Translate

Showing posts with label Andrew Marr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Marr. Show all posts

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

White man Andrew Marr stuffs his words into mouth of yellow woman Hsiao-Hung Pai

From 20th minute.

The journalist Hsiao-Hung Pai focuses on the most marginalised sector of the white working class - the British far right.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0713zf1

"Always fascinated with racism."

"Deep sense of alienation and isolation"

"feel very much like outsiders in their own society"

Marr: "a country of outsiders"

"great sense of marginalisation"

"unemployment"

urban decay

"lack of opportunity"

De-industrialisation of Luton when Vauxhall left. Not solely economic factors, but mainly economic.
Nobody could explain Englishness, probably not even Jake Rees-Mogg himself.

Britain First an online phenomenon mainly.

EDL in decline since Tom Robinson left. Splintering of the group, getting smaller and more violent.
Pegida anti-Islam and anti-Muslim. Violence against refugees and Muslims.

Marr asked about Britain First's Christian marches. She didn't understand the question though he asked her twice.

Precariat mentioned. They have no sense of identity or solidarity with each other.

Listen to her incoherent answer to the final question at the 38th minute.

Marr:

Having looked at all the people who have lost out and are angry white people, what would be your advice to politicians listening to this conversation worrying about the next big swathe of jobs that are going to disappear? What should they be doing?

HHP:

That's such a big question for me. I think the Far Right will have a bigger voice and will feel more confident in expressing themselves when the government practises policies that victimise refugees and migrants. When governments put forward those policies, the Far right has more say. We see that happening in Britain already.

Marr:

And in Britain and in Germany politicians are simply scared of the consequences of this level of migration - they are terrified - and therefore they are much less likely to, as it were, confront the Far Right. 

HHP [cowed by the host of the show so BLATANTLY STUFFING HIS WORDS INTO HER MOUTH]:

Uh huh. And ... um ... [laughs after giving up] ... You said it.

Marr:

I must stop enfolding answers in my questions. It is not good broadcasting.


Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Lord Mandelson spotted by Claire Khaw's friend in Westminster looking grim and purposeful


This was what I was told while she was ringing me about something else, yesterday evening.


Me and Mandy  - are we moving towards ever-closer union?



Would the British people enjoy a politics show called The Lord and Lady Mandelson Politics Show on Sundays around the same time as The Andrew Marr Show?

Would the level of political discourse be raised as a result of Peter and me co-hosting this show?

Will we be the Punch and Judy of politics shows?

Or the Richard and Judy?

I have consulted our horoscopes and they are auspicious.  Scorpio men cannot resist me.

The men who have truly loved me or been tolerably fond of me have been scorpio men.

All the men I have ever loved were scorpio men.

Come up and see me sometime, Peter.

Just for you, I will even join the Labour Party again, if they will have me.

I am actually OK about the aims, objects and values of the Labour Party.  


Clause IV.
Aims and values 
1. The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It 
believes that by the strength of our common 
endeavour we achieve more than we achieve 
alone, so as to create for each of us the means to 
realise our true potential and for all of us a 
community in which power, wealth and 
opportunity are in the hands of the many not the 
few; where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties 
we owe and where we live together freely, in a 
spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect. 
2. To these ends we work for:  
A. A DYNAMIC ECONOMY, serving the public 
interest, in which the enterprise of the market 
and the rigour of competition are joined with 
the forces of partnership and co-operation to 
produce the wealth the nation needs and the 
opportunity for all to work and prosper with a 
thriving private sector and high-quality public 
services where those undertakings essential 
to the common good are either owned by the 
public or accountable to them 
B. A JUST SOCIETY, which judges its strength by 
the condition of the weak as much as the 
strong, provides security against fear, and 
justice at work; which nurtures families, 
promotes equality of opportunity, and delivers 
people from the tyranny of poverty, prejudice 
and the abuse of power 
C. AN OPEN DEMOCRACY, in which government 
is held to account by the people, decisions are 
taken as far as practicable by the communities 
they affect and where fundamental human 
rights are guaranteed 
D. A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, which we protect, 
enhance and hold in trust for future 
generations. 
3. Labour is committed to the defence and security 
of the British people and to co-operating in 
European institutions, the United Nations, the 
Commonwealth and other international bodies to 
secure peace, freedom, democracy, economic 
security and environmental protection for all. 
4. Labour shall work in pursuit of these aims with 
trade unions and co-operative societies and also 
with voluntary organisations, consumer groups 
and other representative bodies. 
5. On the basis of these principles, Labour seeks the 
trust of the people to govern. 

Please don't anyone joke about me joining the LibDems, for I cannot support the nonsense at http://www.libdems.org.uk/constitution.aspx as it would be against my principles.   

As for the aims, objects and values of the Conservative Party, I am still waiting for Stephen Phillips, the Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party who cancelled my membership on 20 December 2012, to tell me what they are at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/my-open-letter-to-conservative-party.html for it seems I have said and done something that is "wholly inconsistent with the aims, objectives and principles of the Conservative Party".  

I must say I was a bit taken aback to be told that the Conservative Party had any principles at all, and am agog to know what they might be.  


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/the-lord-and-lady-mandelson-show-to.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/should-peter-mandelson-present-andrew.html

Friday, 11 January 2013

The Lord and Lady Mandelson Show to replace the Andrew Marr Show?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2259759/BBC-says-Andrew-Marr-conscious-eating-continues-progress-suffering-stroke-aged-just-53.html

Someone suggested that Rory Bremner stand in, which sounds an excellent idea.

I would certainly audition for the job.

What I think would be a lot of fun is if Peter Mandelson and I could co-host the Andrew Marr Show. I have been interviewed on TV a few times, so I think I would be able to acquit myself fairly well before too long, with the right kind of support, management, hairdo and training.

Given enough time to loosen up properly, I could blossom into something resembling Dame Edna Everage, and dear Peter could be my Madge, perhaps.  And then we would swap roles the next show.

Rory Bremner could assume a butler-like role in the show.  I really think it could work.   

The suffering caused by not taking God literally

Taking God's prohibitions against idolatry and blasphemy seriously. 2:00  Most people try to fit in with the prevailing culture.  3:00  ...