How's that @Theocracy4all ? pic.twitter.com/fMkj0EHg9s— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 11, 2019
Perfect! Thank you.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
I see @Theocracy4all hasn't actually addressed any of my arguments or internalised any of my lessons... I guess I'll continue to pay her the same courtesy ! pic.twitter.com/nrwJTcHXU1— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 11, 2019
What were the arguments and lessons you were referring to?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
To say one would or could be X is not quite the same thing as saying one is. Are you familiar with the subjunctive mood?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
It is very disappointing that my ideological sister in theocracy is not familiar with the subjunctive mood. I fear and won't have heard of Montaigne either, who said that grammar is the logic of language. Very few are capable of nuanced thinking in these degenerate days, alas! https://t.co/NZHQQ1Fq3o— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
but mine aren't ironic? even tho I told you the point of the theocracy was for the purpose of educating people that all systems of human governance are computationally equivalent to theocracy. https://t.co/SnWj1hkI6s— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 11, 2019
You are a theocracy if you follow the laws of God. Nobody is clear which deity you worship nor what religion you follow.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
I guess that means we're in a permanent theocracy because the laws of God cannot be broken.— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 11, 2019
Aren't the Ten Commandments the laws of God?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 11, 2019
Aren't the Ten Commandments divine laws?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
ya I get it, when you do immoral things, it's "just bantz". when you get it put back on you, it's "morally reprehensible". I already know you have a circular logic wherein you're always right and your opponent is always wrong. I even illustrated it. https://t.co/Am7M2uhsfi— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 11, 2019
What "immoral things" are you accusing me of?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
Are you confusing physical laws with moral laws?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
I am accused of doing unspecified "immoral things". https://t.co/ceInVtMSzo— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
I am deeply impressed by your powers of analysis. No one understands me better than you, it seems. Can souls collide and merge? https://t.co/zWy91cQpIy— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 11, 2019
The mind is quantum mechanical in 11 dimensions - any number of those can become entangled between entities. But it would not be a merging per se. You need to learn more quantum psychology before the answer is clear! https://t.co/4CfsrAN4Nx https://t.co/MLohuEksKW— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 11, 2019
I have heard that two spiral galaxies can merge to form an elliptical galaxy.https://t.co/vycnybaoth— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
I find this rather beautiful. https://t.co/CHuKmeitJ2— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Whether we find certain things beautiful is nothing to do with how we should behave towards each other, is it?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
morality is able to be determined scientifically, and has been since antiquity. obviously fidelity to truth creates beauty, same with morality and so they can hardly be said to be unrelated. https://t.co/Xb1QWdfw1j— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 12, 2019
How is morality determined scientifically?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
you bring me the moral quandary / sociological degeneracy and I will give you the scientific remedy. hard mode: no bogeymans (i.e.: 'matriarchy') https://t.co/QoWHokHxUU— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 12, 2019
Why do you think your method is better than mine?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
bc science pic.twitter.com/jBZaKdu62A— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) April 12, 2019
I am afraid that does not answer my question.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
We are fellow travellers in that we seek the moral regeneration of the West. Her view is that inner transformation is necessary before there is political transformation. I say a big idea and a grand plan is first necessary to interest and inspire a broad section of the public.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Church of Entropy and I want the other to convert to her ideology. If should only be a matter of time before she acknowledges that Secular Koranism is more easily understood than Periodic Tablism which is based on a category error that physical laws are the same as moral laws.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Church of Entropy knows she is on weak ground when she is asked if she considers the Ten Commandments God's laws. We already know she rejects the Abrahamic faiths as Jewish and wants everyone to reject them on this basis alone. Paganism is an extremist antisemitic manifestation.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Church of Entropy rejects written authority because she regards written authority as inferior, for some reason. Principles are what protect us from error and Hinduism is a failed religion of a failed civilisation that will never reach global dominance because of its idolatry.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Hinduism has no known principles other than that of not eating beef, believing in reincarnation and their cursed and divisive caste system making them hate their government and convert to Sikhism and Islam.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Islam is a universalist religion capable of making the world a better place while allowing individual nations to keep their individuality protecting them from globohomo and the feminazis. Her refusal to read the Koran is be evidence of sloth, bad faith and cowardice, in my view.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
While those of low education/IQ cannot be expected to read a scripture intended to change their views that have become part of their identity because they have nothing other than hatred of Jews, Muslims and non-whites to bind them together, Jen must be held to a higher standard.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
A graduate is supposed to be an educated person who should already know you have to read a book before you can judge its contents. Educated people must also be expected not to make basic category errors and confuse the people they hate and fear with a book they refuse to read.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Once you read the Koran, you will know how little people who call themselves Muslims follow it, just as those who call themselves Jews and Christians ignore their scripture. Hinduism and Buddhism have abstract principles that the average person will not apply without the law.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
A wise person looks at the fruits of any other persons religion.— The Sobriety Sessions (@Jeffrey32576537) April 12, 2019
And we know that idolatrous Christianity is kaput. Leaderless Western men therefore need a new religion and political system. Because they are now willfully blind because they are unprincipled and leaderless, they have become cattle unable to stand up for any principle.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Men of other nations understandably regard a race of leaderless men with no guiding principles afraid of their immoral women who are unmarried mothers indifferent to the parenting of their usually variously fathered illegitimate offspring as ripe for exploitation.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
What is worse than being an immoral unmarried mother badly parenting her variously fathered illegitimate offspring? Men afraid of such women. What is worse than being men afraid of immoral unmarried mothers? Men afraid of men afraid of immoral unmarried mothers, all cursed by God— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Curses for Disobedience https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+28&version=NIV
Blaming the government is complaining about the symptoms. Political activism must be more than complaining about the symptoms. Leaderless godless men cannot be expected to speak the truth, exercise logic or uphold principles. They already have the excuse of being cattle.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
We can already see a pincer movement of Jews and Muslims ganging up with each other to marginalise Roger Scruton, an adherent of a failed religion who can't act decisively because he is doddery and uncertain after the hatred he has expressed for them.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Are you claiming that the people who reject Secular Koranism are not mostly antisemites and Islamophobes who think they are too cool for rules?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
The rules of Islam are contained in the Koran, which should be regarded as a handbook for how you should run your society. If you have a handbook and don't follow or read it because you think you know everything and are too cool for rules, then expect things to go wrong.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Do you know what a category error is? The one you keep making is the one of confusing the people you wish were not in your country with a book you will never read.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jewish-answers-to-suffering-and-evil/I think you mean that Islam has created Muslims - the people in your country whom you regard as a problem. I take a more Jewish view of things in that problems are sent by God to try us and make us more civilised if we solve problems with wisdom and justice.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Low IQ/education people respond to problems using only visual cues. They hate immigration and regard Muslims as the immigrant group they most hate and fear. They also hate Jews because it is in their DNA after so many centuries of Christianity. The problem is usury and feminism.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
Since the majority group ie white beta males hooked on usury and feminism, they will not be wanting to use slut-shaming usury-banning Secular Koranism to solve the problems of usury and feminism. So they sit back, comfortable with complaining about the Jewish problem, as always.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
If I really were talking nonsense, you would not understand me. Do you really think that any society can survive in a healthy state if they do not practise marriage and family values ie have laws that support patriarchal moral values. A matriarchy: a society run by immoral women.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
What is an immoral woman? An obviously immoral woman is a mother of illegitimate offspring. Those who do not support the shaming of immoral women are themselves also morally compromised cowards, especially if they already know what the problem is and cannot deny it.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
You yourself have admitted that you don't want to restore the patriarchy because you do not wish to marry again. I will never sweeten the pill for people too degenerate to admit the truth. I have no idea why you think I would force you to marry again.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
You seem to think that restoring the patriarchy would force you into marrying again, which is not the case. I think you reject the restoration of the patriarchy because you fear to alienate the people around you who most definitely do not want it restored. I understand.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) April 12, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment