What Charles should now say about comparing Putin to Hitler

Proposed Statement from Charles:

"I really don't know what came over me. Of course Putin isn't like Hitler, unless anyone who invades another country is like Hitler, and I do not feel, now that I have thought things through properly, that the British who once had a world empire and is even now behaving in a way that can only be described as an unedifying display of unseemly military aggression disguised as liberal interventionism, is in a position to get on their high horse on this matter. The British are after all these days merely poodles of America.  If the Americans want us to bark at the Russians then we bark at the Russians.

When we fought the Crimean War in 1834 it was was against the Russians, and they have always regarded the Crimea as their backyard.

As for what I said about Hitler, I can only say that I really really really did not mean anything by it.  I was in the presence of a Jewess who was also a Holocaust survivor. This situation made me feel socially obliged to bring Hitler into the conversation to show that I sympathised with her on the one hand, and on the other relate it to something that was topical.  That really was all. Although that tiresome man Edward Lucas has rushed to my defence at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2635617/Hitler-Putin-Charles-right.html there really was no need, and I entirely disagree with him about Winston Churchill, who lost the British their world empire in his fits of drunkenness, depression and the desire to take reckless risks in order to aggrandise himself as a wartime leader.  

If, as A J P Taylor said, WW2 was a continuation of WW1 then what was WW1 really about? Belgian neutrality? Surely not.  The military opportunism the Germans displayed during WW1 was probably because they felt left out in the scramble for Africa and wanted a place in the sun over which they could place their towel, but they are good people really. Perhaps we should blame ourselves for not being more nicer to the Germans who are after all our Teuton cousins who also brew good beer. It seems incredible that the British could have lost their empire over something as trivial as Belgian neutrality.  I suspect the British lost their empire because their policy of being nasty to the Germans for the sake of being nasty to the Germans turned around and bit their sorry asses.  It is now perhaps time to question our political system that allows only fools and knaves to govern us. There.  Why don't you people put that in your pipe and smoke it?"

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Why-not-have-a-one-party-state-if-it-makes-more-sense/353471931432677 

Votes for Ken Livingstone from the "Far Right" whether he wants them or not

What I have distributed on behalf of Ken.  The Iron Cross and the Swastika badges were given to me by Kevin Watmough of the British People's Party when I visited Bradford

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ken-livingstone-quits-mayoral-debate-over-bnp-participation-7665712.html

"BNP candidate Carlos Cortiglia told political blogger Iain Dale he planned to give Mr Livingstone his second preference vote."

It is not quite clear why Carlos said this, but my reasons are clear.  Out of the two front-runners, only Ken Livingstone was against the war.

There is not much difference in terms policy between the two front-runners if you are of an Eurosceptic bent of mind.  Both of them support gay marriage, both of them do not wish to share a platform with the Eurosceptic parties, both of them are recklessly making promises they will probably not be able to keep.

But there is one thing that Ken has done that we can be certain about that Boris has not done, which is to speak against the invasion of Iraq.   It can be inferred that if Boris had remained an MP he would have voted for all the Neocon wars of Cameron and it can also be inferred that Ken would have voted against them if he had the option of doing so.  (Do however please correct me if you know any better.)

http://www.mpacuk.org/story/240412/bigoted-boris-johnson.html

Strangely and sadly, Ken did not use his anti-war stance as a campaigning issue at all.

It was pointed out to me that this is because London voters will only vote for "London issues".  (This is code for "Venal Londoners will vote for whoever most convincingly bribes them with the most things they want.")

Probably, even Muslim Londoners no longer care that their government is invading Muslim countries and killing Muslims who dislike being invaded, in their name.

It would appear that Ken is not campaigning on his anti-war stance because he doesn't think Londoners care about it enough.

Even BNP supporters who were against the war will vote for Boris, because they hate Red Ken, even if he does agree with BNP policy IN ONE IMPORTANT REGARD and was against the invasion of Iraq.

At least  Ken has denounced the invasion of Iraq that entailed the pointless sacrifice of the lives of the white working class men, which has not improved the life of the Iraqis and which has in no way served the British national interest.

When I am Dictator of Britain, I will simply disenfranchise the people whose votes can only be purchased through bribery and who don't give a damn about the atrocities, loss of life on both sides and the messing up of other people's countries committed in the name of a British foreign policy of a corrupt ruling class that is irrational, demented and in urgent need of radical revision.

Western leaders and their lemming-like death wish

http://english.aljazeera.net//news/europe/2011/03/201132184434793591.html

Really quite alarming that Western leaders are all losing their marbles at the same time. It seems they have a death wish. They want another surge of African refugees to come to the EU, it would appear, which will in turn ignite the tinder box of anti-immigrant feeling already in existence so the riots in North Africa come here too.

What is the matter with Cameron? Does he really have no one to advise him at all?

Come on you stupid fucks.  Prop up Gaddafi, say he's OK after all and everything will be calm again.  That is all you have to do.

Oh, but you can't because you have been prating and canting, huffing and puffing about liberty and democracy for so long you can't go back on it now, can you?

Someone ask me how it feels to be the only sane person living in a whole continent of fucking lunatics.