Translate

Showing posts with label Dr Adam Rutherford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr Adam Rutherford. Show all posts

Wednesday, 7 May 2014

Is it a sign of moral degeneracy that neither the BNP nor Adam Rutherford will discuss the eugenic nature and purpose of marriage?

You can breed plants and animals to breed in desirable characteristics and breed out undesirable characteristics.

However, since we are not farm animals and no one breeds us, sexual reproduction is left to the female. It is ALWAYS left to the female if you discount rape.

It is therefore imperative that the morals of the female are rational and responsible to prevent degeneracy.

However, since most men cannot get enough of free and cheap sex, most men are not going to do anything to limit the supply of slut sex.

The men who do not want to limit the supply of free and cheap sex are heterosexual bachelors and MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers).

Most British women are sluts, most British mothers are SSMs, most men are MCSFs and most people are bastards in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Worse, Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland and the rest of the West practice a system called representative democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage.

The flaw of representative democracy is that it is unnecessarily divisive and the flaw of indiscriminate universal suffrage is that if the majority of voters are MCSFs, sluts and SSMs, they will never vote to change the system. Most drunkards and addicts will not think of seeking a cure until they have hit rock bottom. Decline is therefore terminal.

No one in the land is even acknowledging that anything needs to be done.

There are 5 stages of grief and nationalists have not even got past the first stage, which is DENIAL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model

Because most people are atheists now, they are basically selfish sluts and bastards who don't care what happens after they die as long as they can carry on enjoying cheap slut sex.

Many people do not have children and those who do have children did not bring them up properly and probably do not much care for their ill-bred children even if they are still in touch with them.

These people only care about filling their boots before they die and don't give a damn about the mess they leave behind.

That is probably the reason why so many ethno-nationalists cannot bring themselves to support marriage.

They won't support marriage because they don't want to get married or already know that they are unmarriageable. If they supported marriage they would be mocked like an ugly woman with pock-marked face would be mocked if she tried selling face cream called beauty cream.

That is why no nationalist male will ever support marriage.

Even scientists are so infected by PC Libtardism that a scientist presenting a programme on eugenics pointedly blocked me on Twitter just for pointing this out at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/dr-adam-rutherford-does-not-mention.html.  Whither moral and intellectual integrity?

Dr Adam Rutherford - a scientist of integrity or just another pretty boy?
He blocked me on Twitter just for saying that he should consider the role of marriage in eugenics.

Below are some questions for Adam Rutherford to consider.


  1. Is marriage eugenic?
  2. Is wisdom eugenic?
  3. Is feminism dysgenic?
  4. Is chastity eugenic?
  5. Is morality eugenic?
  6. Is free speech eugenic?
  7. Is the purpose of eugenics to make your people who practise its principles better than other people who don't?
  8. What does it say about your moral and intellectual integrity if you refuse to discuss these questions when you discuss eugenics and block Claire Khaw on Twitter just for pointing this out to you?
  9. Do PC Libtards find it hard to admit that PC Libtardism is dysgenic?
  10. If you say it is OK for women to be sluts, is it any surprise that they start fucking losers and lunatics at taxpayers' expense?
  11. Are you an MCSF http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html if you as a male academic presenting a programme about eugenics refrain from criticising government policy of paying SSMs to breed bastards?

Tuesday, 6 May 2014

Why does Dr Adam Rutherford not mention marriage at all in his series about eugenics. Surely shome mistake?



Not quite sure what Dr Rutherford finds so "moronic" about what was said at
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/radio-4-intelligence-born-smart-born-equal-born-different:

“To say one's child might be brighter than the norm is obnoxious. To suggest it's genetic, just adds insult to injury and to publish scientific findings confirming that the reason some children do better than others at school is due to differences in their DNA, is controversial”.

That statement alone tells us so much about the craven, infantile, over sensitised state of the BBC, its staff and probably a good section of modern Britain, all of whom are far too easily “offended”.
The programme was so dumbed down and trivialised that it even included a song and dance act by someone called Tim Minchin!

Obviously, not everyone can excel at sport at the highest level or learn to play a musical instrument to classical concert standard, and few can understand the advanced mathematics required to follow Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory.

The best we can do is to accept the genetic pack of cards we are dealt at the random point of conception and do our very best to exploit the abilities they give rise to.

In the Radio 4 programme, the fear was expressed that such genetic research might be used for “political purposes” which is, of course, what the current debate about multiculturalism and “racism” is all about ad nauseum.

I wonder if they will dare mention in the remaining two programmes the average differences in IQ between different racial groups, results which are consistent and won’t go away (just a reminder – East Asian (Chinese etc) 106, white European 100, African American 85, black (sub Saharan) African 65.
(Measured by culturally unbiased, standardised IQ tests.)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b041xbxc
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b042jhl3

It is now the second episode and marriage is not even mentioned.

I just discovered today that he has blocked me. Perhaps he is angry with me for showing him up by pointing out that he has not mentioned marriage.  I bet the third and final episode does not mention marriage either.  

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...