Mark Collett blames Jews for uncontrolled immigration.
James Goddard prefers to be alarmist about Muslims and Communism.
Who is British is who is a UK citizen.
14:00 MC is not married to the mother of his daughter.
25:00 MC paints a nightmare scenario of his daughter growing up in a Britain that is both black and Muslim and lists the people he wants expelled.
26:00 MC thinks of beating the LGBT agenda without using religion.
27:00 MC objects to the countryside being desecrated with housing developments to accommodate immigrants.
29:00 MC talks about Muslim grooming gangs and the loss of community of whites. That is because Christianity is kaput.
32:00 MC points out that an ethnostate does not mean there are no minorities.
34:00 MC talks about having non-white people on his show but he won't have me on his show. The last time I spoke to MC was in this video.
40:00 MC invites people to imagine Britain being run by blacks as whites in South Africa have a government run by blacks.
43:00 JG says Muslims are scarier than blacks.
44:00 MC paints a black picture of Africans heading to Europe and Britain.
46:00 JG talks about the evil of Islam.
50:00 But for immigration ....
52:00 MC conflates a failure of law enforcement with immigration.
53:00 JG proposes the repatriation of Muslims.
59:00 Boris Johnson and the NHS
1:00:00 Health tourism
1:01:00 Why can't we train our own doctors and nurses? Education, education, education.
1:02:00 Globalism and Islam
1:03:00 Traditional Britain
1:04:00 The enemies of white people
1:06:00 MC never once considers the failure of Christianity.
1:07:00 Globalist and nationalist Jews
1:08:00 The hypocrisy of Liberal Jews
1:09:00 Barbara Lerner Spectre
1:10:00 Porn, Jeffrey Epstein, Mossad,
1:11:00 Ezra Levant,, Tommy Robinson, Robert Maxwell, Prince Charles
1:13:00 Paedophilia
1:15:00 Islam, Communism and the political class
1:15:00 Fragmentation of the Right
1:16:00 The marginalisation of the white working class
1:19:00 Tommy Robinson
1:20:00 Israel First
1:21:00 JG is a Zionist.
1:23:00 Israel, America and AIPAC
2:16:00 The Islamophobia of James Goddard
Inclusive debates of this nature are moronic and a waste of time and energy. There should be a proposal of a particular course of action or a statement asserting the truth of something that can be affirmed or opposed. The participants would be the proposer and opposer. The debates I would favour are:
- Should the patriarchy be restored?
- Is patriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers?
- Is matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers?
- In a war between a patriarchy and a matriarchy, which do you think is more likely to be socially cohesive and militarily efficient?
- Does feminism bribe men with fornication to keep them quiescent under their matriarchy?
- Do nationalists believe that extramarital sex is their human right?
- Do nationalists know that all the world religions forbid extramarital sex?
- Do nationalists know that there are more unmarried parents in Britain than there are married parents? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html
- Do nationalists know that the link between illegitimacy and criminality is well-established? https://rightwingnews.com/top-news/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty/
- If it is agreed that patriarchy should be restored, must sluts be shamed?
- Are sluts women who have sex with men not their husband, especially if they are unmarried mothers?
- Should unmarried parents be treated as sex offenders as quran.com/24/2 prescribes?
- If unmarried parents are to be shamed, what else but Secular Koranism would do the job?
- If you don't want to shame unmarried parents, is it because you are not a married father and do not plan to become one?
- If you are complaining about immigration but refuse to support restoring the patriarchy, are you in the dishonourable position of wishing to wound but being afraid to strike?
- Only patriarchy would produce enough good strong men capable of defending the national interest.
- In a matriarchy, all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother, including POTUS.
- Is marriage eugenic and illegitimacy dysgenic?
- What is the purpose of religion?
- Is Christianity kaput?
- If Christianity is kaput, must it be replaced?
- If Christianity must be replaced because it is kaput, what should it be replaced by?
- If Christianity is not to be replaced by Islam, could it be replaced by Hinduism or Buddhism, which are even more alien to Western traditions?
- Is Judaism divine ethno-nationalism?
- Is Islam divine civic nationalism?
- Is Islam "Judaism Lite"?
- Is Secular Koranism "Islam Lite"? http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
- To get to Ethno-Nationalism, it is necessary to go past Civic Nationalism.
- No society can remain in existence without a religion effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality. The minimum of sexual morality a religion ought to satisfy is ensuring most parents in your society are married parents.
- Should Britain become a one party state?
No comments:
Post a Comment