Feminism is dangerous to your liberty if it is indeed true that feminism causes
false rape accusations to be successfully prosecuted in courts where a defendant is no longer treated as innocent till proven guilty after a fair trial
in a country where the Director of Public Prosecutions is female,
where the Chairman of the Bar Council is female,
where the Home Secretary is female,
where the Prime Minister is also female
and where most female MPs are for gay marriage and against leaving the EU.
The more promiscuous the women, the more shameless the women. The more shameless the women, the more likely they are to report rape.
The more promiscuous the women, the stupider they are. The stupider they are, the more likely they will be pumped and dumped.
The more women are pumped and dumped, the more likely they will be angry and bitter about being pumped and dumped.
The more angry and bitter women are about a lifetime of being pumped and dumped, the more likely they are to falsely accuse a man of rape, especially if a successful conviction entitles them to £11,000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7555299.stm
Is feminism even more totalitarian than a theocracy that guarantees the freedom of belief the way Islam does at
quran.com/2/256?
Is it not the case that all anti-discrimination legislation is in fact thoughtcrime passed by feminists and their running dogs?
In the UK the Equality Act 2010 contains most of the thoughtcrime passed by our matriarchy which is clearly unIslamic under 2:256 of the Koran.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anti-discrimination_acts
It is quite a thought, is it not, to discover that Islam actually gives taxpayers more liberty than feminism?
Is patriarchy less restrictive on your liberty than feminism because it gives you the constitutional right not to be taxed more than a flat rate tax of 20%?
Is it fair enough that those who do not pay taxes do not vote?
Is it not fair enough that the low-waged should not be subject to the burden of being taxed nor the burden of voting?
http://commonsensegovernment.com/the-tytler-cycle-revisited/
Would not a patriarchy - a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers - be more lightly governed than a matriarchy - a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers with illegitimate offspring whom they badly parent?
Is it not abundantly clear that patriarchy is what all rational and moral citizens both men and women should choose while booting out our degenerate matriarchy that was built on decades of feminist legislation which could be repealed at the stroke of the pen?
Has feminism turned our male MPs into spineless worms afraid of their own shadow, terrified of being divorced under the rules of no fault divorce by their entitled wives, accused of a historic sexual offence or deprived of their matrimonial home and children in the family court whose judges are mostly female?
