Translate

Showing posts with label WW2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WW2. Show all posts

Wednesday, 29 July 2020

Thirty Questions for Muslims

1.  Doesn't enjoining good and forbidding evil as the Koran requires of Muslims include telling Christians that Christianity is kaput to as many honourable and influential religious and political leaders as possible before America falls into its Thucydides Trap and declares war on China, when Christians start yet another World War?

2.  Was Britain falling into its Thucydides Trap when it declared war on Germany in WW1?

3.  Was Britain falling into its Thucydides Trap again when it declared war on Germany in WW2?

4.  Did Britain hand over its global empire to the Americans on a platter when it lost its empire after "winning" WW2?

5.  Are the Americans grown up enough to run their global empire as effectively as China is currently governing itself?

6.  Are the Americans like a foolish young man who suddenly wins a large fortune and then proceeds to fritter it away on gambling?

7.  Was the real reason for Britain declaring war on Germany in WW1 the building of the Berlin to Baghdad Railway?

8.  Is the Belt and Road Drive causing America and its allies to fear China in the same way that the building of the Berlin and Baghdad Railway caused Britain to fear Germany and eventually declare war?

9.  Is there anything in the Koran to suggest that Britain declared war against Germany in WW1 and WW2 for good Islamic reasons?  

10.  Can any society function without a religion that at least maintains minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents in your society are married parents?

11.  What should Muslim activists like Hamza Tzortzis and Mohammed Hijab do if they live in a country that is marinating in the moral sewage of globohomo? 

12.  If Christianity is kaput, what is the unofficial religion of the West?

13.  If the unofficial religion of the West is liberalism, what are the principles of liberalism?

14.  If liberalism in the early 21st century West is no more than the globohomo, neoconservatism (a euphemism for dysfunctional and incompetent American imperialism) and the open borders of neo-liberalism which cause the hate and fear provoked by uncontrolled immigration, should Muslims join Putin in declaring liberalism "obsolete"? 

13.  Is liberalism the antithesis of Islamic values?

14.  Is masculinity a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values? 

15.  Do patriarchal moral values at least include treating unmarried parents as sex offenders - as quran.com/24/2 requires - to avoid the degeneracy, chaos and criminality of widespread bastardy that Western governments are now too frightened to address because they don't want to alienate their voters?

16.  The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents. The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents. What is the illegitimacy rate of the UK and how many illegitimate offspring has the current British Prime Minister now sired?

17.  Isn't the quickest and most effective way of dawah telling Westerners they need the rule of law contained in the Koran to protect themselves against their increasingly repressive and irrational government rather than trying to convince them to adopt the religion of the people these Westerners have regard as low status immigrants they have always despised and resented whom they don't think should even be in their country?

18.  Are Muslim activists like Hamza Tzortzis and Mohammed Hijab aware that many Westerners are Islamophobes and antisemites who see large numbers of Muslims dressed as Muslims in their country whom they are no longer allowed to complain about as a humiliation brought on them by Liberal Jews whom they believe deliberately supported uncontrolled immigration to subvert their society and civilisation?

19.  Wouldn't it be easier to tell Post-Christian Western politicians that their rule of law is indeed breaking down instead of talking to Islamophobic peasants who cannot be reasoned with and who would rather die than admit that there is anything wrong with their religion and political system that they themselves already reject?

20.  Is the Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty obviously unIslamic? Instead of being governed by eternal and universal principles of the Abrahamic God, British politicians reserve for themselves the Woman's Prerogative to change her mind about anything for whatever reason and are now behaving like a neurotic and indecisive woman who cannot make up her mind about anything.  

21.  Aren't most Westerners militant atheists who think religion is stupid and evil as well as antisemites and Islamophobes too stubborn and stupid to acknowledge that the Jews and Muslims they hate, fear and envy have what they don't ie the protective wrapper of religion?

22.  Why don't Muslim activists ask Islamophobes if they know of any society that has existed for long without a religion that supports marriage and family values instead of wasting time and energy trying to prove God's existence to low status low education people who already hate them and cannot be reasoned with? 

23.  Islamophobes of the Tommy Robinson variety are mostly low education and low status people who lie to themselves, are obviously neurotic and cannot even define morality. Do Muslim activists like Mohammed Hijab really think these people can be reasoned with?

24.  Are Muslim activists like Hamza Tzortzis and Mohammed Hijab aware that traumatised atheist Islamophobes and antisemites who were mostly deprived of their fathers by their unmarried mother hate themselves because their ancestors  have been tricked or forced into worshipping a Jew on a stick as the co-equal of God? They also hate their ancestors which is why they topple the statues of their own ancestors. These people have nothing other than their hatred of Muslims and Jews as a way of defining themselves and identifying each other as their substitute for religion. 

25.  Do Muslim activists like Hamza Tzortzis and Mohammed Hijab think these Islamophobes will give up their identity and their associates in any significant numbers in their lifetime just to join Muslims in their mosque?

26.  Are you not aware that educated Islamophobes like Charles Moore and Douglas Murray think Islam is low status culture for low status immigrants from places Trump and his supporters would call "shithole countries"? 

27.  Wouldn't dawah be more effective as a political movement offering Islamophobes the bargain of better government under a theocracy in this life rather than making promises to them about their afterlife?

28.  Are Muslim YouTubers afraid of being identified as extremist and having their YouTube channels deactivated if they do what I suggest?

29.  If Muslims activists are afraid of doing what I suggest, wouldn't discussing Secular Koranism amongst themselves on their channels  be a safer way of making dawah to the Western political establishment at one remove? 

30:  If men who call themselves Muslim activists are too afraid to discuss Secular Koranism or challenge me about it, are they in fact wilfully blind cowards who have adopted the tactic of ignoring me? I know I cannot wake men who pretend to be asleep. 


The smugness and dullness of this self-congratulatory stream which was mostly about diet and exercise incensed me.

Saturday, 13 June 2020

Christianity

Christianity is a terribly warlike religion. Forget what Christians did to non-Christians in their crusading wars of imperialism. Just look at what they did to each other!

1) The European Wars of Religion which included the Thirty Years War amongst many others

2) The American Civil War when they were all English-speaking, Christian and Protestant too!

3) WW1

4) WW2

It is not surprising that they would feel a little guilty and uneasy about their white privilege AKA imperial privilege which they don't like to talk about, which they no longer even learn about as schoolchildren. Presumably, it is because a largely atheist population will not suffer to learn about the immensely complex doctrinal and political reasons which caused the Wars of the Reformation and the break up of the Holy Roman Empire, which was a kind of Christian Caliphate.

If Europe had been Muslim, there would have been no need for the Wars of the Reformation. If Europe had already been Muslim and following Islamic rules of warfare, there would have been no WW1, let alone its continuation which was WW2, both framed as the Second Thirty Years War.

Monday, 19 November 2018

Why the welfare state was necessary in Britain to avert revolution after WW2

Don't fight ruinous imperialistic wars and then feel you have to buy off returning soldiers with the welfare state to avert revolution.

Germany never had an empire so when Hitler failed to acquire Russia after losing the war, it wasn't that big a deal. When you have lost a war and Russian soldiers are raping your women, loss of a shoulda woulda coulda empire would be the furthest thing from your mind.

Britain had a world empire and lost it as a result of "winning" WW2.

It is only the most convoluted kind of doublethink and propaganda that persuaded the British that they had won WW2 after all.

As for WW1, what was that all about? Belgian neutrality, apparently. If WW2 was a continuation of WW1, then Britain lost its world empire in 1947 over Belgian neutrality guaranteed by the Treaty of London in 1839.

The Welfare State was more about averting revolution by buying off returning British soldiers who have had enough of dying like flies over the stupid wars
of their ruling classes.

The poppy is really a symbol of failed imperialism as well as an opiate to induce forgetfulness of all the reasons that led to two World Wars.

Does anyone know there was a General Election in 1915 that was cancelled?

The Parliament Act 1911 reduced the maximum life of a Parliament from seven years to five; however, the election that would have been due by 1915 as a result of the Act was not held due to the First World War (1914–1918).

Liberal Prime Minister Asquith thought that by starting and winning a short and successful war against the Germans in the summer of 1914 after which the boys would be home by Christmas, the Liberal Party would win the General Election of 1915.

Think about it: a world empire thrown away by a scummy priapic henpecked Prime Minister over an election that most people now are not even aware of, that would have taken place, but for the WW1.

Now the British are so hooked on the welfare that they would put up with uncontrolled immigration just to continue getting "free" stuff from it.

One bad decision leads to another until you end and your civilisation end up dead.

Time to take democracy out with the trash.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/11/poppy-mania-day-prevents-any-rational.html

Nationalism is not necessarily warlike, liberal democracy is not necessarily peaceable

All politics is about balancing our interests as an individual against the moral rules we are supposed to follow about promoting the greater good.

Competing political tribes try to claim us, but the independent thinker chooses his or her own.

I chose nationalism because I am a universalist. I believe anyone who lives in a nation would wish to be well-governed by a government that promotes the national interest. My ambition is to make nationalism motherhood and apple pie.

As for the insane belief that nationalism is about racism and war, we should be remind ourselves that in both World Wars it was Britain - a liberal democracy - that declared war on Germany.

Britain already had a world empire, and Germany felt it deserved to acquire a bit of living space at the expense of the Russians, since Britain and France had more or less carved up Africa between themselves. Germany was late in the race that was the scramble for colonies.

But we know that it is the victor who writes history, and so it is that the Axis powers were written as evil by the victor for wanting what Britain had already acquired.

What did WW2 demonstrate? That non-combatant Japanese could be nuked in two Japanese cities so that the point could be made it is not for non-whites to dare to acquire empire at the expense of the White Man.

Sadly, just as we do not know what is in our own best interests, governments often do not know what is in their national interest either, and politicians and leaders often do not address their minds to posterity which only promoting the long term national interest would serve.

If the nation is a macrocosm of the individual and it serves the individual to adhere to a set of moral principles, then so too would it benefit a nation to choose the best possible set of moral principles.

It is this that I wish to discuss with an apparently heedless world, full of unemployed and unemployable philosophy graduates quite unable to engage on the matter.

Thursday, 9 August 2018

The Yin and Yang of two World Wars and the decline and fall of the West



7:45  Sayeeda Warsi https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bd8ffl

9:00  White people in the West already hate their own white liberals. All the more do they hate Jews and non-whites who come here and become liberal.  Jews find themselves caught between a rock and a hard place. If they assimilate into liberalism, they are perceived as turbo-charged liberals with added but undeserved Jewish privilege. Sarah Jeong may have been aping white feminist women who hate white men and want to destroy the achievements of their ancestors. The fact that she is being protected by the New York Times will fuel even more anger and resentment. Orthodox Jews who join the alt-right thinking they are white are also confused, but if they have got anything wrong, at least their feelings are normal and understandable.  It is natural for even immigrants to become possessive and protective about their adopted countries.

11:00  Reform Jews in Weimar Germany obviously annoyed the Germans when they participated in the politics of a liberal democracy imposed on them after WW1. Hitler complained just as much about the operation of democracy in Weimar Germany as he did about Jews.

13:00  Scapegoat  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoat
14:00  James O'Brien of LBC
20:00  https://twitter.com/SayeedaWarsi/status/1026462366559559680
20:30  Jay's guitar interlude
25:00  Jay praises me for http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-white-mans-burden.html
26:00  Kevin Grace praised.
29:00  We have to embolden our politicians to not apologise.
30:00  Alex Jones
31:00  Ron Paul https://www.rt.com/usa/435372-ron-paul-twitter-censorship/
35:00  Trump the Messiah?  https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/trump-s-jerusalem-syndrome-whose-end-of-days-messiah-does-he-think-he-is-1.5628063
37:00  Liberal democracies have the same problem of feminsm and gay marriage
39:00  Marriage sanctifies as a child
40:00  Feminists trash marriage and trash the ability of men and women to be good parents or to be parents at all.
41:00  Every action has a reaction.  The Culture War is about Yin and Yang.  An over-assertion of masculinity leads to a backlash of effeminacy. An excess of effeminacy will have its consequence of invasion, war and revolution resulting in the reassertion of masculinity.
45:00  WW1 and WW2
46:00  Pyrrhic victory  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrhic_victory "If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined."
47:00  Dog in the manger foreign policy of the British https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dog_in_the_Manger
https://carlcymrushistoryblog.wordpress.com/2014/04/18/the-berlin-baghdad-railway-and-the-outbreak-of-world-war-one/
48:00  Monopoly
49:00  Attempted assassination of Colonel Maduro https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/08/05/washington-attempts-to-assassinate-the-president-of-venezuela/
50:00  Hasmonean Civil War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasmonean_Civil_War
51:00  The "defence" lobby want war to increase sales
52:00  The Deep State of Pakistan
53:00   British Army 'could stage mutiny under Corbyn', says senior serving general https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/british-army-could-stage-mutiny-under-corbyn-says-senior-serving-general-10509742.html
54:00  Multiculturalism
55:00  American isolationism  https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1601.html
57:00  Muslims in the West are sicced on Muslim states whose regimes America wants to change
58:00  US version of Bin Laden raid is 'full of lies'  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-32698016
59:00  Religion, morality, group solidarity, sole cohesion
1:00:00   Slut shaming
1:02:00   Have we been good little boys and girls worthy of entering the Kingdom of Heaven?
1:07:00  Trump is a catalyst
1:12:00  Wolf whistle
1:16:00  Jay's views on museums
1:17:00  Relationships
1:25:00  Bewitched  and the geisha house
1:33:00  Finland entry for the Eurovision 2018  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEeIeQ-j2zk
1:43:00  90% of men cannot say no to sex
1:45:00  Breasts
1:46:00  Slutocrat  http://www.verbalremedy.co.uk/slavery-and-sluttery-an-interview-with-claire-khaw/
1:48:00  Emotional tampon   https://licensedmentalhealthcounselor.org/2012/05/01/are-you-an-emotional-tampon/
1:52:00  Secular Koranism
1:54:00  Jay and I imagine being married to each other
1:54:30  Sacha Baron Cohen in Who Is America? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkXeMoBPSDk
1:56:00  Elizabeth Young  https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/1324877/incredible-photos-show-the-50-year-old-who-could-pass-for-a-woman-in-her-20s-and-she-puts-it-all-down-to-being-single/
https://www.amazon.co.uk/We-Exist-Why-Elizabeth-Young/dp/0953737810
1:58:00  Chinese restaurants and Secular Koranism
Mechanical hare  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooxQGA3rjuo
2:03:00  Interpretation is a function of power https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/friedrich_nietzsche_109379
https://www.lawteacher.net/lecture-notes/statutory-interpretation.php
2:04:00  Cadbury's mini rolls
https://www.tesco.com/groceries/en-GB/products/295848830

Saturday, 9 September 2017

If the British had been good Muslims they would still have their world empire


Wednesday, 8 March 2017

Why some old timers might think Jews helped whip up the war fever that lost the British their empire





Anti-Semitism discussed from 9:20

From 21st minute: "We can never have a racial policy in Great Britain because we are running a multi-racial empire."















It would be nice to have British historians discussing this, to hear the other side.Will they dare? It is such a political hot potato that historians both Jew or gentile must fear being accused of anti-Semitism whatever they say and however impartial they mean to be towards Jews. 

What I make of The Second Thirty Years' War is explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/poppy-mania-day-prevents-any-rational.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/the-battle-for-barking-revisited.html

"Why did British people die in the Second World War?" one BNP-supporting householder asked.

"They died to let everyone come in and take over."

Secular Koranism is the antidote to anti-Semitism

Are you an anti-Semite just because Jews hate you? 

Why some old timers might think Jews helped whip up the war fever that lost the British their empire

Wednesday, 23 November 2016

How nationalism should be defined

Nationalism should be defined as a political and philosophical ideology of promoting the long term national interest.

It has only been demonised because WW1 and WW2 was blamed on nationalism and is now associated with racism and xenophobia in the late 20th and early 21st century.

Actually, nationalism was a reaction against imperialism.

WW1 occurred because the Austrian Empire was weakening and breaking up. Understandably, when this was happening, peoples that used to be under the Austrian Empire aspired to become independent, and that was why the Serbian terrorist assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

Woodrow Wilson's 14 Points after WW1 articulated and affirmed the principles of national self-determination, which described the principles of nationhood.

WW2 occurred because Britain and France - both empires - wanted to contain Germany's imperial ambitions.

America is an empire, the EU is an empire, Islamic State wants to become a nation state and then an empire with global domination in mind, but Western nations just want their country back again from whoever is pulling the strings of their leaders who keep foisting more and more immigration on a weary and increasingly anxious populace.

Nationalism does not have to mean war, any more than looking after your own interests must mean you will always be fighting and killing other people, if you are not a gangster.

In reality, well-led nations use a mixture of war and diplomacy as an instrument of policy. We just want wise leaders leading our respective nations, and for this to be done, we have to reform our political process.

Nationhood is indispensable because there seems no other way of organising human society. A nation is a piece of territory with borders with its own government. It is the only group we can join that is small enough to care, but big enough to matter.

The real controversy is not that nation states should exist, but how they should be run, who should participate in their decision-making processes and what rules they should follow. The real controversy is therefore between patriarchy and matriarchy ie whether we return to social conservatism and the practice of marriage as a means of reviving the patriarchy run on the clear rules of healthy competition and low taxes, or carry on as we are, being a degenerate matriarchy in which the preferences of immoral women are always prioritised in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage, where men are lower in status to women.

It is precisely because the West is a matriarchy that makes us a post-truth society operating post-truth politics. Because we are no longer moved by facts and logic, we will be moved by something worse: threats, intimidation and violence.

It is a shame no one will discuss this.


Wednesday, 20 April 2016

How Britain lost its world empire and why sexual morality matters


'Britain is an old and declining empire embarrassed by its weakness'

Parliament did not vote on war on 3rd August 1914

The two ruinous world wars Britain inexplicably fought

Paul Craig Roberts:

America became a superpower because of the self-destruction of other countries.

That's right, folks. Americans didn't actually fight for their overseas empire, the dumb ass British handed theirs to them on a platter.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/04/18/how-the-american-neoconservatives-destroyed-mankinds-hopes-for-peace-paul-craig-roberts-2/

7 August 2015
rttimes.co.uk



Descendants of cannon fodder complain about British foreign policy and the genetic and moral damage it caused to the British race. Gentiles being cruel to Jews should not surprise anyone who has seen Fiddler on the Roof or read The Merchant of Venice. Anti-Semitism has always been endemic in Christian Europe and the Catholic Church was clearly to blame.  


St. Pius V in the bull Hebraeorum gens (26 February 1569) did not reference blood libel, but he did make multiple accusations against the Jews, including: usury, theft, receiving stolen goods, pimping, divination and magic. He finishes with this accusation: "Finally, we have sufficiently investigated and explored how unworthily this perverse race attacks the name of Christ; how much hated it is by all those who bear that name; and, finally, with what cunning it plots against their lives."

Pope Benedict XIV wrote a bull Beatus Andreas (22 February 1755) in which he does not express any doubt concerning the murders of children ascribed to the Jews. He states they are perpetrated "out of hatred of Christ" and "out of hatred for the Christian faith" in his De servorum Dei beatificatione. In the bull he speaks about determining what is to be done "when there arises a case of this sort, which often comes to be put forward, concerning some boy who was slain by the Hebrews in Holy Week out of hostility to Christ, such as Blessed Simon and Anderl and also many of the other murdered boys whom the authors mention".

The Edict of Expulsion has not yet been repealed. 


Tuesday, 1 March 2016

Democracies are *not* inherently more peace-loving than dictatorships



26th minute

Peter Lavelle:

"The democracy deficit in the European Union is just astounding to me."

Gilbert Doctorow:

"There is nothing particularly surprising in the failure of democracy to control foreign policy or democratic governments, and this is one of the fatal flaws in the whole neocon ideology: the notion that democratic countries are by their structure peace-loving. The voice of the people has no bearing on the conduct of foreign policy and it is carried out by the executive with its own privileges without answerability in many cases to legislature. The notion of democratic countries being peace-loving is shot through. You are confirming the bigger truth which has unfortunately been driving events for the last 20 years."

Dimitry Babich:

"In the late Roman Empire there was no foreign policy. All was internal policy because the whole world was the Empire, and the Empire had no opponents, only aggressors. It had no insurgents, only terrorists. So if we look at the modern United States and the late Roman Empire, we can see some similarities."

Peter Lavelle:

"When the Empire comes to an end, it is the American people who will find out about it last."

Those of you who know what happened to Athens, who exhausted itself through warfare, is that the Athenians kept voting again and again for war ....

It is truly laughable that Britain, who involved itself in two world wars that were really none of its business and lost its world empire as a result, did so because a Liberal Prime Minister thought fighting a short successful war in 1914 would make it more likely for the Liberal Party to win the 1915 General Election. What happened when the war it participated in turned really nasty? Why, the election was cancelled, of course.

It has been said that WW2 was a continuation of WW1. What, then, was WW1 all about? Britain declared war against Germany because of the Belgian neutrality German troops would violate on their way to France. This was the Belgian neutrality guaranteed in the Treaty of London in 1839.  Did Britain lift a finger to help France during the siege of Paris in 1870? Nope. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/poppy-mania-day-prevents-any-rational.html

There is nothing peaceable about democracies at all. Voters in democracies don't give a damn whom their politicians murder and whose countries they destroy as long as their taxes are low and public spending high. Many apparently educated Britons are quite convinced that Russia is the more militarily aggressive country even as they themselves are aware that their governments have invaded Iraq, Afghanistan, bombed Libya and Syria. This is what Orwell would have called doublethink.

Do voters in democracies feel well-governed?

The answer can be discerned in how well the anti-establishment Trump is doing in the Presidential primaries and how prepared voters are to believe in conspiracy theories. A significant number of people in the West believe that their governments would actually bomb them and then pretend it was Muslim terrorists who did it, and use that as an excuse to bomb and invade more Muslim countries as well as depriving Western citizens of their liberty and privacy.

Soon, a Caliphate will seem like a sensible replacement for the mess we're in now.


Monday, 22 February 2016

Polygamy would have allowed Britain to replenish its population after WW2, without immigration


If the British were majority Muslim then British men would have been allowed to have up to four wives each, easily allowing them to replenish their population after having started and really lost two world wars.

http://quran.com/4/3

"Only one out of ten of you girls can ever hope to marry. This is not a guess of mine. It is a statistical fact."

Just think: if Britain had already been Muslim, it would not have needed to now be in fear of Muslims having so recklessly allowed so many of them in because they wanted cheap labour.

Remember: Demographics is destiny.

Islam would have protected the British from those pesky Muslims they now hate and fear.

Profound truths are paradoxical. 

Saturday, 15 August 2015

Thoughts on #VJDay


Tuesday, 27 January 2015

A historical analysis of Holocaust Memorial Day

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Thirty_Years%27_War

Sunday, 7 December 2014

David Irving may be banned from the US and continues to be *victimised* by Western governments who pride themselves on their "free speech"





Sunday, 7 December 2014
To: Claire Khaw 



Dear Claire,

I'm not writing just because it's Christmas, but because it is something like an emergency. I've beaten Germany, where the permanent ban (imposed in November 1993) has this month been lifted after two Court hearings and a three-year battle by my brave lawyer - because such a ban violates European law, which did not exist when it was slapped on me. The Court even ordered the Bavarian Government to pay all the costs.

But now a new ban threatens or may be already in place, the United States - I will find out when I apply for a new visa to replace the costly one they tore up. I fear that the USA has joined Canada, New Zealand, Australia - where I can't even visit my daughter and her family - and other countries where the enemies of Real History have gained the upper hand. I don't have to tell you that this latest one threatens to be the costliest ban of all.

My books are not banned anywhere in the world, nor the videos of me speaking; but I am.

I am working on my last three titles: Himmler, nearly finished; Churchill's War, vol.3, almost complete (vol.1 is at the "shipyard", being refurnished for a new print edition equivalent in quality to the second); and Memoirs, also almost complete.

But I keep running dangerously low in funds, like right now, and I have only you folks as a back-up to fall back on. Since the 1990s mainstream publishers have not dared print my books. So contribute what you can, if you can, by check, cash, or bank transfer. You'll get a personal letter of thanks from me and, if and when I next speak near you, a personal shake of the hand. In my years it has shaken a lot of Hands, I don't have to tell you!

Yours sincerely,
David Irving



If you care about free speech, please send David Irving a Christmas card with a cheque or click the link to donate by credit card. 

It is shameful how he has been victimised for having an alternative version of history.  

What number is Holocaust Denial?

Why should saying the wrong number result in career and social death?

Why can't any of us discuss this without being victimised by our governments?

Why even pretend we have free speech?

Free speech: the free speech of people whose views you dislike is your free speech too.

British establishment more invested in the idea of punishing David Irving than Zionist Jews


Please cheer David Irving up by making him a credit transfer or sending him both a cheque and a scratch card.

David Irving - imprisoned for saying the wrong number and giving a version of history that departed from the victor's version in the "free" West.



https://www.national-lottery.co.uk/games/scratchcards/prizes



Please give generously to free speech and make David Irving feel that he did the right thing in standing up for what he believes to be the truth. He didn't have to do this and could easily have been a successful TV historian if he had decided to parrot the victor's version.

Polish company says Nazi toys are a ‘fun way’ to learn about history



David Irving told us that in wartime he would look at the Gamages catalogue and dream of all the toys he wanted and couldn't have.  He was told he couldn't have toys because of a nasty man called Hitler and that was what really made him become a historian.  

Please give generously to David Irving, and to free speech, especially for historians. If we do not learn from history we will be condemned to repeat our mistakes.

Marx: "History first enacts itself  as tragedy, then repeats itself as farce."

British establishment more invested in the idea of punishing David Irving than Zionist Jews

Buy WW1, get WW2 *absolutely free*! How to lose your World Empire acquired with the blood, sweat and tears of your ancestors in 30 years

Second Thirty Years' War

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

British establishment more invested in the idea of punishing David Irving than Zionist Jews

The British are even more invested into the idea of punishing Holocaust Denial http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/09/091001.pdf than the Jews, because they have even more to cover up than Zionist Jews who just wanted Israel as a homeland for diaspora Jews, who of course wanted to justify their land grab against the Palestinian Arabs. This is explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/poppy-mania-day-prevents-any-rational.html The British have to pretend to themselves that they had to enter WW1 or the Germans would have invaded, and they would all be speaking German by now if they had not declared war against Hitler for invading Poland. To make it all seem worth their while losing their empire over, they had to big up Hitler as being evil incarnate when it seems that  he was actually a nicer person than Churchill. Whatever you think of, Hitler at least was not a drunk and a depressive, nor did he ban smoking even when he was dictator. http://strangeherring.com/2009/05/17/hitlers-secretarys-memoirs-to-be-published-in-english-pop-up-book-and-video-game-to-follow/ Imagine - Hitler actually being more liberal and respectful of the liberty of Germans to smoke than PC Libtards everywhere!

Hitler's greatest mistake was in expecting the British to be reasonable about Poland when they were being so manifestly unreasonable about going to war ostensibly over Belgium in 1914 over "a scrap of paper", as the German Ambassador in London called the 1839 Treaty of London.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/why-i-would-be-pleased-to-see-statue-of.html

The British under Asquith entered World War 1 because Asquith, the Liberal Prime Minister thought a short and successful war would give the Liberal Party an electoral advantage in the 1915 General Election. They clearly thought that any war would be a short one and that the boys would be home by Christmas. In the end, they lost Britain her world empire ...

The British political establishment would have a much bigger axe to grind as regards WW2 than Zionist Jews ever would.

At his talk on Saturday I tried interesting David Irving in my little idea. Indeed, I remember someone else in his previous talks trying to interest him in WW1, but he repeated his answer to me "I know nothing about WW1, absolutely nothing, and stick to the subjects I know."

The "Second Thirty Years' War" is a disputed periodization sometimes used by historians to encompass the wars in Europe from 1914–1945.


It occurs to me that if there were justice in Britain David Irving would be knighted by now for his services to historical research and the quest for historical truth in the face of a malicious and mendacious establishment wishing to avoid the proclaiming and the hearing of it.
ROYAL.GOV.UK
LikeLike ·  ·  · 16
THE DAVID IRVING PRIZE OF HISTORICAL TRUTH
It is proposed that this prize be awarded to any historian in the world who defy their political establishment in the cause of investigating and proclaiming a Historical Truth that their political establishment does not want to hear or an Unanswered Historical Question that the political establishment cannot answer satisfactorily or convincingly.
LikeLike ·  ·  · 6
Would David Irving say that the British establishment is even more invested in the idea of prosecuting Holocaust Denial than the Jews and Zionists these days, simply because what Britain lost as a result of their insane foreign policy of participating in two ruinous World Wars that led to the loss of the British Empire and the dubious privilege of becoming the 51st state of America?
THE FACTS OF LIFE EXPLAINED AND UGLY TRUTHS TOLD The Scream by Edvard Munch graphically expresses what liberals feel when they hear The Voice of Reason - and that is...
THEVOICEOFREASON-ANN.BLOGSPOT.COM|BY CLAIRE KHAW
LikeLike ·  ·  · 111
What number is Holocaust Denial?
LikeLike ·  ·  · 3
Would David Irving like to define Holocaust Denial in a sentence?
HOLOCAUST DENIAL LEGISLATION IS TOTALITARIAN THOUGHT-CRIME LEGISLATION
A majority of EU countries have long considered that the right to freedom of expression precludes the criminalization of Holocaust denial per se. The full implementation of the 2008 EU Framework Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (hereinafter: the EU FD on racism) will, however, considerably harmonizes the law of Holocaust denial in Europe. While several provisions of the EU FD on racism offer a series of legal options enabling any EU country to limit the scope of national provisions criminalizing “genocide denial,” it remains that all EU Member States are now under the legal obligation to criminalize genocide denial when it is carried out either in a manner likely to incite to violence or hatred or in a manner likely to disturb public order or which is threatening, abusive or insulting. Before offering a critical review of the EU FD on racism and arguing that the political necessity of laws punishing genocide denial and the legal need for an EU-wide prohibition may be seriously questioned, this paper will contend that the legal reasoning developed by national courts in “militant democracies” is far from convincing and that the European Court of Human Rights should have refrained from labeling the Holocaust a clearly established historical fact whose denial constitutes ipso facto an “abuse of right”.
JEANMONNETPROGRAM.ORG
LikeLike ·  ·  · 

Poor old David Irving being bullied and brow-beaten by Tim Sebastian. If he doesn't want to hear the answer he shouldn't have asked the question. (Notice how Tim Sebastian's voice was made louder than David Irving's to make him sound more authoritative and David Irving's voice turned down slightly to make him seem weaker and less authoritative.) David Irving also remorsefully apologises for saying "nigger" when he angrily shouted at a black man for running into him and hurting him. Understandable, I would have thought. Every person can think of a derogatory word to describe anyone they want to insult, so I don't see why black people should be protected from this. If Pakistanis can be called Pakis and the Chinese can be called Chinks why not black people niggers? It is actually racially discriminatory to say only black people are protected from being racially insulted while all the other races have to take it on the chin.


Claire Khaw complimented as being "very Protestant" by Calvinist pastor Paul Vanderklay!

  CLAIRE KHAW does not see any prospect of Christians agreeing on the Doctrine of the Trinity and suggests that Americans at least should go...