Anjem Choudary talking about himself and Islam for 45 minutes

Anjem Choudary explaining why Islam is better for us than democracy and hypocrisy.

Choudary says Sadiq Khan MP is an apostate, and so he is for voting for gay marriage.  I wonder how Muslim terrorists feel about living in a country that has gay marriage.  Will they be disgusted enough to do something about it?  If they did, would we be very very upset?

Instead of a Dear Santa letter, would grown ups instead write

"Dear Muslim Terrorist
For Xmas I would like you to terrorise [fill in the blank]."?

They might like to do something useful for social conservatives for a change.  Then they might become more popular?

In case anyone gets offended over any of this, it really is time people acknowledged that the fanatics and lunatics are already in government and starting wars all over the place.

Can you imagine Nick Griffin and Anjem Choudary sharing a sofa together?

Who is more cuddly?

Nick Griffin?

Or Anjem Choudary?

Or are they both equally cute?

Labour MP spreads hatred against 'Fascistic' Islamists

“There are people living in this country who believe as an article of faith that it is acceptable, even necessary, to kill citizens of any country which has dared to attack a Muslim country. They believe that the kaffir, as they insultingly refer to non-believers, are of less value to their God than Muslims. They despise a culture which extends equal rights to women and gays, and scorn those women who dare to dress “immodestly” as whores.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10095914/Fascistic-Islamists-spread-violence-and-hatred-Labour-MP-says.html
'Fascistic' Islamists spread violence and hatred, Labour MP says

A few questions for Tom Harris MP:

1. What is the purpose of Britain attacking so many Muslim countries?
2. If you are Muslim - and Muslims are supposed to regard other Muslims as brothers and sisters - then it is understandable that you should be angry and upset that your government is attacking and killing your brothers and sisters for no good reason.  
3. If you believe in the God Muslims believe in and practise your faith, surely it would be only natural to think that your God would look upon you more favourably than the people who deny His existence and who look upon your religion with hatred and contempt?
4. Why should you not despise a culture which clearly goes against what you know to be God's commandments?
5. Women who dress immodestly are either whores or sluts, since they seek by their dress to attract the attention of men with a view to having extramarital sex with them, which is forbidden in the Koran, for it advises Muslims to dress modestly.  Tom Harris himself once said of single mothers that they were an army marching us to "national catastrophe"at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/05/welfare-children   
6. How does he proposed to avert our national catastrophe of being overwhelmed by a tsunami of singly parenting sluts and whores if he refuses to propose policies that would discourage them in the first place?  To have our omelet, eggs must be broken, Tom!   
7. Is the expression of any form of social conservatism in strong terms a form of fascism now?

It does appear that Tom Harris is now encroaching on BNP territory.  Not only that, he is adopting the twisted logic of the BNP, which consists of on the one hand agreeing with the social conservatism that all the Abrahamic faiths promote, while on the other disagreeing with Muslims whatever they say, to show hatred for them, even though they secretly agree with them.   

Is Tom Harris sure he wants to go down the BNP route of demonising Muslims while refusing to acknowledge anything wrong with British society that a good Muslim might dislike?   

“Yet preachers of hate as well as their followers and fellow travellers, worship in the same buildings, speak to, work with, and are related to that sensible majority. And those law-abiding citizens have a duty to challenge them, expel them and, if necessary, report them to the authorities.”

What is it that Tom Harris is saying should no longer be sayable?

I hope he is not saying that we may no longer oppose gay marriage or questions the morals of these women who become the "national catastrophe" that is single mothers.

If so, what a shame.  I once thought he was witty and courageous and thought he might one day even be a leadership contender.   

Hope Not Hate should take note of Tom Harris MP's future pronouncements on the subject and note for further similarities to the BNP line.   

The BNP, to be fair to them, have always been against the invasion and bombing of Muslim countries.   http://www.bnp.org.uk/policies/foreign-affairs  This cannot be said of the Labour Party or of the voting record of Tom Harris MP.  

More philosophical questions for Muslims against UK foreign policy who have condemned the Woolwich atrocity

Is it possible to sincerely condemn the actions of someone that vindicates your view about the wrongness of doing something (eg You say "Don't go to war", your government goes to war and something terrible does indeed happens.)?

I would like to add a further dimension to this question.

You are against UK foreign policy and you have derived a degree of grim satisfaction from the Woolwich atrocity since it vindicated your view about the inadvisability of getting involved in Iraq etc.

Your son is also Lee Rigby who is now dead.

Would you condemn atrocity because the victim was your son but would not otherwise have done so?

Or do you refrain from condemning the atrocity even if your son were the victim of terrorists objecting to UK foreign policy because the murder of your son by terrorists was clearly yet another reason why Britain should not have become involved in the invasion and bombing of Muslim lands?

It should be borne in mind that condemning the atrocity would not bring him back nor help in making Muslims less unpopular.

If you cannot say something with sincerity, then why say it at all?  It would only mean that you are being mendacious, hypocritical, cowardly or have been intimidated.

If you are saying that committing that atrocity was in some way disproportionate, then what would have been proportionate?

Can you ever call an action "disproportionate" (eg publicly saying you will vote BNP even if you are Muslim, in order to make a point that you hate UK foreign policy more than you hate the BNP whom you already know hate you) when it will have no effect at all?

What would have been proportionate action to take as regards objecting to UK foreign policy?

Is it enough to say that those who objected to it should just shut up and forget about it?

Is it logical as well as moral not to condemn the atrocity if you remain opposed to the UK foreign policy of invading and bombing Muslim countries?

Was Anjem Choudary logical and moral not to condemn the Woolwich atrocity?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/are-muslim-terrorists-more-rational.html

An idea for Nationalist and Islamist co-operation against the warmongers

What do you think of this idea? Nick Griffin and Anjem Choudary both signing a letter demanding Cameron explain to the British voter what is in it for the British waging the wars that these Muslim terrorists find so objectionable and jointly delivering it to Downing Street.

If I were leader of the BNP this would have been done by now.

Indeed, if I were leader I would have suggested that Choudary and I fly away together to Ibiza and stay a few days there with a film crew to see how we get on with each other.

I thought we might stay at http://www.hotique.com/photos-526-Hacienda-Na-Xamena.html with the idea of bumping into Cameron at Benniras beach perhaps.

It would be fun!  

Time for Muslims to engage with jobsworth political leaders of UKIP and BNP

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFOJBK1G4cM
"Jihdad Murder in Wooldwich"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5aUZoSC76w
£12 billion to get out

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/video-nick-griffin-islamic-extremism
VIDEO: Nick Griffin on Islamic Extremism

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/bnp-leader-nick-griffin-urges-supporters-to-ignore-police-ban-on-planned-march-at-scene-of-drummer-lee-rigbys-brutal-murder-8638632.html

BNP leader Nick Griffin urges supporters to ignore police ban on planned march at scene of Drummer Lee Rigby's brutal murder

BNP leader tweets: 'Ignore reports of march ban. See you there on Saturday'

Griffin is hoping for a riot so that people are killed and hurt and of course for Muslims to be blamed again when people are killed or injured. "Look what you made us do!"  I would ban the march if I were in charge and the police have, to their credit.

https://www.facebook.com/events/100127643531850/

Saturday
13:00
Woolwich New Road, Woolwich, London

Everybody is welcome – regardless of your political affiliation, we want you to join us in London on Saturday 1st June.

We will be meeting in Woolwich at 13.00hrs at the junction between Woolwich Newroad and Gunner Lane, opposite the Barracks.

From there we will take part in a march and motorcade which will terminate at the Lewisham Islamic Centre.

We are marching to demand that the political class take action and kick Muslim 'Hate Preachers Out' of Britain NOW!

Please wear red white and blue and bring flags to fly.

Consider wearing your 'Help For Heroes' T–shirt to show solidarity with their great work in supporting our brave soldiers.

What could be more provoking to a Muslim who objects to UK foreign policy than to call the soldiers who invade and bomb Muslim countries heroes?

But it is surely the intention of the BNP to provoke more attacks on Muslims and to provoke Muslims into further terrorist attacks, and then say that Muslims and non-Muslims cannot live together and guess who must leave the country?

Make no mistake, what would please the BNP the most is if this country descended into an orgy of rioting this summer.  What Griffin would love is for what is happening in Stockholm now to happen in London and any major British city.

This should not surprise anyone who has studied the nationalist scene, for we already know that nationalists can only pray for a breakdown in law and order (because they are too unpleasant, unprincipled and incompetent to ever attract enough votes) so that Nick Griffin and his acolytes can be seen to be stepping in to sort everything out.

That would be fine if Nick Griffin were an honourable man, but he is not.

If he were an honorable man he would encourage more middle class professionals to join the party and keep them there, instead of expelling them one by one if any of them seemed capable of challenging him as a rival leader.   Griffin is happy for the BNP to remain a party perceived to be of uneducated lower class CHAV scum, so that he remains able to milk them for money and labour without them ever wising up.

I have been saying for years now that the indigenous white proletariat have been both betrayed by the LibLabCon and the BNP who do not care enough about them to tell them why successive governments conspire to facilitate immigration when they already know everyone hates it.

It is because British mothers are mostly single mothers and therefore bad parents and the British education system is not fit for the purpose of turning school-leavers into someone a rational employer might wish to hire.

Neither the LibLabCon nor the parties who oppose them dare call for the slaying of the unholy trinity of Sacred Cows that the British even now unquestioningly worship, who are eating them out of house and home and crapping all over their nice carpet.

What is the constitution of this Unholy Trinity of Sacred Cows?

1. The welfare state
2. Sexual liberation
3. Feminism that encourages women to be as promiscuous as men and men to be as cowardly and hypocritical as women

Britain can only be great when she is good, but Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland is now the Land of Compulsory Fornication.  It is just not a good idea to allow most of your people to become welfare-dependent unmarried single mothers and singly-parented NEETs, is it?   

It is certainly not a good idea to let it happen until most mothers in Britain are single mothers and then refuse to discuss this.   

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Do you hear UKIP or BNP saying anything about the above?  Of course not.  They can only think in the short term and of the votes they hope to get.   

They will not be saying anything to alienate the slut and bastard vote, will they?

Of all the political parties in the land, which party do you think has the highest rate of illegitimacy, and which party would alienate most of its natural supporters if it were to denounce never married mothers?

You can be sure that the BNP under Nick Griffin will not be addressing the origins of Western malaise because to suggest that sexual morality may be to blame for lower standards of education and behaviour as well as your country being full of immigrants is more than his or Nigel Farage's job's worth

Only a female and foreigner has dared to say so loudly and frequently while the political establishment and those who claim to oppose them denounce her for what amounts to blasphemy.   

A question springs to mind: will widespread rioting this summer in Britain make the political establishment  more or less likely to ask themselves the questions I have been posing?   

Muslims could help themselves by asking these questions too, but perhaps they prefer just to keep quiet for fear of inciting even more Islamophobia by bringing attention to themselves.  I have already offered to be their spokesperson, but I fear they will find my methods somewhat unorthodox, probably, but it is only I who straddle the entire political spectrum like a colossus ....

Hiring one of their own to do their PR, especially if she wears a hijab or if he has a beard, will only incite more hatred against Muslims.   

As Baroness Warsi well knows, to complain of Islamophobia only generates yet more Islamophobia.  Only one such as I can break the cycle.  

It is of course up to the Muslims to get in touch with me and appoint me their spokesperson, but they probably won't, I fear.

If nothing but widespread rioting will induce the LibLabCon to re-examine UK foreign policy, then, sadly, widespread rioting will be necessary to bring them to their senses.  

As they say, no pain, no gain.  

It is a great shame people cannot be made to see reason before things deteriorate further, but British people, as a result of living in a matriarchy, have become more corrupt, cowardly, hypocritical and irrational over the years.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/why-white-race-is-declining-in-numbers.html  The punishment from God has come, and it seems more is to come, if you believe in such things.  The punishments listed in Deuteronomy does not only apply just to Jews, after all.  It merely states what will happen to your society, whatever your race, if you say it is OK for your women to be sluts and SSMs.

"Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators, and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners."

http://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/worship/book-of-common-prayer/a-commination.aspx

Surely they mean us?

As they say, if the cap fits, wear it.

“Out of the corruption of women proceeds the confusion of races; out of the confusion of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding; and out of this, all evil.”

-Bhagavad Gita, I, verse 41 et seq.

The corruption of women flows from feminism.

Are Muslim terrorists more rational than liberals and BNP supporters?

1. Whom do you think is expressing their dislike of UK foreign policy more effectively?                        (a) Muslim terrorists                                                                                                                        (b) The BNP
2. Who is more rational - Liberals or Muslim terrorists?                                                                      (a) Liberals who invade and bomb Muslim lands without getting any benefit                                           (b) Muslims who object to UK foreign policy and do something about it
3. Who is more rational - Muslims or BNP supporters?                                                                       (a) Muslims who object to a war and demonstrate against it, and even commit acts of terrorism to demonstrate their deep antipathy towards governments and their agents who pursue immoral wars             (b) The BNP who object to the same war but only attack Muslims who object to it.
4. What do the BNP want to do more?                                                                                               (a) Show their hatred of Muslims while hoping for a conflagration that would cause damage to property as well as injury and death to unite voters in their hatred of Muslims                                    (b) Making the government re-examine UK foreign policy
5. The BNP cares no more than the LibLabCon about what happens to young men who become soldiers.                                                                                                                                          (a) Agree.  Dead soldiers killed by Muslims are just the cannon fodder they need in their war against Muslims and Islam to make more and more people hate Muslims.                                                      (b) Disagree.  At least the BNP state their objections to UK foreign policy at http://www.bnp.org.uk/policies/foreign-affairs even if they only demonstrate against Muslims who oppose the very war they claim to oppose, being the cowards and hypocrites they are.
6. Does the Woolwich atrocity make UK foreign policy more or less morally objectionable?                 (a) Yes                                                                                                                                           (b) No                                                                                                                                            (c) No change
7. Is the political establishment or the media now seriously discussing UK foreign policy as a result of the Woolwich atrocity?                                                                                                                                         (a) Yes.  (If yes, please cite examples.)                                                                                            (b) Not that I have noticed.
8. If you were a Muslim terrorist objecting to UK foreign policy, do you think you have done enough to make the UK government re-examine its foreign policy?                                                                  (a) Yes, I can just see them doing it now!                                                                                        (b) No, I am not aware of either the political establishment or the media discussing UK foreign policy in any detail or seriousness, much less calling for its re-examination.
9. If you were a Muslim terrorist objecting to UK foreign policy and you have concluded that 7/7 and the Woolwich atrocity are still not enough to make either the political establishment or the media debate UK foreign policy, what do you think you  think the British should expect?                                  (a) More acts of terrorism.                                                                                                              (b) That Muslim terrorists would just shut up and forget about objecting to UK foreign policy, like a good liberal would.
10. If you are of the view that UK foreign policy is both immoral and not in the British long term national interest, what should you do?                                                                                                                       (a) Continue to object to it in the strongest possible terms.                                                               (b) Shut up and forget about it.                                                                                                         (c) Keep blaming the Muslims but not UK foreign policy, just like the BNP.
11. What would be the best way of honouring the life of Lee Rigby?                                                         (a) By discussing UK foreign policy and demanding answers from Cameron on how invading and bombing Muslim countries serves the long term national interest.                                                        (b) By not discussing UK foreign policy at all and using the Woolwich atrocity to unite voters in hatred against Muslims in the hope of eventually expelling them from the country, as the BNP are hoping to do.  

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/more-philosophical-questions-for.html