The matriarchy wants to topple the statues of the patriarchy and the Western political establishment is now at war with itself

The mania for statue-toppling could end in the destruction of the Statue of Liberty on both sides of the Atlantic. If so, it does suggest that the French Revolution from which liberalism originated was not a very good idea after all. In 1972, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai was asked about the impact of the French Revolution. “Too early to say,” he replied. I trust the time is now ripe to pronounce on this matter. Ellen Futter, whom I believe to be Jewish and not a Trump supporter, has had a very interesting career.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_V._Futter

Has Trump been good for Jews?
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/roosevelt-statue-to-be-removed-for-white-supremacy-overtones/ar-BB15O2nm?ocid=sf

Zionist Jews would think he has made an effort for them by recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Is Ellen Futter an observant Jew or a Liberal Democrat Jew?

Are observant Jews more likely to protect Trump's presidency than liberal Jews who are currently doing their utmost to subvert his presidency and destroy his chances of winning the 2020 Presidential election?

Are Jews who act contrary to the principles of Judaism guilty of Chillul Hashem?

How many Liberal Jews are there to every observant Jew?

How many Liberal Gentiles are there to every Conservative Gentile?

How useful are the ideologies of Liberalism and Conservatism if neither of them have ever had an official handbook while with Jews and Muslims their official handbook is their scripture?

Rabbis would have to agree that Islam is the most Noahide-observant of all world religions. My contention is that Christianity has failed which is evidenced by the statue-toppling of the Western establishment being at war with each other.

The matriarchy is represented by "leftist" female and senior voters too physically and intellectually enfeebled to fight over their statues, the resurgent patriarchy is represented by dispossessed men who see their interests being represented by an alpha male leader capable of winning a second term.The possibility of Trump winning a second term has triggered the liberal elite into a frenzy of police de-funding and statue-toppling mass hysteria.

The liberal elite are weaponising the pandemic which turbo-charged the statue- toppling in the hope of preventing Trump from winning the election. The Western plutocracy is at war with itself and I am reminded of the last time they had a fight with each other over the Corn Laws. The nouveau riche who owned factories and wanted free trade won and the landed gentry lost. Who will win this time?

Neoconservatism is just another name for American imperialism

Leo Strauss says Classical Liberalism is the religion of American imperialism, but where is its scripture and what are its principles?

Before Conservatism, the political parties were divided between Whig and Tory. The Tories were represented by the owners of land, and the Whigs came to represent the new rich of the Industrial Revolution in favour of free trade to better sell their wares in the British Empire.

The new rich got their way when the Corn Laws were repealed which allowed them cheap imported corn for the urban proletariat.

Classical Liberalism is really Conservatism, and Conservatism was created as a defence against the ideas of the French Revolution. What the French Revolutionaries were rebelling against was the Catholic clergy. It can be deduced therefore that Conservatism was really Theocracy Lite, "lite" because it was a synthesis of the old hierarchical and patriarchal ideas of the Bible and the revolutionary idea of egalitarianism.

It is probably time to consider whether we should just have the real thing and stop pretending we know better than scripture when we are only in the mess we're in because we have ignored what are said to be God's commandments. At least with established religions their scripture does not change while what we think is our political ideology is altered with as much frequency as the leader of a political party changes his mind about something or, sometimes more frequently.

God's laws were laid down long ago and, being omniscient and morally perfect, if He exists, He does not make mistakes. A theocracy would at least stop the laws from changing so frequently because our law-makers keep making mistakes and changing their minds.

When once the Church of England was considered to be the Tory Party at area, the Tory Party is now on record of having a Prime Minister that legalised gay marriage.

We need the rules to be clear and stay the same just as we need the day to be 24 hours long and the week to be 7 days long.

The moral chaos we now have is directly related to the frequency of how often our political leaders change their minds. Women, you may have noticed, change their minds more often than men, many Western world leaders are now clueless childless women, and many Western leaders are men afraid of women.

No good will come of this.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/59/Leo_Strauss_Neoconservative