MY answers to PinkNews readers' questions if I had remained the BNP London Mayoral Candidate

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/05/02/bnp-london-mayoral-candidate-carlos-cortiglia-answers-pinknews-readers-questions/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Pinknews+%


Q1.   With about half of the UK’s HIV positive population accessing care in London what will you do as Mayor to ensure that treatment and care budgets are not further cut over the term of your office?

A1.   I will do NOTHING to ensure that the care budgets for the UK's HIV positive population accessing care in London are not further cut over my term of office.  London has more urgent priorities.

Q2.   What will you do as Mayor to support efforts to tackle the high rate of new HIV infections, particularly amongst gay men?

A2.   I will do NOTHING as Mayor to support efforts to tackle the high rate of new HIV infections particularly amongst gay men.  They really should know better by now.  "Supporting efforts to tackle the high rate of new HIV infections" sounds like you are asking straight people to pay for the sex gay people have, when they fail to practice safe-sex.

Q3.  As a lesbian and a parent I am concerned about homophobia in schools. What will you do with your community safety and policing role to lead on and tackle homophobia in schools?

A3.  I will do NOTHING to tackle homophobia in schools.  I am of the view that homosexuality should not be encouraged but should rather be discouraged.   I hope you are aware that all the Abrahamic faiths could be said to be homophobic.  Unlike the LibLabCon whom we oppose, the BNP will not encourage what religious people all over the world consider to be a SIN.

Q4.   In light of allegations of racism in the Met how are you going to make the Met friendlier towards those minorities?

A4.   I intend to pursue a RACIALLY NEUTRAL policy and treat no race any better or any worse than any other.

Q5.   The rift between the LGBT and Muslim communities in London has been very high-profile over the last few years, with homophobic crime on the increase and growing Islamophobia. What would you do to heal the rift?

A5.   I would advise the LGBT communities to be more discreet in their activities so as not to arouse the wrath of socially conservative people in general.  Prevention is better than cure, after all.

Q6.   The public perception of, and trust in, the Metropolitan police is at an all-time low. A police force which lacks the trust of the citizens it is supposed to serve loses effectiveness, making crime harder to prevent. This is a serious concern for minority groups that are at higher risk of crime, such as LGBTs, blacks, Muslims and the disabled. What would you do to reverse this?

A6.   You will find that young men of all races are statistically more likely to become victims of violence.  The perpetrators of violence are also from the same group.   I have absolutely no intention of prioritising the perceived needs of the groups you mention over the indigenous white community whose interests have been ignored and marginalised over the years.  As I have already said, I intend to pursue a RACIALLY NEUTRAL policy.

Q7.   Elderly LGBTs are one of the most economically vulnerable groups in our society. Few have families, often because until relatively recently the state severely restricted LGBTs’ ability to have children through adoption or similar means, and also because until relatively recently it was very common for LGBTs to be disowned by their parents and siblings upon coming out. If elected, what will you do to combat the economic and social deprivation they face?

A3.   There is a reason why people go through the expense and trouble of rearing children. Ultimately, it is to feel that they will have offspring who cares what happens to their elderly parents.  If you encourage more people to be LGBT then society will be taken over by the dependent and elderly who have no children to look after them.  That is perhaps one of the reasons why all the Abrahamic faiths have regarded homosexuality as an abomination.  No, I will do nothing to help them because they have brought all this on themselves.  Let their poverty in old age and their loneliness be a lesson to us all against the evils of the selfish heedless hedonism of homosexuality.

Q8.   Many legal protections have been established in the last 20 years that benefit LGBT people. There are still more (eg bullying in schools, hate crimes) that could be that require cultural shift. How would you encourage London to shift its cultural perceptions?

A8.   I have absolutely no intention of encouraging more people to be homosexual if that is what you mean.  If I could I would repeal the Equality Act and allow owners of B&Bs to refuse to have homosexuals in their establishment, if that is what they want.

Q9.   Will you commit to de-twin the London and Tehran, the capital city of Iran, a country whose penalty for being gay is death?

A9.  I really had no idea that London has been twinned with Tehran.  Where on earth did you get that from?   I have no intention of stoning homosexuals to death.  The most I would do is give them a 100 lashes if they are caught cottaging.

Q10.   Do you think schools which cannot demonstrate sufficient action to address homophobic bullying should fail their Ofsted inspections?

A10.  Certainly not.  British schools should not encourage homosexuality anyway.

Q11.  Do you believe it is important that the mayor’s office supports benchmarks which measure diversity e.g. Stonewall Diversity Champions?

A11.  The BNP believes it is better for the future of the British Nation (and this means of all British citizens irrespective of our race) to discourage rather than encourage homosexuality. Stonewall Diversity Champions would encourage homosexuals to lord it over heterosexuals in the workplace, and I really think people have had enough PC gay rights policies being shoved down their throats.  The BNP would be false to its own to its principles if it did not try to stop this sort of thing and say so in uncompromising terms.

Q12.  Do you support plans by Tower Hamlets Cllr Khan who plans to ban “sex establishments” in Tower Hamlets in order to reduce female exploitation? Do you believe this should include the only gay pub in the area, the White Swan which has an amateur strip night?

A12.   I really think this is a matter for the residents of Tower Hamlets to resolve amongst themselves.   If the majority of the residents want to keep it open then it should stay open.  If they do not, then it should close.   I shall not interfere.

Votes for Ken Livingstone from the "Far Right" whether he wants them or not

What I have distributed on behalf of Ken.  The Iron Cross and the Swastika badges were given to me by Kevin Watmough of the British People's Party when I visited Bradford

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ken-livingstone-quits-mayoral-debate-over-bnp-participation-7665712.html

"BNP candidate Carlos Cortiglia told political blogger Iain Dale he planned to give Mr Livingstone his second preference vote."

It is not quite clear why Carlos said this, but my reasons are clear.  Out of the two front-runners, only Ken Livingstone was against the war.

There is not much difference in terms policy between the two front-runners if you are of an Eurosceptic bent of mind.  Both of them support gay marriage, both of them do not wish to share a platform with the Eurosceptic parties, both of them are recklessly making promises they will probably not be able to keep.

But there is one thing that Ken has done that we can be certain about that Boris has not done, which is to speak against the invasion of Iraq.   It can be inferred that if Boris had remained an MP he would have voted for all the Neocon wars of Cameron and it can also be inferred that Ken would have voted against them if he had the option of doing so.  (Do however please correct me if you know any better.)

http://www.mpacuk.org/story/240412/bigoted-boris-johnson.html

Strangely and sadly, Ken did not use his anti-war stance as a campaigning issue at all.

It was pointed out to me that this is because London voters will only vote for "London issues".  (This is code for "Venal Londoners will vote for whoever most convincingly bribes them with the most things they want.")

Probably, even Muslim Londoners no longer care that their government is invading Muslim countries and killing Muslims who dislike being invaded, in their name.

It would appear that Ken is not campaigning on his anti-war stance because he doesn't think Londoners care about it enough.

Even BNP supporters who were against the war will vote for Boris, because they hate Red Ken, even if he does agree with BNP policy IN ONE IMPORTANT REGARD and was against the invasion of Iraq.

At least  Ken has denounced the invasion of Iraq that entailed the pointless sacrifice of the lives of the white working class men, which has not improved the life of the Iraqis and which has in no way served the British national interest.

When I am Dictator of Britain, I will simply disenfranchise the people whose votes can only be purchased through bribery and who don't give a damn about the atrocities, loss of life on both sides and the messing up of other people's countries committed in the name of a British foreign policy of a corrupt ruling class that is irrational, demented and in urgent need of radical revision.

Schools to be prohibited from challenging gay marriage by PC police

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9717000/9717095.stm

0737
The Catholic Education Service has written to every state-funded Catholic school in England and Wales and asked them to draw the attention of pupils to the Coalition for Marriage's anti-equality petition. Austen Ivereigh, former press secretary to the Archbishop of Westminster Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, and Andrew Copson, Chief Executive of the British Humanist Association, debate the decision.

Listen to this very SINISTER interview.

Apparently, objecting to gay marriage means you are homophobic and against equality, according to the gay British Humanist, Andrew Copson.

Apparently, the BHA are saying that encouraging school children to keep marriage just for heterosexual couples in British schools should no longer allowed, because it is political, and engaging in politics (which entails debate and thinking through the issues) is therefore no longer encouraged in our schools.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/9227210/Catholic-schools-face-indoctrination-claims-over-gay-marriage.html

These people - ie the LibLabCon - are just steam-rolling their legislation, with no more than a token squeak of protest, while the nationalist parties and social conservatives are in complete disarray.

Below are my arguments against "Gay Marriage":

"Gay marriage" is an oxymoron.

Marriage was never meant for gay people, only for men and women who want to procreate and need rules to regulate their relations between each other and also as to the disposition of property in the event of the death of the one or both of the marriage partners.  

Why is marriage not for gay people?  Because they do not have children and have no moral obligation to stay with each other when one of them tires of the other.

"Gay marriage" is like a man wearing a maternity bra or a woman wearing boxer shorts.  It is purely and simply, FETISHISTIC.

Now, I hear that Carlos Cortiglia the BNP London Mayoral Candidate, has promised to defend feminism and gay rights against Islam in page 8 of this week's Time Out.  I was also told that the Time Out reporter was "astounded".

These benighted British Nationalists appear to have no idea that it was decades of chasing the female vote that has brought them to the abyss of national decline and racial degeneracy.

Feminism is a cancer.  Gay marriage is a tumour.

Review of the London Mayoral PEBs and for whom I shall be voting

http://bnptv.org.uk/2012/04/bnp-gla-election-broadcast-2012/
The abysmal BNP PEB in which Carlos Cortiglia is nowhere to be seen and the voiceover is by Nick Griffin in which all the people who say they will vote BNP have strangely incongruous Northern accents for London voters in the mayoral election.  A significant length of it is devoted to explaining how and where to put the cross to its presumably learning disabled supporters.   Embarrassing, infuriating and insulting to anyone who has ever had anything to do with the party.   Some of the more paranoid nationalists have been saying for a while now that Nick Griffin is really a Jew or at any rate a state agent in the pay of Searchlight.  This level of incompetence and mismanagement can only be deliberate, surely, they say.

That he is "a condom on the cock of British nationalism" is another colourful phrase that comes to mind.


Why is Carlos not even in the PEB?  Are they ashamed of him now after making such a fuss about appointing him in the teeth of so many objections within the party?

I was told by Steve Squire the London Organiser that it was not allowed.  But why then is Lawrence Webb in the UKIP PEB then?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01fqh9z
The Green Party PEB has no sign of its rather elderly candidate Jenny Jones and is instead peopled by the young whose future we are invited to consider as we dutifully vote to pay more taxes in the name of the environment.  Cut open a Green and you will find a Red!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yhF1LhHcBc&list=UUJ812xlx_mKRjcZqq_zah2w&index=1
Boris being Boris in this rather predictable PEB.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPhZCzB5TuI&feature=player_embedded
LibDem PEB with a gay ex-copper trying to sound strong on law and order.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzPJH-NqJ1Y&feature=player_embedded
Siobhan Benita looking beautiful and beguiling with just a hint of the air-head about her.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QN-5PauNG0
UKIP London Mayoral Candidate Lawrence Webb appears in this rather competent PEB with the dishy GLA candidate Stephen Woolfe.  PHWOAR!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpZaEVgNyDQ&feature=player_embedded
I have never seen our Ken looking so slick and smooth and good.  Very competently put together, with a very affecting soundtrack.  If I were Ken watching this on the big screen, I would have been moved to tears too, because I am an old softy at heart when all is said and done.

Ken is prepared to discuss controversial matters while Boris the Buffoon tries so very hard not to discuss politics at all.

Boris the Buffoonish Schoolboy v Ken the Man.

Ken may not be public school but he is a Futurist and is prepared to put his money where his mouth is, unlike Boris.  Ken reads the writing on the wall and acts on his accurate reading of it sooner and better than any other British politician I know.

So, looking good, Ken!   Give Boris a haircut for us all on 3 May!   I will be giving Ken my FIRST vote because he was against the war while Boris voted FOR the war, which is just despicable.

All Londoners who hate the idea of British soldiers dying for Neoconning US and UK politicians (Bush, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg and Obama) should vote for Ken if they really care that much (though I suspect most are too unprincipled and apathetic to care about what is being done in their name and wouldn't dream of making any sacrifices for foreigners their government has wronged, especially if they are Muslims).  Probably they don't, but I do, because I hate stupid wars by stupid warmongering politicians who don't know what they are doing.

I am SO disgusted with the embarrassing BNP PEB that I will be voting UKIP even though they won't let me join their party because they want to continue pretending I am racist, when in fact I would not accept racial superiority even if you begged and begged and begged me to take it.

I think it is probably those of the ones who are wary of me are rather elderly and set in their ways, and the younger ones are just wishy-washy effeminate libertarians who don't really believe in free speech and actually rather like the Equality Act 2010 who fear I may use their party as a stepping stone in my plans for world domination ....

Claire Khaw sets out her stall *again* for leadership of a civic nationalist party that will eventually rival the BNP *and* UKIP

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/nick-griffin-for-the-good-of-nationalism-step-down-now/
Andrew Brons BNP MEP slags off incumbent leader of the BNP and invites Nick Griffin to stand down.

And then what?

He is too old to take over and parties like the BNP do not have the luxury of having caretaker leaders.  If they want a new leader he (or she) will have to be able to hit the ground running, be able to keep a fractious party together and connect with the public.

http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=277526118997694&id=694016429&comment_id=1585263
Claudia Dalgleish has more revelations about her ex-boyfriend the London Organiser who is Number 1 on the GLA Top Up list.

MY RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE


I wish people would attack the party on policy grounds.

Ultimately, none of this is going to make the party fall because the people who vote BNP would be OK about sex shops, the aphrodisiacs that they sell and drug use in general. This is probably true of most white voters whom we all know are liberal and licentious on sexual matters.

Even the scandal about the Chairman exposing himself to Claudia Dalgleish in her car was a bit of a damp squib. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2106633/BNP-leader-Nick-Griffin-sex-pest-exposed-glamour-model-car.html?ito=feeds-newsxml  The male members who supported him assumed he had done it, but said Claudia must have led him on, as if it were OK for a leader of a political party to be excused anything just because he was "led on" by a scarlet woman.

Most depraved white British men of all classes would probably be happy to admit that they could never in any circumstances refuse a blow job, no matter who was offering it.

Knowing them, they would feel that having a GLA member who has a bit of a Hugh Hefner reputation would add a bit of glamour to British nationalism.

The BNP have to have Steve Squire because none of them have the money or the guts to do it, and Nick Griffin was never going to let Jeffrey Marshall be the London Mayoral Candidate even if he could pronounce "London" properly, unlike Carlos Cortiglia, the Uruguayan BNP London Mayoral Candidate.

Poor old Jeffrey, who is now being punished for daring to discuss to alight briefly on the subject of eugenics, when he and I objected to the fuss being made about Ivan Cameron's death, whose father had used the NHS to win the sympathy vote, all at expense of the British taxpayer.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2009/05/in-context-jeffrey-marshalls-comments.html

It would appear that the BNP want someone foreign to be their London Mayoral Candidate in just the way major supermarkets prefer foreign labour and the way some white men prefer to have an oriental for a wife because they think she will be more submissive and clean the house and cook better and more often.

What is Andrew Brons doing these days anyway? He is just whingeing from the sidelines and not offering any new ideas.

There is really no alternative to Nick Griffin. However crap disgruntled nationalists think Nick Griffin is, they cannot find anyone better, and that is the bottom line.

The only person who can obviously do it better is me, and these men are never going to be led by someone who is female and foreign. Why, she might even do much better than Nick Griffin, tell them the truth about what is wrong with this country, do what is necessary to take the party to new heights, but that would never do, because white male pride would never cope with being led by a female and a foreigner, even if she is obviously better.

Better the weeds of Nick Griffin to the fruits of Claire Khaw, they will  intone solemnly, like a mantra ...

All that  needs to happen now is for a prominent nationalist to get in touch and we will be Up, Up and Away http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIxm0Th55Iw&feature=fvwrel, but I know many will be inhibited from making such a move, probably because they will have no inhibition in admitting to a fear of flying.

The only way to take British nationalism forward is to NOT be seen to be hating Jews, Muslims, other races or foreigners, but take some of the responsibility for the ills of the nation because of the whole scale submission by the men of Britain to the emasculating effects of feminism.

The only way to make people listen to you is to convince them that you are nicer and smarter and braver than anyone else around, that you really have solutions to the problems, and are not afraid to say things that need to be said.

But this is something that no British nationalist has the courage and the generosity of spirit to do, and they will go back to their tired old ways of whingeing about the Jews, Muslims, foreigners and their own white traitorous liberal politicians, while pathetically hoping for some no-strings sex from the nearest Slut Single Mum.

Jews and Muslims practice family values supported by marriage and their women are better mothers, have more children, so they easily overtake the white working classes.

Why would anyone want to vote for a party whose members are men who cannot compete with immigrant labour in the field of unskilled labour and whom no employers in their right mind would want to hire anyway?

They also go around carrying carrier bags in their lower class way. Only poor men and bag ladies use carrier bags to carry their belongings around in, but they don't care, not even when I point out again and again that the British voter is an incorrigible snob and will never ever vote for a party of poor lower class people who go around carrying their belongings in carrier bags who don't go on foreign holidays often enough to like foreigners.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/real-reason-why-bnp-are-despised-and.html

Of all the BNP activists whom I have heard speak in my time as a BNP member, only Robert Bailey the ex-London Organiser told them to pick up a book occasionally in one of his typically inspirational speeches, for the sake of their race and their nation.

If only the media would ask Nick Griffin why he is so crap when liberalism is just a rotten door waiting to be pushed open with a gentle nudge, but these days the liberal media are not encouraged to ask interesting questions, because they too are afraid of saying the wrong thing and losing their jobs.

Verily, the British live in a land of fools, knaves, cowards, hypocrites, sluts and bastards indulging simultaneously in all the seven deadly sins like there is no tomorrow.  There is really nothing at all you can do with these lemming-like people except watch in wonder and horror as they throw themselves off a cliff en masse.

You cannot appeal to their reason or their sense of honour or fair play because they genuinely do not understand these concepts any more.  If they have a vague idea of what these ideas are they certainly do not have it in them to act upon this thing called principle.

You see, lower animals who are singly-parented by their Slut Single Mums tend not to have the ability to reason with abstract ideas such as morality and the nature and purpose of having principles, and sons who are singly-parented by their single mothers do not learn or practice masculine virtues either at home or in their co-educational schools (who are in any case only staffed by the female and feminist-dominated teaching profession).

Should they get married they will be afraid to annoy and irritate their wives in case she divorces them and takes half their stuff before depriving them of contact with their offspring.

The only thing you can do to them to make them do anything now is to hurt them in the way a farmer would use a cattle prod to move his sheep from field to field, sadly.

How are the mighty fallen.

No comment from the complacent BNP on anti-racist hysteria crippling the operational efficiency of British police

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9184574/Metropolitan-police-commissioner-Bernard-Hogan-Howe-issues-racism-warning-to-force.html

Youths of all ages of all races in all nations know what the cops can be like when they collar you for one reason or another.

Let's face it young men are just not that nice to each other, especially if you divide them into different tribes.   Young white criminal suspects are often treated rudely by white police, before the immigrants arrived.

In Britain suspected criminals who are black will be treated more politely by white British police.

White suspected criminals can continue to be treated rudely by the police without fear of them playing the race card.

This is the liberal idea of improving race relations, which no one, but no one, but no one is prepared to question, not even the complacent BNP whose Chairman has not seen fit to comment on the ever shriller siren screams of anti-racist hysteria.   Not even a tweet from him.   More than his job's worth, I suppose.   

Interestingly, I have been told yesterday that I would not be welcome at the BNP London Mayoral Candidate's Manifesto Launch in North East London on Monday 9 April as a reporter.

Press and Media please ring Stephen Squire for details on: 07771 598 227
Members and supporters wanting to attend please ring Paul on: 07985 147 324

Do they doubt my ability to report impartially on the proceedings then?   

I actually tweeted approvingly of Carlos' performance on LBC the other day compared to the very dull Lawrence Webb.   

To be read in reverse order:

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Well done, Carlos! @londonorganiser

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Gives me such a warm glow to hear the BNP and UKIP London mayoral candidates agreeing with each other! @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
"The Mayor of London has to revalue manual work," says Carlos. Excellent stuff!

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
"Why should anyone pay for parking outside his own home?" asks Carlos. Attaboy! Lawrence can be rather long-winded.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos agrees with Lawrence about LEZ, and is much less boring. Good move, Carlos! @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
LEZzzzzzzzzzzzz @lbc973 @Siobhan4Mayor

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
"Charity begins at home," says Carlos, mastering the art of the soundbite, while Lawrence waffles on about regulations.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
I must say I think Carlos is coming off quite well compared to Lawrence Webb who is a rather dull chap.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos says Olympic tickets printed in the US and merchandise made in China.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos says "I can't make promises I cannot deliver."

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
UKIP candidate says BNP candidate naive to ignore immigration!

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
BNP has to be more inclusive, Carlos says. @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos says he will represent people who are entitled to be in the UK irrespective of race.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
BNP won't be campaigning on immigration, Carlos says.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Slight confusion on UKIP name with Lawrence Webb. @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
It will be fun for me to imagine myself in the shoes of Carlos Cortiglia since I was once prospective BNP London Mayoral candidate.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
UKIP and BNP London Mayoral candidates on @lbc973 http://www.lbc.co.uk/listen-live-3578

I do not need to attend the Manifesto Launch to tell you, dear reader, that everything the BNP does is a waste of your time and your money if they don't sort out their ideology and have a leader who cares about The Cause (by which I take to be the National Interest, rather than what lower class white people who cannot compete with foreigners in the field of unskilled manual labour would like to do non-white British citizens when they get into power).  Nick Griffin is clinging to leadership as a farmer would cling to his only milk-producing cow.   

Do not expect courageous decisions from this man, who has not seen fit to comment on Liam Stacey's 56 day imprisonment for blaspheming against a black footballer.   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2121003/Liam-Stacey-jail-tweeting-abuse-Fabrice-Muamba.html  He calculates, correctly, that most BNP core supporters are too dim and too busy to notice.   The ones in the party who do are too frightened to criticise him because they do not want to be suspended or expelled.   

A member I know has been disabled from commenting from the BNP Facebook page for pointing out that Carlos Cortiglia, the BNP London Mayoral Candidate, committed an infelicity of expression when he talked about the BNP "setting London alight" and then went on immediately to discuss last year's riots.   

You would have thought that NOW is the time to build up a full steam of publicity on policies and principles for British nationalism, before the next General Election.  NOW is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party, but this is not in fact what Nick Griffin wants, if these men have any possibility of appearing to be better leaders than him.   

Nick Griffin does not think the core membership will understand or bother their pretty heads with principles and ideology.  Nick Griffin is only interested in the lowest common denominator.  Nick Griffin is not interested in infusing the party with talent that might threaten his leadership, even if it would help the cause of British Nationalism.

And that is why the BNP is a waste of time and money under its current leadership.   

Carlos Cortiglia - 2012 London BNP Mayoral Candidate

LONDRES E MI PATRIA

ETONCES VOTA CARLOS POR MAJOR (PERO VOTA NO! SENORS BORIS Y KEN).

VOTA PNB (LOS PARTIDA NACIONAL BRITANICOS).

VIVA CARLOS Y LOS PNB!

CARLOS SI! SI! SI!

If I had proceeded to become the BNP mayoral candidate my leaflet would be full of Chinese slogans.  Now wouldn't that be a publicity stunt and a half?

I would be famous in China too and the darling of Xinhua News Agency ...

Carlos Cortiglia's maiden speech as 2012 BNP London Mayoral Candidate AKA the role of the Foreigner in Nationalist Politics

The speech was made on Thursday 22 September 2011.

It was, I was surprised and delighted to report, impressively statesmanlike.  

He began by addressing the accusations of him not supporting the right side in the Falklands War.  The reasons were convoluted and complicated, and the accusations are a "complete fabrication".  

I am myself not bothered either way.  At the time of the Falklands War, Carlos was not a British citizen, but lived in Uruguay and was an Uruguayan citizen.  

Supporting all the wars Britain involves itself in is not conclusive of loyalty, and opposing the last three wars is not conclusive of disloyalty either.

There are many racial nationalists who consider that WW2 should not have been fought.  This is not evidence of their disloyaly either, since many of them regard themselves as patriots and nationalists, or even national socialists.  Anti-Semitism is not conclusive of being a traitor to one's country.  It only shows that one does not accept the liberal narrative of history.  

Doubtless people in South America would have a quite different view towards the Falklands than the British and our perspective is coloured by where we live, whom we identify with, and a certain view of where our best interests lie.   

As a Civic Nationalist who feels that Civic Nationalism alone is enough to give Ethno Nationalists what they want, I am really not bothered about which side Carlos supported.  Britain won the Falklands War, and there may be another one soon when the Argies attack the Falklands again after realising that this country has expended its military resources on pointless wars in Afraqbya and can no longer defend its own territories or expect assistance from the Americans, but we will cross that bridge when we get to it, and know whom to blame.

Carlos praised Baroness Flather who courageously pointed out how the Bangladeshi and Pakistani community was milking the British system by coming here, having lots of babies as single mothers (for women under polygamous marriages are treated as single mothers by the welfare system) at the expense of the British taxpayer.  He praised her for saying what few indigenous and white politicians dare not say.

Below are my notes of his speech.

"I admire her [Baroness Flather] very much and made a programme about her."  (I have no details on this.)

"My role in the party is not as a personality but as a teamplayer."

He said that he bears me (who was expelled by the party for making comments found "unacceptable" to the party concerning the disabled on the Victoria Derbyshire Show) no personal animosity.  "Claire Khaw is not the enemy.  Eddy Butler and Andrew Brons are not the enemy.   We must keep talking.  We have a mission.  Divided we fall, united we have a chance."

"England expects that every man will do his duty."

"We will always have financial problems because we are not the established parties and even they have financial problems too."

"We are simple, ordinary, honest people ... "

"The Labour Party has offshore accounts ... "

"If we do not know anything [about managing our finances] we will learn."

"One of my favourite people in the BNP is Richard Edmonds."

"Bob Gertner is a man.  He built Croydon branch."

"I respect my BNP people."

He also praised Richard Barnbrook and attributed the party's success in Barking to his energy.  Sadly, he no longer takes the party whip after falling out with the party.  "If there is one regret it is to see what happened to Richard Barnbook. He did not sit down.  He made us deliver all the leaflets in the face of tiredness and despair."

"Many are our comrades even if we do not know it."

He mentioned the other failed mayoral candidates:

Michael Barnbrook is an "excellent candidate" but is too critical of the leader.

Jeffrey Marshall is known for making similar comments to me about disabled children.

Carlos writes for the Jewish Chronicle.  That was news to me.

"We will give the media a run for their money.  That is my mission."

I bear Carlos no animosity.   We political animals are a strange mixture of pride and humility, egotism and self-abnegation, wisdom and folly, and we acquire triumph and failure in different proportions depending, really, in our preparedness to carry on forgiving our critics and making friends of our enemies.  

When I entered the room, I was greeted with a jocular "Uh oh.  Here comes trouble."

When Carlos and I clocked each other we both nodded at each other in acknowledgement.

When he said "Claire Khaw is not the enemy", I smiled and nodded my appreciation.

When he finished his speech and came over to shake my hand, I found myself saying "I support you, Carlos."

His message of reconciliation is much needed in the circle of indigenous nationalists. Perhaps if we foreigners are the peacemakers amongst the fighting and fractious natives, then our contribution to nationalism in this country will become clearer and perhaps more generally appreciated amongst the ethno-nationalists who think we should not be in this country, let alone in their party.

For my part, I only wish to point out by my part, as frequently and as loudly as I can, that many of BNP policies are popular with non-whites whose instincts are culturally and rationally non-liberal and patriarchal.  

What the nationalist movement needs to do is to not make us feel we are turkeys voting for Xmas and pretend that all non-whites like liberal policies.   The Muslims are especially disgusted by liberal degeneracy that the liberal political establishment either deliberately promote or dare not condone, but dare not be seen to bite the hand that feeds them.  

By making reaching out to non-white British citizens, and getting more non-white British citizens and foreigners to support the BNP in public, it would make it more likely for the lily-livered indigenous liberal middle class brain-washed whites to get over their fear of voting for a party with a reputation for being racist.

BNP policies remain the most sensible in the land.  It is just unfortunate that those who support it are the equivalent of rough peasants, who know they are right, refuse to shut up when they are abused and intimidated by the liberal elite, but do not have the education and social skills to convey their message in a more appealing way.

Jeffrey Marshall to replace Carlos Cortiglia as 2012 BNP London Mayoral Candidate?

I think Jeffrey Marshall should be the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate.  He was born in London, and is a grammar school boy whose father was a publican who had dealings with the Krays.   He graduated with a degree in History and Philosophy from the University of Kent, has lived abroad and can even speak Spanish.  He is musical and can sing very well.  Indeed, he was leader singer in a band during his student years.  He is also taller than all the other white male candidates and has participated in a ground-breaking debate between Muslims and the BNP, which, because it was civil and enlightening, and showed the BNP in a good light, was deliberately ignored by the liberal media.   Jeffrey could even be a potential leadership candidate, IMHO, despite his "Dr Death" comments about Ivan Cameron.  Indeed, Jeffrey even has a brother who is learning disabled, so all the dreadful things that the Left have been pretending that he wants to do to the disabled, eg exterminate them, is hysterical nonsense and can shown to be so.



http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/12/18/mr-jeffrey-marshalls-speech-to-muslim-debate-intiative/

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/23/muslims-debate-initiative-bnp-jeffrey-marshall-debates-muslims-on-islamification-uk/

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/12/historic-evening-of-debate-between.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-context-jeffrey-marshalls-comments.html
IN CONTEXT: Jeffrey Marshall's Comments about the unproductive

Why Claire Khaw is attacking the *current* Prima Donna BNP London Mayoral Candidate

"Why is Claire Khaw attacking our mayoral candidate?" the BNP ask.

Because I think he will be a disaster and I want it noted that I said he will be a disaster and an embarrassment, even for a pariah party such as as they, when I hear things about him that show that he is clearly unsuited to be LMC.

He is behaving like a schoolgirl having a hissy fit, wailing and howling to all and sundry about my comments about him that were intended to be helpful.

I have said nothing untrue about him, so he really really cannot complain.

He is apparently complaining to the Chairman himself about me, as if he thought that something could be done about it!

How naive if he thinks anyone in this land could get me to delete any of my comments about him on my blog, without the benefit a High Court action, and then only if I have libelled him and only if he has hired very expensive lawyers and spent tens of thousands of pounds in legal fees.

Perhaps he thinks the Chairman could proscribe me. Imagine, little old me, poscribed just for my opinions!

Proscriptions
5 The Chairman may proscribe individuals, organisations or publications which are so hostile to our Party, or whose views and/or behaviour are so likely to bring discredit upon our Party, that Members should have no contact with them.

6 Such a hostile individual, publications or group is thenceforth regarded as a rotten apple and proscription is the means by which they are prevented from contaminating others. Not only are the proscribed barred from attending party functions and activities, but Members are barred from attending events organised by them and barred from sharing platforms with them, distributing or advertising literature and electronic media produced by or in support of them,and promoting events at which they are known or – in the opinion of our Party leadership – likely to be attending.

7 Proscriptions shall come into effect on publication in the National members‟ bulletin and remain in force until further notice. A full list appears on our Partt'website.

Claire Khaw - not only joined, but suspended; not only suspended, but expelled; not only expelled but proscribed!

Fancy!

The EDL is an organisation proscribed by the BNP.

Imagine, little old me, as scary and as dangerous as the EDL!

Fancy!

Expelled just for saying on the Victoria Derbyshire Show that I would not wish to bring up a severely disabled baby   http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html

All for saying WHAT about Carlos exactly?

We don't even know which comment he found so objectionable.

Was it when I said that I speak better English than him?

Or that I write better English than him?

Or that I supported the right side in the Falklands War?

Anyway, I am not being destructive in my criticism of the Carlos, I am being constructive.  Indeed, I am being so constructive that I am proposing that Jeffrey Marshall - who made similar comments about the disabled for which he is now called Dr Death - should be their LMC.

I would be delighted to be the BNP Press Officer or Directrix of Communications (and there is nothing in the rules that say I have to a member of the party to be Press Officer) fielding all the predictably hysterical accusations and questions from the liberal media against Jeffrey about wishing to exterminate the disabled and threatening to sue them for libel if they do not mind their Ps and Qs.

It would be a pleasure and a privilege.

Currently, Carlos is Press Officer, but I think I may just be able to do the job better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prima_donna

Yes, I do mean "prima donna", and not "primo uomo".  

A disturbing threat issued by Carlos Cortiglia to the BNP if something is not done about Claire Khaw

I have some rather disturbing news concerning the BNP mayoral candidate Carlos Cortiglia.

It seems he was unhappy about certain comments I have made about him at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/09/on-carlos-cortiglia-being-announced-as.html viz

5.  I [Claire Khaw] supported the right side in the Falklands War when Carlos was probably then an Argentinian nationalist (although he is in fact an Uraguayan).

But Carlos did publicly supported the Argies, as he admits in his statement:

"In 1982, the Oriental Republic of Uruguay expressed its political support for Argentina, but was very careful to ensure that its neutrality as a country would not be violated by Argentina. As a State employee and as a Uruguayan (not as a British citizen), I made a public pronouncement expressing the position of the Uruguayan government."

While I am aware that he has made a number of threats to "destroy" me while he was on the selection panel for the London mayoral candidate, I have been willing to let bygones be bygones, and have offered helpful advice to him such as suggesting to him on Friday 5 September 2001:

"Carlos was not a British citizen till 2001 so all that happened before and during the Falklands War of 1982 should be discounted, as he was then an Uruguayan citizen as well as an Uruguayan state employee obliged to toe the Uruguayan government's line of support for the Argentines."

and

‎"Those who support BNP policies have to support him now. He would get better support if I were Press Officer though."

and 

"The best way to deal with questions about his support for the Argies is to admit it and then move on.  Say he got one war wrong, but he was against the last 3 wars in Afraqbya (in line with party policy). This means he got 3 out 4 wars right. What is the score of sitting MPs? Most of them voted for the wars in Afraqbya, and this would make their score 1 out of 4."

However, it seems that my constructive comments were not taken in the spirit that they were intended and Carlos still thinks I am out to destroy him, in perhaps the way he said he would destroy me.  (Why would I bother if he is doing the job so well himself?  I am busy woman, after all.)

I actually took the trouble of checking if the Organisers who invited me to give a talk at the BNP meeting on 4 September were in fact breaching the rules, because I did not want them to get into trouble on my account, and believed they were covered by rule 19 and 23.

Rules Governing Official Meetings of a Branch or Group (page 90 of the BNP constitution)

19 No rigid rules shall govern the holding or conduct of Official Meetings or
Executive Meetings of a British Homeland Branch or Group save as are set out
in this Annex 4 or otherwise provided for in the constitution of such Branch or

23 Any Official Meeting of a Branch or Group may be open or closed to
guests as the Branch Organiser or Group Organiser shall determine on the
occasion each such Official Meeting shall be called.  

It seems that Carlos threatened to complain to Head Office about the fact that I was invited to give a talk despite being expelled, with the intention of getting the Organiser concerned into trouble, if he did not stop me from making comments which Carlos found objectionable in Voice of Reason.

In fact, the Organiser concerned promised he would look into it when Carlos rang him on the morning of 11 September.  However, instead of  having the sense to leave the conversation there, he tried to reinforce his request with a form of blackmail, implying he could make trouble for the Organiser, even though the Organiser concerned had already agreed to what he asked.  (This unpleasant habit is so ingrained that Carlos does not even realise he is doing it, suggested the Organiser, trying to excuse Carlos.)

Should they forgive such a heinous act of treachery?  Would they be fools to forgive such uncomradely behaviour from someone who is clearly a grass, and will probably issue similar if not worse threats again when the opportunity presents itself?

Should they give him another chance?  I know no one listens to me, but I would not do so, in their shoes.

The transcript of my talk, which concerned why British nationalism should also be about family values can be found at http://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved&&note_id=10150290579549144

Carlos did rather aggressively shout at me at the meeting, and said something along the lines of: "Don't talk to me about Family Values when the white working classes are disadvantaged.  Don't talk to me about Family Values when the white working classes are oppressed.  Don't talk to me about Family Values when the white working classes have everything against them."

I even refrained from asking him if I am to infer from his rant that he did not support Family Values supported by marriage.

Now it seems he is angry with the Organisers for not coming round and shooting me for making comments about him.

I would have been quite happy to display any comment he made in response to anything I have made here on this blog, but it seems he has not seen fit to contact me in person to clarify or correct me on anything I have said concerning any material fact.   I have said nothing about him that I know to be untrue, in any case, since he himself admits in his statement that he did indeed make a public statement in support of the Argentinians' claim to the Falklands.

unexecuted, undisappeared and unshot, presumably) he would withdraw himself as candidate and even said he would go to The Guardian to sell his story that the BNP are lunatics for inviting me to their East London meeting on 4 September 2011.

I am not quite clear what Carlos expects the BNP to do about me, since they have already expelled me.  Perhaps he would like me proscribed by the party for making comments about him?

Whether or not he means to carry out this threat, whether or not it was said in anger and that he now regrets it, it is too late for Carlos.  The news is out that Carlos attempted to blackmail the Party.

Whether or not the Organisers wish to dismiss this is a childish tantrum that they wish to overlook and forgive, my view remains that such a man is unfit to represent the BNP or indeed any party at all, no matter how small and insignificant.  If Carlos had the courage of his convictions he would have gone straight to The Guardian and have done with it, rather than make childish threats about doing so.

If I make a threat, at least people will know that there is a pretty good chance it will be carried out.

Even the supporters of the BNP - social pariahs though they are - do not deserve to be represented by someone whose political judgement is so demonstrably unsound.

If the BNP proscribe me because they want to please and mollify Carlos, then it is their prerogative.  It is really the marginalised that I wish to stand up for, not a party that claims to represent their interests.

There are times when one has a duty to speak out, even if one will be shot as the bearer of bad news.   There are those who think Carlos should remain candidate despite what he has threatened.  I do not agree with them and feel it is my duty to to say so in public.  I shall be sad to sacrifice my friendship with them, if they cannot forgive me, but Carlos has by his actions show his manifest unfitness to represent any party at all, and still less the BNP, who have all the bad publicity they need and who should just give up with dud candidates.  If they cannot find any decent candidates to represent them, then they should not put forward any at all.

JEFFREY MARSHALL TO REPLACE CARLOS AS LONDON MAYORAL CANDIDATE?

I think Jeffrey Marshall should be the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate.  He was born in London, and is a grammar school boy whose father was a publican who had dealings with the Krays.   He graduated with a degree in History and Philosophy from the University of Kent, has lived abroad and can even speak Spanish.  He is musical and can sing very well.  Indeed, he was leader singer in a band during his student years.  He is also taller than all the other white male candidates and has participated in a ground-breaking debate between Muslims and the BNP, which, because it was civil and enlightening, and showed the BNP in a good light, was deliberately ignored by the liberal media.   Jeffrey could even be a potential leadership candidate, IMHO, despite his "Dr Death" comments about Ivan Cameron.  Indeed, Jeffrey even has a brother who is learning disabled, so all the dreadful things that the Left have been pretending that he wants to do to the disabled, eg exterminate them, is hysterical nonsense and can shown to be so.

There are perfectly good white male candidates available to represent the party and Jeffrey Marshall should the BNP London Mayoral Candidate.   There is no need whatsoever for the Party to put up with unreliable and clearly treacherous foreigners just to show that the BNP are no longer racist or xenophobic.

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/12/18/mr-jeffrey-marshalls-speech-to-muslim-debate-intiative/

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/23/muslims-debate-initiative-bnp-jeffrey-marshall-debates-muslims-on-islamification-uk/

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/12/historic-evening-of-debate-between.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-context-jeffrey-marshalls-comments.html
IN CONTEXT: Jeffrey Marshall's Comments about the unproductive

Let it not be said that Jeffrey Marshall put me up to this, for he actually told me to "make a brief clarification" to the effect that "Carlos didn't actually fight for the Argies on your blog".  This I am very happy to do so.    

On Carlos Cortiglia being announced as the BNP 2012 London Mayoral Candidate

Carlos Cortiglia the 2012 BNP London Mayoral Candidate

http://eddybutler.blogspot.com/2011/09/news-from-nowhere.html?spref=fb

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/regional/carlos-london-british-national-party-mayoral-candidate-announced

"It could have been me, and it should have been me!!" 

would be the words my detractors wish me to utter in public, stamping my feet as I tear at my hair, rend my garments and gnash my teeth before the ground swallowed me up, as it did Rumpeltstiltskin ...

I therefore dedicate this little thought-present to them.

But how do I feel, how do I really really feel?

Well, I  had thought it was too good to be true that I would be really be the BNP mayoral candidate, but everyone was being so encouraging that I had thought it would be within my grasp.

I was not however prepared to stop saying what I feel to be the truth and to express what I felt were rational views - or even put that on hold for a few months - in order to avoid this glittering prize being snatched from my eager grasp.

I do not mind making that sacrifice and demonstrating the high cost of free speech in Britain these days, because it is a very important point to make.

We know who is in power by whom we are not allowed to offend, and those whom we are not allowed to offend are women who make poor reproductive choices, and whose existence become a burden to themselves and taxpayers.

Carlos makes no such statements of course.  He knows that the leadership of the British National Party would not dream of criticising the behaviour of its own members, only the behaviour of liberals and the immigrants who enter this country in great numbers to take the bread out of their mouths at the invitation of the liberals.

Whatever is wrong with this country, it is all the fault of foreigners and liberals, never the white working classes who buy into the sex and shopping pub culture and drug culture of a consumer society - because they know no other, these white working classes who live for physical pleasures before they die, without the promise of an afterlife.

Of course the white working classes cannot compete against these foreigners, for the liberal political establishment discourages all the things that would enable the white working classes to become respectable and fit for purpose, such as a good education and the moral guidance afforded by a religion that would promote family life, unlike the current state religion that is the degenerate Anglican Church - infested by liberals and infected by feminism.

That is why the British have no culture to speak of these days - unless you can call drugs and sex and rock and roll a 'culture'.  If it is a culture, it is the culture of the primitive hedonism, or what animals would do if they could live like us.

How sad then that the white working classes have no one who will advise and warn them.  They have been abandoned first by the liberal establishment and now by their own party that purports to promote their interests.

I like to think that if I had very bad breath or if my bum really did look very large in the micro-mini skirt that I am too ugly, old and fat to wear, someone would point this out to me, either gently or brutally, but, no, the white working classes do not even have the benefit of  close family or friends, no one who will advise and warn them, because they are frankly beyond all help and hope, and are now only fit to be exploited by all and sundry, even by their own political party claiming to represent their interests.

How do I feel then about another foreigner getting the job?

I like to think I can retain my objectivity, though doubtless many would accuse me of having it in for Carlos now.

There is nothing wrong with a foreigner doing the same job a local can do, provided he can do it as well or better.

Oddly, none of the other white male applicants was formally interviewed, and the Organisers were only given the option of rejecting Carlos, and Carlos had been on the selection panel from the beginning in any case.

I shall of course continue to say that I am the best candidate the BNP never had.  I would have been the best candidate because

Imagine Claire Khaw being photographed with a BNP rosette attached to a burkha , brandishing the Britannic shield and trident ...

1. I understand the media and know they like cut-and-paste stories which I help them to write, eg http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8357620/BNP-members-pro-Gaddafi-Facebook-group-snares-politicians.html and   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1362770/Colonel-Gaddafi-Facebook-page-signs-numerous-high-profile-figures-knowledge.html
2. I know journalists and have met them socially in my time.  (I believe Michael Cockerell http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3669656/Michael-Cockerell-I-wont-skimp-or-play-nasty.html took rather a shine to me at the Orwell Prize Award this year.  Whether he did in fact or not you will have to ask him.)  
3. I write better English than Carlos.
4. I speak better English than Carlos.
5. I supported the right side in the Falklands War when Carlos was probably then an Argentinian nationalist (although he is in fact an Uraguayan).
6. I could pass for English if you closed your eyes, but not Carlos.
7. I have been consistent in my views.
8. I am legally-trained.
9. I am not afraid of saying controversial things, and, having said them, I am prepared to defend my positions through the use of logic and reason, however incomprehensible this is to the average Briton these days.  
10. I never back down if I think I am logically and morally right.
11. I could easily do better than the UKIP candidate because I talk their talk, in better written and spoken English than Carlos.   http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/2445-ukip-announce-london-mayor-candidate
12. BNP comrades have privately said to me that I am quite English in an odd way, eg I am like an English eccentric, and that I remind them of what the English used to be etc.  I like to think they are referring to my understanding of aristocratic codes of honour of a bygone imperial era that I gleaned and absorbed from books I have read about the English by the English.
13. I feel that the role of the BNP is to say the unsayable rather than pretend that they can pass themselves off as electable politicians when everyone thinks they are mad, sad and bad anyway.  
14. I have done a comedy course and know how to keep people engaged and entertained.  http://www.laughinghorsecomedy.co.uk/comedycourses/
15. I am known for my charm, wit, warmth, wisdom and inexplicable compulsion to stand up for the weak and oppressed, without for one moment expecting them to be grateful.  
16. Liberals hate and fear me because they don't know what to make of me.
17. Muslims like me, and no London mayoral candidate ever did well without the support of London's largest non-white community.   I would have the knowledge and have been prepared to point out the BNP policies that Muslims would find in line with Koranic principles, and have the chutzpah to solicit their vote.  (The Facebook Koran Book Club https://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=310958681842&ref=ts was my creation.)
18. My Facebook walls are a hang-out both for the White Nationalist community as well as a prominent Orthodox Rabbi.  (The Facebook Mein Kampf Book Club https://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147429175288744&ref=ts was my creation.)
19. I actually have positive and radical ideas that include all the peoples of Britain, rather than the usual anti-immigrant and reactionary negativity that the BNP is known for.
20. I am prepared to take calculated risks.  Friends, lovers and enemies have called me "dangerous".  
21. I have principles and relish all opportunities afforded to me of sticking to them, even if it means I don't become the BNP mayoral candidate and end up getting expelled from the party because of what I said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show, when I said would not wish to bring up a severely disabled baby, nor pass the cost of its care to the taxpayer, like an unwanted parcel, and would expect the midwife to dispose of it for me.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html  Many people have  privately said they agree with me.  

HOW ARE WE TO JUDGE CARLOS?

He would be judged a failure if he does not do better than the UKIP candidate or if UKIP manage to narrow the gap.   

BNP   128,609

UKIP  113,651    

The gap between UKIP and BNP was 14,958 in 2008.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_mayoral_election,_2008

We shall see what we will see.   

2012 UKIP London Mayoral Candidates: Paul Oakley clearly front runner

UKIP's front-running 2012 London Mayoral Candidate: Paul  Oakley

http://www.indhome.com/londonmayor/?page_id=180 has the list prospective UKIP 2012 London mayoral candidates.

I have voted for Paul Oakley and wish him every success. It is a shame it took him so long to move from Tory to UKIP. He was the one who tore up the Maastricht Treaty at a Young Conservatives meeting in 1993.

http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist/ITN/1993/02/07/BSP070293015/?s=conservative+conference+maastricht&st=0&pn=1

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:02 pm said of DAVID COBURN:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Obviously reading speech which is rather unprofessional.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:10 pm said of MICHAEL CORBY:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Reading from speech so rather unprofessional. Delivery rather manic and aggressive because of frantic nodding for purpose of emphasis.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:15 pm said of MICHAEL McGOUGH:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
I have met Michael McGough a few times and know what a nice man he is, but the speech was clearly read, and read without much conviction. The swaying shoulders suggested a certain infirmity of purpose.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:21 pm said of WINSTON McKENZIE:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
UKIP’s prospective Mayor of Rap has all the gestures and vocabulary of gangsta rap. FRIGHTENING.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:25 pm said of LAWRENCE WEBB:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Good looking chap but delivery rather hesitant and dull.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:34 pm said of PAUL OAKLEY:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
PHWOAR. Says all the rights things and presses all the right buttons with his skinhead good looks and his recklessly generous offer to donate half his mayoral salary to charity. He ends with a seductive promise of consultative humility. Did you know how once tore up the Maastricht Treaty with his BARE HANDS as a Young Conservative? Only Claire Khaw (whose wedding he attended) could beat him now, and she wouldn’t feel the need to promise to donate half her mayoral salary either.


There is however a question mark on Paul's political judgement and ability to work with other Eurosceptics in other parties.

Below is his response when I asked him if he cared to point out to the powers that be in UKIP that the prohibition against ex-BNP members from joining is in fact ultra vires at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/08/ukip-prohibition-against-ex-bnp-members.html

"Nope! I haven't studied the background to this so am not sure that I agree with your interpretation. Anyway - I support the policy for two reasons. Firstly, I'm not interested in racial politics in the slightest and don't want UKIP being tainted with it. Secondly, if there was an open-door policy for BNP members then the left would inevitably jump on this to divert attention from the prime reason for the existence of UKIP: to get us out of the EU. In short, I can't see any advantage at all to us in admitting BNP members. In fact, it would be disadvantage all the way. Sorry Claire."

It is of course no surprise at all that Paul should think this way. It took him long enough to move over to UKIP (which he only did this year), suggesting that he is a hesitant kind of man, afraid to take risks and venture out of his political comfort zone. He was a Eurosceptic and we met in 1993 during Bill Cash MP's campaign to oppose the Maastricht Treaty in the House of Lords Committee Stage.  He also thought Michael Howard was a good man to lead the Conservative Party even as I said that his slow sly smile would not serve him well in a country that is neurotically both consciously and unconsciously anti-Semitic.

He opposed the death penalty and probably still opposes it now.

Perhaps he is one of those people who prefer the Eurosceptic movement to be divided and ineffective and sees no long term harm in this. Perhaps he thinks UKIP alone is capable of being a viable opposition to the LibLabCon all by itself.

Perhaps he is one of those many white middle class men in British politics who is terrified of being called a racist and therefore easily intimidated by the Liberal Left.

If so, then one must call into question his judgement, his courage and his ability to respond swiftly and ruthlessly in a fast-changing and increasingly volatile political environment, foreign and domestic.

Debunking ethno-nationalism once and for all

Taken to its logical conclusion, ethno-nationalism would mean repatriating Americans, Australians and New Zealanders back to where they came from.

Those who nevertheless insist that ethno-nationalism is moral and practicable would be reduced to saying possession is nine points of the law and that might is right. 

So give it up now, OK?

Civic nationalism is therefore logically and morally the only way forward because that would enable us all to rub along better with each other.

Nationalism is the ideology of pragmatic national interest that will cherry pick available ideologies for the long term good of the nation. 

I would define the national interest as a judicious balance of the conflicting interests of the various groups of people in that nation. 

Age, gender, class, wealth, race, religion, marital status would be the main reasons why our interests might conflict with each other.

Nationhood comes into being when a group of people under agreed criteria include each other as that part of the group in a way that transcends tribe, race and geography.

The Islamic concept of "ummah" (the Muslim version of Christendom) expresses this abstract concept perfectly.  You are one of the gang if you subscribe to certain core principles of the group.

I am a nationalist in the sense that I feel that the nation is the largest viable grouping that is big enough to matter and small enough to care about us as individuals.  I however reject all racial considerations as a reason for excluding anyone. 

I am even a white nationalist in the sense that I want good things for the white people of Britain, who are tragically most infected and affected by the dementia of liberalism and feminism.

The only antidote to the poison of feminism and liberalism is that of free speech and the promotion of family values supported by marriage.  Unfortunately, such is the sickness that has entered into the hearts and minds of white people that they reject the very things that would save them, preferring to return to their addiction to cheap sex, easy women, drugs, drink, welfare dependency and denial.

Cheap sex and easy women cause widespread illegitimacy, family breakdown and single parenthood, reducing the quality of the national gene pool, progressively increasing the burden on the taxpayer and the productive.   Not only that, it lowers the morals and educational standards of the entire nation, which will soon turn the white race into an inferior race.

There are many in the nationalist movement who would rather have the weeds of ethno-nationalism than the fruits of civic nationalism. It is therefore now time for the civic nationalist movement to have this debate and win it.  The Eurosceptic parties would be ideally placed to organise and hold such a debate, to settle this question once and for all, so we can all move on. 

Many BNP policies are popular, even amongst the ethnic minorities who are understandably inhibited from voting for the BNP because they don't want to be seen as turkeys voting for Xmas. 

The pity of it is that most BNP policies are sensible policies which are invariably discredited by the behaviour and attitudes of its dinosaur members who are on the one hand supporting female promiscuity (at the expense of family values supported by marriage) and on the other insisting on racial exclusion - a recipe for failure, defeat and extinction. 

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/07/bnp-not-prepared-to-promote-family.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/07/nationalism-should-promote-family.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/07/hand-that-rocks-cradle-belongs-to-slut.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/07/i-cannot-attend-meeting-of-prospective.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/06/two-schools-of-thought-in-bnp.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/06/official-britain-now-inferior-nation.html

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/06/more-ostentatious-displays-of.html

A new festival for London - the London Love Festival - when I am mayoress to replace boring and irritating London Marathon

Like this NOT

Were I to be become Mayor of London I would abolish the irritating and boring London Marathon and institute instead a London Love Festival.

Boring and irritating London Marathon.  Who on earth wants to watch this??

The London Love Festival would celebrate the Joys of Outdoor Sex in London's Royal Parks. @SpencerTunick could be called in to do something

Are they perchance facing Mecca?

In keeping with family values only those married to each other may participate in the London Love Festival. The rest of us must look on in horror or envy.

No parades like the problematic Berlin Love Parade, just a general licence for married couples to have sex with each other in the open air in discreet places in the Royal Parks without getting into trouble with the law.

Khaw's Dolls and Effigies for Voodoo, Torture and Execution

I have just had a wonderful idea about making voodoo dolls of hated national figures. The David Cameron and Martin Amis doll would sell well, I think.

Khaw's Voodoo Dolls .... Dolls would have balls so you can have the satisfaction of ripping them off. Dolls would also be specially manufactured to ooze blood and spill guts to make the experience more authentic. A voice that cries out in pain? Dolls to burn at the stake? Dolls to hang, draw and quarter?

Accessories would be gallows and guillotine ... Perhaps an executioner's axe or sword. We could even have a pretend lethal injection thingie ... The possibilities are endless.

Khaw's Dolls for Execution with Accompanying Accessories.

When I am Mayoress of London, I will have specially appointed places for effigy-burning.  I believe that even the BNP would be happy to adopt the Indian and Pakistani custom of the effigy-burning of hated people and then smacking them with a stick as they burn on the ground.

Here is a clip of the Afghans burning an effigy of Obama.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgYc6cS9OKA  I would see to it that British effigies would have a stronger resemblance to the hated person in question.

Twitter Tsar: another fucking stupid idea from Cameron and his Cunts of Convictionless Cuntservatism

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1374681/Wanted-Twitter-Tsar-paid-PM-boost-Governments-online-presence.html

Even if they offered me the job at £142K, I wouldn't do it.  (They are welcome to offer me the job just to test my resolve though.)

I wouldn't do it because even I could not make a silk purse out of the sow's ear that are Camoronic Cuntservative policies.  

I would rather be the unsuccessful 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate than waste any more taxpayers' money on a nonsense job that has "Mission Impossible" written all over it.   

Cameron surprised and upset that what he says is reported

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375341/David-Camerons-F-word-outburst-reporters-British-Empire-gaffe.html

I find it scary and weird that Cameron is actually surprised and upset that what he said was reported.

I don't think I am really that clever, but I really think I could run the country just a teeny bit better than  Cameron and perhaps be a little more popular too, with higher approval ratings.  

Let us hope that I can first cut my teeth on becoming the Mayoress of London next year (if I am indeed chosen by the Party) before I start running the country.  I don't want to become Dictator of Britain with no previous experience of running anything much and mess things up, after all.  

The clever and beautiful Claudia Dalgleish has decided to withdraw her application to become the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate, so that should appreciably improve my chances.   I thought she would have been the perfect Goldilocks candidate - not too cold and not too hot, while a white male middle-aged candidate would have not been perhaps perceived as lacking in appeal to those outside the party and a non-white female candidate too controversial.  

Not, of course that Michael Barnbrook is in any way dull as can be seen at http://www.general-election-2010.co.uk/uk-party-political-news/bnp’s-sleaze-buster-mick-barnbrook-brings-down-another-tory-mp for he was responsible for Tory Brian Binley MP being ordered to repay the sum of £1,500 in expenses wrongly claimed.  .  

My commiserations to Claudia for her withdrawal, and the best of British luck to all the remaining candidates.

May the selection panel choose the candidate who will attract the most votes in London!