How I intend to re-organise the Philosophy Syllabus once I am in power

Belief in the Abrahamic God entails belief in the wisdom of His laws and obedience to them. This means belief in God logically and necessarily entails theocracy. Those who object to this do not in fact worship God, but liberal democracy.

Religions have been around for longer than man-made political ideologies, so if we want our civilisation to last, we should choose an Abrahamic faith rather than make up a political ideology that has no official handbook whose unstated principles are easily subverted by vote-hungry politicians. Religion however has ancient scripture containing what are said to be God's laws.

In the West, there are only two possible Abrahamic faiths to choose from for gentiles, and one of them has obviously failed.

Once we and our political classes have come to the inescapable conclusion of changing the official national religion, this would mean changing the political system too.

When this happens, we would have a one party theocracy as naturally as night follows day.

I have a nasty feeling that people are not going to submit to truth and logic, but try to impose on events some peculiar narrative of their own to fend off the inevitable, until the fool does finally what the wise man does at once.

When I am dictatrix of a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism, I will change the syllabus for Philosophy in academia and require that philosophers direct their minds to dividing themselves into two schools of thought: one which sees the wisdom of His laws and one which denies it.

We know which School is going to win the debate on grounds of Truth, Logic and Morality alone, even if I were not dictatrix, don't we?

Could God be addressing Jews, Christians and Muslims in the following terms?

2:09:00  Luke Ford: "Islam is the most powerful religion today because even if it has fewer members than Christianity, its members it does have take its religion so seriously that they are prepared to kill for their religion."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 3, 2018

Religion has always been a weapon of war. I think God intends for Christians and Muslims to slug it out with each other because God if He exists is a Darwinian. He may very well be offended by Christians claiming an executed revolutionary is His co-equal, right, Jews and Muslims? https://t.co/r6wDW78eFZ

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

There is something repulsive, obscene, absurd and unbelievable about asking rational educated people to believe in or subscribe to the lie that a crucified revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God. Is not the obscenity and absurdity of the Trinity obvious to you?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=18&verse=4

Sahih International: And to warn those who say, " Allah has taken a son."

Pickthall: And to warn those who say: Allah hath chosen a son,

Yusuf Ali: Further, that He may warn those (also) who say, "Allah hath begotten a son":

Shakir: And warn those who say: Allah has taken a son.

Muhammad Sarwar: and admonish those who say that God has begotten a son.

Mohsin Khan: And to warn those (Jews, Christians, and pagans) who say, "Allah has begotten a son (or offspring or children)."

Arberry: and to warn those who say, 'God has taken to Himself a son

While Jews acknowledge that they cannot always explain God's mysterious ways, they attach meaning to suffering and try to make philosophical sense of it. @RabbiYMizrachi has suggested that Muslims are the punishment sent by God to Israeli Jews who blatantly flout God's laws.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

If it is indeed true God if He exists sends Muslims to punish Israeli Jews who flout God's laws, does this mean that observant Jews of Israel deserve to be punished too? I think God punishes them for *not* doing enough to prevent the collective chillul Hashem of the secular Jews.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

Has God sent Muslims to punish Christians too? It seems obvious to me that He must be doing to Christians what He did to Jews. However backward, barbaric, savage, primitive and inbred you think Muslims are, they are still doing better than cucked men who claim to be Christians.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

God seems to be saying: "Even if you ignore all my laws but observe just the one about forbidding and punishing fornication with https://t.co/3K8zKsPjZt, you will do better than those who merely pay lip service to marriage and now promote gay marriage, including the Jews."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

God seems to be saying: "Even if you think the holy books of the Abrahamic faiths are works of fiction, you'd still have to admit that the Koran is superior because it guarantees freedom of belief, gives you a flat rate income tax of 20%, allows divorce and forbids fornication."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The Koran would give Muslim converts the moral authority to ban usury allowing the indebted West to default on its debts it must now know it cannot ever repay. All the solutions to all their problems have been sent and delivered. Why won't they open the package?" #Islamophobia

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The God-given reason of Westerners seems to be in abeyance after so many decades of feminism. Is it not obvious that patriarchy is coastal defences while matriarchy - in the form of feminism - is the eternal and eroding sea? Patriarchy can only be restored by theocracy."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"Feminism is a disease of the mind that has eaten away the reasoning capacity of the men as well as destroying their ability to co-operate to defeat their oppressive and parasitic matriarchy. They are mere cattle, content to obey the orders of over-promoted female mediocrities."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"While Muslims have been sent to plague Jews and Christians for their infidelity to God's laws, they too are being punished for theirs. Things will only improve if all acknowledge simple indisputable fact of the conceptual superiority and undeniable inclusiveness of the Koran."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The Old Testament which is for Jews only, forbids Jew on Jew usury, but allows Jews to practise it on gentiles. The Koran forbids it absolutely. The reasons must be obvious by now, especially to these indebted atheists who think themselves so much cleverer than Muslims?"

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The Old Testament does not forbid fornication, the New Testament only weakly at https://t.co/lYEz9IhPCc. The Koran that states clearly its prohibition and the method of punishment. Even the most shameless would wish to avoid publicly administered corporal punishment."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"If I were to send a prophet to warn the wicked people of the West, would I send a white man? He would be immediately destroyed by the matriarchy. A good practical joke would be to send a female and foreigner with excellent communication skills who understands social media."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"Surely no one who has followed Claire Khaw on Twitter can be in any doubt about the solutions she proposes for the declining and degenerate West? The BBC are still in denial. They will not soon complete their 5 Stages of Grief without a bit of help."  https://t.co/nITK5nwVhU

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"Let us hope that the political establishment of the West can digest the full import of Secular Koranism over their summer holidays, and return refreshed to deal with their problems in new, rational and interesting ways." https://t.co/pnHrdJl0ps

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

Comparative religion with the Abrahamic faiths

Identity politics should be replaced by MORALITY POLITICS and there are broadly only TWO kinds of morality

We all have an identity based on the 5 badges of identity.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/the-badges-of-identity.html

We cannot help the race/class/age/sex we are but we can change our minds about morality. There are only two kinds of morality because there are only two sexes.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/there-are-only-two-kinds-of-morality.html

The two kinds of morality the West can have are broadly:

1) patriarchal moral values supported by the Abrahamic faiths and

2) their antithesis being promoted by our degenerate feminist matriarchy. The conflict can be resolved by men depriving most women of the vote (by narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only) and marrying them after abolishing no fault divorce and repealing totalitarian anti-discrimination legislation.

The real reason why Christianity failed

Christianity has failed to protect the patriarchy, so the West is now a degenerate matriarchy with no solutions or moral authority, despised by the barbarians at its gate.

The is no masculine authority anywhere in the West, only despised politicians obeying the dowager empress of the stinking degenerate matriarchy, out of ideas and arguments, unable to answer questions and therefore avoiding debates, like Theresa May.

All religions have prohibitions and all the Abrahamic faiths have particular prohibitions against female promiscuity because God or wise men over the ages have come to realise how standards of sexual morality have everything to do with the health of the patriarchy.

Why has Christianity failed but not the other two Abrahamic faiths?

Because the Christian identity is based on a corrupt bargain.

Jews and Muslims do not agree with the Christian idea of God who is also Jesus.

While Jews and Muslims obey the prohibitions of their scripture, Christians fancy themselves superior because they think they can get away with ignoring all the laws of God as long as they claim to believe that Jesus is simultaneously God Himself and His son and often lie that they do.

The reason why the West is a degenerate matriarchy now is because Christianity has failed to preserve the patriarchy. Totalitarian Christianity was based on making the corrupt bargain of pretending to believe in the absurdity of the Trinity while allowing what God has forbidden ie extramarital sex.

It is now actually impossible to re-establish the patriarchy using Christianity just as it is impossible to cross the ocean in your car.

How feminism has rotted Western civilisation and why it must be eradicated and replaced

Nothing is forever.

All civilisations rise and fall, and all civilisations are empires consisting of different races.

To keep a multicultural and multiracial empire you need a dominant culture and race.

That dominant race will cease to be dominant if it adopts a toxic culture. Currently, Western culture is toxic because what they think is their culture is nothing to do with religion or tradition.

Tradition is what we do to please our fathers and currently, most Western children do not have a father who shares their home or their mother's bed whose word is the last word in the home.

Western culture such as it is, consists of consumption, sexual liberation and spectator sport.

As Jesus once said, man cannot live by bread and circuses alone, or words to that effect.

Judaism is the most high-maintenance religion of all the Abrahamic faiths. It would be impossible for Judaism to continue if Jewish men could not find Jewish wives prepared to do all the cooking and entertaining required to pass on their Jewish traditions to their Jewish children who will in turn marry Jewish spouses, have Jewish children and give their parents Jewish grandchildren.

I live in England and over the years have noticed that Englishmen have lost their tradition of the Sunday lunch. This is because most of them are now wifeless and deprived of their matrimonial home and children by the rules of no fault divorce. For those who are still married, it seems they cannot find a wife prepared to cook it on Sundays, and are afraid to insist on it for fear of being divorced under the rules of no fault divorce and being deprived of their matrimonial home and children.

Muslim men in Britain seem to have no trouble finding wives who are prepared to do the cooking, although increasingly they are finding themselves being divorced under the rules of no fault divorce too.

The problem is clear, as far as I am concerned, and it is feminism.

The measure of the effectiveness of any religion is how it protects its adherents against feminism.

That is why God has always been associated with patriarchy, and that is why feminists want to destroy it with atheism, sexual liberation and the worship of Mammon. There is even a genre of writing called "chick lit" and it is all about promoting a degenerate culture of sex and shopping, worse than porn. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_lit

The eternal battle of the sexes have always centred around how the rules of marriage are observed.

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all declining and primitive societies are matriarchies.

The purest matriarchy is a society in which marriage is not practised whose members are all illegitimate.

The purest patriarchy is a society in which all members were born of two married parents living together.

You can't think of a matriarchy because they are, with a few rare exceptions, extinct. Rome became extinct because it became a matriarchy. Troy fell because King Priam decided to protect his son Paris who was an adulterer and then ignored the warning of Cassandra who was known for speaking the truth which no one ever believed ... 

There is only one logical religon left

Christianity brought the benefits of the Jewish God to gentiles. Islam does this without requiring gentiles to believe in the Trinity.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 1, 2017

What people forget is that Christianity is totalitarian because if you don't actually believe in the Trinity ie Christ is both God Himself and His Son, you are not Christian and if you are not Christian you won't be issued with a ticket to heaven. (But even if you do get to heaven, you may still be turned away at the gates by St Peter.)

Judaism and Islam dispense with all this nonsense and concentrate on following the principles found in their scripture which keep them on the straight and narrow.

If you do not believe in the Trinity then you are not even Christian.

Since most people do believe vaguely in the idea of a "something out there", it is not too much to ask them to believe in a supreme, omnipotent and morally perfect God. But to expect them to believe that Jesus is also God and His Son combined with the Holy Spirit requires a different order of unquestioning credulity and absurdity no longer possible to expect from people who are not longer prevented by law from denying the Trinity.

Judaism assumes that it is a privilege enough to have been born and to have lived as a Jew. Islam promises that every little deed of ours will be carefully recorded and taken into account on the Day of Reckoning with our good deeds weighed against the bad and our ultimate destination hanging in the balance.

Only Christianity makes belief in the absurdity of the Trinity an absolute requirement to be Christian without which there shall be no salvation. This explains why Christian fanatics are always proclaiming that Jesus is Lord and saying they are always talking to Jesus like he was their best mate.

In fact, they should not be pretending to be talking to either Jesus or his mother, whom Catholics rather blasphemously in my view call "Mother of God". Instead, what they should be doing is to think of God in the abstract and how He represents every single idea Man has ever conceived of and those that he is yet to conceive of in the future to come. These are the methods by which we can be assisted towards  contemplating God and infinity, or, as the Hindus would have it: Atman and Brahman. It is therefore childishly anthropomorphic and infantile to pretend God is a woman or a man we can chatter inanely to as if he or she were someone in our kitchen having a cup tea with us, which is the Christian idea. The Muslim idea of God is infinitely more sophisticated, since we are invited to contemplate an entity that is possibly merely an abstraction of abstractions or in fact the most powerful being in the entire universe.

If we are to have a religion, it seems that we are only left with one rational choice if we don't want to be Jews, don't want to pretend to believe in an absurdity, don't want to go through the charade of pretending we are praying to a woman or her son, in order to be part of the mainstream or else suffer ostracisation and discrimination in a Christian-majority country.