Translate

Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts

Sunday, 5 January 2020

Why the law under liberalism is an ass

The law under liberalism is an ass, but why doesn't Christianity protect Western nations from gay marriage? Because it is kaput. Can any society survive without practising marriage and family values? The fact is that a matriarchy is a society whose members mostly do not practise marriage. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. The kind of theocracy to choose would be one based in divinely revealed scripture eg the Torah or the Koran, because everything else is changeable or would fall out of fashion. Both Jews and Muslims are agreed that Christians are idolatrous because they worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

Since the West became great as a Christian nation practising patriarchal moral values, it is time to consider its replacement, because no society can survive without a religion to bind its members together.  Religion comes from the Latin "religare", which means "to bind". Religion is therefore the means that will obtain your society social cohesion and the building blocks of a stable society are families in which both husband and wife live together rearing their children in a loving relationship. The golden thread that runs through all the five world religions is respect for the practice of marriage and family values. Christianity no longer maintains the minimum standard of sexual morality that makes couples marry before they have children. The link between criminality and illegitimacy has been well-established over the ages.

If you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would find it easy to accept that Christians would be cursed by God for practising the idolatry He has specifically and explicitly forbidden in His Ten Commandments for 2000 years without showing any signs of remorse.

Even if you did not believe in God, you should be able to see how idolatry leads to self-worship because idolatry implicitly rejects the rule of God's laws found in the Torah or the Koran. Self-worship would lead ineluctably to self-destruction, which was what happened to Narcissus. It is not for nothing that a mental disorder was named after him. How long could any civilisation survive if both the governed (who will soon become ungovernable) and their government suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder?

The point is that practising idolatry means that we eventually fall into self-worship and therefore what happened to Narcissus will also happen to us and our civilisation if we reject Truth, Logic and Morality in favour of our own emotional, irrational and immoral nihilistic preferences.


Monday, 24 September 2018

The danger of saying of any group of people that "they are all the same"

Nationalists who make no distinction between assimilated liberal Jews and Orthodox Jews are of course antisemites. I wonder how they would feel if white people in general were identified en masse as being degenerate sex addicts who promote gay marriage because they want to turn our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah.

Of course, it suits their narrative perfectly ie

"Jews are all assimilated turbo-charged liberals and we already have enough trouble with liberals of our own, so make them all go to Israel." 
"Muslims are terrorists and sex predators because they are Muslim. Their prophet also married a nine year old girl which makes him a paedophile. Muslims follow a paedo prophet and are paedophiles and terrorists. So kick them out." 

In other words, I wonder how white people who hate Jews and Muslims would feel if all white people were treated as if they were liberals and supported gay marriage because their governments have been busily promoting it globally.

Imagine, please, white people, how you would feel if all the other races of the world decided that your presence on earth was a trouble to other earthlings and something had better be done about the way you are spreading the filth of gay marriage all over the world and turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah thereby attracting the same punishment it did.

Before they started with their gay marriage nonsense, they started two World Wars. Not just one, but two World Wars. Not only did they start two World Wars, they nuked Japan twice. Not only did they nuke Japan twice, they nuked two different Japanese cities and killed non-combatants in those cities when they dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Now, they are about to start World War 3. Time to tell them where to get off, surely, before they do more damage?

Isn't it almost comical the way white Islamophobes huff and puff about the violence of verses in the Koran that tell Muslims who were not trained soldiers how to disable their enemy by striking at their fingers and throats when they never gave a second thought about nuking the non-combant citizens of two Japanese cities twice without even thinking twice about it?

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=8&verse=12

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki

Casualties and losses
20 American, British, and Dutch POWs killed

Hiroshima:
20,000 soldiers killed
70,000–126,000 civilians killed

Nagasaki:
39,000–80,000 killed

Total killed:
129,000–226,000

I am sure the Russians would object at being tarred by the same brush so I won't include them. Therefore there will still be nice non-gay marriage spreading white people on earth after the WASPs have been sent out of the solar system.

Let us imagine that a spaceworthy vessel existed - a bit like a spaceworthy banana boat - that could transport all white but non-Russian people to another habitable planet where they could go spread their filth of gay marriage they all love so much in some other solar system.  Let us imagine there were a spaceworthy vessel that all white people on earth could be fitted into which could be launched into space so white could people could be sent on their way before they do more damage by further corrupting the morals of earthlings thereby provoking the wrath of God.

Would it not make sense to send them on their way, my fellow non-white earthings? 

Thursday, 19 April 2018

Neoconservatism is just another name for American imperialism

Leo Strauss says Classical Liberalism is the religion of American imperialism, but where is its scripture and what are its principles?

Before Conservatism, the political parties were divided between Whig and Tory. The Tories were represented by the owners of land, and the Whigs came to represent the new rich of the Industrial Revolution in favour of free trade to better sell their wares in the British Empire.

The new rich got their way when the Corn Laws were repealed which allowed them cheap imported corn for the urban proletariat.

Classical Liberalism is really Conservatism, and Conservatism was created as a defence against the ideas of the French Revolution. What the French Revolutionaries were rebelling against was the Catholic clergy. It can be deduced therefore that Conservatism was really Theocracy Lite, "lite" because it was a synthesis of the old hierarchical and patriarchal ideas of the Bible and the revolutionary idea of egalitarianism.

It is probably time to consider whether we should just have the real thing and stop pretending we know better than scripture when we are only in the mess we're in because we have ignored what are said to be God's commandments. At least with established religions their scripture does not change while what we think is our political ideology is altered with as much frequency as the leader of a political party changes his mind about something or, sometimes more frequently.

God's laws were laid down long ago and, being omniscient and morally perfect, if He exists, He does not make mistakes. A theocracy would at least stop the laws from changing so frequently because our law-makers keep making mistakes and changing their minds.

When once the Church of England was considered to be the Tory Party at area, the Tory Party is now on record of having a Prime Minister that legalised gay marriage.

We need the rules to be clear and stay the same just as we need the day to be 24 hours long and the week to be 7 days long.

The moral chaos we now have is directly related to the frequency of how often our political leaders change their minds. Women, you may have noticed, change their minds more often than men, many Western world leaders are now clueless childless women, and many Western leaders are men afraid of women.

No good will come of this.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/59/Leo_Strauss_Neoconservative

Saturday, 21 October 2017

Why women who want to be mothers of legitimate children should be against feminism

Any woman who wants to become a wife and mother of legitimate children should be able to see the harm feminism does her and women like her because feminism makes men unfit for marriage and reluctant to marry.

MY PLAN OF ACTION

1) Say to people who already have legitimate children that Secular Koranism offers them a better society for their children, grandchildren and their descendants. 

2)  Say to people who aspire to have legitimate children that Secular Koranism offers them a better chance of getting married and finding a marriageable spouse.

3)  Say to LGBTs that they can still have the kind of sex that they want provided they don't flaunt their sexuality but that gay marriage and the civil partnership will be abolished, and also inheritance tax. 

4)  Get SSMs (Slut Single Mothers) on board who are at least prepared to admit that they would not have become SSMs if they knew they would suffer 100 lashes per bastard. 

5) Say to people who have no intention of ever becoming parents of legitimate children for whatever reason that they will be tolerated as long as they do not expect to be the equal of parents of legitimate children.

Monday, 11 September 2017

Men who condone extramarital sex and gay marriage while refusing to support traditional marriage

Fornication is a mortal sin and treated as a sexual offence in the Koran attracting corporal punishment of 100 lashes.



British men are now so degenerate that even the men of the Traditional Britain Group cannot bring themselves to support traditional values. Indeed, it is rumoured that John Kersey, its Vice President, is about to sire illegitimate offspring.

Fornication is a mortal sin and the gateway to bastardy, and bastardy is the gateway to degeneracy, delinquency, criminality and the decline and fall of your civilisation. For these reasons, it must be punished in this life by the government as quran.com/24/2 prescribes, or our degeneracy will be terminal as well as irreversible and the the angels to weep for us.

Matthew 13:49-50, "So it will be at the end of the age; the angels shall come forth, and take out the wicked from among the righteous. 50 and will cast them into the furnace of fire; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth."



http://traditionalbritain.org/tag/john-kersey/

Such men will fall under one or more of the following categories.

a) His mother is an unmarried mother.

b) He is an unmarried father.

c) He is is currently having sex with a fornicating slut.

d) He is hoping to have sex with a fornicating slut.

e) If he is a none of the above, he will be afraid to offend fornicating sluts and men who fall under these categories, who are the overwhelming majority of men and women in his society.

f) He is not masculine enough to defend the patriarchal moral values necessary for a patriarchy.

g) He is an atheist and believes that by the time the shit hits the fan he will be long gone or, he believes God will forgive him for ignoring his religious duty to exterminate the Amalekite if he is a Jew, or to forbid evil if he is Muslim.

h) He belongs to the Western liberal political establishment whose voters fall into categories above.

i) He is anti-establishment and criticising the Western liberal political establishment ie alt-right but also morally compromised, falling into one or more of the categories above.

j) He is a degenerate living in a degenerate culture whose morals have been corrupted by half a century of degenerate feminism.

k) He cannot bear the vices of his civilisation nor their cure - Secular Koranism.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Should MCSF and SPOSSM bachelors be treated as second class citizens?

Sunday, 16 July 2017

E Michael Jones on sexual morality and the price of sex




E Michael Jones:

What this means is you have to act like a homosexual now, even if you're not a homosexual. What does that mean?
You engage in transient, sterile sexual relationships because they're cheap and because of that you're not going to ask for a raise whereas if you'd gotten married and had children you would have all this responsibility and you'd need more money. So what we have now is Berlin as the new paradigm of urban development. The gay mayor of Berlin says:
"We're poor, but we're sexy."
That's the paradigm for the entire world right now. In other words, even if you're not homosexual, you should act like a homosexual and engage in transient sterile relationships and be content with low-waged jobs because we'll call them start-ups, which will be the excuse for not paying you a decent wage. This is the way state of the art sexual liberation is being used to control primarily the millennial generation which is not forming families. The millennials have swallowed this homosexual propaganda hook, line and sinker and don't understand how they're being controlled by it.

Saturday, 21 May 2016

What would have happened to the gaily married celebrity who enjoyed a threesome with a gaily married couple under sharia?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3598396/Married-star-threesome-couple-gets-identity-SECRET.html

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful. 

Under sharia, there would be no question of allowing a clearly stated sexual offence to ever be called marriage or allowing sodomite couples to adopt children who have already suffered the misfortune of having been abandoned to the care system by their natural parents.

Wednesday, 17 February 2016

What Muslims think of Islam

5Pillars submitted a list of 352 influential British Muslims to market research company PCP to take part in a survey. The survey consisted of 95 statements pertaining to Islamic beliefs and practices categorised under 12 topic headings. From the 352 influential British Muslims, 150 completed the survey.

Sadly, missing were:

"Neoconservatism and Western Neo-Imperialism are evil and oppressive." 
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Muslims have a duty to fight or at least denounce Neoconservatism because it is evil and oppressive."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Only Islam is strong enough to eradicate Feminism, the source of Western degeneracy and dementia."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Muslims must help Islamophobes eradicate the evil of feminism to demonstrate the benefits of Islam."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Local councils, public bodies should be banned by law from boycotting “unethical” companies eg companies involved in the arms trade, fossil fuels, tobacco products or Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Local councils, public bodies should be banned by law from boycotting “unethical” companies eg companies involved in the arms trade, fossil fuels, tobacco products or Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Gay marriage and the civil partnership is cursed by God who also curses all MPs who voted to legalise this abomination." 
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"The degenerate, decadent and decaying state of Western civilisation and morality is what Islam would have prevented."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Only Islam can regenerate the degenerate West."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Neoconservatism which implements the Wolfowitz Doctrine is more violent and militarily aggressive than any verse in the Koran, including http://quran.com/8/12."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Liberalism didn't say nuke two Japanese cities, but Liberals did it anyway.Therefore the warfare Liberals practice is more violent and vindictive than any verse in the Koran."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"Islamic methods of punishment (eg capital and corporal punishment) is an excellent way to ease prison over-crowding and save taxpayers money."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"http://quran.com/2/256 would abolish the Equality Act 2010 because the Koran is against thoughtcrime and compulsion in belief."  
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"http://quran.com/24/2 is an excellent way of shaming sluts and must be implemented as soon as possible to prevent the West becoming even more degenerate and demented."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"http://quran.com/8/41 means that a flat rate income tax of 20% is what all civilised Islamic nations  interpreting the Koran correctly ought to have."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

"http://quran.com/24/33  means slavery and brothels would be legal in an Islamic State interpreting the Koran correctly."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

Because Muslims are required to agree a marriage contract before they marry, this would immediately and implicitly abolish no fault divorce and prevent a gold-digger wife from taking half her husband's property and depriving him of his children no matter how bad her own behaviour. If marriage is a contract, then divorce is breach of contract which automatically includes fault."
Strongly Agree/Agree/Neither Agree Nor Disagree/Disagree/Disagree Strongly

Monday, 18 January 2016

Thoughts on Taiwan's first female President


Tsai has shown her support for LGBT rights and endorsed same-sex marriage. On August 21, 2015, which is also a Chinese Valentine's Day, she released a campaign video in which three same-sex couples actors appeared. On 31 October 2015, when the biggest gay pride parade in Asia was held in Taipei, Tsai expressed her support for same-sex marriage. She posted a 15-second video on her Facebook page saying "I am Tsai Ing-wen, and I support marriage equality” and "Let everyone be able to freely love and pursue happiness”.

She was named 英文, which means "English language".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsai_Ing-wen

The First Spinster President of Taiwan will be a fucking disaster. I feel sorry for Taiwanese men already.

This woman is not known for having a position on anything, according to her Wikipedia entry, except for being in favour of gay marriage and being against the idea of reunification with China. A true Chinese nationalist would see reunification with the motherland as rational and inevitable, particularly as democracy is already failing in the West.

Being named "English Language" is also a disgusting sign of cultural deference to the West though it has to be admitted that there are Englishwomen who are called China and India. I believe these names work because they end in A. Would you name your daughter "Latin", "French", "Sanskrit", "Greek", "Mandarin", "Spanish", "German" or "Arabic"? It is just too silly for words.  

I guess the Taiwanese must have been pretty fed up with previous incumbent to vote for her, but I predict it will be out of the frying pan and into the fire for them.

As you can see, feminism is a worldwide scourge and the sooner it is called out the better it will be for everyone in the world. 

Friday, 15 January 2016

How gay is Christianity? It is very very very gay indeed.


Yeah but no, but yeah, but no ... 


http://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/half-of-priests-and-bishops-are-gay

Offended liberal curated my tweets on sex



https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3Antfem%20to%3ARabonaNutmeg&src=typd


'Tis true that I do say extramarital sex should become a sexual offence attracting corporal punishment as prescribed by 24:2. http://quran.com/24/2


Says I am sexually-frustrated and may wish to assist me in relief.


Actually, the male adulterer and fornicator would also be similarly punished under 24:2 of the Koran.


What have I said that is untrue or illogical? She won't say, but agrees with a self-confessed madman that I am mad. Liberals, eh?


What's there to be scared of? What does she think is going to happen?


Metuant dum oderint, eh?


"May" is not the same as "is" or "will", is it? When you say of someone they need sorting it out or a good slapping or even "a good poking", you don't actually mean you would do it yourself, do you? You might do perhaps, but you have certainly not said so, therefore it should in no way be interpreted as a promise or a declaration.

As for being an extremist, this term just means "non-mainstream" or "out of harmony with current government thinking". If the government says YES but you say NO, who is the extremist? If the government says NO but you say YES, who is the extremist? It is a meaningless term! As I keep saying, it is better to be Far Right than Far Wrong ...


Wow, not only has this silly woman blocked me, she has protected her tweets and changed her username to @BerthaBagshot in a desperate effort to hide from me, as if she feared I would do something to her. Don't worry, Victoria Bertha darling! It is enough for me to know that I won the argument and as a result you tried to traduce me in all sorts of ways, maliciously calling me mad, bad and dangerous to know and even claiming I merited police attention. That woman is clearly hysterical. I suppose she is afraid her friends who think her so erudite and enlightened will notice that she cannot come up with a single counter-argument to any of mine.





Giles Fraser blocks Claire Khaw after she praises him for his positioning and says he is attractive to C of E women


"started telling your followers to love X"


Thursday, 17 December 2015

Anne McElvoy on British Conservaliberalism

British Conservatism: The Grand Tour
British Liberalism: The Grand Tour

Liberalism meaningless: the rich think it means freedom from laws and taxes, the poor think it means freedom from poverty and oppression.

Either Liberalism is the same thing as Conservatism or it is not. Anne McElvoy seems to think they are the same.

Do you get the impression that Anne McElvoy uses Liberalism and Conservatism interchangeably? I do.

Is Anne McElvoy's series on British Liberalism just a rehash of her series on British Conservatism?

Listening to Anne McElvoy on British Conservatism/Liberalism, do you get the impression it is just "shit UK governments do"?

British Liberalism and British Conservatism seems to be nothing more than "shit the British government does and thinks".

Anne McElvoy's on Conservatism/Liberalism should be a programme called What Passes for British Political Thought since the French Revolution.

British Conservatism came from an Irishman as a belated response to the French Revolution.

Conservatism is an ideology no older than the American and French Revolutions, which failed to prevent Russian Revolution.

Ask a Western politician or journalist to tell you where Conservatism ends and Liberalism begins, and he will start prevaricating and looking nervous and shifty. Try it yourself if you don't believe me. Predictably, I received no answer from Anne McElvoy when I asked her this question.




Liberalism and Conservatism means whatever Western politicians want it to mean.

Liberalism and Conservatism means motherhood and apple pie to the typical British voter.  It therefore means precisely nothing.

In Australia the party closest to Conservatism is called the Liberal Party.  Does this mean confusion, incoherence bordering on mania and dementia?

The West whose ideology is Conservatism and Liberalism do not even have an agreed "scripture" for their "religion".

Has Conservaliberalism stood the test of time - all 252 years of it so far?

ISIS have the Koran said to come from God, while the West do not even have an agreed "scripture" for their ideology. Perhaps it can only be found in The Unholy and Unwritten Conservaliberal Book of Making It Up As You Go Along?

There was a reason why the plebs demanded that The Twelve Tables of Romebe placed in a prominent part of the forum so that the operation of Rome's laws would be accessible and foreseeable.

What are Western values? It seems to mean Conservaliberalism which it cannot even agree on or officially define.

Would Edmund Burke be shocked and disgusted that a Conservative Prime Minister has legalised gay marriage?

Liberalism + Conservatism + Wolfowitz Doctrine + Full Spectrum Dominance + Neoconservatism + Neoliberalism = American Imperialism

Can even the most intelligent intellectual defend an ideology that does not have a commonly agreed source?

Is it wise to defend ideologies that are clearly incoherent and make no sense at all which no one can define?

It is clearly unwise to present a programme on these incoherent ideologies relying only on politicians' reminiscences of what was said and done when they were in government and politics without any attempt to define where Conservatism ends and Liberalism begins. Let us call it Conservaliberalism then!

Is PC Liberalism the equivalent of Sexual Liberation and casual fornication leading to widespread bastardy and national degeneracy? Is this the "way of life" the West is so keen on defending?

ISIS hate gay marriage while Conservaliberals seem to be saying they are prepared to defend it to the death.  What is the point of defending a practice that would result in racial and national degeneracy which God has already declared to be an abomination in both the Bible and Koran?

Conservatism + Liberalism = Gay Marriage

Conservatism + Liberalism + Democracy = Immigration?

Another expression of Conservaliberalism is being in the EU and NATO, irrespective of whether or not it is in the national interest, because, let's face it, these pygmy politicians have no idea what to do outside it, because they have no imagination or principles, and have no idea what the national interest is. They only want to be in office without being in power and only think in terms of elections the way children think of playing musical chairs.

Why do Liberals and Conservatives pretend they can't understand why people hate immigration when they know being hospitable to even family members can be a pain?

Would Victorian Conservaliberals' views on sexual morality be closer that of ISIS than the gay and female advisers of Downing Street?

Did Anne McElvoy mention that the National Liberal Party merged with the Conservative Party in 1947? I don't think so.

The Liberal Nationals also changed their name to National Liberals at this stage. (Their reluctance to take this label originally is said to be a reaction to Lloyd George's use of the name for the earlier National Liberal Party in the 1920s.)

So, Conservaliberalism is a good thing then? Well, it has made the West what it is now  ...

If I had been presenting the programme, I would have pointed out that Conservatism was no more than a response to the French Revolution.

Since both Conservatism and Liberalism are the same thing in the mind of Anne McElvoy, we can say that Conservaliberalism is no more than 252 years old. I choose 1763 because that was the beginning of the American Revolution, which the French had a part in. http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/features/americanrevolution/timeline.html

If the French had not fought the Seven Years War then they would not have found their coffers empty and having to replenish them through the imposition of objectionably high taxes.

If Louis XVI had been Caliph of France - a Caliph is a constitutional dictator - and governed Islamically according to all the rules of the Koran, he would not have lost his head.

If Henry Tudor had been Muslim, it would have been no big deal for him to have up to four wives. Think of the number of heads that would have stayed on shoulders and the wars avoided if there had been no Catholic Church for Protestants to protest against and all the religious wars and persecution in Europe that would have been avoided. Forget all the non-Christians the Christians killed, ask yourself how many Christians the Christians killed. It is just possible that Christians killed even more Christians than they killed Muslims. Quite a thought, eh? It was the schismatic nature of Christianity that caused white people to endlessly fight, persecute and kill each other. It was Conservaliberalism that started two World Wars, after all, but Anne McElvoy doesn't mention that either. It is not surprising then that white people became so good at war and took over the world. Now that they only go around hypocritically pretending that they invade oil-rich Muslim countries to save Muslims from themselves and pay mercenaries to fight their wars, they will most probably go the way of the Roman empire.

Was the The Seven Years War fought for Koranically-approved reasons?  No, because it only officially permits defensive wars. Sure, go acquire an empire if you want - the Koran allows Muslims conquerors to impose the jizya on their conquered after all, but if you don't win it or can't really afford it, then on your head be it.

An Islamic rate of tax is only a flat rate income tax of 20%.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums Did you know hedge funds also charge 20%?  http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/two_and_twenty.asp  Why is 20 the magic number? Because it is the highest percentage most people would willingly pay without trying to avoid or evade it.

Was WW1 fought for Koranically-approved reasons? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_military_jurisprudence Nope. Should Russia have entered it? Nope. If the Russians had had a Caliph of Russia rather than silly Tsar with an equally silly Tsarina carrying on with Rasputin, there would have been no Russian Revolution either.

What do the French now think of their Revolution? Do you know they are now on their fifth Republic? Yep, every time they change their constitution, a new republic is formed, and they have changed their constitution five times already, cos they keep getting it wrong ...

As Zhou Enlai said, it is too early to tell if the French Revolution was a good thing. Since he is dead, perhaps we should ask the French people what they think of the French Revolution now. I did recently and the response was a Gallic shrug.

Does the picture below say anything you might want to say about Conservaliberalism?



Anne McElvoy's series on British Conservatism

Sunday, 11 October 2015

God, marriage and Western civilisation

The Roman birth rate fell when the Roman Empire was declining and falling. A falling birth rate is a signifier of a decline in the ability and numbers of married men available to exercise good husbandry over their women.

Make no mistake, a lower birth rate is the consequence of degeneracy, and degeneracy is the consequence of prioritising the right to have recreational sex over the duty to have legitimate offspring as well as producing a heir and a spare. Degenerate societies are invariably senescent and effeminate.

Even if we all replaced ourselves and all married and had a son and a daughter, women would eventually predominate because women live longer than men, unless this is dealt with using sati - the Hindu tradition of widow burning.

Those who are concerned about immigration should note that in Calais there are hardly any young people and certainly more old women than old men. This explains the inability of Calais to repel invaders.

The purpose of marriage is to have legitimate offspring, so that the quality of the next generation is maintained and not worse than the current one, and therefore the best they possibly can be. This duty to have legitimate offspring is linked to the attempt by a nation's government to maintain its ability to fight a successful defensive war.

While there are some who blame the increasing feminisation of society to material causes such as oestrogen in the water, feminisation is caused by policies tolerating extramarital sex. Extramarital sex is of course forbidden in both the Bible and the Koran which treats it as a sexual offence attracting corporal and even capital punishment.

We can most easily understand God by knowing what His laws are, and we can most easily please Him by obeying them and divining their purpose. Even if we do not really believe in the literal existence of God, we should have no difficulty identifying the evils His laws were intended to discourage and prevent ie degeneracy. The problem of degeneracy will always remain as long as the next generation require sexual reproduction to come into being.

We are degenerate if we are morally, materially, intellectually and physically inferior to our parents. If we are legitimate but our offspring are illegitimate, we are degenerate. If we are gay and cannot bring ourselves to marry a spouse of the opposite sex with whom to have legitimate offspring, then we are also degenerate.

God if He exists intended for us to obey His laws and rewards those who most faithfully and rationally obey His laws with success in warfare. It is the Koran that states His laws most briefly and clearly compared to the Old and New Testament.

Only Christian and Western chauvinism prevents degenerate politicians who have been marinating in porn and morally corrupting feminism for decades. This degeneracy they already suffer from also prevents them from acknowledging that their society is degenerate. This means they cannot bring themselves to discuss, let alone implement policies that would bring about the moral regeneration of the West because democratic politicians already know that the overwhelming majority of their voters do not wish to give up what they regard as their inalienable human right to have extramarital sex and are too cowardly to persuade them otherwise.

The Abrahamic God is also the Roman God of War as well as the synthesis of the deities of the Greek and Roman pantheon. While Mars was the Roman God of War, Pallas Athene was the Greek Goddess of Wisdom and War. In the end both the Greeks and Romans broke their own rules. The Greeks who prided themselves on their reason lost their reason when they succumbed to ruinous wars and warmongering, and the Romans who prided themselves on their hatred of kings and autocrats in time began to worship their emperors.

Great civilisations breaking the rules that made them great are of course well advanced in their journey on the road to perdition. Liberalism is no longer about free speech and rational discourse but about gay marriage and labelling anyone opposed to the legalisation of gay marriage as extremists and potential terrorists. Gay marriage is really no more than sanctifying a sexual offence, and analogous to repealing criminal laws to "solve" the problem of rising crime.

The West has now strayed so far from the baseline of morality that it has redefined both the institutions of family and marriage for the purposes of making their perversions legitimate in the eyes of their law. It is laughable that a family is now defined as capable of existing in any form other than children and their biological parents. The right to marry has now been extended to couples patently incapable of sexual reproduction with each other.

Gay marriage is conclusive evidence of degeneracy because its existence proclaims the government's intention of conferring equality on couples obviously not capable of sexual reproduction with each other and only interested in recreational sex with those who have taken the trouble of getting married before having legitimate children staying together to bring them up. As Aristotle said, the greatest injustice is treating unequal things equally.

Those who don't respect the rules of traditional marriage are invariably degenerate and will eventually defeated by people who do see the benefits of marriage and family and the necessity of enforcing a system of laws that protects these institutions.

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...