solution to all the ills of feminism is at hand.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
To whom would my solution appeal to? Why, all the previously successful men - from Rolf Harris to Taria Ramadan - who are now being accused of historic sexual offences already knowing that an accusation is now as good as a conviction in the Kangaroo Courts of our Matriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
And so there is a bargain indeed to be struck between Islam and the growing numbers of terrified men with something to lose if an immoral woman falsely and maliciously accuses them of a historic sexual offence. Ya better all start thinking about the deal before you end up in jail— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Not only will you end up in jail because some immoral woman falsely and maliciously accused you of a historic sexual offence, your property will be confiscated preventing its transmission to your offspring. The revolution eventually devours its children, you know.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
So no, I am not appealing just to the lower classes who are despised and marginalised, illegitimate and under-educated with substance abuse problems, because they have lost their ability to become of part of the labour force. These people have been warehoused for extinction.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
One small step to take is to submit to truth, logic and morality, if you know the purpose of morality, and it ain't about getting you to heaven. For me, immortality is a mention in the history books, an occasional nod from posterity, an acknowledgement of achievement, if any.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
The benefits of a having a supreme authority would be obvious to any lawyer who has heard of the Supreme Court - the final court of appeal in your legal system. If you were to say God is your final authority, you would have to obey His laws and we know He won't be adding to them.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
If you're a libertarian, you'd want your society to have the minimum number of laws and the lowest possible taxes. Feminism in its dementia keeps changing and adding to its laws to disguise its failure and to intimidate opponents. If you want a smaller state, choose theocracy.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
A theocracy must logically appeal to those who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring with their spouse. Therefore those who refuse to give up extramarital sex would predictably object to the restoration of the patriarchy which would treat them as sex offenders.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Does any species enjoy sexual liberation? Do their females let them? If they did they too would be extinct, if these females let any passing male impregnate just for the fun of recreational sex without choosing carefully the father of their offspring. Marriage is eugenic.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
It is morally obscene, intellectually repugnant to call yourself truthful, rational and moral if you seek dismiss the issues I have raised without discussing them properly. We live in an age of moral obscenity, of intellectual abeyance. There are no rational courageous moral men.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
An entire civilisation that does not have a single rational courageous moral man capable of discussing the issues I have raised deserves to become extinct, does it not?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 29, 2018
Friday, 8 December 2017
The alt-right discuss eugenics without discussing marriage - exasperating!
Mark Collett talks in terms of blood and soil and how Western civilisation is uniquely white. Whites have been resting on their laurels of bastardy, fornication and the welfare state and can no longer contemplate life without these any more. https://t.co/KbyKu5Lr1s— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Steve Fransen says the Jews are winning, winning, winning ... https://t.co/F49yma2juA— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Does anybody else think Steve Fransen and Mark Collett looks Jewish? Wouldn't be surprised if they have some Jewish ancestry. This might explain their tenacity in the face of apparently hopeless odds. Perhaps I have some Jewish blood too! https://t.co/kkEfge1JMu— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Tara McCarthy talks about sperm banks for superior white people. https://t.co/kkEfge1JMu— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Mark Collett says civic nationalism is just another word for multi-culturalism. Actually no, because civic nationalism presupposes a dominant culture. https://t.co/F49yma2juA— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Tara McCarthy frets about the plummeting global IQ of whites. This is caused by white people having babies before marriage and not caring whom they marry, unlike Jews and Muslims who don't do this sort of thing. https://t.co/F49yma2juA— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Orientals and Jews have high IQs because they make a point of not having babies before they are married and make a point of staying together for the sake of the children. White people can't even find a decent spouse to marry because most white men and women are unmarriageable. https://t.co/S5gTJ5ypSA— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
The alt-right talk about eugenics, completely ignoring the fact that marriage is eugenic, bastardy is dysgenic. Eugenics is reinventing the wheel of marriage but their wheel is square. The solution is simple: shame sluts with https://t.co/3K8zKsPjZt https://t.co/F49yma2juA— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Reflect, please, white people, at the logic of what I am saying: the idiocracy we now have is because of generations of degenerate breeding promoted by feminism making you think fornication is OK. Your gene pool has already been compromised, https://t.co/ZTQHUJw8Mq https://t.co/F49yma2juA— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
It was a Jew - the late Keith Joseph, no less - who warned about fornication compromising the human stock of white gentiles. Will the alt-right give him the credit for being the only senior male in politics who said this in the last half century? https://t.co/H1p1I8IuvT https://t.co/n7Nu5V0pUD— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Transgenderism is discussed. Feminism led to gender equality. Gender equality led to gender confusion. Gender confusion led to gender dysphoria. Stupid feminists delighted in encouraging singly parented boys to become girls because imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. https://t.co/F49yma2juA— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
You can't easily become a superior race when you have a rotten slut and bastard culture where no one cares about parenting or education where most people are unmarriageable and gay marriage is legal. https://t.co/n7Nu5V0pUD— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
At 37, Mark Collett is the wisest, most mature and experienced of the alt-right YouTubers of Britain. The older generation of nationalists who have given up are not much interested in what he does though, because they expect him to fail as they have. https://t.co/k1uTDbsMb3— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Well, that was terrible and embarrassing, but not that many people were listening to their adolescent drivel, fortunately. I was probably the only political commentator of mature years listening, and that is cos I am a committed CIVIC nationalist with whom they dare not debate! https://t.co/3ULsGpuoV5— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
On and on they go about the health and fitness of the ideal ethno-nationalist, giving the impression that ethno-nationalism is only for the young and foolish, which it is. https://t.co/4Tkqr7Yntp— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
It is very instructive watching the alt-right who can no longer even form a political party and are now deprived of the advice of their elders and betters whom I know would hate them to succeed where they have failed.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
People of faith have inter-generational co-operation but the alt-right are just one generation, currently young, before they grow old and bitter too, and in turn want the next generation to fail because they would hate them for succeeding where they have failed.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
If they won't discuss what needs to be discussed, they are only left with talking about health and fitness, dating and relationships, dieting and exercise ...— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
How sad to be totally deprived of the adviice of their elders and betters. Perhaps their elders and betters tried to give them advice, but were defeated by their heedlessness and mulishness.— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
A friendly contact from a #BNP 'old hand' prompted me to write an article explaining why the political road is now worse than useless, it is actually a dangerous, resource-wasting diversion. Why? How? And what is Plan B? I've posted it on Facebook, so come and find out more! pic.twitter.com/CGYpzq2Ro8— Nick Griffin (@NickGriffinBU) December 8, 2017
https://www.facebook.com/nick.griffin.12177276/posts/374495186335116
It is almost unbelievable how bereft of ideas nationalists are. Not only have they no solution except to flee the country, there is no attempt at all to examine the causes of their failure, much less acknowledge their mistakes. Unbelievable, almost. https://t.co/aW5gsIZsMW— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) December 8, 2017
Monday, 17 July 2017
Racial degeneracy, national decline and the end of Western civilisation as we know it
Let's just say for the sake of argument that people of the same race, ability and class were divided into two different gender balanced groups with the same number of fertile individuals.
Group A respected the most important rule of traditional marriage which is to forbid and punish extramarital sex and allowed men up to four wives if they could support them but prescribed monogamy as the ideal.
Group B was sexually liberated and were uninhibited in having under-aged sex and fornication was widespread and normalised. They also condoned divorce and never married mothers, indulged in sodomy, fornicated, committed incest, gave its five year old schoolchildren sex education classes to get them hooked on recreational sex nice and early as well as allowing its infertile women to use IVF and allowing its LGBT couples to "marry" and have surrogate babies. Worst of all, free online porn was available to all and Woman's Hour - which is even worse than porn in corrupting the morals of the women - was broadcast 6 days a week.
What do you think will happen to the genetic stock of the respective groups 100 years later?
Who do you think would win if the two groups were to wage war against each other?
How much longer will you retain Western hegemony if you are too stupid to work this out, pretend you don't know what I am talking about and won't discuss this with me on your alt-right YouTube channel?
Group A respected the most important rule of traditional marriage which is to forbid and punish extramarital sex and allowed men up to four wives if they could support them but prescribed monogamy as the ideal.
Group B was sexually liberated and were uninhibited in having under-aged sex and fornication was widespread and normalised. They also condoned divorce and never married mothers, indulged in sodomy, fornicated, committed incest, gave its five year old schoolchildren sex education classes to get them hooked on recreational sex nice and early as well as allowing its infertile women to use IVF and allowing its LGBT couples to "marry" and have surrogate babies. Worst of all, free online porn was available to all and Woman's Hour - which is even worse than porn in corrupting the morals of the women - was broadcast 6 days a week.
What do you think will happen to the genetic stock of the respective groups 100 years later?
Who do you think would win if the two groups were to wage war against each other?
How much longer will you retain Western hegemony if you are too stupid to work this out, pretend you don't know what I am talking about and won't discuss this with me on your alt-right YouTube channel?
Tuesday, 20 June 2017
The most eugenic selection of whom to save if earth were to become the sinking vessel the Titanic was
One alpha male of any race per lifeboat full of the most fertile women of any race and their possibly mixed-race children if any. This would make sense if earth were the sinking vessel and the lifeboat were a space-worthy vessel destined to find another planet to colonise.
Actually, he might need other men with him to help him control the women, but then he would have to share the women. Polyandry is forbidden by the Koran though. If this is the case the alpha male might allow a gay man on board to help him control the women.
https://quran.com/4/24
http://www.justislam.co.uk/product.php?products_id=103
Actually, he might need other men with him to help him control the women, but then he would have to share the women. Polyandry is forbidden by the Koran though. If this is the case the alpha male might allow a gay man on board to help him control the women.
https://quran.com/4/24
http://www.justislam.co.uk/product.php?products_id=103
Saturday, 20 May 2017
Why we are now an Idiocracy
Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.
The most important rule of marriage - now absolutely forgotten in the West - is that our sex partner must be our spouse and we can only have one at a time (unless we are a Muslim man and even then only if we can afford to have more than one up to a maximum of four and have the patience and time to make a good show of being fair to them). Not only must our spouse be fuckable, s/he must be a good for a long term relationship and have the characteristics of a good parent such as patience and a caring nature. Marriage is therefore an additional filter for the people we find fuckable because it tells us that it is wrong to fuck people just because we find them fuckable for they must also be good for a long term relationship with children. Even if we don't find them that fuckable, as women we should still prefer someone whom we think is a good prospect as a long term partner and parent than someone we find merely fuckable. If we ignore these rules, our race gets stupider and stupider and our government more and more corrupt until we are now where we are in the West with our morals in the toilet like a turd about to be flushed away.
Women should bear in mind that men are not that fussy, according MGTOW Is Freedom. According to him, men who are single and looking just want their spouse to be good enough, and want every woman they meet to be The One, so they can stop looking.
From the 9th minute:
Sunday, 5 February 2017
What I propose is already being done
Crazy tweets by insane BNP-reject Claire Khaw featured in this article.https://t.co/a7RAd5V2cp@ntfem— Homophobia kills (@LabourGay) January 26, 2017
@ResistingHate This is hate speech and very worrying, no doubt the authorities are keeping an eye.— JayT❄ (@TjayJT) January 26, 2017
@TjayJT @ResistingHate What I propose is similarly being proposed by the august institutions mentioned at https://t.co/cYjwJ0ktW1— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics launched an enquiry in 2006 into critical care in fetal and neonatal medicine, looking at the ethical, social and legal issues which may arise when making decisions surrounding treating extremely premature babies.
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, in its submission, recommended that a public debate be started around the options of "non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia" for "the sickest of newborns". The College stated that there should be discussion over whether "deliberate intervention" to cause death in severely disabled newborn babies should be legalised; it stated that while it was not necessarily in favour of the move, it felt the issues should be debated. The College stated in this submission that having these options would save some families from years of emotional and financial suffering; it might also reduce the number of late abortions, "as some parents would be more confident about continuing a pregnancy and taking a risk on outcome". In response to this proposal, Pieter Sauer, a senior paediatrician in the Netherlands, argued that British neonatologists already perform "mercy killings" and should be allowed to do so openly.
The Church of England submission to the enquiry supported the view that doctors should be given the right to withhold treatment from seriously disabled newborn babies in exceptional circumstances, and the Christian Medical Fellowship stated that when treatment would be "a burden" this was not euthanasia.
— Resisting Hate (@ResistingHate) January 30, 2017
@ResistingHate @TjayJT You do not like it when I successfully defend myself, do you?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
— Resisting Hate (@ResistingHate) January 30, 2017
@ResistingHate @TjayJT I don't expect libtards to debate honestly, actually. To be libtard is to debate dishonestly.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
@ResistingHate @TjayJT Just pointing out to you that what I propose is also being proposed by The Nuffield Council on Bioethics.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
@ResistingHate @TjayJT Just pointing out to you what I propose is also being proposed by The Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
@ResistingHate @TjayJT Just pointing out to you what I propose is also being proposed by The C of E and The Christian Medical Fellowship.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
@TjayJT @ResistingHate Exploring ethical issues in biology and medicine https://t.co/KoszFPk898 The implications of this is clear.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
@TjayJT @ResistingHate Outrage as Church backs calls for severely disabled babies to be killed at birth— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
Read more: https://t.co/Yg7HjDjNik
— JayT❄ (@TjayJT) January 30, 2017
— Resisting Hate (@ResistingHate) January 30, 2017
@ResistingHate @TjayJT I am not ranting, my dear, just explaining to you why I am right about everything.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
@ntfem @resistinghate @tjayjt She is an isolated fantasist, take no notice. She wants to be on the media & is trying to shock for attention.— Nora Chance (@Dora_Chance) January 30, 2017
@Dora_Chance @ResistingHate @TjayJT It is scary to live in a country where telling the truth is a revolutionary act. https://t.co/gsPK4dpb4D— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 30, 2017
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 31, 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_in_ancient_Rome#Roman_laws_on_disability
The Twelve Tables included a law that said disabled or deformed children should be put to death, usually by stoning.
In addition, Dionysius of Halicarnassus wrote that the city's founder Romulus required children who were born disabled to be exposed on a hillside. Historians think that this was a fairly common practice due to a believed high number of congenital defects, which are sourced due to poor nutrition, incest, and disease.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pater_familias#Children
The laws of the Twelve Tables required the pater familias to ensure that "obviously deformed" infants were put to death. The survival of congenitally disabled adults, conspicuously evidenced among the elite by the partially-lame Emperor Claudius, demonstrates that personal choice was exercised in the matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Ironside
Ironside received attention after her appearance on BBC One's religious discussion programme, Sunday Morning Live, in 2010. She stated "If a baby's going to be born severely disabled or totally unwanted, surely an abortion is the act of a loving mother." and added "If I were the mother of a suffering child - I mean a deeply suffering child - I would be the first to want to put a pillow over its face... If it was a child I really loved, who was in agony, I think any good mother would."
http://www.freethesaurus.com/terefah
The questionable viability of newly born infants, due, at least in part, to doubts as to whether they were premature or full-term, led Jewish law to exempt one who kills a child less than thirty days old from human prosecution, just as it treats the person who kills the terefah.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9710426/Children-placed-on-controversial-death-pathway.html
Monday, 7 November 2016
The US Presidential Elections and the politics of race and sex
It is college-educated women who cannot abide Trump. Polls have suggested that if women did not vote, Trump would easily win by a landslide.
If only women voted, Trump would lose.
Genders divided in the US - if only men voted, Donald Trump would win by a landslide
Don't blame Jews, Communists, Socialists or Cultural Marxists for the decline of Western nations, blame indiscriminate universal suffrage and women who were given the vote and then ended up using it against men by voting for parties that promise more regulation to protect feckless women and higher taxes to support those who ended up husbandless because they believed in feminist propaganda.
Both the women featured in these exchanges intend to vote Democrat: the pretty one and the fat one at https://www.rt.com/uk/365663-presidential-election-americans-britain/
Females are libtard.
So why are women libtard?
Because men prefer women to be kind and stupid, this is what women make themselves appear to be, to make themselves more attractive to the majority of men who have this preference.
However, instead of just being kind and stupid towards men of their own race and nationality, they are also kind and stupid towards men of other races and nationalities, who seem much more interesting than the men of their own race and nation.
Being women, they have the excuse of of their sex to take no interest whatsoever in foreign policy and have no view about the neocon wars which Hillary Clinton keeps waging.
Men are endogamous, women exogamous.
White men who melodramatically complain about white genocide have only themselves to blame if they continue to refuse to shame sluts who have sex with men not their husband.
Sadly, most white men dare not shame sluts for transparently self-serving reasons. Most white men and women are in fact unmarriageable. Being unmarriageable, extramarital sex is the only kind of sex they can ever hope to get. Because their culture and practice of sexual liberation necessitates having more than one sex partner, their perceived status is linked to how many sex partners they can attract and have.
The plight of the white race is a morality tale of lust, one of the seven dead sins. It is certainly deadly to Western civilisation. This morality tale is representative of how urgent and imperative is the male desire for sex. It is also illustrative of how marriage as a practice maintained the quality of the gene pool and how its desecration as an institution resulted in degeneracy and Western malaise.
Those who wish to overthrow the matriarchy and re-establish the patriarchy will find it useful to acknowledge that most men will do almost anything for sex, including marry.
Making sex the privilege of only couples married to each other would prevent unmarriageable people from reproducing and contaminating the gene pool with their bastards, thereby lowering standards.
The only problem is that the white man is hooked on the idea of extramarital sex as his human right and this is an entitlement he will not give it up without a fierce and injurious struggle.
When he regards with horror and loathing brown Muslim immigrants swarming into his previously white country, it is not just racial resentment he feels, but also fear and loathing of their religion which threatens his Culture of Sexual Liberation and Fornication and Sodomy.
Little does he know that it is in embracing Islam that would allow him the means of regaining control of his women again, for all the Abrahamic faiths promote and maintain the patriarchy through their indispensable ingredient of marriage.
No one will see the point of marriage if extramarital sex is easily obtainable, cheap and free, so it must be forbidden and punished. This means sluts must be shamed to significantly restrict the supply of extramarital sex.
What I am doing - proposing that extramarital sex become a sexual offence - is the equivalent of telling the Aztecs to give up human sacrifice.
"Over our dead bodies!" they cry.
But what other solution is there?
http://ipfactly.com/human-sacrifice-10-aztec-sacrifice-facts/
If only women voted, Trump would lose.
Genders divided in the US - if only men voted, Donald Trump would win by a landslide
Don't blame Jews, Communists, Socialists or Cultural Marxists for the decline of Western nations, blame indiscriminate universal suffrage and women who were given the vote and then ended up using it against men by voting for parties that promise more regulation to protect feckless women and higher taxes to support those who ended up husbandless because they believed in feminist propaganda.
Both the women featured in these exchanges intend to vote Democrat: the pretty one and the fat one at https://www.rt.com/uk/365663-presidential-election-americans-britain/
Females are libtard.
So why are women libtard?
Because men prefer women to be kind and stupid, this is what women make themselves appear to be, to make themselves more attractive to the majority of men who have this preference.
However, instead of just being kind and stupid towards men of their own race and nationality, they are also kind and stupid towards men of other races and nationalities, who seem much more interesting than the men of their own race and nation.
Being women, they have the excuse of of their sex to take no interest whatsoever in foreign policy and have no view about the neocon wars which Hillary Clinton keeps waging.
Men are endogamous, women exogamous.
White men who melodramatically complain about white genocide have only themselves to blame if they continue to refuse to shame sluts who have sex with men not their husband.
Sadly, most white men dare not shame sluts for transparently self-serving reasons. Most white men and women are in fact unmarriageable. Being unmarriageable, extramarital sex is the only kind of sex they can ever hope to get. Because their culture and practice of sexual liberation necessitates having more than one sex partner, their perceived status is linked to how many sex partners they can attract and have.
The plight of the white race is a morality tale of lust, one of the seven dead sins. It is certainly deadly to Western civilisation. This morality tale is representative of how urgent and imperative is the male desire for sex. It is also illustrative of how marriage as a practice maintained the quality of the gene pool and how its desecration as an institution resulted in degeneracy and Western malaise.
Those who wish to overthrow the matriarchy and re-establish the patriarchy will find it useful to acknowledge that most men will do almost anything for sex, including marry.
Making sex the privilege of only couples married to each other would prevent unmarriageable people from reproducing and contaminating the gene pool with their bastards, thereby lowering standards.
The only problem is that the white man is hooked on the idea of extramarital sex as his human right and this is an entitlement he will not give it up without a fierce and injurious struggle.
When he regards with horror and loathing brown Muslim immigrants swarming into his previously white country, it is not just racial resentment he feels, but also fear and loathing of their religion which threatens his Culture of Sexual Liberation and Fornication and Sodomy.
Little does he know that it is in embracing Islam that would allow him the means of regaining control of his women again, for all the Abrahamic faiths promote and maintain the patriarchy through their indispensable ingredient of marriage.
No one will see the point of marriage if extramarital sex is easily obtainable, cheap and free, so it must be forbidden and punished. This means sluts must be shamed to significantly restrict the supply of extramarital sex.
What I am doing - proposing that extramarital sex become a sexual offence - is the equivalent of telling the Aztecs to give up human sacrifice.
"Over our dead bodies!" they cry.
But what other solution is there?
http://ipfactly.com/human-sacrifice-10-aztec-sacrifice-facts/
There are many reasons for the Aztec defeat at the hands of the Spanish in 1521, one of which was the ritual of human sacrifice. Firstly, this bloodthirsty practice made them many enemies among neighbouring tribes. These other tribes formed alliances with the Spanish and helped them defeat the Aztecs. It is also thought that the high number of human sacrifices made each year (up to 20,000) physically affected their chances of success because they simply had fewer people than they could have had to offer a better resistance.
Monday, 27 July 2015
The degeneracy of the West is evidenced by its rejection of any idea that points to its degeneracy
The badges of being a degenerate:
The person who wrote https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/33xk5h/dr_penman_or_how_i_stopped_worrying_and_learned/ accusing Penman of supporting eugenics but was too cowardly to give his or her name is not a social conservative either.
If you are a social conservative then you believe in the law supporting marriage through forbidding and punishing extramarital sex and privileging the married and their children over the unmarried.
If you call social conservatives fascists or Nazis, you must be a libtard. A libtard is a feminist believes that sex between consenting adults is no business of the government and that extramarital sex is a human right.
Most Western voters are libtards and all Western politicians pander to libtard sexual preferences because they are so cowardly and corrupt they prefer to remain in office rather than correct grave and continuing errors.
Instead of denying that she wanted to legalise inceset, she blocked me.
The Decline and Fall of the West | Dr. Jim Penman and Stefan Molyneux
- an inability to understand the concept of degeneracy
- denying that one is degenerate
- denying that the West is degenerate
- believing that degeneracy is not his or her problem
- having no shame that one is in denial about one's degeneracy
- being incapable either individually or collectively of uncompromisingly supporting marriage
- being incapable of understanding or pretending not to understand that supporting marriage means logically and necessarily forbidding and punishing extramarital sex
- being incapable of understanding or pretending not to understand that marriage is eugenic and bastardy dysgenic
- believing that degeneracy is not the problem of the degenerate because it will be the problem of the next generation
- really not knowing or pretending not to know why Muslims do not wish to integrate into a culture that has turned most Western men into pussywhipped degenerate cowards lower than sluts afraid to uncompromisingly support marriage and denounce/renounce feminism
- feeling no shame that one is a selfish atheist childless sex-addicted libtard who only cares about the next sexual encounter and doesn't give a damn about what happens after he or she is dead
Biohistory? My thoughts on Jim Penman’s book: http://t.co/HkjUGs4XWy via @Peter_Turchin
— Peter Turchin (@Peter_Turchin) June 15, 2015
@Peter_Turchin The question you ask in the penultimate paragraph of your blog is easily answered: religion/morality/law/culture/practice.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 5, 2015
@ntfem I am a scientist, and I require a bit more detail, theoretical and empirical
— Peter Turchin (@Peter_Turchin) July 6, 2015
@Peter_Turchin You are an empiricist demanding to see evidence when the use of deductive reasoning would serve you better.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 6, 2015
@ntfem Actually, I do both theory and data. Deductive reasoning needs to be converted into a mathematical model. Penman doesn't do it.
— Peter Turchin (@Peter_Turchin) July 6, 2015
@Peter_Turchin You are not a social conservative, are you?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 6, 2015
@Peter_Turchin Because you are not a social conservative and a social liberal, you would wish to undermine the arguments of #biohistory.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 9, 2015
@Peter_Turchin I put it you that you are avoiding my question at https://t.co/ZpbkpI3hlI because you are *not* a social conservative.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 9, 2015
@Peter_Turchin I repeat my question at https://t.co/ZpbkpI3hlI: you are not a social conservative, are you?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 9, 2015
The person who wrote https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/33xk5h/dr_penman_or_how_i_stopped_worrying_and_learned/ accusing Penman of supporting eugenics but was too cowardly to give his or her name is not a social conservative either.
If you are a social conservative then you believe in the law supporting marriage through forbidding and punishing extramarital sex and privileging the married and their children over the unmarried.
If you call social conservatives fascists or Nazis, you must be a libtard. A libtard is a feminist believes that sex between consenting adults is no business of the government and that extramarital sex is a human right.
Most Western voters are libtards and all Western politicians pander to libtard sexual preferences because they are so cowardly and corrupt they prefer to remain in office rather than correct grave and continuing errors.
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml If it is not the purpose of government to promote the long term national interest, what is it for?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
— gail (@g_a_i_l_c) July 26, 2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@ntfem @oakjim @bbcsml don't make silly assumptions! Look at my tweets & read what I think about animal issues.
— gail (@g_a_i_l_c) July 26, 2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml What business is it of the state's if a father has sex with his daughter?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
— gail (@g_a_i_l_c) July 26, 2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml Why won't you answer my question on whether you would like to repeal the law against incest?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml I know what my answer is, but I have no idea about yours. It is looking bad that you won't answer though.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml Consenting adults: daughter over 18 having sex with her father who is also 18.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml Consenting adults: brother over 18 having sex with his sister who is also over 18.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml Consenting adults: grandmother over 18 having sex with grandson who is also over 18.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml Consenting adults: grandfather over 18 who is having sex with his granddaughter who is also over 18.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml I ask you again: do you think incest should be legalised? You can phone a friend since you are obviously unsure.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
@g_a_i_l_c @oakjim @bbcsml There are people who think incest should be legalised. Are you one of them?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 26, 2015
Instead of denying that she wanted to legalise inceset, she blocked me.
The Decline and Fall of the West | Dr. Jim Penman and Stefan Molyneux
Monday, 18 May 2015
Marriage acted as a constraint on the degenerative consequences of casual sex
@AnthonyLarme Marriage and rational female preferences were the two filters of the next generation. Now feminism has utterly destroyed both.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@ntfem Agreed - and many in the MRM would likewise concur
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme MRMs should stop calling themselves MRMs and instead call themselves antifeminists. War needs to be declared on feminism.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The only credit I am prepared to give @MikeBuchanan11 is that he dared to call himself an antifeminist.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The attractions of purely recreational sex cannot be underestimated in a cultural n political environment of sexual liberation
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme When you think about it, human females AKA sluts actually make LESS RATIONAL reproductive decisions than LOWER ANIMALS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Females of the animal kingdom do not have casual sex. The stakes are too high for them and so they choose very carefully.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The least a female animal can do is choose the father of her offspring for strength, size or some positive characteristic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
Now, a slut going clubbing on the pull would choose a male sex partner for the size of his sex organ, knowing nothing about him. She might have sex in a toilet with him and possibly find herself knocked up a few months later, having forgotten even his name, if indeed he gave her his real name at the time.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1182373/Welcome-binge-Britain-Polish-photographer-documents-years-drunken-revelry-Cardiff.html
@AnthonyLarme Marriage and rational female preferences were the two filters of the next generation. Now feminism has utterly destroyed both.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme If the female is foolish she would have been constrained by family pressure from marrying the coachman, so to speak.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
An adolescent aristocratic female is likely to find her coachman more attractive than males of her own class. Familiarity breeds contempt, after all. Coachmen would be hired on the basis of their looks. Should an aristocratic father allow his daughter to marry or fuck as she pleases? What do you think, dear reader?
@AnthonyLarme The safeguards that existed before: shame, parental pressure, a sense of self-preservation/-interest are all but destroyed now
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme There really is nothing now to stop the stupid irresponsible promiscuous female from doing exactly as she pleases.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme So, really, all the sex education anyone really needs is contained in 4:15, 4:16 and 24:2 of the Koran. NOTHING ELSE NEEDED.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
Wednesday, 4 March 2015
The British matriarchy was established in 1974 when Keith Joseph's career was destroyed by sluts
@ntfem re: your continual dislike of whining by men ... why do I do it? why do many other anti-feminists do it? ... cont....
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 4, 2015
@ntfem b/c PC/feminism = power via exclusive victimhood. To destroy that power, you have to destroy their exclusive victimhood narrative.
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 4, 2015
@ntfem also, if you want strong, confident men to take charge and destroy feminism, how can men do this without taking care of themselves?
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme It is just a matter of how you frame your complaints. Saying "Pity me" is not going to enhance the complainant's masculinity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme A man who is a victim is in the same position as a rape victim in terms of marriageability. No one wants to touch soiled goods
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme When people see victims whom they think deserve to be victims cos of their obvious unattractiveness, they don't get support.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme As I have said, the obvious sub-alpha male status of these beta male complainants instinctively arouses pity and contempt.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I have told antifeminists many a time that the first thing they must do is find a leader who has alpha qualities.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme They probably won't do it because the ones I am talking to wants to be leader of the pack, like that pathetic Mike Buchanan.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Everything about Mike Buchanan is the opposite of persuasive. He alienates his audience INSTANTLY cos of his charmlessness.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme If @MikeBuchanan11 insists on doing it all himself the least he can do is get some media training to project himself better.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme When infantilised men think the only way to get what they want is through snivelling victimhood they are beyond help.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I have also said before that beta males will never accept the authority of another obviously beta male. @MikeBuchanan11
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme While I understand that beta males are really the victims of feminism, these victims should not be led by another beta male.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Being led by a beta male will immediately lower the status of your group. Isn't this OBVIOUS?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme There is also a reason why no alpha male will want to involve himself in antifeminism: because he knows he will lose status.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I am the only person able to do the job willing to do the job, but masculine/racial pride prevents you from accepting my help.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I know Mike Buchanan would rather fail than accept my help because his little man pride won't allow him to do so.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme If antifeminism were being led by an alpha male he would not feel threatened by me at all, but Mike Buchanan is sub-alpha.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The last line of defence of the sub alpha male is "I don't want to and you can't make me" and this Mike Buchanan is using.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme What I have said illustrates why it is CRUCIAL beta males only choose their leader and that women must not be allowed to do so
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I do realise that saying this means calling into question female suffrage, and I am not suggesting that it be abolished.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The best way of modifying the existence of female suffrage is to introduce the principle of no representation without taxation
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Under no representation without taxation most women wd be disenfranchised after abolition of anti-discrimination legislation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Not only should there be no representation without taxation I propose to free the low-waged from the burden of paying taxes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Once the welfare-claiming classes have been disenfranchised, beta males can choose their leader without feminine interference.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme http://t.co/iqNgNJbltc “Women usually vote for the more handsome man" and *despise* men like Mike Buchanan,.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Not only is Mike Buchanan not doing the antifeminist movement any good he is lowering the status of men associated with it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Because antifeminists are so fragmented Mike Buchanan is probably the only fish in his tiny pond.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme His little man's pride will make cling on to what little status he thinks he has. Mike Buchanan will not give in gracefully.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Mike Buchanan will not admit that he is not the best leader for antifeminism and will continue not to engage with me at all.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme By not engaging with me or discussing or denouncing them Mike Buchanan thinks he is depriving me of the oxygen of publicity
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The Mike Buchanan syndrome of beta male hopelessness is why the vote should not have been extended indiscriminately to women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Do not forget that it was the female vote that put New Labour in power. Attractive men are usually incorrigibly shallow/vain.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Don't forget that that women will always vote to lower standards of sexual morality because they think it benefits them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did. http://t.co/qXXP6MBANk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme 78% of warmongering female MPs were Blair's Babes from Labour's all-women shortlists http://t.co/DXqFmDdb6c
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties http://t.co/bYwOq5QanX
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme It is time men dared to propose holistic and radical solutions like mine or at the very least discuss them amongst themselves.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Perhaps the reason why cowardly Mike Buchanan won't even engage with me on this is because he fears to be thought an extremist
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I think it has 2b acknowledged that I have managed to make all my points without ever trying to make anyone feel sorry for me.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Young men prepared to fight this join ISIS leaving senescent n scared beta males to whinge like women weakly weekly, it seems.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Beta males applying to the matriarchy to be pitied and have their grievances acknowledged and addressed is a mug's game.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The pity of it is that these pathetic beta males do not even dare to suggest that indiscriminate universal suffrage was wrong.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Beta males presenting the matriarchy with a list of complaints will be brushed aside, but those with a solution would not be.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme That there is no man in the Anglosphere able to present the case against antifeminism competently and boldly is a tragedy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I had hoped that some ambitious politician with alpha qualities would wish to take my ideas and run with them but not at all.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme In the Liberal West where free speech supposedly exists NOT A SINGLE SENIOR POLITICIAN Is prepared to discuss my ideas.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The beta males I am in touch with can't/won't do anything because they dislike my ideas or want to suppress my ideas.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme A Prime Minister in waiting Keith Joseph did propose ideas resembling mine in 1974, 41 years ago and his career was destroyed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme http://t.co/9teiATrNsR has a transcript of Keith Joseph's speech when he warned "our human stock is threatened" *BY SLUTS*.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme How likely are these effete/effeminate PC politicians to criticise Slut Single Mothers when it hasn't been done for 41 years?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme So this the reality of the pornocracy of the West, you can be sure that the US President will not be criticising sluts either.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Think about it: the man supposed to be the most powerful man in the world - the US President - is actually LOWER THAN A SLUT.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
"We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise."
@AnthonyLarme When oppressed men cannot find male leaders to lead them and feel they can only resort to feminine stratagems the end is nigh.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme It is of course the lack of a patriarchal religion that reduced Western men to a bunch of snivelling incompetents in denial.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme If Christianity is kaput and stuffed with the very enemies it ought to be denouncing, the only religion left is Islam.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The difference between an alpha male and a beta male: the alpha male is not afraid to act according to logic and truth.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The difference between an alpha and a beta male: the beta male is really a coward always afraid of what people will think.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme White beta males reduced to effeminate whingeing because that was probably all they saw their single mother doing.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Beta males reduced to this pathetic state probably cos they never knew their fathers who might have taught them something else
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Again and again it is immoral women you should be blaming but beta males want to have sex with immoral women ie sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Because men want to have sex with women even immoral women they will always instinctively defer to sluts they want to fuck.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Beta males without sound morals would be attracted to this murdering slut. http://t.co/VYYD6iDtzx
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Chauvinistic dishonourable stupidly stubborn beta males will continue to insist that their pornocracy is better than Islam.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@AnthonyLarme There is no doubt in my mind who will win this clash of civilisations now that Islam has declared war on the West.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015
@ntfem Mike Buchanan seems to want to change the feminist system from within the feminist system, playing by their rules.
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Then he is a supplicant and that would just lower his status which would be counter-productive when his status is already low.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@ntfem the Western world's most powerful men - big Govt. & big business - are wedded to feminism, seemingly forever. Hard 2 topple.
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Alpha males won't know till too late how feminism has them by the goolies. Many former alpha males are now convicted paedos.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@ntfem So, do *you* wish 2 destroy the feminist victim narrative (women = victim/men = perpetrators)? If so, how? Less voting rights/quotas?
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015
@AnthonyLarme I have already proposed that there should be representation without taxation which is gender neutral.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@ntfem 4 an alpha man 2 lead against feminism, he'd have 2 affirm tradit. sex morality & go against what makes most rich men rich (feminism)
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Alpha males with their sex addiction, atheism and corrupted morals will not be doing anything of the sort to help beta males.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Most these so-called alpha males happily admit that they are not going to fight cos they think "This will last my lifetime."
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@AnthonyLarme They think "By the time the shit hits the fan I will be dead." They fear their wives will divorce them and no fault divorce.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
@AnthonyLarme You may continue waiting to find a white alpha male to represent you, but perhaps your only real option is to make do with me.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Maronite Christian @GBkishere tells us the story of his life
1:00 Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take. 2:00 Maronite Christianity explained. 3:00 Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...
