Time for Muslims to engage with jobsworth political leaders of UKIP and BNP

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFOJBK1G4cM
"Jihdad Murder in Wooldwich"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5aUZoSC76w
£12 billion to get out

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/video-nick-griffin-islamic-extremism
VIDEO: Nick Griffin on Islamic Extremism

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/bnp-leader-nick-griffin-urges-supporters-to-ignore-police-ban-on-planned-march-at-scene-of-drummer-lee-rigbys-brutal-murder-8638632.html

BNP leader Nick Griffin urges supporters to ignore police ban on planned march at scene of Drummer Lee Rigby's brutal murder

BNP leader tweets: 'Ignore reports of march ban. See you there on Saturday'

Griffin is hoping for a riot so that people are killed and hurt and of course for Muslims to be blamed again when people are killed or injured. "Look what you made us do!"  I would ban the march if I were in charge and the police have, to their credit.

https://www.facebook.com/events/100127643531850/

Saturday
13:00
Woolwich New Road, Woolwich, London

Everybody is welcome – regardless of your political affiliation, we want you to join us in London on Saturday 1st June.

We will be meeting in Woolwich at 13.00hrs at the junction between Woolwich Newroad and Gunner Lane, opposite the Barracks.

From there we will take part in a march and motorcade which will terminate at the Lewisham Islamic Centre.

We are marching to demand that the political class take action and kick Muslim 'Hate Preachers Out' of Britain NOW!

Please wear red white and blue and bring flags to fly.

Consider wearing your 'Help For Heroes' T–shirt to show solidarity with their great work in supporting our brave soldiers.

What could be more provoking to a Muslim who objects to UK foreign policy than to call the soldiers who invade and bomb Muslim countries heroes?

But it is surely the intention of the BNP to provoke more attacks on Muslims and to provoke Muslims into further terrorist attacks, and then say that Muslims and non-Muslims cannot live together and guess who must leave the country?

Make no mistake, what would please the BNP the most is if this country descended into an orgy of rioting this summer.  What Griffin would love is for what is happening in Stockholm now to happen in London and any major British city.

This should not surprise anyone who has studied the nationalist scene, for we already know that nationalists can only pray for a breakdown in law and order (because they are too unpleasant, unprincipled and incompetent to ever attract enough votes) so that Nick Griffin and his acolytes can be seen to be stepping in to sort everything out.

That would be fine if Nick Griffin were an honourable man, but he is not.

If he were an honorable man he would encourage more middle class professionals to join the party and keep them there, instead of expelling them one by one if any of them seemed capable of challenging him as a rival leader.   Griffin is happy for the BNP to remain a party perceived to be of uneducated lower class CHAV scum, so that he remains able to milk them for money and labour without them ever wising up.

I have been saying for years now that the indigenous white proletariat have been both betrayed by the LibLabCon and the BNP who do not care enough about them to tell them why successive governments conspire to facilitate immigration when they already know everyone hates it.

It is because British mothers are mostly single mothers and therefore bad parents and the British education system is not fit for the purpose of turning school-leavers into someone a rational employer might wish to hire.

Neither the LibLabCon nor the parties who oppose them dare call for the slaying of the unholy trinity of Sacred Cows that the British even now unquestioningly worship, who are eating them out of house and home and crapping all over their nice carpet.

What is the constitution of this Unholy Trinity of Sacred Cows?

1. The welfare state
2. Sexual liberation
3. Feminism that encourages women to be as promiscuous as men and men to be as cowardly and hypocritical as women

Britain can only be great when she is good, but Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland is now the Land of Compulsory Fornication.  It is just not a good idea to allow most of your people to become welfare-dependent unmarried single mothers and singly-parented NEETs, is it?   

It is certainly not a good idea to let it happen until most mothers in Britain are single mothers and then refuse to discuss this.   

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Do you hear UKIP or BNP saying anything about the above?  Of course not.  They can only think in the short term and of the votes they hope to get.   

They will not be saying anything to alienate the slut and bastard vote, will they?

Of all the political parties in the land, which party do you think has the highest rate of illegitimacy, and which party would alienate most of its natural supporters if it were to denounce never married mothers?

You can be sure that the BNP under Nick Griffin will not be addressing the origins of Western malaise because to suggest that sexual morality may be to blame for lower standards of education and behaviour as well as your country being full of immigrants is more than his or Nigel Farage's job's worth

Only a female and foreigner has dared to say so loudly and frequently while the political establishment and those who claim to oppose them denounce her for what amounts to blasphemy.   

A question springs to mind: will widespread rioting this summer in Britain make the political establishment  more or less likely to ask themselves the questions I have been posing?   

Muslims could help themselves by asking these questions too, but perhaps they prefer just to keep quiet for fear of inciting even more Islamophobia by bringing attention to themselves.  I have already offered to be their spokesperson, but I fear they will find my methods somewhat unorthodox, probably, but it is only I who straddle the entire political spectrum like a colossus ....

Hiring one of their own to do their PR, especially if she wears a hijab or if he has a beard, will only incite more hatred against Muslims.   

As Baroness Warsi well knows, to complain of Islamophobia only generates yet more Islamophobia.  Only one such as I can break the cycle.  

It is of course up to the Muslims to get in touch with me and appoint me their spokesperson, but they probably won't, I fear.

If nothing but widespread rioting will induce the LibLabCon to re-examine UK foreign policy, then, sadly, widespread rioting will be necessary to bring them to their senses.  

As they say, no pain, no gain.  

It is a great shame people cannot be made to see reason before things deteriorate further, but British people, as a result of living in a matriarchy, have become more corrupt, cowardly, hypocritical and irrational over the years.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/why-white-race-is-declining-in-numbers.html  The punishment from God has come, and it seems more is to come, if you believe in such things.  The punishments listed in Deuteronomy does not only apply just to Jews, after all.  It merely states what will happen to your society, whatever your race, if you say it is OK for your women to be sluts and SSMs.

"Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators, and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners."

http://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/worship/book-of-common-prayer/a-commination.aspx

Surely they mean us?

As they say, if the cap fits, wear it.

“Out of the corruption of women proceeds the confusion of races; out of the confusion of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding; and out of this, all evil.”

-Bhagavad Gita, I, verse 41 et seq.

The corruption of women flows from feminism.

Questions about sex predators and their victims of all races

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/politics/baroness-warsi-some-pakistani-men-think-young-white-girls-are-fair-game-for-sex-abuse-7766319.html

1. Are white girls easy meat?
2. Are they easier meat than Muslim girls?
3. Is it a good thing for a woman to be "easy"?
4. Does being "easy meat" mean you are a slut?
5. If most white women are sluts, does it mean that white men have lost control of their women?
6. What does it say about you as a race if you have lost control of your women?
7. Do you get think you are likely to get respect from other races when other races think your women are stupid sluts and you as a man are afraid of stupid sluts?
8. Are white mothers bad mothers compared to Asian Muslim mothers?
9. Why are white mothers so shit?
10. Is the reason why white girls are such easy meat because their mothers are Slut Single Mums AKA Never Married Mothers?
11. Why are white men so afraid of criticising their women?
12. Is it because white men fear not getting sex from their women if they criticise them?
13. Are white women who are sluts beyond criticism?
14. If so, is this a Good Thing?
15. There are more and more women claiming that women should never be called sluts.  Is this matriarchal censorship a Good Thing?
16. Are white men despicable cowards for cowering so fearfully in silence before the worst of their women, the Slut Single Mother?
17. Do Muslim sex predators "respect" less their victims less than non-Muslim sex predators?
18. Do non-Muslim sex predators "respect" their victims more than Muslim sex predators?
19. Surely all sex predators of all races do not respect their victims at all?
20. Are there more Muslim sex predators in Britain than there are non-Muslim sex predators?

It is really very simple, boys and girls.  If a man has sex with an easy meat girl, he will  not respect her afterwards and want to move on.  Just imagine a man as a child with lots of presents under a Xmas tree.  The more of them he has, the less he will value them.   Certainly, a woman he has possessed cheaply and easily will be called a slag or a slut.   It is therefore quite easy to understand why a Muslim man would respect Muslim women because they tend to be wrapped up and not easily available, unlike white girls.   

If white men want to do something about the cheapness of their women then it is of course up to them to do something about this.  It may be that they want their women cheap and easy, especially if they know they cannot afford a wife or a girlfriend or even the occasional services of an honest prostitute.   

Therein lies the crux of the problem.   White men know what they must do but they will not do what is necessary because the cure for feminism is now worse than the disease , and in any case they no longer believe in God, Honour, Nation or Posterity, concepts which might help them fight the foul emasculating disease of feminism.  

What is the cure for feminism?  What would be strong enough to fight feminism and the emasculating cowardice, the stinking hypocrisy and the debilitating dementia of the white man?

Only religion (and only one religion - the one they most hate and fear) can save the white man now, for he cannot return to Christianity, for the cancer of feminism has spread to his government and his religious institutions who are now full of women, feminists, socialists, homosexuals, communists and third rate minds.  Indeed, the cancer of feminism shares his home with him and his bed with him.   He fears the disapproval and rejection of his women, and we all know that men are only after the One Thing.  If he has a wife, he will fear being divorced by her and being deprived of his children and half his property, which she can easily do, because the divorce laws of this benighted land allows her to do so.   

In the Family Courts, held in camera, no journalist can hear you scream ...

Most of these white men will have been brought up as drug-taking, drinking hedonistic liberal atheists.   The white man therefore knows that there is no afterlife.  This being the case, he will see it as expedient to take the crumbs of pleasure from the feminist table like a beggar or a dog.  Such a man is unlikely to assert his right to free speech, and even less likely to fight for his principles, assuming he even knew what such things are. Honour is an alien concept, and behaving honourably an unknown practice.   

There is no helping a race of men such as this.   

When men have no reason and no sense of honour, they can only be driven like animals, by means of a cattle prod from behind.

Cardinal Kaspar says ...

Cardinal Kaspar

Baroness Warsi

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11317441

"Become a godless Marxist shit-hole become a Third World shit-hole.  Geddit?"

 Just because you don't like it doesn't mean he hasn't got a point, you people of the Extreme Wrong.

Cardinal Kaspar for Pope!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11322739

And, irony of ironies, Baroness Warsi, with Third World origins, says the Labour government appeared to have viewed religion as

"essentially a rather quaint relic of our pre-industrial history".

"They were also too suspicious of faith's potential for contributing to society - behind every faith-based charity, they sensed the whiff of conversion and exclusivity." 

"And because of these prejudices they didn't create policies to unleash the positive power of faith in our society."

A Muslim woman is going to sort the heathen white people out.   This is what happens when people trash their own culture for sex, shopping, whingeing and binge drinking. 

Would Jesus have voted BNP? Would the Prophet Muhammad?

I rather thank that in Jesus’ time, people would have been allowed to complain about foreigners and talk of sending them home, as they do in South Africa, without being persecuted and villified.

Would Jesus have voted BNP?

Bishop John Goddard’s comment on Sunday, Radio 4 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00khhp0 - that the BNP sow division was countered by Roger Bolton pointing out that the Church’s policy of allowing homosexual priests is in itself divisive.

In other words, politics and religion are divisive. Man is so divided and contentious that quite often, he would disagree with the opinions that he himself has held at another time.

Knowing what we do about Jesus, it is quite likely that he would have remained enigmatic and not voted.

Would Muhammad have said:

"Let us Muslims vote BNP because they have so many policies we agree on? At least, the BNP would not have invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. Muslims, like the BNP, did not support 42 day detention, and we appear to have similar views about the Holocaust, Zionism and Israel. Let us make a friend of an enemy, as the Koran advises us to do, and concentrate on things we are agreed on, rather than their Islamophobia, which may be more to do with ignorance and fear, which we may in time correct."?

EX-BNP MUSLIMS:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/sep/24/religion.uk

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambridgeshire/7464736.stm

BNP-SYMPATHETIC MUSLIMS

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-484825/Some-BNP-voters-legitimate-views-immigration-says-Tory-peer.html

Some BNP voters have 'legitimate views' on immigration, says Baroness Warsi

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/platform/2008/07/ali-miraj-its-p.html

Ali Miraj: It's perfectly rational for the ignored white working class to vote BNP

Muslims would doubtless approve of the BNP’s stance on

1) withdrawing British troops from Muslim lands
2) the return of capital punishment
3) the return of corporal punishment

Indeed, Muslims may be concerned about immigration and see the connection between the EU and uncontrolled immigration, and wish to withdraw from it, as the BNP do.

Islam does not endorse PC-liberalism of tolerance (of promiscuity, single mothers, widespread illegitimacy leading to the lowering of standards of education and behaviour, the drug and pub culture of this country etc).

Their religion tells them to forbid what is evil and enjoin what is good.

What we must now decide is whether it would be a good thing to tell the Lib-Lab-Con how much they are hated, by voting BNP.

Perhaps it is time to show the Church too, that it is so out of touch with the British people that its condemnation of the BNP will result, perversely, in more votes for them. The Anglican Church has embraced the values of our unofficial religion of "tolerance", Moral Relativism and homosexual priests, while refusing to defend the interests of the white working classes, who never go to church anyway, not even to get their children into a decent church school. These days, the white urban proletariat are more likely to find themselves going to mosque than church.

The Anglican Church, being complicit in the political establishment's determination not to discuss immigration or address any of its problems honestly, except to condemn anyone who questions it as "racist", no longer holds any moral authority.

The incompetence with which they have made their views known is laughable.

If I were Archbishop of Canterbury (and what an Archbishop I would be!) I would have questioned the ridiculous BNP assumption that Jesus would have voted for them.

If I were Mufti of Britain (and what a Great Mufti I would be!) I would point out how much common ground there is between the BNP and Muslims, and hint that most Muslims would be happy voting for them because they like their policies, as most non-Muslims do, if only they were not so Islamophobic and obsessed with race.

BNP membership list published online

At the time of writing, I was unable to access the BNP website which I imagine has crashed due to overwhelming interest.

This debacle demonstrates why it is absolutely necessary that the BNP lift their colour bar and take a more Le Pennian view of nationalism.

I would have thought any BNP member who is not a rabid racist would see that this is the only political solution to the problem of continuing harassment and victimisation by the media, employers, unions etc.

Below are some reasons why they might not agree with me:

1) Members are too frightened to say that even if that is what they think.

2) Members are mostly unreconstructed racists and don't even want to say non-whites can join as full members, even as they know they will stay away in droves. (The NF do not have a colour bar, though of course they do not need to, with their policies of compulsory but "humane" repatriation!)

3) Members and leadership are mostly too ignorant and stubborn to see this.

4) Members and leadership are too fearful of change to take constructive well-timed action to ride this crest of publicity to a good place.

5) For some (probably racist) reason, the BNP believe that only white people know what is in the British National Interest, forgetting that it was a class of white Labour and Tory politicians who first let all the foreigners in! They also forget that the people who are most horrible to them are people of their own race.

Most thoughtful non-whites instinctively understand why the white urban proletariat would want to join the BNP in our PC world.

Two Muslims who understand:

Baroness Warsi
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-484825/Some-BNP-voters-legitimate-views-immigration-says-Tory-peer.html

Ali Miraj
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/platform/2008/07/ali-miraj-its-p.html