Translate

Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts

Friday, 4 September 2020

The French Revolution finally comes to an end in 2020

The political and moral system of the West - liberalism - produces matriarchy. Putin pronounced it "obsolete" in June 2019. Trump identified himself as nationalist in October 2019. The 2020 US Presidential elections is really about whether men and women think they should be married parents and nationalists or remain the sexually liberated bachelors and bitter spinsters of liberalism.

'I am a nationalist': Trump's embrace of controversial label sparks uproar

Donald Trump denounces 'globalism' in nationalist address to UN

French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte’s Islam

Did You Know? Napoleon Was A Serious Admirer Of Islam

The French Civil Code originated from sharia

Nationalism cannot exist without patriarchy and matriarchy is the product of feminism which rode into town on the coat-tails of liberal egalitarianism.

Liberalism is one of the dangerous ideas of the French Revolution which is about to finally hit the buffers after 300 years.

https://professorbuzzkill.com/qnq-26-zhou-enlai/


at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, 11 October 2015

Putin Tells Everyone Exactly Who Created ISIS

at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

Paul Craig Roberts on the Syrian Crisis


at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, 30 September 2015

To what extent does Jeremy Corbyn agree with Paul Craig Roberts about US foreign policy?


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 22 May 2014

What Charles should now say about comparing Putin to Hitler

Proposed Statement from Charles:

"I really don't know what came over me. Of course Putin isn't like Hitler, unless anyone who invades another country is like Hitler, and I do not feel, now that I have thought things through properly, that the British who once had a world empire and is even now behaving in a way that can only be described as an unedifying display of unseemly military aggression disguised as liberal interventionism, is in a position to get on their high horse on this matter. The British are after all these days merely poodles of America.  If the Americans want us to bark at the Russians then we bark at the Russians.

When we fought the Crimean War in 1834 it was was against the Russians, and they have always regarded the Crimea as their backyard.

As for what I said about Hitler, I can only say that I really really really did not mean anything by it.  I was in the presence of a Jewess who was also a Holocaust survivor. This situation made me feel socially obliged to bring Hitler into the conversation to show that I sympathised with her on the one hand, and on the other relate it to something that was topical.  That really was all. Although that tiresome man Edward Lucas has rushed to my defence at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2635617/Hitler-Putin-Charles-right.html there really was no need, and I entirely disagree with him about Winston Churchill, who lost the British their world empire in his fits of drunkenness, depression and the desire to take reckless risks in order to aggrandise himself as a wartime leader.  

If, as A J P Taylor said, WW2 was a continuation of WW1 then what was WW1 really about? Belgian neutrality? Surely not.  The military opportunism the Germans displayed during WW1 was probably because they felt left out in the scramble for Africa and wanted a place in the sun over which they could place their towel, but they are good people really. Perhaps we should blame ourselves for not being more nicer to the Germans who are after all our Teuton cousins who also brew good beer. It seems incredible that the British could have lost their empire over something as trivial as Belgian neutrality.  I suspect the British lost their empire because their policy of being nasty to the Germans for the sake of being nasty to the Germans turned around and bit their sorry asses.  It is now perhaps time to question our political system that allows only fools and knaves to govern us. There.  Why don't you people put that in your pipe and smoke it?"

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Why-not-have-a-one-party-state-if-it-makes-more-sense/353471931432677 
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 21 May 2014

What Charles can do to retrieve the situation after comparing Putin to Hitler

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2634400/Putin-behaving-just-like-Hitler-says-Charles-Princes-controversial-verdict-Russian-leaders-invasion-Ukraine.html

Scenario on D-Day, 6 June 2014

Putin gives Charles a hurt look, turns on his heel and flounces out of the room.

Cue Charles to follow him into an empty room so that he can explain himself to Putin

If Putin and Charles do not emerge from that room arm in arm smiling happily, the British will actively consider abolishing monarchy.

If Charles negotiates an advantageous treaty between Gazprom and Britain we make him absolute monarch.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

God created evil eg idolatry so Christians can reject it with their reason

Atheists claim their beliefs are based on facts and logic.  1:00  The problem of evil 2:00  Do Christians really understand and believe in t...